Supreme Court The Supreme Court Friday expressed concern over what it described as a deep-rooted nexus involving banks, asset reconstruction companies (ARCs) and borrowers, observing that public money could not be lent and subsequently written off without serious attempts at recovery.A bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice V Mohana said its primary concern was the alleged misuse of public funds that could otherwise have been utilised for public welfare.The court issued notices to the Centre, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and other respondents on a plea alleging that loans worth Rs 1,537 crore owed to public sector banks were settled through two ARCs for just Rs 73.50 crore.During the proceedings, the bench questioned the manner in which stressed assets were being resolved and raised concerns about the role of various stakeholders in such settlements.”This is a deep-rooted nexus between the borrowers, ARCs and banks,” the bench said as per news agency PTI.The judges acknowledged that courts generally refrain from interfering in the commercial decisions of banks, but indicated that concerns arose when substantial losses were borne by the public exchequer.”But if this is the commercial wisdom that you collect taxpayers’ money, public money and you recklessly release it and give loans and then you don’t make any effort or try to recover it, this kind of conduct is not acceptable,” the bench observed.Appearing for the petitioners, advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay argued that large debts were routinely being transferred at steep discounts, causing significant losses to public finances.”This is not a single case. I am saying it is a tip of the iceberg,” Upadhyay said, while seeking an investigation into the alleged nexus among borrowers, banks and ARCs.The bench also remarked that the functioning of ARCs required closer scrutiny and scheduled the matter for further hearing after four weeks.The petition, filed through advocate Ashwani Kumar Dubey, seeks an investigation into alleged banking irregularities involving public sector banks, ARCs and a Noida-based infrastructure company.Among other reliefs, the plea has sought directions to the Centre “to constitute a judicial commission or an expert committee including officers of the RBI, SEBI, Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO), ED and the CBI to investigate the corporate and banking fraud facilitated by the asset reconstruction companies (ARCs)”.According to the petition, the infrastructure firm secured loans amounting to nearly Rs 912 crore from a consortium of seven banks led by the State Bank of India between 2012 and 2015.It further alleged that a forensic audit carried out in 2018 uncovered evidence indicating that more than Rs 902 crore had been diverted through shell entities, fictitious vendors, undisclosed bank accounts and other suspected fraudulent transactions.The plea, filed by Muzaffarnagar resident Prateeksha and two others, seeks a detailed probe into the alleged banking fraud and the role of ARCs in facilitating it.Get the latest India news and live updates. Download the TOI App.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosWhy Brahmins Are Suddenly At The Centre Of UP’s 2027 Political Battle | SP vs BSP vs BJP ExplainedTMC Escalates Battle To Delhi As Abhishek Banerjee Seeks Action On Rebel MPsJio Files DRHP With SEBI | Mukesh Ambani Hands IPO Leadership To Isha, Akash & AnantFrom ‘Brother-in-Ideals’ To A Cold Greeting: Stalin’s Message Exposes DMK-Congress RiftLNG Tanker ‘DISHA’ Reaches Gujarat After Hormuz Crossing, Boosting India’s Energy ConfidenceUP CM Yogi Adityanath Defends SIT Probe In Ram Mandir Donation Row, Says Truth Will Be RevealedCockroach Janta Party Seeks ₹1 Crore Compensation For Families Amid NEET Suicide CrisisEx-PM I.K. Gujral’s Son Duped Of ₹7.8 Crore, Cops Claim ‘Majority’ Of Amount | WatchAnthropic CEO Dario Amodei’s ‘Disorganised’ India AI Summit Remark Triggers Congress-BJP FaceoffTelegram Loses Court Battle As Delhi HC Refuses To Lift Temporary Block | Watch123Photostories10 regional jackfruit dishes from across the world and why it is celebrated so muchFrom respecting Gauri Khan’s space to teaching his sons to respect women: 5 times Shah Rukh Khan proved he is Bollywood’s ultimate green flag10 baby girl names that mean pure in different languagesFrom Alia Bhatt to Katrina Kaif: Inside the pilates routine that keeps these Bollywood divas fit6 most beautiful hidden villages in India that are absolutely worth a tripWhy were women banned from doing makeup on Bollywood sets? Sonam Kapoor’s makeup artist explains the breaking of the 59-year-old barrierInside Nia Sharma’s stunning Mumbai home: A luxe bar, breathtaking skyline views and lavish interiorsJanhvi Kapoor’s Kota silk gold zari saree is a fit made for the gods with devotion, heritage, and luxury energyThis Himalayan village is famous for its 32 hairpin bends and ancient silk routeSamantha Ruth Prabhu consumes 100g protein daily at just 50 kg, has banned ‘superfoods’ from diet after myositis diagnosis123Hot PicksEngland vs New ZealandYuvraj SinghLionel MessiAP SSC resultsKannur University FYUGP TrialShiv SenaJD VanceStrait of HormuzHormoz nuclear power plantTop TrendingBihar gang-rapeUS-Iran Peace DealStock Market LiveFIFA World Cup 2026What is Legacy BadgeBEST bus strikeAIIMS BSc Nursing Admit CardMHT CET PCM 2nd attempt resultsGold rate todayIndia-UK FTA
The Supreme Court Friday expressed concern over what it described as a deep-rooted nexus involving banks, asset reconstruction companies (ARCs) and borrowers, observing that public money could not be lent and subsequently written off without serious attempts at recovery.A bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice V Mohana said its primary concern was the alleged misuse of public funds that could otherwise have been utilised for public welfare.The court issued notices to the Centre, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and other respondents on a plea alleging that loans worth Rs 1,537 crore owed to public sector banks were settled through two ARCs for just Rs 73.50 crore.During the proceedings, the bench questioned the manner in which stressed assets were being resolved and raised concerns about the role of various stakeholders in such settlements.“This is a deep-rooted nexus between the borrowers, ARCs and banks,” the bench said as per news agency PTI.The judges acknowledged that courts generally refrain from interfering in the commercial decisions of banks, but indicated that concerns arose when substantial losses were borne by the public exchequer.“But if this is the commercial wisdom that you collect taxpayers’ money, public money and you recklessly release it and give loans and then you don’t make any effort or try to recover it, this kind of conduct is not acceptable,” the bench observed.Appearing for the petitioners, advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay argued that large debts were routinely being transferred at steep discounts, causing significant losses to public finances.“This is not a single case. I am saying it is a tip of the iceberg,” Upadhyay said, while seeking an investigation into the alleged nexus among borrowers, banks and ARCs.The bench also remarked that the functioning of ARCs required closer scrutiny and scheduled the matter for further hearing after four weeks.The petition, filed through advocate Ashwani Kumar Dubey, seeks an investigation into alleged banking irregularities involving public sector banks, ARCs and a Noida-based infrastructure company.Among other reliefs, the plea has sought directions to the Centre “to constitute a judicial commission or an expert committee including officers of the RBI, SEBI, Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO), ED and the CBI to investigate the corporate and banking fraud facilitated by the asset reconstruction companies (ARCs)”.According to the petition, the infrastructure firm secured loans amounting to nearly Rs 912 crore from a consortium of seven banks led by the State Bank of India between 2012 and 2015.It further alleged that a forensic audit carried out in 2018 uncovered evidence indicating that more than Rs 902 crore had been diverted through shell entities, fictitious vendors, undisclosed bank accounts and other suspected fraudulent transactions.The plea, filed by Muzaffarnagar resident Prateeksha and two others, seeks a detailed probe into the alleged banking fraud and the role of ARCs in facilitating it.
