The Parliament passed the Registration of Births and Deaths (Amendment) Bill, 2026. The Parliament passed the Registration of Births and Deaths (Amendment) Bill, 2026, amid a wider logjam that has repeatedly disrupted the Monsoon Session. The Rajya Sabha cleared the legislation on Tuesday by voice vote days after the Lok Sabha passed it on July 31 amid opposition protests without a debate.Both Houses witnessed repeated adjournments during the session, with several Bills being passed amid disruptions. The Monsoon Session began on July 20 and is scheduled to conclude on August 13.The new legislation focuses on a seemingly routine but important part of government records like registering births and deaths. A birth certificate records a person’s entry into the official system, while a death certificate formally records their departure.Together, these documents help establish identity, maintain public records and provide proof for a range of legal and administrative purposes. The amendment seeks to tighten the process when such events are reported long after they occur.What does the Bill change?Under the existing system, delayed registration already requires additional verification. If information about a birth or death is submitted after one year but within two years, the amended law will require an order from a district magistrate, sub-divisional magistrate or an executive magistrate authorised by the district magistrate.For cases reported more than two years after the event, the threshold becomes higher. The registration will require an order from a judicial magistrate of the First Class having jurisdiction over the place where the birth or death occurred.The magistrate will have to verify the correctness of the information before permitting registration. A prescribed fee will also have to be paid, according to a document released by the government.The amendment also updates the reference to an “Executive Magistrate” in the 1969 law to align it with the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which replaced the earlier Code of Criminal Procedure.The government says the primary objective is to ensure that births and deaths are registered promptly and that delayed registrations are subjected to stronger scrutiny.The Registration of Births and Deaths Act makes registration mandatory. According to the government’s statement of objects and reasons, birth and death certificates provide legal identity and can be used as evidence of a person’s birth or death.The government argues that the integrity of these records is particularly important because birth certificates can be used for several official purposes, including processes involving identity and citizenship-related documentation.Tighter scrutiny of delayed registrations, it says, can help prevent fraudulent or questionable entries and improve the reliability of official records.BJP IT cell head Amit Malviya said, “The objective is straightforward: encourage timely registration, prevent fraudulent or dubious entries, and preserve the credibility of birth and death certificates, the foundational documents that establish a person’s legal identity.”The government has also pointed to a significant rise in registration rates over the past decade.Union minister of state for home Nityanand Rai said birth registration increased from 86.6% in 2014 to 99.1% in 2024, while death registration rose from 72.5% to 99.4% during the same period. He also said around 3.5 lakh registration centres have been established across the country.The government’s argument is that as registration coverage approaches universal levels, the focus must increasingly be on ensuring that the remaining delayed or questionable cases are properly verified.What is the significance of a birth certificate?A birth certificate is often the first formal document linking an individual to the state. It records details such as a person’s date and place of birth and can be required for a range of official purposes, including education, employment, passports and other government documentation.The government has also highlighted the role of birth records in establishing identity and in processes where proof of birth or citizenship-related documentation is required.That makes the accuracy of the registration system important beyond population statistics.A fraudulent birth certificate, for instance, could potentially affect records across several government systems. Similarly, failure to register deaths can leave outdated information in official databases.The government has also linked accurate death registration with keeping records, including electoral rolls, updated.What happened in the Parliament?The Lok Sabha passed the Bill on July 31 by voice vote amid opposition protests. Several opposition MPs entered the Well of the House demanding the presence of Union home minister Amit Shah, and the legislation was cleared without a debate.Parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju criticised the opposition for not participating in the proceedings and said the government wanted a discussion on the “important Bill”.“It is unfortunate. Please do not repeat this in the future. People who sent you to Parliament will seek answers from you,” Rijiju said, urging MPs to participate in debates rather than disrupt proceedings.The legislation was passed amid continued sloganeering, with the opposition MPs demanding the presence of Union home minister Amit Shah and his response on the “police action” against student protesters on July 20 at Jantar Mantar.The Rajya Sabha later took up the Bill amid similar disruptions.Moving the Bill in the Rajya Sabha, Rai said the government wanted every birth and death to be properly recorded. He said, “The country wants that anyone born in the country, it is important that he or she is registered. Anyone who has died, cannot continue to remain in the voter lists to benefit some parties.”Rai also linked the legislation to concerns over people who have died continuing to appear on electoral rolls.The country now wants to get rid of ghosts. There are govts in some states that look for an opportunity and welcome those (who were not born in India) and register their births who are not eligible to be registered here. Now, we will not allow this to happen.Union minister of state for home Nityanand RaiHe also cited the rise in registration rates as evidence of the government’s efforts to improve the system.Some NDA members supported the legislation. YSRCP member M R Reddy, AIADMK’s M Thambidurai and BRS member Ravi Chandra Vaddiraju backed the Bill. BJP member Biswajit Sinha, meanwhile, accused the Congress of opposing the legislation because it did not want proper registration of births and deaths.Sinha also referred to the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in West Bengal, claiming that people who had died years earlier remained on voter lists.He alleged that some parties were helping illegal Bangladeshi and Pakistani infiltrators obtain birth registrations and voter identities, and said the proposed changes would help prevent such practices.Leader of opposition Mallikarjun Kharge said, “The prime minister and the home minister should come. we want discussion.”Despite the protests, the Bill was taken up for consideration and passage.Why did the opposition sayOpposition members did not reject the need for accurate birth and death records but questioned the practical implications of requiring a Judicial Magistrate of the First Class to approve registrations delayed by more than two years.UPPL member Pramod Boro said the objective of the Bill was important but questioned whether an administrative responsibility should be shifted to the judiciary.He warned that the provision could add to the workload of courts, increase costs and make registration more difficult for migrants, homeless people, poor families and those living in remote areas.BJD member Santrupt Misra also questioned why registrations are delayed in the first place. He suggested that the government should identify the reasons behind late registration and consider dedicated registration offices, particularly in tribal areas, to improve access.CPI(M) member V Sivadasan supported the need for proper registration but said the government should also focus on the circumstances surrounding deaths, including malnutrition and student deaths.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesThe passage came amid a wider logjam in the Monsoon Session, with repeated adjournments in both Houses and several Bills being cleared amid disruptions.With Parliament having passed the Bill, the legislation will now go through the remaining constitutional process before coming into force. The Bill, therefore, seeks to strike a balance between two objectives: ensuring that births and deaths are recorded promptly, while subjecting unusually delayed registrations to greater scrutiny.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorKanchan YadavKanchan Yadav is a writer at The Times of India, where she covers business, politics, international affairs and social issues. Her reporting also focuses on policy, governance and economic developments, with a close lens on how decisions in corridors of power affect everyday lives and community well-being.Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideos‘Brahmins Joining BSP’: Mayawati SLAMS Akhilesh Yadav Over PDA’s ‘P Change’ From Pichhde To Pandit‘I Am Proud Of All Of You’: PM Modi’s Big Msg To Students At First Public Speech After CJP ProtestsKashmir Tourist Security To Get Major Upgrade With CCTV, Command Centres And Security AuditsUS Senate Passes Russia Sanctions Bill, India Faces Potential 100% Tariff Over Russian Oil Purchases’Did We Fail To Listen’: Tharoor Admits CJP Protest Resonated More Than Congress ‘Chhatron Ki Goonj’JPSC Protest Enters Day 14: Students Demand Exam Cancellation, CBI Probe After First Talks With GovtSonam Wangchuk Says Wife Sought Rahul Gandhi’s Help To End His 26-Day Hunger Strike At Jantar MantarOMCs Say E20 Petrol Meets Quality Standards After Nationwide Testing, Reject Contamination ClaimsNeha Bora Inked During Jharkhand Student Protest: AISA Alleges Political Attack, Accused DetainedJharkhand JPSC Protest: Hunger Striker Hospitalised After Four Days As Students Continue Agitation123PhotostoriesOptical illusion personality test: What you spot first says everything about your hidden desiresRed or white patch in your mouth that won’t go away? Doctor explains the warning signs you should not ignore10 best monsoon snacks to enjoy on rainy daysFrom tiny forest jewels to giant river hunters: 12 kingfishers species to spot in IndiaDelhi must stay ahead of dengue this monsoon: Why rain, stagnant water and delayed diagnosis can turn a seasonal threat serious5 things stylish women always remove from their closetsDia Mirza’s mother’s maroon Banarasi saree is a generational love letter that fast fashion could never match7 extraordinary animals travellers can see in some of Earth’s harshest placesYour liver can repair itself, but not forever: Doctor explains when early liver damage can be reversed and what happens if scarring progressesWhy do lifts have mirrors? The surprising reason behind this everyday feature123Hot PicksThailand School ShootingUPI TransactionsAsk Me AnythingJharkhand protestGurgaon rainNICL Assistant RecruitmentAnkur WarikooIndia Labour CodesGold rate todayTop TrendingJapanese Quote of the dayNagpur Rape CaseAbhijeet DipkeGujarat Mystery WellJPSC ProtestDelhi RainDelhi Wife MurderEknath ShindeTamil Nadu BudgetPraveen Nettaru Murder Case

The Parliament passed the Registration of Births and Deaths (Amendment) Bill, 2026. The Parliament passed the Registration of Births and Deaths (Amendment) Bill, 2026, amid a wider logjam that has repeatedly disrupted the Monsoon Session. The Rajya Sabha cleared the legislation on Tuesday by voice vote days after the Lok Sabha passed it on July 31 amid opposition protests without a debate.Both Houses witnessed repeated adjournments during the session, with several Bills being passed amid disruptions. The Monsoon Session began on July 20 and is scheduled to conclude on August 13.The new legislation focuses on a seemingly routine but important part of government records like registering births and deaths. A birth certificate records a person’s entry into the official system, while a death certificate formally records their departure.Together, these documents help establish identity, maintain public records and provide proof for a range of legal and administrative purposes. The amendment seeks to tighten the process when such events are reported long after they occur.What does the Bill change?Under the existing system, delayed registration already requires additional verification. If information about a birth or death is submitted after one year but within two years, the amended law will require an order from a district magistrate, sub-divisional magistrate or an executive magistrate authorised by the district magistrate.For cases reported more than two years after the event, the threshold becomes higher. The registration will require an order from a judicial magistrate of the First Class having jurisdiction over the place where the birth or death occurred.The magistrate will have to verify the correctness of the information before permitting registration. A prescribed fee will also have to be paid, according to a document released by the government.The amendment also updates the reference to an “Executive Magistrate” in the 1969 law to align it with the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which replaced the earlier Code of Criminal Procedure.The government says the primary objective is to ensure that births and deaths are registered promptly and that delayed registrations are subjected to stronger scrutiny.The Registration of Births and Deaths Act makes registration mandatory. According to the government’s statement of objects and reasons, birth and death certificates provide legal identity and can be used as evidence of a person’s birth or death.The government argues that the integrity of these records is particularly important because birth certificates can be used for several official purposes, including processes involving identity and citizenship-related documentation.Tighter scrutiny of delayed registrations, it says, can help prevent fraudulent or questionable entries and improve the reliability of official records.BJP IT cell head Amit Malviya said, “The objective is straightforward: encourage timely registration, prevent fraudulent or dubious entries, and preserve the credibility of birth and death certificates, the foundational documents that establish a person’s legal identity.”The government has also pointed to a significant rise in registration rates over the past decade.Union minister of state for home Nityanand Rai said birth registration increased from 86.6% in 2014 to 99.1% in 2024, while death registration rose from 72.5% to 99.4% during the same period. He also said around 3.5 lakh registration centres have been established across the country.The government’s argument is that as registration coverage approaches universal levels, the focus must increasingly be on ensuring that the remaining delayed or questionable cases are properly verified.What is the significance of a birth certificate?A birth certificate is often the first formal document linking an individual to the state. It records details such as a person’s date and place of birth and can be required for a range of official purposes, including education, employment, passports and other government documentation.The government has also highlighted the role of birth records in establishing identity and in processes where proof of birth or citizenship-related documentation is required.That makes the accuracy of the registration system important beyond population statistics.A fraudulent birth certificate, for instance, could potentially affect records across several government systems. Similarly, failure to register deaths can leave outdated information in official databases.The government has also linked accurate death registration with keeping records, including electoral rolls, updated.What happened in the Parliament?The Lok Sabha passed the Bill on July 31 by voice vote amid opposition protests. Several opposition MPs entered the Well of the House demanding the presence of Union home minister Amit Shah, and the legislation was cleared without a debate.Parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju criticised the opposition for not participating in the proceedings and said the government wanted a discussion on the “important Bill”.“It is unfortunate. Please do not repeat this in the future. People who sent you to Parliament will seek answers from you,” Rijiju said, urging MPs to participate in debates rather than disrupt proceedings.The legislation was passed amid continued sloganeering, with the opposition MPs demanding the presence of Union home minister Amit Shah and his response on the “police action” against student protesters on July 20 at Jantar Mantar.The Rajya Sabha later took up the Bill amid similar disruptions.Moving the Bill in the Rajya Sabha, Rai said the government wanted every birth and death to be properly recorded. He said, “The country wants that anyone born in the country, it is important that he or she is registered. Anyone who has died, cannot continue to remain in the voter lists to benefit some parties.”Rai also linked the legislation to concerns over people who have died continuing to appear on electoral rolls.The country now wants to get rid of ghosts. There are govts in some states that look for an opportunity and welcome those (who were not born in India) and register their births who are not eligible to be registered here. Now, we will not allow this to happen.Union minister of state for home Nityanand RaiHe also cited the rise in registration rates as evidence of the government’s efforts to improve the system.Some NDA members supported the legislation. YSRCP member M R Reddy, AIADMK’s M Thambidurai and BRS member Ravi Chandra Vaddiraju backed the Bill. BJP member Biswajit Sinha, meanwhile, accused the Congress of opposing the legislation because it did not want proper registration of births and deaths.Sinha also referred to the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in West Bengal, claiming that people who had died years earlier remained on voter lists.He alleged that some parties were helping illegal Bangladeshi and Pakistani infiltrators obtain birth registrations and voter identities, and said the proposed changes would help prevent such practices.Leader of opposition Mallikarjun Kharge said, “The prime minister and the home minister should come. we want discussion.”Despite the protests, the Bill was taken up for consideration and passage.Why did the opposition sayOpposition members did not reject the need for accurate birth and death records but questioned the practical implications of requiring a Judicial Magistrate of the First Class to approve registrations delayed by more than two years.UPPL member Pramod Boro said the objective of the Bill was important but questioned whether an administrative responsibility should be shifted to the judiciary.He warned that the provision could add to the workload of courts, increase costs and make registration more difficult for migrants, homeless people, poor families and those living in remote areas.BJD member Santrupt Misra also questioned why registrations are delayed in the first place. He suggested that the government should identify the reasons behind late registration and consider dedicated registration offices, particularly in tribal areas, to improve access.CPI(M) member V Sivadasan supported the need for proper registration but said the government should also focus on the circumstances surrounding deaths, including malnutrition and student deaths.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesThe passage came amid a wider logjam in the Monsoon Session, with repeated adjournments in both Houses and several Bills being cleared amid disruptions.With Parliament having passed the Bill, the legislation will now go through the remaining constitutional process before coming into force. The Bill, therefore, seeks to strike a balance between two objectives: ensuring that births and deaths are recorded promptly, while subjecting unusually delayed registrations to greater scrutiny.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorKanchan YadavKanchan Yadav is a writer at The Times of India, where she covers business, politics, international affairs and social issues. Her reporting also focuses on policy, governance and economic developments, with a close lens on how decisions in corridors of power affect everyday lives and community well-being.Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideos‘Brahmins Joining BSP’: Mayawati SLAMS Akhilesh Yadav Over PDA’s ‘P Change’ From Pichhde To Pandit‘I Am Proud Of All Of You’: PM Modi’s Big Msg To Students At First Public Speech After CJP ProtestsKashmir Tourist Security To Get Major Upgrade With CCTV, Command Centres And Security AuditsUS Senate Passes Russia Sanctions Bill, India Faces Potential 100% Tariff Over Russian Oil Purchases’Did We Fail To Listen’: Tharoor Admits CJP Protest Resonated More Than Congress ‘Chhatron Ki Goonj’JPSC Protest Enters Day 14: Students Demand Exam Cancellation, CBI Probe After First Talks With GovtSonam Wangchuk Says Wife Sought Rahul Gandhi’s Help To End His 26-Day Hunger Strike At Jantar MantarOMCs Say E20 Petrol Meets Quality Standards After Nationwide Testing, Reject Contamination ClaimsNeha Bora Inked During Jharkhand Student Protest: AISA Alleges Political Attack, Accused DetainedJharkhand JPSC Protest: Hunger Striker Hospitalised After Four Days As Students Continue Agitation123PhotostoriesOptical illusion personality test: What you spot first says everything about your hidden desiresRed or white patch in your mouth that won’t go away? Doctor explains the warning signs you should not ignore10 best monsoon snacks to enjoy on rainy daysFrom tiny forest jewels to giant river hunters: 12 kingfishers species to spot in IndiaDelhi must stay ahead of dengue this monsoon: Why rain, stagnant water and delayed diagnosis can turn a seasonal threat serious5 things stylish women always remove from their closetsDia Mirza’s mother’s maroon Banarasi saree is a generational love letter that fast fashion could never match7 extraordinary animals travellers can see in some of Earth’s harshest placesYour liver can repair itself, but not forever: Doctor explains when early liver damage can be reversed and what happens if scarring progressesWhy do lifts have mirrors? The surprising reason behind this everyday feature123Hot PicksThailand School ShootingUPI TransactionsAsk Me AnythingJharkhand protestGurgaon rainNICL Assistant RecruitmentAnkur WarikooIndia Labour CodesGold rate todayTop TrendingJapanese Quote of the dayNagpur Rape CaseAbhijeet DipkeGujarat Mystery WellJPSC ProtestDelhi RainDelhi Wife MurderEknath ShindeTamil Nadu BudgetPraveen Nettaru Murder Case


Explainer: What changes as Parliament passes Registration of Births and Deaths Bill
The Parliament passed the Registration of Births and Deaths (Amendment) Bill, 2026.

The Parliament passed the Registration of Births and Deaths (Amendment) Bill, 2026, amid a wider logjam that has repeatedly disrupted the Monsoon Session. The Rajya Sabha cleared the legislation on Tuesday by voice vote days after the Lok Sabha passed it on July 31 amid opposition protests without a debate.Both Houses witnessed repeated adjournments during the session, with several Bills being passed amid disruptions. The Monsoon Session began on July 20 and is scheduled to conclude on August 13.The new legislation focuses on a seemingly routine but important part of government records like registering births and deaths. A birth certificate records a person’s entry into the official system, while a death certificate formally records their departure.Together, these documents help establish identity, maintain public records and provide proof for a range of legal and administrative purposes. The amendment seeks to tighten the process when such events are reported long after they occur.

What does the Bill change?

Under the existing system, delayed registration already requires additional verification. If information about a birth or death is submitted after one year but within two years, the amended law will require an order from a district magistrate, sub-divisional magistrate or an executive magistrate authorised by the district magistrate.For cases reported more than two years after the event, the threshold becomes higher. The registration will require an order from a judicial magistrate of the First Class having jurisdiction over the place where the birth or death occurred.The magistrate will have to verify the correctness of the information before permitting registration. A prescribed fee will also have to be paid, according to a document released by the government.The amendment also updates the reference to an “Executive Magistrate” in the 1969 law to align it with the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which replaced the earlier Code of Criminal Procedure.The government says the primary objective is to ensure that births and deaths are registered promptly and that delayed registrations are subjected to stronger scrutiny.The Registration of Births and Deaths Act makes registration mandatory. According to the government’s statement of objects and reasons, birth and death certificates provide legal identity and can be used as evidence of a person’s birth or death.The government argues that the integrity of these records is particularly important because birth certificates can be used for several official purposes, including processes involving identity and citizenship-related documentation.Tighter scrutiny of delayed registrations, it says, can help prevent fraudulent or questionable entries and improve the reliability of official records.BJP IT cell head Amit Malviya said, “The objective is straightforward: encourage timely registration, prevent fraudulent or dubious entries, and preserve the credibility of birth and death certificates, the foundational documents that establish a person’s legal identity.”The government has also pointed to a significant rise in registration rates over the past decade.Union minister of state for home Nityanand Rai said birth registration increased from 86.6% in 2014 to 99.1% in 2024, while death registration rose from 72.5% to 99.4% during the same period. He also said around 3.5 lakh registration centres have been established across the country.The government’s argument is that as registration coverage approaches universal levels, the focus must increasingly be on ensuring that the remaining delayed or questionable cases are properly verified.

What is the significance of a birth certificate?

A birth certificate is often the first formal document linking an individual to the state. It records details such as a person’s date and place of birth and can be required for a range of official purposes, including education, employment, passports and other government documentation.The government has also highlighted the role of birth records in establishing identity and in processes where proof of birth or citizenship-related documentation is required.That makes the accuracy of the registration system important beyond population statistics.A fraudulent birth certificate, for instance, could potentially affect records across several government systems. Similarly, failure to register deaths can leave outdated information in official databases.The government has also linked accurate death registration with keeping records, including electoral rolls, updated.

What happened in the Parliament?

The Lok Sabha passed the Bill on July 31 by voice vote amid opposition protests. Several opposition MPs entered the Well of the House demanding the presence of Union home minister Amit Shah, and the legislation was cleared without a debate.Parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju criticised the opposition for not participating in the proceedings and said the government wanted a discussion on the “important Bill”.“It is unfortunate. Please do not repeat this in the future. People who sent you to Parliament will seek answers from you,” Rijiju said, urging MPs to participate in debates rather than disrupt proceedings.The legislation was passed amid continued sloganeering, with the opposition MPs demanding the presence of Union home minister Amit Shah and his response on the “police action” against student protesters on July 20 at Jantar Mantar.The Rajya Sabha later took up the Bill amid similar disruptions.Moving the Bill in the Rajya Sabha, Rai said the government wanted every birth and death to be properly recorded. He said, “The country wants that anyone born in the country, it is important that he or she is registered. Anyone who has died, cannot continue to remain in the voter lists to benefit some parties.”Rai also linked the legislation to concerns over people who have died continuing to appear on electoral rolls.

The country now wants to get rid of ghosts. There are govts in some states that look for an opportunity and welcome those (who were not born in India) and register their births who are not eligible to be registered here. Now, we will not allow this to happen.

Union minister of state for home Nityanand Rai

He also cited the rise in registration rates as evidence of the government’s efforts to improve the system.Some NDA members supported the legislation. YSRCP member M R Reddy, AIADMK’s M Thambidurai and BRS member Ravi Chandra Vaddiraju backed the Bill. BJP member Biswajit Sinha, meanwhile, accused the Congress of opposing the legislation because it did not want proper registration of births and deaths.Sinha also referred to the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in West Bengal, claiming that people who had died years earlier remained on voter lists.He alleged that some parties were helping illegal Bangladeshi and Pakistani infiltrators obtain birth registrations and voter identities, and said the proposed changes would help prevent such practices.Leader of opposition Mallikarjun Kharge said, “The prime minister and the home minister should come. we want discussion.”Despite the protests, the Bill was taken up for consideration and passage.

Why did the opposition say

Opposition members did not reject the need for accurate birth and death records but questioned the practical implications of requiring a Judicial Magistrate of the First Class to approve registrations delayed by more than two years.UPPL member Pramod Boro said the objective of the Bill was important but questioned whether an administrative responsibility should be shifted to the judiciary.He warned that the provision could add to the workload of courts, increase costs and make registration more difficult for migrants, homeless people, poor families and those living in remote areas.BJD member Santrupt Misra also questioned why registrations are delayed in the first place. He suggested that the government should identify the reasons behind late registration and consider dedicated registration offices, particularly in tribal areas, to improve access.CPI(M) member V Sivadasan supported the need for proper registration but said the government should also focus on the circumstances surrounding deaths, including malnutrition and student deaths.

Share your thoughts in the comments