Rajni Rani, a national-level sportswoman with multiple medals, was denied a promotion in 2013 despite a directive by the Central Administrative Tribunal in Sept 2012 to consider her case. NEW DELHI: A national-level sportswoman, employed as a safaiwala (group D employee) in railways since 2003, has been awaiting promotion to group C level for last two decades despite the railway ministry’s policy to grant out-of-turn first promotion to medal-winning employees, a criterion she had fulfilled by winning two medals in national events.A decade after winning medals but not getting promotion as per the policy, Rajni Rani moved Punjab and Haryana HC in 2016 with a writ petition, which got dismissed on technical grounds. Her appeal against the HC order has been pending in SC since Nov 2016.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesIt was last heard on Jan 9, 2017, when a bench of Justices J Chelameswar and A M Sapre admitted her petition and asked the Union govt to file a response in eight weeks. On May 15, 2018, registrar Kapil Mehta had recorded that statement of case had not been filed by any of the parties despite expiry of the time granted. He had asked for the case to be listed before the court as per rules. However, her petition continued to gather dust till her counsel Wednesday requested a bench headed by CJI Surya Kant for an early hearing. A visibly unhappy CJI directed the registry to list the petition for hearing on Aug 21.Rajni said she was due for promotion in 2005 after winning medals but was denied the benefit of first promotion on the ground that one of the four events she had participated in did not qualify as a national event. She said the rules prescribed participation in only two events. Rajni said she had won a bronze medal at 52nd Northern Railway Athletic Meet in Feb 2005, gold medal at 44th Senior National Inter-State competition in July 2004 and represented railways in open National in Mumbai in Sept 2004, securing fourth position.Rajni was denied a promotion in 2013 despite a directive by Central Administrative Tribunal to railways in Sept 2012 to consider her case. When she challenged the decision, both CAT and HC dismissed her petitions.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosThreat Letter Targets Kashmiri Pandits In Kashmir, Employees Asked To Stay Alert Amid Security FearChilling Crash Video: Atiq Ahmed’s Son’s Creta Flips After Losing Control On Highway | WatchUdhayanidhi Backs CM Vijay’s Tamil Nadu Delimitation Stand, Demands No Cut In State’s LS SeatsFCRA Bill Sent To 31-Member JPC Amid Opposition Protests, Akhilesh-Rijiju Clash Over MinoritiesRijiju slams opposition over parliament chaos, says ‘running away from debate’Explained: Why Amritpal Singh’s Party Fielded Son of Indira Gandhi’s Assassin In Punjab Elections?Prashant Kishor Promises Jobs For 10,000 Bankipur Youths After Ending BJP’s 30-Year Hold | WatchIndia’s Map Move Rattles China: What Naming 27 Places In Arunachal Means?Air India Phuket-Delhi Pilot’s Confirmatory Dope Test Reportedly Positive For Marijuana, Sources SayTamil Nadu Assembly Passes Anti-NEET Resolution As DMK, AIADMK And PMK Back Abolition Demand123PhotostoriesKyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2: From Smriti Irani to Amar Upadhyay, here’s how much the cast earns per episodeBeyond Payasam: Traditional South Indian sweets that deserve a tryPreity Zinta goes full royalcore in an Rs 42,500 fuchsia farshi salwar set for ‘Batwara 1947’ promotionsTaking multiple supplements every day? Doctors warn these common combinations could do more harm than good10 beautiful baby girl names that symbolise graceOptical illusion personality test: What you see first reveals your hidden personality type10 classic, smokey and flavourful tikkas perfect for evening snacking5 everyday phone habits that may be damaging your relationship without you noticingThe science behind coriander leaves turning black in the refrigerator and 4 easy hacks to keep them fresh for long8 Indian dinners with over 30g protein that don’t require protein powder123Hot PicksInternational Youth DayMHT-CET CAP round seat allotmentSlovenia Indian embassyJharkhand protestN ChandrasekaranNEET PG 2026 city slipIran warSBI Clerk RecruitmentUP scholarshipTop TrendingChennai AirportNagpur Rape CaseAir India Phuket-Delhi FlightMumbai Kurla LandslideBengaluru Missing TechieSpiceJet FlightTelangana AccidentAbhijeet DipkeWeather TomorrowShakeel Noorani

Rajni Rani, a national-level sportswoman with multiple medals, was denied a promotion in 2013 despite a directive by the Central Administrative Tribunal in Sept 2012 to consider her case. NEW DELHI: A national-level sportswoman, employed as a safaiwala (group D employee) in railways since 2003, has been awaiting promotion to group C level for last two decades despite the railway ministry’s policy to grant out-of-turn first promotion to medal-winning employees, a criterion she had fulfilled by winning two medals in national events.A decade after winning medals but not getting promotion as per the policy, Rajni Rani moved Punjab and Haryana HC in 2016 with a writ petition, which got dismissed on technical grounds. Her appeal against the HC order has been pending in SC since Nov 2016.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesIt was last heard on Jan 9, 2017, when a bench of Justices J Chelameswar and A M Sapre admitted her petition and asked the Union govt to file a response in eight weeks. On May 15, 2018, registrar Kapil Mehta had recorded that statement of case had not been filed by any of the parties despite expiry of the time granted. He had asked for the case to be listed before the court as per rules. However, her petition continued to gather dust till her counsel Wednesday requested a bench headed by CJI Surya Kant for an early hearing. A visibly unhappy CJI directed the registry to list the petition for hearing on Aug 21.Rajni said she was due for promotion in 2005 after winning medals but was denied the benefit of first promotion on the ground that one of the four events she had participated in did not qualify as a national event. She said the rules prescribed participation in only two events. Rajni said she had won a bronze medal at 52nd Northern Railway Athletic Meet in Feb 2005, gold medal at 44th Senior National Inter-State competition in July 2004 and represented railways in open National in Mumbai in Sept 2004, securing fourth position.Rajni was denied a promotion in 2013 despite a directive by Central Administrative Tribunal to railways in Sept 2012 to consider her case. When she challenged the decision, both CAT and HC dismissed her petitions.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosThreat Letter Targets Kashmiri Pandits In Kashmir, Employees Asked To Stay Alert Amid Security FearChilling Crash Video: Atiq Ahmed’s Son’s Creta Flips After Losing Control On Highway | WatchUdhayanidhi Backs CM Vijay’s Tamil Nadu Delimitation Stand, Demands No Cut In State’s LS SeatsFCRA Bill Sent To 31-Member JPC Amid Opposition Protests, Akhilesh-Rijiju Clash Over MinoritiesRijiju slams opposition over parliament chaos, says ‘running away from debate’Explained: Why Amritpal Singh’s Party Fielded Son of Indira Gandhi’s Assassin In Punjab Elections?Prashant Kishor Promises Jobs For 10,000 Bankipur Youths After Ending BJP’s 30-Year Hold | WatchIndia’s Map Move Rattles China: What Naming 27 Places In Arunachal Means?Air India Phuket-Delhi Pilot’s Confirmatory Dope Test Reportedly Positive For Marijuana, Sources SayTamil Nadu Assembly Passes Anti-NEET Resolution As DMK, AIADMK And PMK Back Abolition Demand123PhotostoriesKyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2: From Smriti Irani to Amar Upadhyay, here’s how much the cast earns per episodeBeyond Payasam: Traditional South Indian sweets that deserve a tryPreity Zinta goes full royalcore in an Rs 42,500 fuchsia farshi salwar set for ‘Batwara 1947’ promotionsTaking multiple supplements every day? Doctors warn these common combinations could do more harm than good10 beautiful baby girl names that symbolise graceOptical illusion personality test: What you see first reveals your hidden personality type10 classic, smokey and flavourful tikkas perfect for evening snacking5 everyday phone habits that may be damaging your relationship without you noticingThe science behind coriander leaves turning black in the refrigerator and 4 easy hacks to keep them fresh for long8 Indian dinners with over 30g protein that don’t require protein powder123Hot PicksInternational Youth DayMHT-CET CAP round seat allotmentSlovenia Indian embassyJharkhand protestN ChandrasekaranNEET PG 2026 city slipIran warSBI Clerk RecruitmentUP scholarshipTop TrendingChennai AirportNagpur Rape CaseAir India Phuket-Delhi FlightMumbai Kurla LandslideBengaluru Missing TechieSpiceJet FlightTelangana AccidentAbhijeet DipkeWeather TomorrowShakeel Noorani


20 years and waiting: A decade on, SC to hear athlete’s promotion plea junked by HC in 2016
Rajni Rani, a national-level sportswoman with multiple medals, was denied a promotion in 2013 despite a directive by the Central Administrative Tribunal in Sept 2012 to consider her case.

NEW DELHI: A national-level sportswoman, employed as a safaiwala (group D employee) in railways since 2003, has been awaiting promotion to group C level for last two decades despite the railway ministry’s policy to grant out-of-turn first promotion to medal-winning employees, a criterion she had fulfilled by winning two medals in national events.A decade after winning medals but not getting promotion as per the policy, Rajni Rani moved Punjab and Haryana HC in 2016 with a writ petition, which got dismissed on technical grounds. Her appeal against the HC order has been pending in SC since Nov 2016.

Share your thoughts in the comments