A content creator moved HC alleging that genuine creators such as him were denied access to the copyright tool NEW DELHI: Delhi high court Wednesday asked Meta to explain the criteria it follows to grant users access to its copyright management tool, Rights Manager, for Facebook and Instagram.A content creator moved HC alleging that genuine creators such as him were denied access to the copyright tool and, thus, were unable to protect their original content whose ownership was claimed by scammers using Rights Manager.Justice Anup J Bhambhani criticised the platform’s restrictive policy. “Why does everybody not have access to it then? It is like giving the key to the robber and not to the owner of the house,” it said.The judge said there appeared to be “some chinks in the armour, some loopholes” in the Meta policy on safeguarding the copyright material.Rights Manager enables pre-approved users to identify content uploaded on Facebook and Instagram and stake ownership as it permits them to monitor, block or act against such content.“Rights Manager is a video, audio and image-matching tool that we developed for rights holders of all sizes — from individual creators to media publishers, sports leagues, music labels and others — to identify and manage their content on Facebook and Instagram, including live videos,” the platform told the court.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesMeta submitted before HC that the copyright strikes against the plaintiff stood reversed and whatever content was removed has also been restored. It said the plaintiff’s accounts had never been suspended and remained accessible.HC then issued summons in the suit and posted the matter for hearing on Sept 24 along with a connected petition filed by another content creator.The second plea has alleged that the creator’s Instagram account was suspended following a copyright strike that was subsequently found to be false. The connected proceedings will also examine issues concerning the authority of social media platforms to suspend user profiles based on copyright infringement claims.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosThreat Letter Targets Kashmiri Pandits In Kashmir, Employees Asked To Stay Alert Amid Security FearChilling Crash Video: Atiq Ahmed’s Son’s Creta Flips After Losing Control On Highway | WatchUdhayanidhi Backs CM Vijay’s Tamil Nadu Delimitation Stand, Demands No Cut In State’s LS SeatsFCRA Bill Sent To 31-Member JPC Amid Opposition Protests, Akhilesh-Rijiju Clash Over MinoritiesRijiju slams opposition over parliament chaos, says ‘running away from debate’Explained: Why Amritpal Singh’s Party Fielded Son of Indira Gandhi’s Assassin In Punjab Elections?Prashant Kishor Promises Jobs For 10,000 Bankipur Youths After Ending BJP’s 30-Year Hold | WatchIndia’s Map Move Rattles China: What Naming 27 Places In Arunachal Means?Air India Phuket-Delhi Pilot’s Confirmatory Dope Test Reportedly Positive For Marijuana, Sources SayTamil Nadu Assembly Passes Anti-NEET Resolution As DMK, AIADMK And PMK Back Abolition Demand123PhotostoriesKyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2: From Smriti Irani to Amar Upadhyay, here’s how much the cast earns per episodeBeyond Payasam: Traditional South Indian sweets that deserve a tryPreity Zinta goes full royalcore in an Rs 42,500 fuchsia farshi salwar set for ‘Batwara 1947’ promotionsTaking multiple supplements every day? Doctors warn these common combinations could do more harm than good10 beautiful baby girl names that symbolise graceOptical illusion personality test: What you see first reveals your hidden personality type10 classic, smokey and flavourful tikkas perfect for evening snacking5 everyday phone habits that may be damaging your relationship without you noticingThe science behind coriander leaves turning black in the refrigerator and 4 easy hacks to keep them fresh for long8 Indian dinners with over 30g protein that don’t require protein powder123Hot PicksInternational Youth DayMHT-CET CAP round seat allotmentSlovenia Indian embassyJharkhand protestN ChandrasekaranNEET PG 2026 city slipIran warSBI Clerk RecruitmentUP scholarshipTop TrendingChennai AirportNagpur Rape CaseAir India Phuket-Delhi FlightMumbai Kurla LandslideBengaluru Missing TechieSpiceJet FlightTelangana AccidentAbhijeet DipkeWeather TomorrowShakeel Noorani
NEW DELHI: Delhi high court Wednesday asked Meta to explain the criteria it follows to grant users access to its copyright management tool, Rights Manager, for Facebook and Instagram.A content creator moved HC alleging that genuine creators such as him were denied access to the copyright tool and, thus, were unable to protect their original content whose ownership was claimed by scammers using Rights Manager.Justice Anup J Bhambhani criticised the platform’s restrictive policy. “Why does everybody not have access to it then? It is like giving the key to the robber and not to the owner of the house,” it said.The judge said there appeared to be “some chinks in the armour, some loopholes” in the Meta policy on safeguarding the copyright material.Rights Manager enables pre-approved users to identify content uploaded on Facebook and Instagram and stake ownership as it permits them to monitor, block or act against such content.“Rights Manager is a video, audio and image-matching tool that we developed for rights holders of all sizes — from individual creators to media publishers, sports leagues, music labels and others — to identify and manage their content on Facebook and Instagram, including live videos,” the platform told the court.
Share your thoughts in the comments
Be respectful · TOI community guidelines
Meta submitted before HC that the copyright strikes against the plaintiff stood reversed and whatever content was removed has also been restored. It said the plaintiff’s accounts had never been suspended and remained accessible.HC then issued summons in the suit and posted the matter for hearing on Sept 24 along with a connected petition filed by another content creator.The second plea has alleged that the creator’s Instagram account was suspended following a copyright strike that was subsequently found to be false. The connected proceedings will also examine issues concerning the authority of social media platforms to suspend user profiles based on copyright infringement claims.