Apex court on Coalgate case NEW DELHI: Diluting its 12year-old order mandating appeals to be filed only in the Supreme Court against trial court orders in coal block allotment scam cases, the SC Wednesday said the prosecution and accused can move the Delhi HC challenging acquittals or convictions recorded by the special judge.Taking up the long pending appeals in coal scam cases, a bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant, and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana said, “Why did the Supreme Court invite such a burden on itself ? There may have been certain concerns at some point of time. But can the Supreme Court denude the high court’s constitutionally conferred powers to hear appeals against trial court orders? Powers of the high court to hear appeals against trial court is part of the basic structure.”Appearing for some of the accused in coal scam cases, senior advocate Kapil Sibal said SC should not be the first forum of appeal against trial court orders. However, SC-appointed special public prosecutor R S Cheema said trials in two-thirds of the cases have been over and that the restraint on approaching the high court against interim orders of the special judge should continue.The bench agreed with Cheema but said that in those cases where the trial court has recorded either conviction or acquittal, the appeal by person or prosecution must challenge it before the Delhi high court.In Sept 2014, Supreme Court had cancelled 204 of the 218 coal block allocations and directed that all appeals against framing of charge, quashing of case and bail petitions must be filed only before the Supreme Court and not Delhi high court.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesThis restriction was imposed to prevent accused from delaying trials.Sibal, who was a minister in the Congress-headed UPA govt when the coal scam and 2G scam cases rocked its electoral support base, told the court that the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) had made an omnibus calculation about alleged loss to exchequer because of the coal block allocations, without quantifying loss attributable to individual coal blocks.“We have challenged the basis on which such calculations were made by the CAG. Moreover, we have also questioned whether mere allotment of coal blocks would amount to corrupt practice without any mining having taken place at all,” Sibal said.The top court asked Cheema and the counsel for accused to help in categorizing the bunch of cases for hearing from Aug 18.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideos‘Vasteguna Huiya, Kuchu-Puchu, FOMO’: Viral Gen Z Vocabulary Echoes In ParliamentBihar Man Claims He Was Booked In NEET Leak Protest Viral Video Sparks Questions Over Protest FIRs’Dear Saurav…’ BJP MP Kangana Ranaut Tells CJP’s Saurav Das To ‘Learn Some Skill’ | Watch’Detaining Activists Is Normal’: JP Nadda Defends Police Crackdown On CJP ProtestersWho Is V Kamakoti? IIT Madras Director And Exam Reforms Task Force Member Draws Political FireKhawaja Asif Calls POK Protesters “Enemies Like India” Amid Deadly Crackdown; Statement Sparks StirLok Sabha Passes Anti-Paper Leak Bill Amid Ruckus Over Rahul’s ‘Shooting’ Charge Against Amit Shah’Put Pellets Into Blood Of Our Students,’ Rahul Gandhi’s Attack On Hm Shah In LS Sparks Uproar’Student, Idiot, Andhbhakt’: Rahul Gandhi’s ‘3 Categories’ Remark Sparks Row In Lok SabhaPoJK Burns Amid Violence And Protests: Why The World’s Silence And The Crisis Matter To India123Photostories7 fashion mistakes that are secretly making you look older than you areYou’ve crossed it countless times, but do you know why it’s called a zebra crossing?’Avengers: Doomsday’: What details did fans miss in the trailer? Here’s what comic book hintsMeghalaya’s Lakadong Turmeric has 10% curcumin, the highest among Indian varieties: What does this actually means for your healthWhy airplane windows are round: The engineering mistake that changed aviation foreverFrom alleging ex-wife Shweta Tiwari’s affair with her Kasautii co-star Cezanne Khan to claiming he Wasn’t allowed to meet their daughter; Raja Chaudhary makes serious allegationsNot a 5 a.m. person? Try these 7 simple morning habits insteadWho Is Isha Rikhi? Badshah’s wife’s emotional post sparks separation rumours6 ways to make hard-boiled eggs easier to peel; Physics explains why one method works best5 psychology-backed lessons every father should teach his son about people and life123Hot PicksMCC new rulesJalen HurtsDelhi Lakshmi YojanaTN CM Vijay’s new officeRussian sanctions billCWG 2026 GamesSmartphone exportsTN supplementary resultsNew anti-paper leak billTop TrendingTony RomosJantar Mantar ProtestKarnataka SuicideBJP MLA Yashpal Suvarna ArrestGurgaon Road RageAbhijeet Dipke Marriage ProposalsUGC PG ProgrammeWeather TomorrowPalani Mutt Temple Land CaseStock Market Up
NEW DELHI: Diluting its 12year-old order mandating appeals to be filed only in the Supreme Court against trial court orders in coal block allotment scam cases, the SC Wednesday said the prosecution and accused can move the Delhi HC challenging acquittals or convictions recorded by the special judge.Taking up the long pending appeals in coal scam cases, a bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant, and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana said, “Why did the Supreme Court invite such a burden on itself ? There may have been certain concerns at some point of time. But can the Supreme Court denude the high court’s constitutionally conferred powers to hear appeals against trial court orders? Powers of the high court to hear appeals against trial court is part of the basic structure.”Appearing for some of the accused in coal scam cases, senior advocate Kapil Sibal said SC should not be the first forum of appeal against trial court orders. However, SC-appointed special public prosecutor R S Cheema said trials in two-thirds of the cases have been over and that the restraint on approaching the high court against interim orders of the special judge should continue.The bench agreed with Cheema but said that in those cases where the trial court has recorded either conviction or acquittal, the appeal by person or prosecution must challenge it before the Delhi high court.In Sept 2014, Supreme Court had cancelled 204 of the 218 coal block allocations and directed that all appeals against framing of charge, quashing of case and bail petitions must be filed only before the Supreme Court and not Delhi high court.
Share your thoughts in the comments
Be respectful · TOI community guidelines
This restriction was imposed to prevent accused from delaying trials.Sibal, who was a minister in the Congress-headed UPA govt when the coal scam and 2G scam cases rocked its electoral support base, told the court that the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) had made an omnibus calculation about alleged loss to exchequer because of the coal block allocations, without quantifying loss attributable to individual coal blocks.“We have challenged the basis on which such calculations were made by the CAG. Moreover, we have also questioned whether mere allotment of coal blocks would amount to corrupt practice without any mining having taken place at all,” Sibal said.The top court asked Cheema and the counsel for accused to help in categorizing the bunch of cases for hearing from Aug 18.
