Abhishek Upadhyay on Tuesday sought Supreme Court’s intervention Abhishek Upadhyay, the journalist who reported embezzlement of donations at Ayodhya’s Ram temple, on Tuesday sought Supreme Court’s intervention saying that Ghaziabad police have, in connection with a case of road rage against him, sought his digital footprints from social media platform X since June 1, which could jeopardise identities of sources who tipped him about the donation scam.His counsel Anoop P Awasthi told a bench led by CJI Surya Kant that Ghaziabad police’s request to X HQ in California for the alleged road rage case of Aug 18 would result in gross violation of his right to privacy, adding that such data in the hands of police would reveal the identities of the sources who informed him about temple theft.The FIR concerns an alleged incident of Aug 18, yet the investigating agency seeks the petitioner’s IP and account-related information from June 1, well before the alleged incident. No nexus between such sweeping historical digital information and the investigation of the alleged incident has been disclosed in the impugned notice,” Upadhyay said in his application.The bench said it had on Aug 25 protected the journalist from coercive action by police in the road rage case and that his fresh application would be listed for hearing in due course.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosManipur Violence: Three Naga Villages Attacked, 10 Houses Torched In Fresh Kangpokpi ClashesUnion Minister Chirag Paswan Gets Death Threat From ‘Terrorists’, Office Seeks Enhanced SecurityS-400 vs Project Kusha: Why India Wants More Russian Air Defence Despite Atmanirbharta’Historic Win’: CJP Hails Supreme Court Verdict As Apex Court Quashes FIRs, Sept 5 CancelledMamata Banerjee’s Niece Found Dead In Birbhum Home, Post-Mortem Underway To Establish CauseSonia Gandhi’s ‘Belonging’ Book Row: Why Did Penguin India Drop the Publishing Deal?Centre Defers Census In Manipur Amid NRC ProtestsCash Shortage Unlocks ₹17 Crore Fake Note Mystery At PNB’s Saharanpur Currency ChestBihar, Jharkhand End 25-Year Dispute, Sign Sone River Water-Sharing Agreement‘Spreading Jhooth Ki Goonj’: PM Modi Hits Out At Rahul Gandhi, Hails 7.8% GDP Growth In New Video123Hot PicksNepal floodGrand Canyon floodsSugar importMumbai milk priceCNG priceGoa anti-conversion billTN milk price hikeMaharashtra SIRDelhi trafficTop TrendingDelhi Teen Gang RapeUS Iran WarNepal FloodsDan DriscollPakistan Hindu Temple DemolishedGlenn PhillipsPascal WehrleinConnor McDavidDelhi SIRLebron James

Abhishek Upadhyay on Tuesday sought Supreme Court’s intervention Abhishek Upadhyay, the journalist who reported embezzlement of donations at Ayodhya’s Ram temple, on Tuesday sought Supreme Court’s intervention saying that Ghaziabad police have, in connection with a case of road rage against him, sought his digital footprints from social media platform X since June 1, which could jeopardise identities of sources who tipped him about the donation scam.His counsel Anoop P Awasthi told a bench led by CJI Surya Kant that Ghaziabad police’s request to X HQ in California for the alleged road rage case of Aug 18 would result in gross violation of his right to privacy, adding that such data in the hands of police would reveal the identities of the sources who informed him about temple theft.The FIR concerns an alleged incident of Aug 18, yet the investigating agency seeks the petitioner’s IP and account-related information from June 1, well before the alleged incident. No nexus between such sweeping historical digital information and the investigation of the alleged incident has been disclosed in the impugned notice,” Upadhyay said in his application.The bench said it had on Aug 25 protected the journalist from coercive action by police in the road rage case and that his fresh application would be listed for hearing in due course.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosManipur Violence: Three Naga Villages Attacked, 10 Houses Torched In Fresh Kangpokpi ClashesUnion Minister Chirag Paswan Gets Death Threat From ‘Terrorists’, Office Seeks Enhanced SecurityS-400 vs Project Kusha: Why India Wants More Russian Air Defence Despite Atmanirbharta’Historic Win’: CJP Hails Supreme Court Verdict As Apex Court Quashes FIRs, Sept 5 CancelledMamata Banerjee’s Niece Found Dead In Birbhum Home, Post-Mortem Underway To Establish CauseSonia Gandhi’s ‘Belonging’ Book Row: Why Did Penguin India Drop the Publishing Deal?Centre Defers Census In Manipur Amid NRC ProtestsCash Shortage Unlocks ₹17 Crore Fake Note Mystery At PNB’s Saharanpur Currency ChestBihar, Jharkhand End 25-Year Dispute, Sign Sone River Water-Sharing Agreement‘Spreading Jhooth Ki Goonj’: PM Modi Hits Out At Rahul Gandhi, Hails 7.8% GDP Growth In New Video123Hot PicksNepal floodGrand Canyon floodsSugar importMumbai milk priceCNG priceGoa anti-conversion billTN milk price hikeMaharashtra SIRDelhi trafficTop TrendingDelhi Teen Gang RapeUS Iran WarNepal FloodsDan DriscollPakistan Hindu Temple DemolishedGlenn PhillipsPascal WehrleinConnor McDavidDelhi SIRLebron James


Ram temple cash theft: Journalist accuses cops of digital tracking
Abhishek Upadhyay on Tuesday sought Supreme Court’s intervention

Abhishek Upadhyay, the journalist who reported embezzlement of donations at Ayodhya’s Ram temple, on Tuesday sought Supreme Court’s intervention saying that Ghaziabad police have, in connection with a case of road rage against him, sought his digital footprints from social media platform X since June 1, which could jeopardise identities of sources who tipped him about the donation scam.His counsel Anoop P Awasthi told a bench led by CJI Surya Kant that Ghaziabad police’s request to X HQ in California for the alleged road rage case of Aug 18 would result in gross violation of his right to privacy, adding that such data in the hands of police would reveal the identities of the sources who informed him about temple theft.The FIR concerns an alleged incident of Aug 18, yet the investigating agency seeks the petitioner’s IP and account-related information from June 1, well before the alleged incident. No nexus between such sweeping historical digital information and the investigation of the alleged incident has been disclosed in the impugned notice,” Upadhyay said in his application.The bench said it had on Aug 25 protected the journalist from coercive action by police in the road rage case and that his fresh application would be listed for hearing in due course.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *