Supreme Court Tuesday sought Centre’s response to the use of a ‘totaliser’ mechanism to mix votes NEW DELHI: Supreme Court Tuesday sought Centre’s response to the use of a ‘totaliser’ mechanism to mix votes from different EVMs before counting, to prevent any backlash from candidates by preserving voter anonymity.Petitioner advocate Ashwini Upadhyay said a totalisation system hides booth-wise voting patterns by mixing up votes from multiple electronic voting machines (typically around 14) before displaying the count, which helps protect voters from post-poll violence and political victimisation.Election Commission, through senior advocate D Seshadri Naidu, said the issue was referred by EC to govt, which consulted stakeholders and found it inadvisable to employ the ‘totalisation’ mechanism, mainly because of staunch opposition by political parties. He said a switch to this method would require changing the statute which the commission could not bring about.When Upadhyay pointed out that the totalisation mechanism was adopted by EC to count paper ballots, a bench of CJI Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana asked Centre to respond on why the same mechanism could not be adopted for EVMs. Upadhyay also said in Jan 2018, EC itself had told the court that the “time had come” to introduce the totaliser to “protect secrecy of the ballot and privacy of the individual”.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelines It had said that “the right of the people staying in a particular locality should not be exposed, and any kind of prejudice or discrimination because of the voting pattern should be avoided”.In a U-turn, EC in its affidavit filed on Aug 31 said, “Experience of litigations has revealed that the present system which includes a simultaneous audit by the candidates is necessary to ensure that frivolous and baseless allegations do not cloud the outcome…” It said the introduction of the totaliser system would give fresh anxieties, misgivings and allegations regarding data, machine tampering and transmission glitches.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosManipur Violence: Three Naga Villages Attacked, 10 Houses Torched In Fresh Kangpokpi ClashesUnion Minister Chirag Paswan Gets Death Threat From ‘Terrorists’, Office Seeks Enhanced SecurityS-400 vs Project Kusha: Why India Wants More Russian Air Defence Despite Atmanirbharta’Historic Win’: CJP Hails Supreme Court Verdict As Apex Court Quashes FIRs, Sept 5 CancelledMamata Banerjee’s Niece Found Dead In Birbhum Home, Post-Mortem Underway To Establish CauseSonia Gandhi’s ‘Belonging’ Book Row: Why Did Penguin India Drop the Publishing Deal?Centre Defers Census In Manipur Amid NRC ProtestsCash Shortage Unlocks ₹17 Crore Fake Note Mystery At PNB’s Saharanpur Currency ChestBihar, Jharkhand End 25-Year Dispute, Sign Sone River Water-Sharing Agreement‘Spreading Jhooth Ki Goonj’: PM Modi Hits Out At Rahul Gandhi, Hails 7.8% GDP Growth In New Video123Hot PicksNepal floodGrand Canyon floodsSugar importMumbai milk priceCNG priceGoa anti-conversion billTN milk price hikeMaharashtra SIRDelhi trafficTop TrendingDelhi Teen Gang RapeUS Iran WarNepal FloodsDan DriscollPakistan Hindu Temple DemolishedGlenn PhillipsPascal WehrleinConnor McDavidDelhi SIRLebron James

Supreme Court Tuesday sought Centre’s response to the use of a ‘totaliser’ mechanism to mix votes NEW DELHI: Supreme Court Tuesday sought Centre’s response to the use of a ‘totaliser’ mechanism to mix votes from different EVMs before counting, to prevent any backlash from candidates by preserving voter anonymity.Petitioner advocate Ashwini Upadhyay said a totalisation system hides booth-wise voting patterns by mixing up votes from multiple electronic voting machines (typically around 14) before displaying the count, which helps protect voters from post-poll violence and political victimisation.Election Commission, through senior advocate D Seshadri Naidu, said the issue was referred by EC to govt, which consulted stakeholders and found it inadvisable to employ the ‘totalisation’ mechanism, mainly because of staunch opposition by political parties. He said a switch to this method would require changing the statute which the commission could not bring about.When Upadhyay pointed out that the totalisation mechanism was adopted by EC to count paper ballots, a bench of CJI Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana asked Centre to respond on why the same mechanism could not be adopted for EVMs. Upadhyay also said in Jan 2018, EC itself had told the court that the “time had come” to introduce the totaliser to “protect secrecy of the ballot and privacy of the individual”.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelines It had said that “the right of the people staying in a particular locality should not be exposed, and any kind of prejudice or discrimination because of the voting pattern should be avoided”.In a U-turn, EC in its affidavit filed on Aug 31 said, “Experience of litigations has revealed that the present system which includes a simultaneous audit by the candidates is necessary to ensure that frivolous and baseless allegations do not cloud the outcome…” It said the introduction of the totaliser system would give fresh anxieties, misgivings and allegations regarding data, machine tampering and transmission glitches.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosManipur Violence: Three Naga Villages Attacked, 10 Houses Torched In Fresh Kangpokpi ClashesUnion Minister Chirag Paswan Gets Death Threat From ‘Terrorists’, Office Seeks Enhanced SecurityS-400 vs Project Kusha: Why India Wants More Russian Air Defence Despite Atmanirbharta’Historic Win’: CJP Hails Supreme Court Verdict As Apex Court Quashes FIRs, Sept 5 CancelledMamata Banerjee’s Niece Found Dead In Birbhum Home, Post-Mortem Underway To Establish CauseSonia Gandhi’s ‘Belonging’ Book Row: Why Did Penguin India Drop the Publishing Deal?Centre Defers Census In Manipur Amid NRC ProtestsCash Shortage Unlocks ₹17 Crore Fake Note Mystery At PNB’s Saharanpur Currency ChestBihar, Jharkhand End 25-Year Dispute, Sign Sone River Water-Sharing Agreement‘Spreading Jhooth Ki Goonj’: PM Modi Hits Out At Rahul Gandhi, Hails 7.8% GDP Growth In New Video123Hot PicksNepal floodGrand Canyon floodsSugar importMumbai milk priceCNG priceGoa anti-conversion billTN milk price hikeMaharashtra SIRDelhi trafficTop TrendingDelhi Teen Gang RapeUS Iran WarNepal FloodsDan DriscollPakistan Hindu Temple DemolishedGlenn PhillipsPascal WehrleinConnor McDavidDelhi SIRLebron James



If It Was Used For Ballot Papers, Why Not For EVMs Before Counting, It Asks



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *