The Supreme Court on Monday set aside Gauhati high court’s judgments that upheld declarations of 27 appellants as foreigners, noting that citizenship and foreigner status must be decided through a “fair, lawful and reasonable” process.The ruling came from a Bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta, which remanded the cases to the concerned Foreigners Tribunals for fresh adjudication.The court allowed the appeals while observing that questions relating to citizenship carry “profound constitutional significance” and require adherence to procedural fairness, according to LiveLaw.“Citizenship and foreigner status occupy a field of high constitutional and legal significance,” the bench observed.The Supreme Court, however, acknowledged the government’s interest in preventing misuse of citizenship claims. It said the State has a “legitimate and compelling interest” in ensuring that individuals who are not legally entitled to Indian citizenship do not obtain such status through false claims or procedural delays.“The State has a legitimate and compelling interest in ensuring that persons who are not legally entitled to claim Indian citizenship do not secure such status by misuse of process, by false claim or by taking advantage of delays,” the Bench said.At the same time, the court emphasised that such concerns cannot override the requirement of a fair hearing.“At the same time, the determination of such status must be made through a process which is fair, lawful and reasonable. The statutory burden under Section 9 of the Foreigners Act, 1946 remains fully applicable,” the Bench observed.The court clarified that it had not examined the merits of the appellants’ citizenship claims or the documents submitted by them.“We have not examined the merits of the claims of citizenship by the appellants or expressed any opinion on the genuineness, admissibility, relevance or sufficiency of any document relied upon by them. Those questions must be decided by the concerned Tribunal independently,” it said.The Bench also clarified that the remand order should not be treated as providing any relief on the citizenship claims.“The remand being directed is not intended to confer any equity in favour of a person who is unable to establish his or her claim. It is only to ensure that the serious consequence of being declared a foreigner follows from an adjudication which satisfies the requirements of the Foreigners Act, 1946, the Foreigners (Tribunals) Order, 1964, and the constitutional mandate of fairness,” the Court said.The Supreme Court directed the Foreigners Tribunals to reconsider the cases independently, without being influenced by previous findings of the high court or the tribunals.“The concerned Tribunals shall decide the cases afresh and uninfluenced by any of the observations made by the high court or by the Tribunals in the earlier opinions,” the Bench directed.Relying on Section 9 of the Foreigners Act, 1946, the Gauhati high court had held that the burden of proving Indian citizenship rests entirely on the proceedee, as the relevant facts are considered to be within their special knowledge. The high court observed that this burden does not shift even in ex parte proceedings.Get the latest India news and live updates. Download the TOI App.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosHealth Camp Horror? FIR Against TMC MP Abhishek Banerjee After Woman’s Leg AmputatedSupreme Court Pushes Dialogue Route In Gyanvapi Case, Refers Dispute To Special Lok AdalatRailways Clarifies Viral Puja Video, Says Ritual Was Held in ₹3 Lakh Privately Booked Saloon Coach’Black Magic, Cow Urine’: Shiv Sena (UBT) Leader’s Daughter-In-Law Makes Shocking Allegations’I Lock Up Religion When…’: Annamalai Confirms ‘We The Leaders’ Will Become Political PartyWatch: Assam CM Himanta Sarma Drives Road Roller, Destroys Seized Drugs’1 Indian Missing’: MEA Condemns Attack On Vessel Carrying Indian Crew Off Oman Coast’Do I Have To Ask Trump?’: Omar Abdullah Launches Attack At Modi Govt Over Jammu-Kashmir StatehoodBJP Rejects Omar Abdullah’s ‘Operation Lotus’ Allegation, Demands Proof Or Public ApologyHapur Woman Critical After Allegedly Drinking Acid From Sealed Water Bottle; Police Launch Probe123PhotostoriesWant better health and peace of mind? Follow these 6 Vastu tipsKate Middleton saved her best Wimbledon look for last in a stunning sage green dress7 Everyday habits that can quietly damage even the happiest relationshipsWho came before Laila Hasanovic? Inside Wimbledon 2026 winner Jannik Sinner’s full dating history (including a tennis star)These 4 signs are said to have the highest IQWomen over 30, especially mothers, face these 5 common health problems: Doctor says early prevention can make all the differenceTrying for a baby? This one dental habit could make a difference”Scrambled egg mein crush…aur phir”: Raj Thackeray shares his unique Egg recipe loved by his father and Bal ThackerayForget crash diets and health hacks: Cardiologist reveals 5 simple daily habits that can transform your health, one day at a timeTop 3 eggs in the world and the right way to consume them123Hot PicksGold Rate TodayRajasthan PG admissionsSouth China SeaMTET hall ticketNepal protestLucknow-Kanpur ExpresswayEPFO amnesty schemeOil price todayE20 petrol newsTop TrendingSamantha BuschMadurai AccidentDelhi Police Constable Wife MurderFIFA World Cup 2026Karnataka Pakistani ArrestedGhaziabad Mall Rape MurderRamesh MhatreDelhi NCR rainGurgaon EncounterIran war
The Supreme Court on Monday set aside Gauhati high court’s judgments that upheld declarations of 27 appellants as foreigners, noting that citizenship and foreigner status must be decided through a “fair, lawful and reasonable” process.The ruling came from a Bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta, which remanded the cases to the concerned Foreigners Tribunals for fresh adjudication.The court allowed the appeals while observing that questions relating to citizenship carry “profound constitutional significance” and require adherence to procedural fairness, according to LiveLaw.“Citizenship and foreigner status occupy a field of high constitutional and legal significance,” the bench observed.The Supreme Court, however, acknowledged the government’s interest in preventing misuse of citizenship claims. It said the State has a “legitimate and compelling interest” in ensuring that individuals who are not legally entitled to Indian citizenship do not obtain such status through false claims or procedural delays.“The State has a legitimate and compelling interest in ensuring that persons who are not legally entitled to claim Indian citizenship do not secure such status by misuse of process, by false claim or by taking advantage of delays,” the Bench said.At the same time, the court emphasised that such concerns cannot override the requirement of a fair hearing.“At the same time, the determination of such status must be made through a process which is fair, lawful and reasonable. The statutory burden under Section 9 of the Foreigners Act, 1946 remains fully applicable,” the Bench observed.The court clarified that it had not examined the merits of the appellants’ citizenship claims or the documents submitted by them.“We have not examined the merits of the claims of citizenship by the appellants or expressed any opinion on the genuineness, admissibility, relevance or sufficiency of any document relied upon by them. Those questions must be decided by the concerned Tribunal independently,” it said.The Bench also clarified that the remand order should not be treated as providing any relief on the citizenship claims.“The remand being directed is not intended to confer any equity in favour of a person who is unable to establish his or her claim. It is only to ensure that the serious consequence of being declared a foreigner follows from an adjudication which satisfies the requirements of the Foreigners Act, 1946, the Foreigners (Tribunals) Order, 1964, and the constitutional mandate of fairness,” the Court said.The Supreme Court directed the Foreigners Tribunals to reconsider the cases independently, without being influenced by previous findings of the high court or the tribunals.“The concerned Tribunals shall decide the cases afresh and uninfluenced by any of the observations made by the high court or by the Tribunals in the earlier opinions,” the Bench directed.Relying on Section 9 of the Foreigners Act, 1946, the Gauhati high court had held that the burden of proving Indian citizenship rests entirely on the proceedee, as the relevant facts are considered to be within their special knowledge. The high court observed that this burden does not shift even in ex parte proceedings.
