The government provided Rs 25 lakh in financial assistance to support the family and govt jobs to Ankita’s brother and father NEW DELHI: The Dehradun court today once again rejected the bail pleas of all the accused in the Ankita Bhandari murder case. Due to the strong and effective prosecution by the state government, the accused could not secure any relief. The court order reflected the state government’s resolve in ensuring justice for Ankita and securing the strictest punishment for those found guilty under the law.The conviction of the accused in the Ankita Bhandari murder case and their sentence to life imprisonment is evidence that, under the leadership of chief minister Pushkar Singh Dhami, the state government worked with seriousness and determination from the very beginning of this sensitive case until the final judicial verdict, with the objective of ensuring the strictest possible punishment for the perpetrators.After the incident came to light, the Dhami government ensured that within 24 hours the accused were sent to jail, and an SIT was constituted for a fair and thorough investigation. Action was also initiated against the accused under the Gangsters Act.During the investigation, a detailed chargesheet of approximately 500 pages was prepared, incorporating statements of nearly 100 witnesses along with important evidence. The prosecution consistently presented the case strongly before the court, as a result of which the bail applications of the accused were repeatedly rejected, and they remained behind bars throughout the trial. As a result of the strong investigation and effective prosecution, the perpetrators of Ankita’s murder were ultimately sentenced to life imprisonment.Throughout the process, the state government accorded the highest priority to the sentiments of Ankita’s parents and family. In accordance with the family’s demands, government counsels were changed three times. Moreover, when Ankita’s parents demanded a CBI investigation, chief minister Pushkar Singh Dhami respected their sentiments and ordered a CBI probe into the matter.The government provided Rs 25 lakh in financial assistance to support the family. In addition, jobs were provided to Ankita’s brother and father, fulfilling the government’s commitment to stand by the bereaved family.Throughout the entire case, the Dhami government’s stand remained clear from day one: no matter how influential a criminal may be, the law will take its course, and the guilty will be brought before the law and given the strictest possible punishment. Amid questions raised regarding the investigation, the investigation process was also found satisfactory at the judicial level, and the accused were brought to justice as a result of strong prosecution.Meanwhile, Congress and people associated with other organisations repeatedly raised questions in the name of the so-called ‘VIP’, attempting to create confusion among the public. If anyone had any concrete facts or evidence in this regard, the same should have been presented before the investigating agencies and the court. Making allegations outside the court for political gain and misleading the public is not a fight for justice; rather, it amounts to politicising an extremely sensitive case concerning Ankita.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesChief minister Pushkar Singh Dhami had made it clear from the very beginning that ensuring justice for Ankita was the government’s highest priority. From swift arrests, an SIT investigation, a strong chargesheet and action under the Gangsters Act, to ensuring that the accused did not get bail, changing the prosecution arrangement as per the family’s demand, providing financial assistance and employment, and ordering a CBI investigation at the request of Ankita’s parents—the government took decisions with sensitivity and firmness at every stage.In the fight to secure justice for Ankita, the state government did not limit itself to assurances; it stood firmly with the family through concrete action, strong prosecution and a decisive outcome.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosModi Govt’s Gen-Z Outreach: One Union Minister To Visit One University Daily‘Fuel For Free’: Chandigarh’s ‘Petrol Langar’ Turns Chaotic, Leaves People Fuming‘No Respect For Court’: Arrest Warrant Against Mahua Moitra In Hate Speech CaseUS Envoy Calls J&K ‘Important Part Of India’ During 1st Kashmir Visit After Article 370 AbrogationPatna Erupts As Tejashwi Yadav Detained During RJD March Over Siwan AK-47 And Paper Leak RowPakistan’s 2 AM Panic Over Operation Sindoor Documentary: Pak Army Calls It ‘Tragedy & Comedy’Kolkata Hotel Fire Kills 9, Six Injured; 80 Rescued As Safety Norms Face Serious QuestionsSupreme Court To Form Panel On July 20 Clash, Examine Police Force And Alleged Pellet Gun UseManipur Shuts Down For 48 Hours As NRC Demand Intensifies Ahead Of 2027 Census DeadlineAAP Leader Satyendar Jain Arrested In Delhi Jal Board ‘Corruption’ Case; Kejriwal Hits Out At BJP123Photostories5 tips to improve your communication skills10 baby girl names that feel effortlessly elegant and modern5 easy-to-do beauty secrets that make you look effortlessly expensiveOptical illusion personality test: What you see first reveals whether you’re judgmental or too hard on yourselfBigg Boss Malayalam 8: Celebrities who can shine in the showStop saying sorry for choosing yourself: 7 things every woman should never feel guilty about, according to Ankur WarikooWhy do Indian brides wear black beads on their mangalsutra? The tradition, belief, and symbolism explainedFrom Orry to Rubina Dilaik, Gaurav Khanna and others: Net worth of popular Khatron Ke Khiladi 15 contestantsLung cancer story is changing in India: Why doctors are looking at the air we breathe, not just the habits we have7 Signs your body is telling you to get more rest123Hot PicksIndia Oil ExportsBank holidays this weekAzam KhanCSBC resultJharkhand ProtestJSSC-CGL exam cancelledGold rate todayZepto internshipTN maternity leaveTop TrendingKiren RijijuBengaluru MurderRahul GandhiBhopal MurderKerala MurderKiren RijijuAbhijeet DipkeSatyaki SavarkarBengaluru RapidoBen Gvir
NEW DELHI: The Dehradun court today once again rejected the bail pleas of all the accused in the Ankita Bhandari murder case. Due to the strong and effective prosecution by the state government, the accused could not secure any relief. The court order reflected the state government’s resolve in ensuring justice for Ankita and securing the strictest punishment for those found guilty under the law.The conviction of the accused in the Ankita Bhandari murder case and their sentence to life imprisonment is evidence that, under the leadership of chief minister Pushkar Singh Dhami, the state government worked with seriousness and determination from the very beginning of this sensitive case until the final judicial verdict, with the objective of ensuring the strictest possible punishment for the perpetrators.After the incident came to light, the Dhami government ensured that within 24 hours the accused were sent to jail, and an SIT was constituted for a fair and thorough investigation. Action was also initiated against the accused under the Gangsters Act.During the investigation, a detailed chargesheet of approximately 500 pages was prepared, incorporating statements of nearly 100 witnesses along with important evidence. The prosecution consistently presented the case strongly before the court, as a result of which the bail applications of the accused were repeatedly rejected, and they remained behind bars throughout the trial. As a result of the strong investigation and effective prosecution, the perpetrators of Ankita’s murder were ultimately sentenced to life imprisonment.Throughout the process, the state government accorded the highest priority to the sentiments of Ankita’s parents and family. In accordance with the family’s demands, government counsels were changed three times. Moreover, when Ankita’s parents demanded a CBI investigation, chief minister Pushkar Singh Dhami respected their sentiments and ordered a CBI probe into the matter.The government provided Rs 25 lakh in financial assistance to support the family. In addition, jobs were provided to Ankita’s brother and father, fulfilling the government’s commitment to stand by the bereaved family.Throughout the entire case, the Dhami government’s stand remained clear from day one: no matter how influential a criminal may be, the law will take its course, and the guilty will be brought before the law and given the strictest possible punishment. Amid questions raised regarding the investigation, the investigation process was also found satisfactory at the judicial level, and the accused were brought to justice as a result of strong prosecution.Meanwhile, Congress and people associated with other organisations repeatedly raised questions in the name of the so-called ‘VIP’, attempting to create confusion among the public. If anyone had any concrete facts or evidence in this regard, the same should have been presented before the investigating agencies and the court. Making allegations outside the court for political gain and misleading the public is not a fight for justice; rather, it amounts to politicising an extremely sensitive case concerning Ankita.
Share your thoughts in the comments
Be respectful · TOI community guidelines
Chief minister Pushkar Singh Dhami had made it clear from the very beginning that ensuring justice for Ankita was the government’s highest priority. From swift arrests, an SIT investigation, a strong chargesheet and action under the Gangsters Act, to ensuring that the accused did not get bail, changing the prosecution arrangement as per the family’s demand, providing financial assistance and employment, and ordering a CBI investigation at the request of Ankita’s parents—the government took decisions with sensitivity and firmness at every stage.In the fight to secure justice for Ankita, the state government did not limit itself to assurances; it stood firmly with the family through concrete action, strong prosecution and a decisive outcome.
