The CJP has maintained that the march was peaceful and that the police response was disproportionate. NEW DELHI: The Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) on Thursday sharply challenged the Supreme Court’s observations on the use of pellet guns during student protests. CJP spokesperson Saurav Das accused the court of failing to rigorously examine whether the police action against peaceful demonstrators on July 20 was justified.Responding to the hearing on petitions related to the Delhi protest crackdown, Das said the court’s position raised serious questions about the use of force against non-violent protesters and who authorised it.“The Supreme Court has stated that pellet guns may be used in exceptional circumstances. First, did the peaceful protesters actually create such exceptional circumstances on July 20th?… There was no situation that warranted the use of pellet guns…. The Supreme Court should have rigorously examined whether the circumstances truly justified an action that caused a person to lose their eyesight. The second point is: Can pellet guns be used against peaceful protesters under any circumstances?… Ultimately, the Home Minister was responsible for supervision and issuing orders… The Supreme Court, too, needs to give serious and strict consideration to these matters, rather than simply rubber-stamping or endorsing such measures,” Das said.His remarks came after the Supreme Court heard a petition challenging the Delhi Police’s use of pellet guns during the July 20 march from Jantar Mantar to Parliament, during which several protesters were injured, and some allegedly suffered permanent loss of eyesight.The CJP has maintained that the march was peaceful and that the police response was disproportionate.According to the party, police attempted to stop the procession through a lathi charge and the firing of pellet guns. Das sought to place responsibility squarely on the government rather than on procedural justifications for the use of force.“The opposition is doing its job. Its role is precisely to ask questions and hold the government accountable. I saw that a discussion was taking place in Parliament. There ought to be a discussion on who issued the orders on July 20th, and who will answer for the conduct of the police towards the protesters and the brutality inflicted upon them? Naturally, the Home Minister should provide an answer regarding this matter,” he said.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesThe remarks came as the CJP has continued to question the handling of the July 20 protests in both political and legal forums. Earlier, Das had also criticised a separate Supreme Court interim order in a batch of PILs related to the protests, arguing that it could allow governments to continue investigations against protesters despite what he described as the Centre’s assurance that FIRs would be withdrawn.For the CJP, the debate has moved beyond crowd control and entered the realm of public accountability. The party insists that the central question is not simply whether pellet guns can be used in exceptional circumstances, but whether the events of July 20 ever met that threshold in the first place.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideos‘Cut Shudra’s Tongue If…’: Kharge Quotes ‘Translated Manusmriti’ In RS; Sudhanshu, Nadda Hit BackAssam Flood Death Toll Rises To 78 As Over Three Lakh Remain Affected Despite Receding WatersHockey India’s Saffron Jersey Sparks Massive Row As Olympians, Critics Question Iconic Blue IdentitySonam Wangchuk Praises Vande Bharat Train; Reminds Govt To Honour Vow Made To Protesting Students₹28.5 Cr Cash Seized In Birbhum: Former Govt Bus Driver Arrested | Tulu Mondal Link Under ProbeMamata Banerjee Urges EC To End TMC Symbol Dispute As Rival Faction Misses Repeated DeadlinesSC Questions Blanket Ban On Pellet Guns, Orders Preservation Of RAF Ammunition LogOver 1 Lakh Schools Across India Have Only One Teacher; Andhra Pradesh Records Highest NumberStudent Allegedly Hacks IIT Kanpur- IIT Madras Websites After Admission RejectionAbhijeet Dipke Says PM Modi Should “Become An Influencer”, Warns Of Fresh Student Protest123PhotostoriesSobhita Dhulipala to Aditi Rao Hydari: Celebrity Showstoppers who lit up India Couture Week 202610 baby names inspired by Celtic legendsOptical illusion personality test: What you see first reveals your hidden superpowers and weaknesses5 things difficult people teach you that kind people never canNTR to Prabhas, Ranbir Kapoor: 10 actors who portrayed Lord Ram on the silver screenWhen every negative pregnancy test hurts a little more: Doctors explain why fertility burnout is becoming the hidden mental health crisis nobody talks aboutWhy every designer suddenly had a ‘story’ and not just a collection at the India Couture Week 2026From ‘Insidious: Out Of The Further’ to ‘Mutiny’: Hollywood releases of August 20265 plants people grow for luck, that have better practical benefits that many probably haven’t heard aboutMyths vs facts: Is shaving facial hair bad for women?123Hot PicksAugust School HolidaysNHL Trade RumorsKerala Engineering rank listBhagat SinghByelection todayFranz KafkaFed meetingKanwar Yatra securityNew anti-paper leak billTop TrendingTamil Nadu Schools New MealMitch JonesNanakdin Bhurji DeathSonam RaghuvanshiNagpur MurderGujarat MurderHardoi Double SuicideMohammad Ali Jauhar University demolitionWeather TomorrowStock Market Up
NEW DELHI: The Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) on Thursday sharply challenged the Supreme Court’s observations on the use of pellet guns during student protests. CJP spokesperson Saurav Das accused the court of failing to rigorously examine whether the police action against peaceful demonstrators on July 20 was justified.Responding to the hearing on petitions related to the Delhi protest crackdown, Das said the court’s position raised serious questions about the use of force against non-violent protesters and who authorised it.“The Supreme Court has stated that pellet guns may be used in exceptional circumstances. First, did the peaceful protesters actually create such exceptional circumstances on July 20th?… There was no situation that warranted the use of pellet guns…. The Supreme Court should have rigorously examined whether the circumstances truly justified an action that caused a person to lose their eyesight. The second point is: Can pellet guns be used against peaceful protesters under any circumstances?... Ultimately, the Home Minister was responsible for supervision and issuing orders… The Supreme Court, too, needs to give serious and strict consideration to these matters, rather than simply rubber-stamping or endorsing such measures,” Das said.His remarks came after the Supreme Court heard a petition challenging the Delhi Police’s use of pellet guns during the July 20 march from Jantar Mantar to Parliament, during which several protesters were injured, and some allegedly suffered permanent loss of eyesight.The CJP has maintained that the march was peaceful and that the police response was disproportionate.According to the party, police attempted to stop the procession through a lathi charge and the firing of pellet guns. Das sought to place responsibility squarely on the government rather than on procedural justifications for the use of force.“The opposition is doing its job. Its role is precisely to ask questions and hold the government accountable. I saw that a discussion was taking place in Parliament. There ought to be a discussion on who issued the orders on July 20th, and who will answer for the conduct of the police towards the protesters and the brutality inflicted upon them? Naturally, the Home Minister should provide an answer regarding this matter,” he said.
Share your thoughts in the comments
Be respectful · TOI community guidelines
The remarks came as the CJP has continued to question the handling of the July 20 protests in both political and legal forums. Earlier, Das had also criticised a separate Supreme Court interim order in a batch of PILs related to the protests, arguing that it could allow governments to continue investigations against protesters despite what he described as the Centre’s assurance that FIRs would be withdrawn.For the CJP, the debate has moved beyond crowd control and entered the realm of public accountability. The party insists that the central question is not simply whether pellet guns can be used in exceptional circumstances, but whether the events of July 20 ever met that threshold in the first place.