Supreme Court of India turned down plea on mandatory period leave. (AI image for representation) NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court of India on Friday declined to entertain a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking a nationwide policy granting menstrual leave to women students and employees, observing that mandating such a provision could unintentionally reinforce gender stereotypes and potentially affect women’s employment prospects.A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, however, said the competent authority may examine the petitioner’s representation and consider the possibility of framing a policy on menstrual leave after consulting relevant stakeholders.The court disposed of the PIL with directions to the authorities to take an appropriate decision on the representation.“These pleas are made to create fear, to call women inferior — that menstruation is something bad happening to them. Israel Iran WarUS-Israel-Iran War News Live Updates: Saudi intercepts drone headed to Shaybah oil field; Israeli strikes 10 Hezbollah targets in Beirut’No hostile or friendly fire’: US refueling aircraft crashes in western Iraq; rescue operations onGulf crisis fallout: US temporarily allows sale of some Russian oil after Iran threatens to ‘set region’s oil, gas on fire’This is projected as an affirmative right. But one must also think about the employer who has to grant paid leave,” the bench observed.The petition had been filed by Shailendra Mani Tripathi.During the hearing, the Chief Justice raised concerns about the potential social consequences of mandating menstrual leave through legislation, noting that such measures could unintentionally reinforce stereotypes about women.Voluntary policies welcome: CJI on Kerala exampleSenior advocate M R Shamshad, appearing for the petitioner, pointed out that certain states and institutions had already taken steps to accommodate menstrual leave.He cited the example of Kerala, where relaxations have been introduced in schools, and added that several private companies have voluntarily provided menstrual leave to employees.Responding to this, the Chief Justice said voluntary policies were welcome but cautioned against making such provisions mandatory through law.“Voluntarily given is excellent. The moment you make it compulsory in law, nobody will give them jobs. Nobody will take them in the judiciary or government jobs — their career will be over. They will say you should sit at home after informing everyone,” he said.The bench also noted the possible impact such measures could have on workplace perceptions and the professional advancement of women.Taking note of the submissions, the court observed that the petitioner had already submitted a representation to the concerned authorities and said there was no need to repeatedly approach the court seeking a mandamus.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosIndia Among 60 Nations Under New Trade Probe By Trump Administration Over Forced Labour ImportsIAF Chief AP Singh Takes Sortie In MiG-29 Fighter Jet, Reviews Combat Readiness At Adampur BasePM Modi Dials Iran President, Flags Indian Safety, Energy Supply Risks Amid Rising Gulf Tensions’Public Interest Will Guide Every Decision’: PM Modi Reassures Nation Amid Global UncertaintyIndian Crew Hit In Iran War Shipping Chaos: 3 Dead, 4 InjuredCentre Urges Citizens To Avoid Panic Booking As India Assures Stable LPG, Fuel Supply Amid WarChief Of Integrated Staff Air Marshal Dixit Says India Not Dealing With Same Pakistan After Operation SindoorEpstein Chants Greet Hardeep Puri In Lok Sabha Amid Rahul Gandhi’s Dig At Minister, Birla Steps In“Energy Security Compromised”: Rahul Gandhi Sounds Alarm In Parliament’India’s Fuel Supply Stable’: Hardeep Singh Puri Rejects LPG Shortage, Oil Crisis Fears In Lok Sabha123PhotostoriesWhy is it so difficult to book a Dhikala safari in Jim Corbett National Park?Future mobility of tech hub: Is Bengaluru struggling due to bus shortage?Kritika Kamra- Gaurav Kapur to Yami Gautam- Aditya Dhar: 10 Indian celebrities who chose simplicity over big-fat weddings10 hydrating Indian breakfast dishes made with cucumberWhy devotees are told not to take prasad home from Mehandipur Balaji TempleEmma Stone, Katy Perry, Bruno Mars, Nicolas Cage: Hollywood stars who changed their names and built unforgettable identitiesBaby names for boys born on FridayMost beautiful galaxies ever captured by NASA telescopesHow to grow juicy watermelons in a terrace gardenCelebrity parents 2026: Ellie Goulding, Meghan Trainor, Kat Graham and other Hollywood stars who expanded their families123Hot PicksGold Price PredictionIndian RupeeStock Market TodayGold rate todayIncome Tax CalculatorPublic holidays March 2026Bank Holidays MarchTop TrendingPatrick MahomesCardi BWilt ChamberlainBank of Baroda Peon Admit cardFrancisco AlvarezLPG Crisis IndiaMadison Pettis GirlfriendIran US WarIPL 2026 Chennai Super KingsMiddle East War
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court of India on Friday declined to entertain a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking a nationwide policy granting menstrual leave to women students and employees, observing that mandating such a provision could unintentionally reinforce gender stereotypes and potentially affect women’s employment prospects.A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, however, said the competent authority may examine the petitioner’s representation and consider the possibility of framing a policy on menstrual leave after consulting relevant stakeholders.The court disposed of the PIL with directions to the authorities to take an appropriate decision on the representation.“These pleas are made to create fear, to call women inferior — that menstruation is something bad happening to them. This is projected as an affirmative right. But one must also think about the employer who has to grant paid leave,” the bench observed.The petition had been filed by Shailendra Mani Tripathi.During the hearing, the Chief Justice raised concerns about the potential social consequences of mandating menstrual leave through legislation, noting that such measures could unintentionally reinforce stereotypes about women.
Voluntary policies welcome: CJI on Kerala example
Senior advocate M R Shamshad, appearing for the petitioner, pointed out that certain states and institutions had already taken steps to accommodate menstrual leave.He cited the example of Kerala, where relaxations have been introduced in schools, and added that several private companies have voluntarily provided menstrual leave to employees.Responding to this, the Chief Justice said voluntary policies were welcome but cautioned against making such provisions mandatory through law.“Voluntarily given is excellent. The moment you make it compulsory in law, nobody will give them jobs. Nobody will take them in the judiciary or government jobs — their career will be over. They will say you should sit at home after informing everyone,” he said.The bench also noted the possible impact such measures could have on workplace perceptions and the professional advancement of women.Taking note of the submissions, the court observed that the petitioner had already submitted a representation to the concerned authorities and said there was no need to repeatedly approach the court seeking a mandamus.