Sonu Nigam’s intellectual property suit resolved by Bombay High Court as the singer’s namesake agrees to not use his identity, image without authorisation

Sonu Nigam’s intellectual property suit resolved by Bombay High Court as the singer’s namesake agrees to not use his identity, image without authorisation


Sonu Nigam's intellectual property suit resolved by Bombay High Court as the singer's namesake agrees to not use his identity, image without authorisation

A legal dispute over the use of a shared name on social media has been resolved after a namesake of singer Sonu Nigam agreed not to use the singer’s identity or likeness on the internet. The Bombay High Court disposed of a commercial intellectual property suit after the parties reached a settlement.Justice Madhav Jamdar, on August 13, recorded the settlement after lawyers for both sides informed the court that the matter had been amicably resolved. The parties submitted consent terms, which were accepted by the court as undertakings.The singer had moved the High Court seeking protection of his personality and publicity rights. His plea sought a permanent injunction restraining Sonu Nigam Singh and any associated persons or entities from using the name “Sonu Nigam”, as well as the singer’s image, likeness, or other attributes of his personality without authorisation.He had also alleged that the use of similar identifiers and imagery could mislead the public into believing that Singh’s social media account or services were connected with, endorsed by, or belonging to him. The petition further sought restrictions on the re-creation, publication, uploading, circulation, and reproduction of the allegedly infringing content.The court noted that an ad-interim order passed on July 11, 2025, had already restrained Singh and anyone acting through him from using the display name or account name “Sonu Nigam” on social media platforms. The lawyers informed the court that the order had been complied with.The consent terms were signed by Nigam’s power-of-attorney holder, Saira Dawood Makani, and Singh. Makani was present in court, while Singh appeared via video conferencing. Both parties confirmed that the dispute had been settled in accordance with the agreed terms.“Various statements made in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings given to this Court,” Justice Jamdar said in the order.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *