Sonam Wangchuk (File photo) NEW DELHI: Environmental activist Sonam Wangchuk attempted to “instigate” Ladakh’s youth for protests inspired by regime-toppling movements in Nepal and Bangladesh, the Centre and the Union Territory administration told the Supreme Court on Monday.Wangchuk has been in jail since September last year following deadly violence during pro-statehood protests in his native Ladakh. He is detained under the stringent National Security Act (NSA) and is has been lodged in a prison in Jodhpur, Rajasthan.The NSA empowers the Centre and states to detain individuals to prevent them from acting in a manner “prejudicial to the defence of India”. The maximum detention period is 12 months, though it can be revoked earlier.The Supreme Court is currently hearing a writ petition filed by Wangchuk’s wife, social entrepreneur Gitanjali J Angmo, challenging his detention.“Wangchuk carefully crafted his speeches to mobilise Gen Z, urging agitations similar to those in Nepal and Bangladesh, while invoking Mahatma Gandhi’s speeches to mask his true intentions. He also referenced ‘Arab Spring’-style movements that led to the overthrow of multiple governments in the Arab world,” Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, told a bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and PV Varale.Mehta further alleged that the former educationist sought to create a rift between the central government and the people of Ladakh by framing the government as “them” and the people as “us.” He also claimed Wangchuk called for a “plebiscite” and “referendum.”“There is no ‘them’ or ‘us’—we are all Indians. Ladakh shares borders with China and Pakistan, making it a very fragile region. His speeches must be considered in their entirety. He was allegedly misleading young people while selectively invoking Mahatma Gandhi, who never incited people against their own government,” the SG told the bench.Mehta argued that the district magistrate of Leh—the Union Territory capital where violence erupted on September 24, 2025—had carefully reviewed relevant materials, including videos of Wangchuk’s speeches, before issuing the preventive detention order. “It took four hours for the detention order to be executed. After the district magistrate passed it, a DIG-rank officer briefed him and showed him videos of Wangchuk’s speeches, explaining the grounds for detention,” the SG noted.Addressing the petitioner’s contention that the district magistrate relied on “borrowed material,” Mehta maintained that this argument is flawed. “The district magistrate is not required to witness every speech firsthand. Officials who heard the speeches recorded videos and submitted them as evidence. Based on these materials, the order was passed,” he contended.The arguments remained inconclusive and are set to continue on Tuesday.(With PTI inputs)About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosPak Analyst Rips Munir Over Trump Minerals Pitch And IMF Loans After US Snubs Pakistan On Pax SilicaBalochistan Crisis: Pakistan-Origin Commentator Takes Apart Islamabad, Exposes Lies On India’India Showed…’: Ex-Army Chief Naravane’s Remarks On Galwan Clash Resurface After Lok Sabha Row’Faster Than BrahMos’: DRDO Calls New Hypersonic Anti Ship Missile A Game Changer For IndiaLok Sabha Heats Up As Tejasvi Surya Labels UPA Rule Lost Decade Of Opportunity, Congress ProtestsWe Are Here After Official Appointment’: Mamata Slams Delhi Police at Banga BhavanExplained: How India-EU Trade Deal Reshapes Europe Market, Leaves Pakistan And Bangladesh On EdgeRahul Gandhi Vs Rajnath Singh, Amit Shah In Lok Sabha Over Doklam Claims From Ex Army Chief MemoirBudget 2026: 10 Changes In Income Tax Rules That Will Reshape How Indians Save And File ReturnsFrom Minerals Gift To Diplomatic Snub: Pakistan Misses Out On Key US Meet While India Takes Seat123Photostories10 luxury bikes that blend power, precision, and prestige‘The 50’, ‘Bigg Boss’, ‘Laughter Chef’: Celebrity reality shows that never fail to entertainHrithik Roshan shares his post-workout meal photo and it is plateful of things we all loveKriti Sanon pens a special note for ‘Special Friend’ after Nupur Sanon’s Hindu wedding- See pictures8 ways to experience a different side of DelhiJustin Bieber’s performance to Lola Young’s win: Highlights from the 68th Annual Grammy Awards nightTop 10 countries in the world by GDP (2026 Projections); check India’s positionMumbai Metro Line 6: 15-km elevated corridor to transform commute with 13 key stations10 smallest houses across the WorldChef Ranveer Brar shares 3 smart tips to make restaurant-style Lemon Rice123Hot PicksBudget 2026Gold Silver PricesCigarette Prices HikeFebruary 2026 bank changesIncome Tax CalculatorPublic holidays February 2026Bank Holidays februaryTop TrendingOKC Thunder vs Denver Nuggets InjuryMLB Trade RumorsDrake MayeDeshaun WatsonNHL Trade UpdateSnowboarder RyanMLB TradeRyan ClarkTua TagovailoaBad Bunny
NEW DELHI: Environmental activist Sonam Wangchuk attempted to “instigate” Ladakh’s youth for protests inspired by regime-toppling movements in Nepal and Bangladesh, the Centre and the Union Territory administration told the Supreme Court on Monday.Wangchuk has been in jail since September last year following deadly violence during pro-statehood protests in his native Ladakh. He is detained under the stringent National Security Act (NSA) and is has been lodged in a prison in Jodhpur, Rajasthan.The NSA empowers the Centre and states to detain individuals to prevent them from acting in a manner “prejudicial to the defence of India”. The maximum detention period is 12 months, though it can be revoked earlier.The Supreme Court is currently hearing a writ petition filed by Wangchuk’s wife, social entrepreneur Gitanjali J Angmo, challenging his detention.“Wangchuk carefully crafted his speeches to mobilise Gen Z, urging agitations similar to those in Nepal and Bangladesh, while invoking Mahatma Gandhi’s speeches to mask his true intentions. He also referenced ‘Arab Spring’-style movements that led to the overthrow of multiple governments in the Arab world,” Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, told a bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and PV Varale.Mehta further alleged that the former educationist sought to create a rift between the central government and the people of Ladakh by framing the government as “them” and the people as “us.” He also claimed Wangchuk called for a “plebiscite” and “referendum.”“There is no ‘them’ or ‘us’—we are all Indians. Ladakh shares borders with China and Pakistan, making it a very fragile region. His speeches must be considered in their entirety. He was allegedly misleading young people while selectively invoking Mahatma Gandhi, who never incited people against their own government,” the SG told the bench.Mehta argued that the district magistrate of Leh—the Union Territory capital where violence erupted on September 24, 2025—had carefully reviewed relevant materials, including videos of Wangchuk’s speeches, before issuing the preventive detention order. “It took four hours for the detention order to be executed. After the district magistrate passed it, a DIG-rank officer briefed him and showed him videos of Wangchuk’s speeches, explaining the grounds for detention,” the SG noted.Addressing the petitioner’s contention that the district magistrate relied on “borrowed material,” Mehta maintained that this argument is flawed. “The district magistrate is not required to witness every speech firsthand. Officials who heard the speeches recorded videos and submitted them as evidence. Based on these materials, the order was passed,” he contended.The arguments remained inconclusive and are set to continue on Tuesday.(With PTI inputs)
