Representative image In Haryana, if a family member is accused of murdering a govt servant, then he/she or their family members are not entitled to any compassionate financial benefit till they are cleared of the criminal case, but they are eligible for compassionate employment in lieu of the deceased employee.Taking exception to this conflict, a bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and N K Singh said the incongruency in the welfare scheme is apparent as the lesser of the relief, that is the financial assistance, is suspended till the person is acquitted in the trial for murder of the deceased employee but is entitled to a bigger relief – permanent public employment.Writing the judgment, Justice Singh said, “The result, on a plain reading of the Rules of 2019 as they stand, is that a family member who stands accused of complicity in the death of the govt employee cannot receive a monthly monetary payment during the criminal proceedings, but may, on this interpretation, be considered for a permanent govt appointment during the same period.”“That this anomaly could generate confusion, heartburn, unnecessary litigation, and genuine difficulties in administration is apparent,” the bench said and told the Haryana govt to examine and address this legislative gap by introducing appropriate provisions in the Rules of 2019.Get the latest India news and live updates. Download the TOI App.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosFalta Strongman Paraded In Shorts By Cops After Arrest In Falta | WatchAll 28 Chief Ministers Attend NITI Aayog Meeting, Marking End of Recent Boycott TrendKirti Azad Dismisses Exit Talks, Says Didi Will Fix Kalyan Banerjee Dispute | WatchCongress Sweeps Three Of Four Karnataka Rs Seats As Poll Ends Without ContestBJP Wins All Three MP Rajya Sabha Seats Unopposed After Congress Nominee RejectedRam Mandir Funds Issue Takes New Turn With Call For Investigation; Calls For Accountability Emerge’Abhishek Banerjee Destroyed TMC’: Suspended Leader Riju Dutta Launches Fresh AttackIndia-Bangladesh Border Standoff Leaves 55-year-old Stranded In No-Man’s LandEggs Thrown At Arrested TMC Leader Sukumar Dutta During Court Transit In Durgapur | Watch’Will Not Abandon Mamata’: Shatrughan Sinha Rejects Split Talk, Reaffirms Loyalty To ‘Joda Phool’123PhotostoriesInland Taipan changes colour with the seasons: Inside the strange and dramatic seasonal color change explainedIs your child carrying emotional baggage? 6 subtle signs and what parents can do to help“This will help prevent…and improve..” Why did Amit Shah praise this rice varietyShoaib Malik to Glenn Maxwell: 7 international cricketers who married Indian women27-year-old woman shares 5 reasons she doesn’t want to get married earlyNo crowds, no chaos: This remote Himalayan valley in Uttarkhand feels frozen in time5 venomous snakes you’ll only find in Africa and where to spot them5 things fathers should never do and how these mistakes affect a child’s personality5 surprising health benefits of cow gheeFrom MMS scam to sponsors seeking sexual favours: Ranjini Haridas opens up about ill experiences in her career123Hot Picks147000 Medical BillGulf of Oman attackFifa World Cup Opening CeremonyShakiraIndia Vs Afghanistan HighlightsVaibhav SooryavanshiLewis HamiltonCJP ProtestHow to Watch FIFA world cup highlightsTop TrendingHaryana Gym Owner MurderGuru Randhawa Gym FiringGold Rate TodayFIFA World Cup 2026Delhi Hotel FireSingappen Special ForceCJP ProtestCBSE Class 10 Second Board ResultBengaluru Child DeathKarnataka Murder

Representative image In Haryana, if a family member is accused of murdering a govt servant, then he/she or their family members are not entitled to any compassionate financial benefit till they are cleared of the criminal case, but they are eligible for compassionate employment in lieu of the deceased employee.Taking exception to this conflict, a bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and N K Singh said the incongruency in the welfare scheme is apparent as the lesser of the relief, that is the financial assistance, is suspended till the person is acquitted in the trial for murder of the deceased employee but is entitled to a bigger relief – permanent public employment.Writing the judgment, Justice Singh said, “The result, on a plain reading of the Rules of 2019 as they stand, is that a family member who stands accused of complicity in the death of the govt employee cannot receive a monthly monetary payment during the criminal proceedings, but may, on this interpretation, be considered for a permanent govt appointment during the same period.”“That this anomaly could generate confusion, heartburn, unnecessary litigation, and genuine difficulties in administration is apparent,” the bench said and told the Haryana govt to examine and address this legislative gap by introducing appropriate provisions in the Rules of 2019.Get the latest India news and live updates. Download the TOI App.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosFalta Strongman Paraded In Shorts By Cops After Arrest In Falta | WatchAll 28 Chief Ministers Attend NITI Aayog Meeting, Marking End of Recent Boycott TrendKirti Azad Dismisses Exit Talks, Says Didi Will Fix Kalyan Banerjee Dispute | WatchCongress Sweeps Three Of Four Karnataka Rs Seats As Poll Ends Without ContestBJP Wins All Three MP Rajya Sabha Seats Unopposed After Congress Nominee RejectedRam Mandir Funds Issue Takes New Turn With Call For Investigation; Calls For Accountability Emerge’Abhishek Banerjee Destroyed TMC’: Suspended Leader Riju Dutta Launches Fresh AttackIndia-Bangladesh Border Standoff Leaves 55-year-old Stranded In No-Man’s LandEggs Thrown At Arrested TMC Leader Sukumar Dutta During Court Transit In Durgapur | Watch’Will Not Abandon Mamata’: Shatrughan Sinha Rejects Split Talk, Reaffirms Loyalty To ‘Joda Phool’123PhotostoriesInland Taipan changes colour with the seasons: Inside the strange and dramatic seasonal color change explainedIs your child carrying emotional baggage? 6 subtle signs and what parents can do to help“This will help prevent…and improve..” Why did Amit Shah praise this rice varietyShoaib Malik to Glenn Maxwell: 7 international cricketers who married Indian women27-year-old woman shares 5 reasons she doesn’t want to get married earlyNo crowds, no chaos: This remote Himalayan valley in Uttarkhand feels frozen in time5 venomous snakes you’ll only find in Africa and where to spot them5 things fathers should never do and how these mistakes affect a child’s personality5 surprising health benefits of cow gheeFrom MMS scam to sponsors seeking sexual favours: Ranjini Haridas opens up about ill experiences in her career123Hot Picks147000 Medical BillGulf of Oman attackFifa World Cup Opening CeremonyShakiraIndia Vs Afghanistan HighlightsVaibhav SooryavanshiLewis HamiltonCJP ProtestHow to Watch FIFA world cup highlightsTop TrendingHaryana Gym Owner MurderGuru Randhawa Gym FiringGold Rate TodayFIFA World Cup 2026Delhi Hotel FireSingappen Special ForceCJP ProtestCBSE Class 10 Second Board ResultBengaluru Child DeathKarnataka Murder


Compassionate job & financial benefit can’t have conflicting clauses: SC

In Haryana, if a family member is accused of murdering a govt servant, then he/she or their family members are not entitled to any compassionate financial benefit till they are cleared of the criminal case, but they are eligible for compassionate employment in lieu of the deceased employee.Taking exception to this conflict, a bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and N K Singh said the incongruency in the welfare scheme is apparent as the lesser of the relief, that is the financial assistance, is suspended till the person is acquitted in the trial for murder of the deceased employee but is entitled to a bigger relief – permanent public employment.Writing the judgment, Justice Singh said, “The result, on a plain reading of the Rules of 2019 as they stand, is that a family member who stands accused of complicity in the death of the govt employee cannot receive a monthly monetary payment during the criminal proceedings, but may, on this interpretation, be considered for a permanent govt appointment during the same period.”“That this anomaly could generate confusion, heartburn, unnecessary litigation, and genuine difficulties in administration is apparent,” the bench said and told the Haryana govt to examine and address this legislative gap by introducing appropriate provisions in the Rules of 2019.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *