Ram temple donation ‘theft’ row: Simple case of crime, don’t politicise it, says SC NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday said the alleged Ram temple donation embezzlement case should not be politicised, observing that it was ‘a simple case of commission of crime’ and that the court’s role was only to ensure a proper investigation into the matter.The apex court made the remarks while hearing petitions seeking a court-monitored probe into the alleged embezzlement of donations at the Ram temple in Ayodhya, including demands for a CBI investigation, a forensic audit and an audit by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust’s accounts.The bench was headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana. During the hearing, the bench said, “It is a simple case of commission of crime. We are only here to ensure a proper investigation. Courts are not a place for politics.” The court also asked the parties not to politicise the issue.The Supreme Court asked Solicitor General Tushar Mehta to take instructions on whether a Special Investigation Team (SIT) could be set up to probe the alleged embezzlement of donations at the Ram temple.Responding to the court, the solicitor general said an SIT had already been constituted and that the Uttar Pradesh Police was investigating the case.The matter has been posted for further hearing on July 27, when the Uttar Pradesh government will apprise the court about the progress of the SIT probe.The investigation gathered pace after the SIT submitted an interim report that led to the registration of an FIR, the arrest of eight accused and the recovery of nearly Rs 80 lakh allegedly siphoned off from temple donations. The probe also triggered the resignations of former Trust general secretary Champat Rai and former trustee Anil Mishra.According to sources, the SIT has sought additional time to examine financial records, administrative procedures and the alleged irregularities before submitting its final report. The report is also expected to recommend reforms in the temple’s donation collection, counting and administrative systems.The petitions before the Supreme Court seek a court-monitored CBI investigation, a forensic audit and a CAG audit of the Trust’s finances, while questioning the adequacy of the ongoing state probe. The Trust is scheduled to meet in Ayodhya on July 22 to discuss the SIT’s findings and consider corrective measures based on its recommendations.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosJP Nadda To Meet CJP Leaders As Centre Initiates Dialogue Amid Parliament MarchSonam Wangchuk’s Latest Hunger Strike Note Shifts Focus To Accountability, Parliament AssuranceDelhi Metro Closes Five Stations, Police Block CJP’s Parliament March Amid Massive SecurityCentre To Introduce Bill Making Insult To Vande Mataram A Criminal OffenceDelhi Police Warns Against CJP’s Parliament March; Says No Permission Granted, Legal Action Likely’Strictly Prohibited’: Delhi Police Invokes Section 163, Issues Warning Over CJP’s Sansad MarchCJP Releases Do’s & Don’ts For ‘Chalo Sansad’ March As Sonam Wangchuk Continues Hunger StrikeFlash Floods, Landslides Hit J&K’s Poonch-Rajouri; Vaishno Devi, Amarnath Yatra SuspendedModi Govt’s Invitation To Rebel TMC Faction Sparks Row, Oppn Walks Out Of All-Party Meet‘Entire System Shakes When…’: Jantar Mantar Protesters Speak Ahead Of July 20 Sansad March123Photostories6 Smart ways to use essential oils in your bathroom for a fresher, spa-like feelUpcoming week’s OTT releases (July 20-July 26): From ‘A Toxic Love Story’ to ‘BLEACH’World’s top 10 most valuable restaurant chains and their billion-dollar brandsSpent 16 years in school, yet nobody taught you about money, AI, or psychology? Here are 8 things every woman needs to learn that actually matterThe truth about collagen loss: Why early prevention beats anti-wrinkle treatmentsJennifer Winget turns into a storybook bride in a dreamy white ball gown for her countryside wedding5 Simple Rituals to Attract Wealth and Remove Financial ObstaclesTop 10 best islands in the world in 2026; Asia dominates the rankings with 6 winsInspired by UK homes: Here are 6 kitchen worktop ideas to tryStop throwing potato peels and combine them with baking soda: 5 clever kitchen uses you’ll wish you knew earlier123Hot PicksDU BTech AdmissionAP EAPCET counsellingUS import pricesBihar DCECE round 2 seat allotmentDelhi Metro stationsJantar MantarKerala Plus Two SAY resultsCJP Parliament marchBengali LanguageTop TrendingRajasthan RapeLucknow Jawahar Bhawan FireWeather TomorrowCJP ProtestSonam WangchukNEET Paper LeakJoseph VijayAbhishek BanerjeeIshowspeedIran war
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday said the alleged Ram temple donation embezzlement case should not be politicised, observing that it was ‘a simple case of commission of crime’ and that the court’s role was only to ensure a proper investigation into the matter.The apex court made the remarks while hearing petitions seeking a court-monitored probe into the alleged embezzlement of donations at the Ram temple in Ayodhya, including demands for a CBI investigation, a forensic audit and an audit by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust’s accounts.The bench was headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana. During the hearing, the bench said, “It is a simple case of commission of crime. We are only here to ensure a proper investigation. Courts are not a place for politics.” The court also asked the parties not to politicise the issue.The Supreme Court asked Solicitor General Tushar Mehta to take instructions on whether a Special Investigation Team (SIT) could be set up to probe the alleged embezzlement of donations at the Ram temple.Responding to the court, the solicitor general said an SIT had already been constituted and that the Uttar Pradesh Police was investigating the case.The matter has been posted for further hearing on July 27, when the Uttar Pradesh government will apprise the court about the progress of the SIT probe.The investigation gathered pace after the SIT submitted an interim report that led to the registration of an FIR, the arrest of eight accused and the recovery of nearly Rs 80 lakh allegedly siphoned off from temple donations. The probe also triggered the resignations of former Trust general secretary Champat Rai and former trustee Anil Mishra.According to sources, the SIT has sought additional time to examine financial records, administrative procedures and the alleged irregularities before submitting its final report. The report is also expected to recommend reforms in the temple’s donation collection, counting and administrative systems.The petitions before the Supreme Court seek a court-monitored CBI investigation, a forensic audit and a CAG audit of the Trust’s finances, while questioning the adequacy of the ongoing state probe. The Trust is scheduled to meet in Ayodhya on July 22 to discuss the SIT’s findings and consider corrective measures based on its recommendations.
