NEW DELHI: Though the Dowry Prohibition Act criminalises both taking and giving of dowry, the givers — which means the bride and her family members — would be shielded from prosecution if they are aggrieved persons, Supreme Court on Thursday said, reports Amit Anand Choudhary.SC’s clarification came on a plea of a man who submitted that an FIR should be lodged against his wife and in-laws also as they had admitted in their harassment complaint against him that dowry was given at the time of the wedding. A bench of Justices Sanjay Kumar and K Vinod Chandran, however, said that Section 7(3) was introduced in the Act to address such kind of situations.SC said Section 7(3) was introduced in the Dowry Prohibition Act to address such kind of situations to protect the aggrieved parties who have to confess to giving bribes while filing complaints of domestic violence and dowry harassment after marriage.The top court noted that the amendment in the law to introduce Section 7 (3) was brought on the basis of joint parliamentary committee report, which suggested that the giver of the dowry should not be dealt with on equal footing as the taker and that the giver of dowry is forced to do so by societal and customary norms.One of the recommendations of the committee was that the givers of dowry, i.e., the parents, should not be equated with those who take the dowry, as the givers are victims rather than criminals, as parents are compelled to give dowry and they do not do so out of their free will.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideos’Never Be Forgiven’: PM Modi Dares Opposition On Women Quota Bill, Priyanka Gandhi Questions Timing‘Won’t Reduce South’s Share’: Amit Shah Clarifies On Delimitation, Calls Oppn Claims ‘Misleading’Hal’s Light Utility Helicopter Explained: Specs, Altitude Edge And Why It Matters‘PM Modi Only Flag Bearer Of Feminism’: Kangana Ranaut Targets Congress Over Women Quota Bill In Lok SabhaPM Modi, French President Macron Stress Urgent Need To Restore Hormuz Safety During Phone Call’If Chanakya Were Alive…’: Priyanka Gandhi’s Swipe At Amit Shah Over Delimitation, Women QuotaNo More Russian Oil Waiver: What The US Decision Means For India’s Energy Needs Amid West Asia CrisisAustria’s Chancellor Calls India Key Partner, Pushes India-EU Trade Deal Amid Global TurmoilLok Sabha Erupts As Sawant Names Sengar, Brij Bhushan; Dubey Hits Back With Aaditya Thackeray Claim‘Not A Backdoor Exercise’: Tejasvi Surya Counters Opposition On Delimitation, Flags Representation Risks123Photostories8 rare baby boy names that start with the letter ‘K’Exclusive – Kiku Sharda opens up about his kids’ reaction to his female roles, Sunil Grover’s talent, and his bond with Kapil Sharma5 Japanese food rituals that could fix your eating habits instantly5 Signs of high emotional intelligence that instantly set you apart from others5 things couples do before calling it quitsWhy your heirloom Kanjeevaram saree feels so different from a modern silk shirt8 most unusual monkeys in the world: From capuchins to mandrillsStep inside Chris Gayle’s ₹20 crore lavish Jamaica mansion with private nightclub, infinity pools and unbelievable ocean views!‘Are we eating all our mangoes’: Why despite being the largest producer of mangoes, India is able to export just 1 percentGold vs lab-grown diamonds: What should you really buy this Akshaya Tritiya?123Hot PicksIran warWipro buyback planPurple cap winnerOrange cap winnerIPL Points TablePublic holidays April 2026Bank Holidays AprilTop TrendingTCS NashikTrump-Modi callSouth Delimitation ImpactAmit ShahPriyanka GandhiUK Flea Treatment RulesAlex ManningerCody RhodesCharlie Kirk ControversyTiger Woods
NEW DELHI: Though the Dowry Prohibition Act criminalises both taking and giving of dowry, the givers — which means the bride and her family members — would be shielded from prosecution if they are aggrieved persons, Supreme Court on Thursday said, reports Amit Anand Choudhary.SC’s clarification came on a plea of a man who submitted that an FIR should be lodged against his wife and in-laws also as they had admitted in their harassment complaint against him that dowry was given at the time of the wedding. A bench of Justices Sanjay Kumar and K Vinod Chandran, however, said that Section 7(3) was introduced in the Act to address such kind of situations.SC said Section 7(3) was introduced in the Dowry Prohibition Act to address such kind of situations to protect the aggrieved parties who have to confess to giving bribes while filing complaints of domestic violence and dowry harassment after marriage.The top court noted that the amendment in the law to introduce Section 7 (3) was brought on the basis of joint parliamentary committee report, which suggested that the giver of the dowry should not be dealt with on equal footing as the taker and that the giver of dowry is forced to do so by societal and customary norms.One of the recommendations of the committee was that the givers of dowry, i.e., the parents, should not be equated with those who take the dowry, as the givers are victims rather than criminals, as parents are compelled to give dowry and they do not do so out of their free will.
