File photo NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday refused to extend transit anticipatory bail protection for Congress leader Pawan Khera, asking him instead to approach a competent court in Assam in connection with a case linked to allegations against the wife of Assam chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma.A bench of Justices JK Maheshwari and Atul S Chandurkar rejected Khera’s plea seeking extension of relief till April 20 to enable him to move a court in Assam.Court clarifies earlier orderWhile declining relief, the apex court clarified that its earlier order staying the Telangana high court’s grant of transit anticipatory bail would not prejudice the jurisdictional court in Assam.“The court deciding the application shall not be adversely influenced by any order granting transit bail or otherwise,” the bench said, adding that any anticipatory bail plea must be decided on its own merits, uninfluenced by prior orders, as per news agency ANI.The court also said Khera is at liberty to approach the appropriate court and, if required, seek assistance from the registry if the court is not functioning.“In view of the above, the respondent is at liberty to approach the appropriate court. In case the court is not functioning, a request may be made to the court registry, and the same shall act in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the plea stands disposed of”, the Court noted.Background of the caseThe development comes after the Supreme Court earlier stayed the Telangana high court’s order granting Khera one week’s transit anticipatory bail, effectively making him vulnerable to arrest by Assam Police.During the earlier hearing, the court had questioned the Telangana high court’s jurisdiction in entertaining Khera’s plea in a case registered in Assam. The state had argued that Khera engaged in “forum-shopping” by approaching a court outside the state where the FIR was filed.The case pertains to allegations that Khera made false statements against the Assam chief minister’s wife.The controversy stems from a press conference held on April 5, where Khera alleged that Sarma’s wife, Riniki Bhuyan Sharma, held multiple passports and owned foreign property that were not disclosed in the chief minister’s election affidavit for the April 9 Assembly polls. Both Sarma and his wife rejected the claims as “false and fabricated”.Following the remarks, a case was registered against Khera at the Guwahati Crime Branch police station under sections 175 (false statement in connection with an election), 35 and 318 (cheating) of the Bharatiya Nyaya SanhitaWith Friday’s order, the Supreme Court has reiterated that Khera must seek relief from a court in Assam, which will independently assess his anticipatory bail plea.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosRed Fort Blast Probe Twist: White Collar Module Used JeM Name To Mask Bigger Terror Revival PlanPakistan Reacts After India’s Delimitation Bill Includes Pakistan-Occupied Jammu & KashmirTCS Nashik Row Takes Twist As Accused’s Kin Calls Case Scripted, Alleges Bajrang Dal’s Involvement’International Law Must Be Respected’: India Urges Restoration Of Safe Navigation In Hormuz At UNGA’Pakistan’s Role Discussed’: Shashi Tharoor On Foreign Secretary Briefing On West Asia Conflict‘I Am Warning Govt’: AIMIM Chief Asaduddin Owaisi Says Delimitation Could Become ‘Permanent Wound’’Never Be Forgiven’: PM Modi Dares Opposition On Women Quota Bill, Priyanka Gandhi Questions Timing‘Won’t Reduce South’s Share’: Amit Shah Clarifies On Delimitation, Calls Oppn Claims ‘Misleading’Hal’s Light Utility Helicopter Explained: Specs, Altitude Edge And Why It Matters‘PM Modi Only Flag Bearer Of Feminism’: Kangana Ranaut Targets Congress Over Women Quota Bill In Lok Sabha123PhotostoriesRicky Ponting’s ₹173 crore ‘trophy home’ in Toorak, Melbourne screams luxury with a private tennis court, designer pool, and cricket memorabilia10 unforgettable souvenirs from Nepal trip that capture the spirit of the Himalayas7 places where nature’s loudest sounds can be heardChef Ranveer Brar appointed Odisha Brand Ambassador: What makes Odisha’s Temple Cuisine so sacred and special12 research-backed habits highly intelligent people avoid but most people do every day5 Japanese wisdom quotes to help kids stay strong and keep goingViswanathan Anand’s Chennai home: A blend of simplicity, legacy, and chess8 rare baby boy names that start with the letter ‘K’Exclusive – Kiku Sharda opens up about his kids’ reaction to his female roles, Sunil Grover’s talent, and his bond with Kapil Sharma5 Japanese food rituals that could fix your eating habits instantly123Hot PicksIran warWipro buyback planPurple cap winnerOrange cap winnerIPL Points TablePublic holidays April 2026Bank Holidays AprilTop TrendingNashik TCSAmir HamzaDelhi Brigadier Assualt CaseMadhya Pradesh Rape NewsPriyanka GandhiUK Flea Treatment RulesAlex ManningerCody RhodesCharlie Kirk ControversyTiger Woods
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday refused to extend transit anticipatory bail protection for Congress leader Pawan Khera, asking him instead to approach a competent court in Assam in connection with a case linked to allegations against the wife of Assam chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma.A bench of Justices JK Maheshwari and Atul S Chandurkar rejected Khera’s plea seeking extension of relief till April 20 to enable him to move a court in Assam.
Court clarifies earlier order
While declining relief, the apex court clarified that its earlier order staying the Telangana high court’s grant of transit anticipatory bail would not prejudice the jurisdictional court in Assam.“The court deciding the application shall not be adversely influenced by any order granting transit bail or otherwise,” the bench said, adding that any anticipatory bail plea must be decided on its own merits, uninfluenced by prior orders, as per news agency ANI.The court also said Khera is at liberty to approach the appropriate court and, if required, seek assistance from the registry if the court is not functioning.“In view of the above, the respondent is at liberty to approach the appropriate court. In case the court is not functioning, a request may be made to the court registry, and the same shall act in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the plea stands disposed of”, the Court noted.
Background of the case
The development comes after the Supreme Court earlier stayed the Telangana high court’s order granting Khera one week’s transit anticipatory bail, effectively making him vulnerable to arrest by Assam Police.During the earlier hearing, the court had questioned the Telangana high court’s jurisdiction in entertaining Khera’s plea in a case registered in Assam. The state had argued that Khera engaged in “forum-shopping” by approaching a court outside the state where the FIR was filed.The case pertains to allegations that Khera made false statements against the Assam chief minister’s wife.The controversy stems from a press conference held on April 5, where Khera alleged that Sarma’s wife, Riniki Bhuyan Sharma, held multiple passports and owned foreign property that were not disclosed in the chief minister’s election affidavit for the April 9 Assembly polls. Both Sarma and his wife rejected the claims as “false and fabricated”.Following the remarks, a case was registered against Khera at the Guwahati Crime Branch police station under sections 175 (false statement in connection with an election), 35 and 318 (cheating) of the Bharatiya Nyaya SanhitaWith Friday’s order, the Supreme Court has reiterated that Khera must seek relief from a court in Assam, which will independently assess his anticipatory bail plea.
