NEW DELHI: BCI’s controversial decision to bar 2026 law graduates from Hyderabad’s NALSAR University of Law from being registered as advocate, which it withdrew within hours, brought into focus the regulator’s working which has been headed by senior advocate and BJP MP Manan Kumar Mishra for 14 years.A statutory body established under Advocates Act, 1961, BCI is mandated to regulate legal profession and legal education. It lays down standards of professional conduct for advocates, exercises disciplinary jurisdiction, and recognises universities whose law degrees qualify a person for enrolment. Section 7(1)(g) of the Act also gives it general supervision and control over state bar councils.But no provision of the Act gives it the power to enrol a person as an advocate which is to be done by a state bar council to admit persons as advocates on its roll. Clearly, the regulator ventured into the area beyond its domain by taking punitive measures against students, and upset SC which observed that BCI had no business to intervene in the matter.The controversy has put the spotlight on BCI’s functioning on whether it has over the years been able to discharge its statutory duty to maintain the standard of legal profession and legal education. Going by a statement of Mishra himself, BCI has failed in its duty by a massive margin.An outspoken man who contested polls as nominees of BSP and Congress before drifting into BJP , has said on more than one occasion that 35-40% of advocates have fake degrees, and are practicing in the courts on the basis of fabricated degree certificates. The statement, while believed to be true by many, is an indictment of regulator and clear evidence that guard rails against serious malpractice have not been working.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesAnother failure of BCI is in the field of legal education as it failed to maintain standard in view of proliferation of law colleges; some of them are virtually selling law degrees with students exempted from attending classes. It has regularly faced SC’s ire for not infusing professionalism into the profession and not taking action against erring lawyers who keep resorting to strikes.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosActivist Devendra Mahto Stopped From Tiranga March As Jharkhand Student Protest Escalates On I-Day‘Came From The Top’: Mahua Moitra Alleges Late-Night Pressure, Seeks Speaker Om Birla’s InterventionDid Congress Leaders Signal Stop? Viral Vande Mataram Video Sparks Political Firestorm In New DelhiIndia Signs ₹1,577 Crore Drone Deals As Army Powers Up Precision Strikes And Unmanned WarfareAjit Doval Breaks Silence On Operation Sindoor, Reveals PM Modi’s Immediate Response After PahalgamPM Modi From Red Fort: India’s Self-Reliance Push, Semiconductor Boom And Manufacturing SurgeRahul Gandhi, Kharge Skip Red Fort Event Again As Congress Flags Threats To Democratic InstitutionsPM Modi From Red Fort: India’s Self-Reliance Push, Semiconductor Boom And Manufacturing SurgePM Modi From Red Fort On 80th Independence Day: ‘India Must Dream Big And Move Forward’79 Years Of Freedom: What Do Indians Really Want From Their Country, Leaders And Democracy Now?123PhotostoriesYour walk changes after 60, but is it really ‘normal ageing’? What a shuffle, sway or slower step could be telling you7 Foods to eat in the morning for better digestion and easier bowel movementsWant a better relationship with your parents? 8 simple tips every teenager should try10 baby girl names inspired by ancient flowersOptical illusion personality test: What you see first reveals your most irritating personality traitForget Medu Vada: 7 South Indian snacks that are worth a try with filter coffeeWhat happens when you rub lemon on dishes and cutlery? The real chemistry behind this kitchen hackMonsoon food poisoning: 7 everyday foods that can look safe but turn risky because of water, humidity and poor storageAbhishek Malhan’s luxurious mansion: A private swimming pool, home theatre, private lifts and moreTrisha Krishnan keeps it classic in a mustard saree as she attends CM Vijay’s first Independence Day ceremony123Hot PicksMartin Luther King JrRajasthan UCCDelhi trafficJharkhand protestEast Coast Railway GDCE recruitmentMP Class 10, 12 timetableIran warKarnataka bandhUP NEET UG counsellingTop TrendingOil Prices TodayIndiGo Fight CancelledDelhi High Court Bomb ThreatAmbala Sikh Community ProtestManan KumarVirender Singh BasoyaJP NaddaWeather TomorrowBengaluru RapidoAbhijeet Dipke
NEW DELHI: BCI’s controversial decision to bar 2026 law graduates from Hyderabad’s NALSAR University of Law from being registered as advocate, which it withdrew within hours, brought into focus the regulator’s working which has been headed by senior advocate and BJP MP Manan Kumar Mishra for 14 years.A statutory body established under Advocates Act, 1961, BCI is mandated to regulate legal profession and legal education. It lays down standards of professional conduct for advocates, exercises disciplinary jurisdiction, and recognises universities whose law degrees qualify a person for enrolment. Section 7(1)(g) of the Act also gives it general supervision and control over state bar councils.But no provision of the Act gives it the power to enrol a person as an advocate which is to be done by a state bar council to admit persons as advocates on its roll. Clearly, the regulator ventured into the area beyond its domain by taking punitive measures against students, and upset SC which observed that BCI had no business to intervene in the matter.The controversy has put the spotlight on BCI’s functioning on whether it has over the years been able to discharge its statutory duty to maintain the standard of legal profession and legal education. Going by a statement of Mishra himself, BCI has failed in its duty by a massive margin.An outspoken man who contested polls as nominees of BSP and Congress before drifting into BJP , has said on more than one occasion that 35-40% of advocates have fake degrees, and are practicing in the courts on the basis of fabricated degree certificates. The statement, while believed to be true by many, is an indictment of regulator and clear evidence that guard rails against serious malpractice have not been working.
Share your thoughts in the comments
Be respectful · TOI community guidelines
Another failure of BCI is in the field of legal education as it failed to maintain standard in view of proliferation of law colleges; some of them are virtually selling law degrees with students exempted from attending classes. It has regularly faced SC’s ire for not infusing professionalism into the profession and not taking action against erring lawyers who keep resorting to strikes.
