NEW DELHI: Bar Council of India chairman Manan Kumar Mishra on Saturday apologised to law students following the council’s controversial decision to briefly halt the enrolment of National Academy of Legal Studies and Research (NALSAR) University of Law’s 2026 graduating batch as advocates, Bar and Bench reported.In a letter issued on Independence Day, Mishra said he regretted any words or communication connected to the controversy that may have hurt the feelings of law students.”If anything connected with the present controversy, any of my words, or letter, has hurt the feelings of our law students, I sincerely regret and apologise for the same. There should be no hesitation in saying so,” the letter reads.”An expression of regret is not a matter of prestige or ego. It is simply an acknowledgment that the feelings and concerns of our students matter,” he added.The apology comes after the BCI directed all state bar councils not to enrol NALSAR’s 2026 graduates as advocates until further orders. The council withdrew the directive within hours following an uproar on social media.The BCI had initially said it was examining allegations regarding a campaign against Chief Justice of India Surya Kant’s participation in NALSAR’s convocation and had sought a report identifying those responsible.The council later modified its decision to allow the enrolment of the university’s 2026 graduates before withdrawing the notification altogether. The revised notification said the “vast majority” of students were innocent and should not be made to suffer for the alleged “misconduct” of a few.The controversy began after around 450 graduating NALSAR students urged the university to reconsider inviting CJI Kant as chief guest at its convocation. The students cited his alleged refusal to hear pleas concerning “police brutality” against students who had marched to Parliament on July 20 seeking the resignation of then-Union education minister Dharmendra Pradhan over the NEET-UG question paper leak in May.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesThe Supreme Court later expressed “strong disapproval” of the BCI’s now-revoked order.A bench headed by CJI Kant, and comprising Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana, said students have the right to protest peacefully and described the episode as a “dialogue” between him and the students.”If students are protesting peacefully, who is BCI to take action? It is the right of the students to protest peacefully. It is a dialogue between students and me. No one else has to step in,” the CJI said.The Supreme Court also stayed any coercive action against students or faculty by the BCI or state councils.”It (the letter) was absolutely uncalled for,” the bench added.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideos‘Came From The Top’: Mahua Moitra Alleges Late-Night Pressure, Seeks Speaker Om Birla’s InterventionDid Congress Leaders Signal Stop? Viral Vande Mataram Video Sparks Political Firestorm In New DelhiIndia Signs ₹1,577 Crore Drone Deals As Army Powers Up Precision Strikes And Unmanned WarfareAjit Doval Breaks Silence On Operation Sindoor, Reveals PM Modi’s Immediate Response After PahalgamPM Modi From Red Fort: India’s Self-Reliance Push, Semiconductor Boom And Manufacturing SurgeRahul Gandhi, Kharge Skip Red Fort Event Again As Congress Flags Threats To Democratic InstitutionsPM Modi From Red Fort: India’s Self-Reliance Push, Semiconductor Boom And Manufacturing SurgePM Modi From Red Fort On 80th Independence Day: ‘India Must Dream Big And Move Forward’79 Years Of Freedom: What Do Indians Really Want From Their Country, Leaders And Democracy Now?NALSAR Row Erupts: CJI Raps BCI, As CJP Demands Resignation Of Bar Council Chief123PhotostoriesWant a better relationship with your parents? 8 simple tips every teenager should try10 baby girl names inspired by ancient flowersOptical illusion personality test: What you see first reveals your most irritating personality traitForget Medu Vada: 7 South Indian snacks that are worth a try with filter coffeeWhat happens when you rub lemon on dishes and cutlery? The real chemistry behind this kitchen hackMonsoon food poisoning: 7 everyday foods that can look safe but turn risky because of water, humidity and poor storageAbhishek Malhan’s luxurious mansion: A private swimming pool, home theatre, private lifts and moreTrisha Krishnan keeps it classic in a mustard saree as she attends CM Vijay’s first Independence Day ceremonyBigg Boss Tamil 10 ‘The Common Man’: From contestants to telecast time, here’s everything you need to knowRashtrapati Bhavan’s Independence Day At Home reception to serve these 7 dishes from 4 Indian states123Hot PicksMartin Luther King JrRajasthan UCCDelhi trafficJharkhand protestEast Coast Railway GDCE recruitmentMP Class 10, 12 timetableIran warKarnataka bandhUP NEET UG counsellingTop TrendingOil Prices TodayIndiGo Fight CancelledDelhi High Court Bomb ThreatAmbala Sikh Community ProtestManan KumarVirender Singh BasoyaJP NaddaWeather TomorrowBengaluru RapidoAbhijeet Dipke
NEW DELHI: Bar Council of India chairman Manan Kumar Mishra on Saturday apologised to law students following the council’s controversial decision to briefly halt the enrolment of National Academy of Legal Studies and Research (NALSAR) University of Law’s 2026 graduating batch as advocates, Bar and Bench reported.In a letter issued on Independence Day, Mishra said he regretted any words or communication connected to the controversy that may have hurt the feelings of law students.“If anything connected with the present controversy, any of my words, or letter, has hurt the feelings of our law students, I sincerely regret and apologise for the same. There should be no hesitation in saying so,” the letter reads.“An expression of regret is not a matter of prestige or ego. It is simply an acknowledgment that the feelings and concerns of our students matter,” he added.The apology comes after the BCI directed all state bar councils not to enrol NALSAR’s 2026 graduates as advocates until further orders. The council withdrew the directive within hours following an uproar on social media.The BCI had initially said it was examining allegations regarding a campaign against Chief Justice of India Surya Kant’s participation in NALSAR’s convocation and had sought a report identifying those responsible.The council later modified its decision to allow the enrolment of the university’s 2026 graduates before withdrawing the notification altogether. The revised notification said the “vast majority” of students were innocent and should not be made to suffer for the alleged “misconduct” of a few.The controversy began after around 450 graduating NALSAR students urged the university to reconsider inviting CJI Kant as chief guest at its convocation. The students cited his alleged refusal to hear pleas concerning “police brutality” against students who had marched to Parliament on July 20 seeking the resignation of then-Union education minister Dharmendra Pradhan over the NEET-UG question paper leak in May.
Share your thoughts in the comments
Be respectful · TOI community guidelines
The Supreme Court later expressed “strong disapproval” of the BCI’s now-revoked order.A bench headed by CJI Kant, and comprising Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana, said students have the right to protest peacefully and described the episode as a “dialogue” between him and the students.“If students are protesting peacefully, who is BCI to take action? It is the right of the students to protest peacefully. It is a dialogue between students and me. No one else has to step in,” the CJI said.The Supreme Court also stayed any coercive action against students or faculty by the BCI or state councils.“It (the letter) was absolutely uncalled for,” the bench added.
