April 19, 2026

Jaishankar receives a memento from Motegi in New Delhi on Friday (IANS photo) NEW DELHI: Foreign minister S Jaishankar and his Japanese counterpart Toshimitsu Motegi Friday chaired the 18th India-Japan strategic dialogue that saw both sides agreeing to boost cooperation in AI and critical minerals while seeking enhanced engagement on issues related to South Asia, West Asia and Africa and reaffirming their commitment to development of India’s northeast. Among the significant outcomes was a decision to establish a Japan-India AI strategic dialogue and to ramp up dialogue both between the private sectors and govts on issues related to economic security. Jaishankar and Motegi, who called on PM Narendra Modi in the morning, also decided to convene the joint working group on critical minerals early this year under the economic security initiative to advance collaboration in the fields of rare earths and critical minerals, according to the MEA.Both sides agreed to expedite the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train (Shinkansen) project and Japan reiterated its commitment to supply India with the next-gen E10 Shinkansen train. According to Japan, the AI initiative is aimed at achieving innovation and growth. There was focus on also boosting startup cooperation through a support initiative.The ministers discussed resilient supply chains, critical minerals, defence and discussed ways to address energy, health, and maritime security. “Economic security today is particularly paramount. I think both our countries attach enormous importance to it, and how to de-risk our own economies, and how to de-risk the international economy are both very important,” said Jaishankar.Amid uncertainty over Quad, Jaishankar told Motegi India att-ached highest priority to working with Japan in forums like Quad, UN, G4 and G20. “We are leading democracies, we are the major economies of the world, and we have today not just an opportunity, but also an obligation, a duty to shape the global order, and in the current uncertain global situation, it’s even more important that we work closely towards shared strategic goals,” said Jaishankar.Japan’s foreign ministry spokesperson Toshihiro Kitamura said that “in order to have the engagement of the US in this region, we believe that Quad is a very important framework to facilitate such cooperation”. Japan expressed interest in quickly formalising the deal to supply the Indian Navy with Unified Complex Radio Antenna.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosDevendra Fadnavis Says BJP Created History in Maharashtra Civic ElectionsDeloitte Partner Says Budget Must Fix GST Gaps, Cut Costs, Boost Domestic ManufacturingAs Iran Burns, India Flags Risk To 9,000 Indians, MEA Sets Record Straight On Chabahar Port Exit’North Indian Girls Face Curbs’: DMK MP Sparks Row; Trump Warns Iran of Brutal Action Over KillingsSC Stays FIRs Against ED, Issues Notice To Didi; Raj Thackeray’s Big Bombshell In Mumbai Civic PollsBJP-Alliance Sweeps BMC Polls, Thackeray Reunion Flops; Rahul Slams EC Over ‘Ink Mark’ RowBritish MP Bob Blackman Warns Of Hindu Killings In Bangladesh As Extremism Rises, Democracy FaltersRanchi ED Raid: Jharkhand HC Calls Police Action ‘Pre-Planned’, Orders Security BoostMumbai And Pune Verdict Shake Thackeray And Pawar Dynasties As Legacy Politics Faces Reality CheckPiyush Goyal Says Startup India Generated Over 21 Lakh Jobs, Credits PM Modi123PhotostoriesHow to make Moong Dal Chilla for breakfast5 warm Indian destinations above 25°C right now to escape the winter chillExclusive – Naagin 7’s Eisha Singh on bond with Priyanka Chahar Choudhary, Bigg Boss journey; says ‘It took a very long time to come out of it’5 lizards that look like real-life dragonsVande Bharat Sleeper Launch On January 17: How Is New Indian Railways Train Better Than Rajdhani? Top Features & Stunning PhotosHow to make Kerala Chicken Curry at home8 rare baby girl names with powerful meaningsKanjeevaram vs Banarasi silk: Which saree is best for your wedding day?Top 5 Southern Indian fish dishes that are full of flavours and traditionKaran Johar, Sanjay Dutt, Sunny Leone: Bollywood celebrities who welcomed parenthood with twins123Hot PicksMaharashtra Election ResultsBudget 2026Gold rate todayBank holiday todayBMC Election ResultsPublic holidays January 2026Bank Holidays JanuaryTop TrendingGracie HuntTravis KelceNBA Trade RumorsEdmonton OilersLinus UllmarkMaharashtra Civic Poll ResultsAustin Reaves Net WorthTua TagovailoaDana WhiteToto Wolff and Christian Horner Net Worth

Vamsikrishna02 mins mins
Jaishankar receives a memento from Motegi in New Delhi on Friday (IANS photo) NEW DELHI: Foreign minister S Jaishankar and his Japanese counterpart Toshimitsu Motegi Friday chaired the 18th India-Japan strategic dialogue that saw both sides agreeing to boost cooperation in AI and critical minerals while seeking enhanced engagement on issues related to South Asia, West Asia and Africa and reaffirming their commitment to development of India’s northeast. Among the significant outcomes was a decision to establish a Japan-India AI strategic dialogue and to ramp up dialogue both between the private sectors and govts on issues related to economic security. Jaishankar and Motegi, who called on PM Narendra Modi in the morning, also decided to convene the joint working group on critical minerals early this year under the economic security initiative to advance collaboration in the fields of rare earths and critical minerals, according to the MEA.Both sides agreed to expedite the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train (Shinkansen) project and Japan reiterated its commitment to supply India with the next-gen E10 Shinkansen train. According to Japan, the AI initiative is aimed at achieving innovation and growth. There was focus on also boosting startup cooperation through a support initiative.The ministers discussed resilient supply chains, critical minerals, defence and discussed ways to address energy, health, and maritime security. “Economic security today is particularly paramount. I think both our countries attach enormous importance to it, and how to de-risk our own economies, and how to de-risk the international economy are both very important,” said Jaishankar.Amid uncertainty over Quad, Jaishankar told Motegi India att-ached highest priority to working with Japan in forums like Quad, UN, G4 and G20. “We are leading democracies, we are the major economies of the world, and we have today not just an opportunity, but also an obligation, a duty to shape the global order, and in the current uncertain global situation, it’s even more important that we work closely towards shared strategic goals,” said Jaishankar.Japan’s foreign ministry spokesperson Toshihiro Kitamura said that “in order to have the engagement of the US in this region, we believe that Quad is a very important framework to facilitate such cooperation”. Japan expressed interest in quickly formalising the deal to supply the Indian Navy with Unified Complex Radio Antenna.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosDevendra Fadnavis Says BJP Created History in Maharashtra Civic ElectionsDeloitte Partner Says Budget Must Fix GST Gaps, Cut Costs, Boost Domestic ManufacturingAs Iran Burns, India Flags Risk To 9,000 Indians, MEA Sets Record Straight On Chabahar Port Exit’North Indian Girls Face Curbs’: DMK MP Sparks Row; Trump Warns Iran of Brutal Action Over KillingsSC Stays FIRs Against ED, Issues Notice To Didi; Raj Thackeray’s Big Bombshell In Mumbai Civic PollsBJP-Alliance Sweeps BMC Polls, Thackeray Reunion Flops; Rahul Slams EC Over ‘Ink Mark’ RowBritish MP Bob Blackman Warns Of Hindu Killings In Bangladesh As Extremism Rises, Democracy FaltersRanchi ED Raid: Jharkhand HC Calls Police Action ‘Pre-Planned’, Orders Security BoostMumbai And Pune Verdict Shake Thackeray And Pawar Dynasties As Legacy Politics Faces Reality CheckPiyush Goyal Says Startup India Generated Over 21 Lakh Jobs, Credits PM Modi123PhotostoriesHow to make Moong Dal Chilla for breakfast5 warm Indian destinations above 25°C right now to escape the winter chillExclusive – Naagin 7’s Eisha Singh on bond with Priyanka Chahar Choudhary, Bigg Boss journey; says ‘It took a very long time to come out of it’5 lizards that look like real-life dragonsVande Bharat Sleeper Launch On January 17: How Is New Indian Railways Train Better Than Rajdhani? Top Features & Stunning PhotosHow to make Kerala Chicken Curry at home8 rare baby girl names with powerful meaningsKanjeevaram vs Banarasi silk: Which saree is best for your wedding day?Top 5 Southern Indian fish dishes that are full of flavours and traditionKaran Johar, Sanjay Dutt, Sunny Leone: Bollywood celebrities who welcomed parenthood with twins123Hot PicksMaharashtra Election ResultsBudget 2026Gold rate todayBank holiday todayBMC Election ResultsPublic holidays January 2026Bank Holidays JanuaryTop TrendingGracie HuntTravis KelceNBA Trade RumorsEdmonton OilersLinus UllmarkMaharashtra Civic Poll ResultsAustin Reaves Net WorthTua TagovailoaDana WhiteToto Wolff and Christian Horner Net Worth


India, Japan decide to ramp up dialogue on economic security

Jaishankar receives a memento from Motegi in New Delhi on Friday (IANS photo)

NEW DELHI: Foreign minister S Jaishankar and his Japanese counterpart Toshimitsu Motegi Friday chaired the 18th India-Japan strategic dialogue that saw both sides agreeing to boost cooperation in AI and critical minerals while seeking enhanced engagement on issues related to South Asia, West Asia and Africa and reaffirming their commitment to development of India’s northeast. Among the significant outcomes was a decision to establish a Japan-India AI strategic dialogue and to ramp up dialogue both between the private sectors and govts on issues related to economic security. Jaishankar and Motegi, who called on PM Narendra Modi in the morning, also decided to convene the joint working group on critical minerals early this year under the economic security initiative to advance collaboration in the fields of rare earths and critical minerals, according to the MEA.Both sides agreed to expedite the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train (Shinkansen) project and Japan reiterated its commitment to supply India with the next-gen E10 Shinkansen train. According to Japan, the AI initiative is aimed at achieving innovation and growth. There was focus on also boosting startup cooperation through a support initiative.The ministers discussed resilient supply chains, critical minerals, defence and discussed ways to address energy, health, and maritime security. “Economic security today is particularly paramount. I think both our countries attach enormous importance to it, and how to de-risk our own economies, and how to de-risk the international economy are both very important,” said Jaishankar.Amid uncertainty over Quad, Jaishankar told Motegi India att-ached highest priority to working with Japan in forums like Quad, UN, G4 and G20. “We are leading democracies, we are the major economies of the world, and we have today not just an opportunity, but also an obligation, a duty to shape the global order, and in the current uncertain global situation, it’s even more important that we work closely towards shared strategic goals,” said Jaishankar.Japan’s foreign ministry spokesperson Toshihiro Kitamura said that “in order to have the engagement of the US in this region, we believe that Quad is a very important framework to facilitate such cooperation”. Japan expressed interest in quickly formalising the deal to supply the Indian Navy with Unified Complex Radio Antenna.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related News

. NEW DELHI: Parliament has voted down the government’s proposal to expand the Lok Sabha from 543 to 850 seats, implement 33% reservation for women, and redraw constituencies accordingly, but the defeat has not closed the issue. If anything, it has exposed how a once-technical constitutional mechanism has become one of the most consequential unresolved questions in electoral politics.It is important to note that the Women’s Reservation Act 2023, which provides for a 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state legislative assemblies, came into force on April 16, 2026 amid the ongoing debate on proposed bills.The opposition was unambiguous about these bills. “This defeat is not of women’s quota but of delimitation by the backdoor,” said Revolutionary Socialist PartyMP N K Premachandran. Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav called it a “defeat of BJP’s malice.” Trinamool Congress, whose 21 MPs had been urgently mobilised by the INDIA bloc, proved critical to the margin. After the vote, Congress’s Rahul Gandhi spoke personally with TMC’s Abhishek Banerjee to thank him for the support.Congress’s Priyanka Gandhi Vadra was direct: “PM Modi maliciously linked women’s quota to delimitation based on the 2011 census. His hollow attempt to pose as the messiah of women has failed today.”CPI MP Sandosh Kumar put the charge differently- that women should “see through BJP’s approach of delaying women’s quota by linking it to the census and delimitation.”On the government side, home minister Amit Shah, as the bill’s fate became clear, offered to adjourn the House and return with an amended bill. “I have the amendment prepared,” he said, pressing the government’s commitment to the 50% seat expansion. Prime Minister Narendra Modi made a final appeal before voting, asking MPs to “reflect on your conscience” and act on behalf of women across the country.The bill failed. Two related pieces of legislation, including the one to set up a delimitation commission, were not tabled in the Rajya Sabha. Parliament was adjourned.What government proposedThe government’s plan was architecturally different from any previous delimitation exercise. Its central proposal was to increase total Lok Sabha seats by 50%, from 543 to 850, while keeping each state’s proportional share of seats unchanged. Uttar Pradesh, which currently holds 80 seats, would have received 120; Tamil Nadu, with 39, would have received 58 or thereabouts.The mechanism for women’s reservation flowed from this expansion. If every state’s seats increased by 50%, one-third of the new total — 33% — could be reserved for women, equalling precisely the one-third of the expanded total. The arithmetic was designed to be self-contained: no state would lose share, and the reservation obligation would be met without redistributing existing seats.The proposed delimitation commission, as described in the bill circulated to lawmakers, would be headed by a former Supreme Court judge, with the chief election commissioner or a nominee as a member, consistent with past practice.The exercise for the Lok Sabha, government sources made clear, was to be delinked from the 2011 census. Constituency boundaries would be redrawn; the proportional shares of states in the Lok Sabha would not change. In that structural sense, it was closer to the 2008 delimitation exercise than to the full reallocation exercises of 1952, 1963, or 1973. .Why opposition read it as threatThe bill’s legal architecture contained a provision that drew sustained fire. As Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy’s Swapnil Tripathi, lead at Charkha (Centre for Constitutional Law), explained: “Currently, Article 82 requires that delimitation of constituencies and readjustment of seats among states be undertaken after completion of every census, using population data of that census. The present bill removes this obligation and instead leaves it to parliament to determine both timing of delimitation and census to be used for the exercise. Importantly, this transforms what was a constitutional obligation into a matter of legislative discretion.”That shift from constitutional mandate to parliamentary choice was the provision that most alarmed critics. It would have allowed parliament to decide, at will, which census data to use and when to act, stripping Article 82 of its periodic, automatic character.Congress lead speakers Gaurav Gogoi and K C Venugopal accused the government of using women’s quota as “cover” for a larger electoral reengineering. Gogoi invoked the American term explicitly- BJP was using delimitation “like gerrymandering in the US, where seats are redrawn for political exploitation.” He pointed to what he called precedents in Jammu & Kashmir, where a delimitation commission used census 2011, and in Assam, where the election commission used census 2001, bypassing norms of geographical contiguity and uniformity. “What was done in Assam and J&K, government wants to do it in the entire country,” he said.DMK chief M K Stalin, who had led protests in Tamil Nadu, said his party’s concern was squarely about delimitation–”which requires careful thought to ensure it is fair, especially for southern states.” He said the government should have delinked women’s reservation from delimitation entirely.Congress challenged the government to implement women’s reservation immediately in the existing 543-seat House without linking it to census or delimitation. The government declined. .Stakes for southern statesThe underlying anxiety that animated the southern bloc is rooted in demography and mathematics that are not in dispute.India’s seat allocation in the Lok Sabha has not been updated since 1977. It rests on the 1971 census. In the five decades since, population growth has been sharply uneven. Northern states Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan grew faster. Southern states Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh invested earlier in public health and fertility reduction, and their populations stabilised sooner.Based on 2011 census data, Tamil Nadu has a population of approximately 7 crore and sends 39 MPs to the Lok Sabha. Uttar Pradesh has a population of roughly 20 crore, nearly three times as large, and sends 80. A Tamil Nadu MP represents approximately 18 lakh voters; and a UP MP represents approximately 25 lakh.Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy’s research quantifies what a strict population-based delimitation could produce: going by projected 2026 population, Tamil Nadu could fall to 31 Lok Sabha seats while Uttar Pradesh could rise to 90. More populous northern states have reason to argue their representation has been frozen unjustly. But southern states–which implemented family planning successfully, raised literacy, and reduced fertility–fear they are being penalised for effective governance.The government’s expansion plans–keeping proportional shares frozen while growing the overall House–was presented precisely as the resolution to this conflict. Each state keeps its share; all states gain seats; women get their quota. Critics, however, argued that the real issue was not the immediate arithmetic of the current bill, but the constitutional discretion it would have created for all future delimitation exercises. .What delimitation actually meansThe word is used loosely in political debate to describe three distinct processes. The first is the allocation of seats among states — how many of the Lok Sabha’s total seats each state receives. This is the most consequential dimension and the one frozen since 1977. The second is the redrawing of constituency boundaries within states — carving a state’s allotted seats into geographic units of roughly equal population. The third is the reservation of specific constituencies for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, placed in areas where those communities form the largest share of the local population.These three processes have different constitutional triggers and very different political stakes. The 2008 delimitation exercise, for instance, redrew boundaries within states using 2001 Census data — but left the inter-state seat distribution entirely untouched. The current debate is almost entirely about the first category, which has not moved in over five decades.The Constitutional frameworkThe architecture begins with Article 81 — seats in the Lok Sabha shall be allocated broadly in proportion to state populations. Article 82 mandates that upon completion of each census, allocation and constituency division shall be readjusted by such authority as Parliament may by law determine. Article 170 mirrors this for state assemblies.Article 327 empowers Parliament to make laws on all matters relating to elections, including delimitation. Article 329(a) removes courts from the picture: the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constituencies or the allotment of seats “shall not be called in question in any court.”The original design was automatic: every census triggered a readjustment, keeping representation tethered to population. It was a commitment to equal citizenship — one person, one vote, one value.The Freeze: Why it happenedIn 1976, the 42nd constitutional amendment suspended inter-state seat revision until after the 2001 census, freezing Lok Sabha seats at 543. The stated rationale was protective — states that had successfully implemented family planning should not be penalised in representation relative to faster-growing states.In 2001, the 84th constitutional amendment extended the freeze to the first census after 2026. The delimitation commission’s own guidelines, issued in 2002 under Secretary Shangara Ram, recorded the consequence plainly: “the total number of existing seats as allocated to various states in the House of the people on the basis of 1971 census shall remain unaltered till the first census to be taken after the year 2026.”The 87th constitutional amendment (2003) permitted a partial exercise using 2001 data — constituency boundaries within states could be redrawn, and SC/ST reserved seat calculations updated — without altering state-wise seat totals. The 2008 delimitation order resulted from this partial exercise. It redrew boundaries. It did not reallocate seats. India has now operated under 1971 population figures for over five decades. .How a delimitation exercise proceedsWhen the next exercise is triggered, it will follow a structured, multi-stage procedure documented in the delimitation commission’s official guidelines.Parliament first enacts a new delimitation act — each exercise requires fresh legislation, and the old act is repealed. The Union government then constitutes a delimitation commission, chaired by a retired Supreme Court judge, with the chief election commissioner and relevant state election commissioners as ex-officio members. For each state, the commission associates five MPs and five MLAs as nominated members. These associate members can attend hearings, consult on working papers, and submit dissenting notes. They cannot vote. They cannot block final orders.The commission then prepares working papers covering district-wise population data, seat entitlements, SC/ST population distributions, and proposed constituency boundaries. Guidelines specify that constituencies must be “geographically compact areas” with regard to “physical features, existing boundaries of administrative units, facilities of communication and public convenience.” A deviation of 10 percent plus or minus from the state or district average population is permissible where geography demands it.Draft proposals are published in the Gazette of India and in state gazettes, in at least two vernacular newspapers per state, with a deadline for public objections. Public sittings follow in each state. A final order, signed by the full commission, is then published. Copies are laid before the Lok Sabha and state assemblies, but — as the guidelines confirm — “no modification shall be permissible therein by them.” Parliament receives the orders. It cannot change them.The last such exercise, covering 28 states, took over six years from commission to final order.The courts cannot intervene — and whyThe insulation of delimitation from judicial review was definitively established in Meghraj Kothari vs Delimitation Commission (1967). The petitioner challenged a notification that converted his constituency, Ujjain, from a general to an SC-reserved seat, removing his right to contest it. The Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissed the petition on the short ground that Article 329(a) barred any such challenge. The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal.The court held that delimitation commission orders, once published in the Gazette, carry the same force as law made by Parliament itself under Article 327. The practical reasoning was explicit: if such orders could be challenged in courts, “any voter, if he so wished, could hold up an election indefinitely by questioning the delimitation of the constituencies from court to court.” Section 10(2) of the Delimitation Commission Act reinforced this — every such order “shall have the force of law and shall not be called in question in any court.”This does not mean all constitutional questions are foreclosed. Whether Parliament had authority to enact a particular enabling statute, or whether a commission exceeded its mandate, remains theoretically arguable in narrow circumstances. But courts have historically exercised great deference in this space, and the constitutional design strongly discourages litigation that would delay elections.What happens nextThe defeated bill has not resolved the underlying questions–it has deferred them. The census itself is overdue. Scheduled for 2021, it was delayed by the pandemic and houselisting of census has been started this year. The ‘caste census’–which was accepted by the government after opposition parties demanded it–will be done in the second phase. Without published census figures, the constitutional trigger under Article 82 cannot fire. Whether it will be completed in time to enable delimitation before the 2029 general election is uncertain.If delimitation proceeds, Parliament will determine what form it takes. An expansion of the House, constitutionally permissible, could soften proportional losses for southern states while meeting the women’s reservation mandate. A full population-based reallocation within the existing 543-seat cap would produce the gains and losses that drove this week’s confrontation. A further extension of the freeze remains a third option.The bill defeated in Parliament had proposed to strip Article 82 of its mandatory character, giving Parliament discretion over both timing and census data. That change is now off the table. But the underlying tension — between the democratic principle that each citizen’s vote should count equally, and the federal principle that states should not be penalised for effective governance — has not been resolved. It has been sent back to Parliament, and to the constitutional negotiation that will have to happen before 2029.Delimitation has never been purely about constituency boundaries. It is India’s recurring constitutional effort to reconcile two things that periodically fall out of alignment: the democratic imperative that every citizen’s vote count equally, and the federal imperative that the compact between states remain intact.The freeze of 1976 resolved that tension by choosing federation over arithmetic. The 84th amendment of 2001 extended that choice for another quarter-century. What happens after 2026 will define which principle governs India’s political geography for decades to comeEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosManipur Streets Erupt As Security Forces Fire Tear Gas On Protesters | WatchManipur Horror: Retired Soldier Among Two Shot Dead In Ukhrul Highway AttackWhat We Know About Indian Ships Hit In Hormuz Strait By Iran Gunboats And Unknown ProjectilePakistan Clears Bn UAE Debt As Saudi Extends Bn Deposit TermPakistan Army Chief Asim Munir Under US Scanner, Flagged As Risk For Trump Team’Our Relationship Very Strong’: Iran’s Abdul Majid On Hormuz Firing Incident On Indian VesselsCong, TMC, DMK Guilty’, PM Modi Blasts Oppn For Blocking Women Reservation BillIndia Summons Iran Envoy Summoned After Ships Targeted In Strait of Hormuz | WatchWomen’s Reservation Amendment Fails In Lok Sabha, Delimitation Bill Put On HoldYogi Adityanath Alleges ‘Identity Crisis’ In Bengal, Targets TMC Over Governance123PhotostoriesHow to stop rice flour roti from cracking: 5 proven home tips to make soft and puffed rotiAs Deepika Padukone and Ranveer Singh announce second pregnancy, a look at Bollywood’s cutest pregnancy announcementsInside Cristiano Ronaldo and Georgina Rodríguez’s parenting style: How they’re raising grounded, disciplined teen sons7 factors driving property price growth in Indian metro citiesFrom lotus feet darshan to reopening of Gangotri Temple: 5 rare spiritual journeys to experience this Akshaya TritiyaSamay Raina reveals financial struggles after India’s Got Latent controversy; says, ‘I lost everything, I feared going broke and in debt’Why Mumbai’s Churchgate–Virar, CSMT–Kalyan routes are being considered for underground shiftBaby names inspired by everyday qualities parents quietly admireWorm or snake? Woman finds a crawly inside a cabbage: FSSAI’s safety guidelines on how to clean veggies and fruits‘Bigg Boss Marathi Season 6’: From Raqesh Bapat-Vishal Kotian’s ugly clash to Rakhi Sawant’s fiery face-offs, moments that defined the season123Hot PicksIran warDelimitation Bill DefeatPurple cap winnerOrange cap winnerIPL Points TablePublic holidays April 2026Bank Holidays AprilTop TrendingIPL Orange Cap 2026VijayPM Modi LiveWorld Largest EconomySue BirdIce SpicePahalgam Pony Wallah StoryWomen Quota BillE Coli Smuggling CaseErika Kirk Event

. NEW DELHI: Parliament has voted down the government’s proposal to expand the Lok Sabha from 543 to 850 seats, implement 33% reservation for women, and redraw constituencies accordingly, but the defeat has not closed the issue. If anything, it has exposed how a once-technical constitutional mechanism has become one of the most consequential unresolved questions in electoral politics.It is important to note that the Women’s Reservation Act 2023, which provides for a 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state legislative assemblies, came into force on April 16, 2026 amid the ongoing debate on proposed bills.The opposition was unambiguous about these bills. “This defeat is not of women’s quota but of delimitation by the backdoor,” said Revolutionary Socialist PartyMP N K Premachandran. Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav called it a “defeat of BJP’s malice.” Trinamool Congress, whose 21 MPs had been urgently mobilised by the INDIA bloc, proved critical to the margin. After the vote, Congress’s Rahul Gandhi spoke personally with TMC’s Abhishek Banerjee to thank him for the support.Congress’s Priyanka Gandhi Vadra was direct: “PM Modi maliciously linked women’s quota to delimitation based on the 2011 census. His hollow attempt to pose as the messiah of women has failed today.”CPI MP Sandosh Kumar put the charge differently- that women should “see through BJP’s approach of delaying women’s quota by linking it to the census and delimitation.”On the government side, home minister Amit Shah, as the bill’s fate became clear, offered to adjourn the House and return with an amended bill. “I have the amendment prepared,” he said, pressing the government’s commitment to the 50% seat expansion. Prime Minister Narendra Modi made a final appeal before voting, asking MPs to “reflect on your conscience” and act on behalf of women across the country.The bill failed. Two related pieces of legislation, including the one to set up a delimitation commission, were not tabled in the Rajya Sabha. Parliament was adjourned.What government proposedThe government’s plan was architecturally different from any previous delimitation exercise. Its central proposal was to increase total Lok Sabha seats by 50%, from 543 to 850, while keeping each state’s proportional share of seats unchanged. Uttar Pradesh, which currently holds 80 seats, would have received 120; Tamil Nadu, with 39, would have received 58 or thereabouts.The mechanism for women’s reservation flowed from this expansion. If every state’s seats increased by 50%, one-third of the new total — 33% — could be reserved for women, equalling precisely the one-third of the expanded total. The arithmetic was designed to be self-contained: no state would lose share, and the reservation obligation would be met without redistributing existing seats.The proposed delimitation commission, as described in the bill circulated to lawmakers, would be headed by a former Supreme Court judge, with the chief election commissioner or a nominee as a member, consistent with past practice.The exercise for the Lok Sabha, government sources made clear, was to be delinked from the 2011 census. Constituency boundaries would be redrawn; the proportional shares of states in the Lok Sabha would not change. In that structural sense, it was closer to the 2008 delimitation exercise than to the full reallocation exercises of 1952, 1963, or 1973. .Why opposition read it as threatThe bill’s legal architecture contained a provision that drew sustained fire. As Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy’s Swapnil Tripathi, lead at Charkha (Centre for Constitutional Law), explained: “Currently, Article 82 requires that delimitation of constituencies and readjustment of seats among states be undertaken after completion of every census, using population data of that census. The present bill removes this obligation and instead leaves it to parliament to determine both timing of delimitation and census to be used for the exercise. Importantly, this transforms what was a constitutional obligation into a matter of legislative discretion.”That shift from constitutional mandate to parliamentary choice was the provision that most alarmed critics. It would have allowed parliament to decide, at will, which census data to use and when to act, stripping Article 82 of its periodic, automatic character.Congress lead speakers Gaurav Gogoi and K C Venugopal accused the government of using women’s quota as “cover” for a larger electoral reengineering. Gogoi invoked the American term explicitly- BJP was using delimitation “like gerrymandering in the US, where seats are redrawn for political exploitation.” He pointed to what he called precedents in Jammu & Kashmir, where a delimitation commission used census 2011, and in Assam, where the election commission used census 2001, bypassing norms of geographical contiguity and uniformity. “What was done in Assam and J&K, government wants to do it in the entire country,” he said.DMK chief M K Stalin, who had led protests in Tamil Nadu, said his party’s concern was squarely about delimitation–”which requires careful thought to ensure it is fair, especially for southern states.” He said the government should have delinked women’s reservation from delimitation entirely.Congress challenged the government to implement women’s reservation immediately in the existing 543-seat House without linking it to census or delimitation. The government declined. .Stakes for southern statesThe underlying anxiety that animated the southern bloc is rooted in demography and mathematics that are not in dispute.India’s seat allocation in the Lok Sabha has not been updated since 1977. It rests on the 1971 census. In the five decades since, population growth has been sharply uneven. Northern states Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan grew faster. Southern states Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh invested earlier in public health and fertility reduction, and their populations stabilised sooner.Based on 2011 census data, Tamil Nadu has a population of approximately 7 crore and sends 39 MPs to the Lok Sabha. Uttar Pradesh has a population of roughly 20 crore, nearly three times as large, and sends 80. A Tamil Nadu MP represents approximately 18 lakh voters; and a UP MP represents approximately 25 lakh.Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy’s research quantifies what a strict population-based delimitation could produce: going by projected 2026 population, Tamil Nadu could fall to 31 Lok Sabha seats while Uttar Pradesh could rise to 90. More populous northern states have reason to argue their representation has been frozen unjustly. But southern states–which implemented family planning successfully, raised literacy, and reduced fertility–fear they are being penalised for effective governance.The government’s expansion plans–keeping proportional shares frozen while growing the overall House–was presented precisely as the resolution to this conflict. Each state keeps its share; all states gain seats; women get their quota. Critics, however, argued that the real issue was not the immediate arithmetic of the current bill, but the constitutional discretion it would have created for all future delimitation exercises. .What delimitation actually meansThe word is used loosely in political debate to describe three distinct processes. The first is the allocation of seats among states — how many of the Lok Sabha’s total seats each state receives. This is the most consequential dimension and the one frozen since 1977. The second is the redrawing of constituency boundaries within states — carving a state’s allotted seats into geographic units of roughly equal population. The third is the reservation of specific constituencies for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, placed in areas where those communities form the largest share of the local population.These three processes have different constitutional triggers and very different political stakes. The 2008 delimitation exercise, for instance, redrew boundaries within states using 2001 Census data — but left the inter-state seat distribution entirely untouched. The current debate is almost entirely about the first category, which has not moved in over five decades.The Constitutional frameworkThe architecture begins with Article 81 — seats in the Lok Sabha shall be allocated broadly in proportion to state populations. Article 82 mandates that upon completion of each census, allocation and constituency division shall be readjusted by such authority as Parliament may by law determine. Article 170 mirrors this for state assemblies.Article 327 empowers Parliament to make laws on all matters relating to elections, including delimitation. Article 329(a) removes courts from the picture: the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constituencies or the allotment of seats “shall not be called in question in any court.”The original design was automatic: every census triggered a readjustment, keeping representation tethered to population. It was a commitment to equal citizenship — one person, one vote, one value.The Freeze: Why it happenedIn 1976, the 42nd constitutional amendment suspended inter-state seat revision until after the 2001 census, freezing Lok Sabha seats at 543. The stated rationale was protective — states that had successfully implemented family planning should not be penalised in representation relative to faster-growing states.In 2001, the 84th constitutional amendment extended the freeze to the first census after 2026. The delimitation commission’s own guidelines, issued in 2002 under Secretary Shangara Ram, recorded the consequence plainly: “the total number of existing seats as allocated to various states in the House of the people on the basis of 1971 census shall remain unaltered till the first census to be taken after the year 2026.”The 87th constitutional amendment (2003) permitted a partial exercise using 2001 data — constituency boundaries within states could be redrawn, and SC/ST reserved seat calculations updated — without altering state-wise seat totals. The 2008 delimitation order resulted from this partial exercise. It redrew boundaries. It did not reallocate seats. India has now operated under 1971 population figures for over five decades. .How a delimitation exercise proceedsWhen the next exercise is triggered, it will follow a structured, multi-stage procedure documented in the delimitation commission’s official guidelines.Parliament first enacts a new delimitation act — each exercise requires fresh legislation, and the old act is repealed. The Union government then constitutes a delimitation commission, chaired by a retired Supreme Court judge, with the chief election commissioner and relevant state election commissioners as ex-officio members. For each state, the commission associates five MPs and five MLAs as nominated members. These associate members can attend hearings, consult on working papers, and submit dissenting notes. They cannot vote. They cannot block final orders.The commission then prepares working papers covering district-wise population data, seat entitlements, SC/ST population distributions, and proposed constituency boundaries. Guidelines specify that constituencies must be “geographically compact areas” with regard to “physical features, existing boundaries of administrative units, facilities of communication and public convenience.” A deviation of 10 percent plus or minus from the state or district average population is permissible where geography demands it.Draft proposals are published in the Gazette of India and in state gazettes, in at least two vernacular newspapers per state, with a deadline for public objections. Public sittings follow in each state. A final order, signed by the full commission, is then published. Copies are laid before the Lok Sabha and state assemblies, but — as the guidelines confirm — “no modification shall be permissible therein by them.” Parliament receives the orders. It cannot change them.The last such exercise, covering 28 states, took over six years from commission to final order.The courts cannot intervene — and whyThe insulation of delimitation from judicial review was definitively established in Meghraj Kothari vs Delimitation Commission (1967). The petitioner challenged a notification that converted his constituency, Ujjain, from a general to an SC-reserved seat, removing his right to contest it. The Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissed the petition on the short ground that Article 329(a) barred any such challenge. The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal.The court held that delimitation commission orders, once published in the Gazette, carry the same force as law made by Parliament itself under Article 327. The practical reasoning was explicit: if such orders could be challenged in courts, “any voter, if he so wished, could hold up an election indefinitely by questioning the delimitation of the constituencies from court to court.” Section 10(2) of the Delimitation Commission Act reinforced this — every such order “shall have the force of law and shall not be called in question in any court.”This does not mean all constitutional questions are foreclosed. Whether Parliament had authority to enact a particular enabling statute, or whether a commission exceeded its mandate, remains theoretically arguable in narrow circumstances. But courts have historically exercised great deference in this space, and the constitutional design strongly discourages litigation that would delay elections.What happens nextThe defeated bill has not resolved the underlying questions–it has deferred them. The census itself is overdue. Scheduled for 2021, it was delayed by the pandemic and houselisting of census has been started this year. The ‘caste census’–which was accepted by the government after opposition parties demanded it–will be done in the second phase. Without published census figures, the constitutional trigger under Article 82 cannot fire. Whether it will be completed in time to enable delimitation before the 2029 general election is uncertain.If delimitation proceeds, Parliament will determine what form it takes. An expansion of the House, constitutionally permissible, could soften proportional losses for southern states while meeting the women’s reservation mandate. A full population-based reallocation within the existing 543-seat cap would produce the gains and losses that drove this week’s confrontation. A further extension of the freeze remains a third option.The bill defeated in Parliament had proposed to strip Article 82 of its mandatory character, giving Parliament discretion over both timing and census data. That change is now off the table. But the underlying tension — between the democratic principle that each citizen’s vote should count equally, and the federal principle that states should not be penalised for effective governance — has not been resolved. It has been sent back to Parliament, and to the constitutional negotiation that will have to happen before 2029.Delimitation has never been purely about constituency boundaries. It is India’s recurring constitutional effort to reconcile two things that periodically fall out of alignment: the democratic imperative that every citizen’s vote count equally, and the federal imperative that the compact between states remain intact.The freeze of 1976 resolved that tension by choosing federation over arithmetic. The 84th amendment of 2001 extended that choice for another quarter-century. What happens after 2026 will define which principle governs India’s political geography for decades to comeEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosManipur Streets Erupt As Security Forces Fire Tear Gas On Protesters | WatchManipur Horror: Retired Soldier Among Two Shot Dead In Ukhrul Highway AttackWhat We Know About Indian Ships Hit In Hormuz Strait By Iran Gunboats And Unknown ProjectilePakistan Clears $2Bn UAE Debt As Saudi Extends $3Bn Deposit TermPakistan Army Chief Asim Munir Under US Scanner, Flagged As Risk For Trump Team’Our Relationship Very Strong’: Iran’s Abdul Majid On Hormuz Firing Incident On Indian VesselsCong, TMC, DMK Guilty’, PM Modi Blasts Oppn For Blocking Women Reservation BillIndia Summons Iran Envoy Summoned After Ships Targeted In Strait of Hormuz | WatchWomen’s Reservation Amendment Fails In Lok Sabha, Delimitation Bill Put On HoldYogi Adityanath Alleges ‘Identity Crisis’ In Bengal, Targets TMC Over Governance123PhotostoriesHow to stop rice flour roti from cracking: 5 proven home tips to make soft and puffed rotiAs Deepika Padukone and Ranveer Singh announce second pregnancy, a look at Bollywood’s cutest pregnancy announcementsInside Cristiano Ronaldo and Georgina Rodríguez’s parenting style: How they’re raising grounded, disciplined teen sons7 factors driving property price growth in Indian metro citiesFrom lotus feet darshan to reopening of Gangotri Temple: 5 rare spiritual journeys to experience this Akshaya TritiyaSamay Raina reveals financial struggles after India’s Got Latent controversy; says, ‘I lost everything, I feared going broke and in debt’Why Mumbai’s Churchgate–Virar, CSMT–Kalyan routes are being considered for underground shiftBaby names inspired by everyday qualities parents quietly admireWorm or snake? Woman finds a crawly inside a cabbage: FSSAI’s safety guidelines on how to clean veggies and fruits‘Bigg Boss Marathi Season 6’: From Raqesh Bapat-Vishal Kotian’s ugly clash to Rakhi Sawant’s fiery face-offs, moments that defined the season123Hot PicksIran warDelimitation Bill DefeatPurple cap winnerOrange cap winnerIPL Points TablePublic holidays April 2026Bank Holidays AprilTop TrendingIPL Orange Cap 2026VijayPM Modi LiveWorld Largest EconomySue BirdIce SpicePahalgam Pony Wallah StoryWomen Quota BillE Coli Smuggling CaseErika Kirk Event

Vamsikrishna 0
Prime Minister Narendra Modi and West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee (File photo) The 2026 West Bengal Assembly election is once again being fought not just on governance, welfare, or corruption, but on something far more visceral. The identity. As the campaign sharpens, the familiar charge of “bohiragoto” has returned to the centre of the political stage, with the All India Trinamool Congress (TMC) reviving a narrative that helped it decisively blunt the rise of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) five years ago. The immediate trigger this time, as seen in the reaction to Leander Paes joining the BJP, shows how quickly the labels are deployed as “outsider, parachuted, not one of us”.But if the TMC has revived the “outsider” charge, the BJP in 2026 is attempting to respond with a different line of argument rather than engaging only in denial. The party has increasingly foregrounded the issue of illegal infiltration, alleging that the state government has been “lenient” towards undocumented migrants and that this has implications for Bengal’s demographic and cultural landscape.From the BJP’s perspective, this shifts the debate from whether it is an “outsider” political force to a broader question of who constitutes an “outsider” within Bengal itself. The TMC, however, has rejected these claims and framed them as “politically motivated”, maintaining that the BJP is raising such concerns to counter the perception of being culturally disconnected from the state. This marks a significant evolution in the insider-outsider politics of Bengal or or “bhadralok vs bohiragoto” narrative.The insider versus outsider framing did not originate in 2026, but the 2021 West Bengal Assembly elections marked its most effective deployment. Faced with an aggressive BJP expansion, CM Mamata Banerjee transformed what could have been a standard anti-incumbency battle into a referendum on identity. Her message was simple and politically potent that Bengal must be governed by those who belong to it.The 2021 slogan “Bangla Nijer Meyekei Chay” reframed the contest as belonging versus intrusion. The BJP, led prominently in the state campaign by figures like Narendra Modi and Amit Shah, was cast as an external force attempting to capture Bengal politically and culturally.The BJP did have a growing base in Bengal and several Bengali leaders, but the visibility of central leadership and the party’s campaign style allowed the TMC to successfully construct the image of an “outsider party”.The results of 2021 reinforced its effectiveness. The TMC returned to power with a commanding mandate, and the outsider narrative was widely seen as one of the factors that consolidated support across regions and demographics. However, what has changed in 2026 is the BJP’s strategic response.Instead of only asserting its local credentials, the BJP is reframing the identity debate around demographics and citizenship. It has consistently accused the TMC of accommodating illegal immigrants, particularly from neighbouring Bangladesh, and argued that this is altering the cultural and electoral character of the state. In this telling, the question is no longer whether the BJP is an outsider, but whether Bengal itself is being transformed from within.The argument maybe politically loaded but it appears BJP has been trying to reposition itself not as an external force, but as a “protector” of Bengali identity as the party has claimed that unchecked infiltration would dilute local culture, strain resources, and reshape voting patterns, and that the TMC’s alleged tolerance of this process is “driven by vote-bank politics”.In a direct inversion of the TMC’s framing where Mamata Banerjee positions herself as the defender of Bengal against outsiders from Delhi, the BJP positions itself as the defender of Bengal against outsiders crossing the border.Alongside this, the BJP has also sharpened its argument to counter the “outsider party” label. It frequently invoked Syama Prasad Mukherjee, the founder of the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, the ideological predecessor of the BJP, who was himself a Bengali and a prominent figure in the state’s political history. By doing so, the BJP attempts to anchor its legitimacy within Bengal’s own political lineage.This may just not be symbolic. It is also an attempt by the BJP to counter the TMC’s framing by pointing to its ideological lineage, including figures like Syama Prasad Mukherjee, who was from Bengal. The argument, as put forward by the party’s local unit, is that its roots are not entirely external to the state, even if its current leadership and structure are national in character.At the same time, the BJP has sought to localise its campaign more carefully than in 2021, placing greater emphasis on Bengali leadership, cultural references, and region-specific messaging. This reflects an acknowledgement that electoral contests in West Bengal are shaped significantly by perceptions of cultural familiarity and regional connect.Even so, a structural tension persists. The BJP’s political model is anchored in a strong central leadership and a national identity, while West Bengal’s political culture has historically responded more strongly to regional idioms and locally rooted leadership. Managing this balance remains an ongoing challenge for the party.Fish-ing for votesIn the polls, even food has become a flashpoint in the 2026 campaign. CM Mamata Banerjee has alleged the BJP could restrict fish, meat and egg consumption, framing it as a threat to Bengali culture. The BJP has rejected this, with leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi, countering the claims and making visible efforts to signal alignment with local food traditions.In Pandaveswar, BJP candidate Jitendra Nath Tiwari filed nomination papers with a “fish procession,” supporters carrying baskets while he held a large one. He said, “If promoting West Bengal’s culture is drama, I am proud of this drama.” CM Mamata BanerjeeThe TMC, for its part, has continued with its established framing. It emphasises language, culture, and lifestyle as markers of identity, and often questions whether the BJP’s political approach aligns with Bengal’s social and cultural context. Issues such as food habits, language use, and everyday practices are frequently invoked to underline this distinction.What makes the 2026 contest particularly notable is that both narratives are now operating simultaneously. The TMC continues to portray the BJP as an external political force, while the BJP raises concerns around illegal infiltration and its potential impact, arguing that this too is a question of identity and belonging. The TMC, however, rejects these claims and characterises them as politically motivated.The result is a layered identity debate, where the idea of an “outsider” is being defined in different ways. For voters, the choice is not only between two parties, but also between competing interpretations of belonging and representation.The outsider questionThis dynamic is not entirely unique to West Bengal, though its intensity here is distinctive.In Maharashtra, for instance, the politics of regional identity has long been associated with the Shiv Sena, which built support around the idea of protecting local interests against migrants. While the context differs, the broader linkage between identity and political legitimacy is similar.In Tamil Nadu, parties such as the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam have historically foregrounded language and regional identity, often positioning themselves against perceived cultural imposition from outside the state.Assam presents another variation, where debates around migration and citizenship have played a central role in shaping political discourse and electoral outcomes.Narrative vs strategyWhat sets West Bengal apart is the extent to which cultural identity and electoral strategy have become intertwined. The debate extends beyond economics or migration to include language, literature, food, and a broader sense of cultural self-definition. This helps explain why the narrative continues to hold relevance in 2026.The episode involving Leander Paes also highlights how fluid the definition of “insider” can be within this context. Despite his long-standing association with Kolkata, his political shift prompted questions about belonging, underscoring how identity in political discourse can be shaped by alignment as much as by background.The BJP’s emphasis on infiltration introduces an additional dimension to the debate, adding to the existing insider-outsider framing rather than replacing it. This has broadened the conversation from political identity to questions of demography and governance, even as these claims remain contested.As voters head to the polls, this layered contest is likely to influence perceptions alongside more traditional issues such as employment, development, and law and order. Both parties appear to be combining identity-based messaging with policy-oriented promises.Over the past decade, one consistent feature of West Bengal’s politics has been the centrality of belonging in electoral discourse.In 2026, that contest over belonging continues, shaped by competing narratives and evolving political strategies.About the AuthorRajeev SinghRajeev Singh is a Digital Content Producer with The Times of India. He covers politics, policies, defence, and conflicts for readers curious to know their implications. He loves digging into legal maxims and political trivia. On off days, when not turning pages or learning русский, he lives in the reverie of “what ifs” and “how abouts.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosManipur Streets Erupt As Security Forces Fire Tear Gas On Protesters | WatchManipur Horror: Retired Soldier Among Two Shot Dead In Ukhrul Highway AttackWhat We Know About Indian Ships Hit In Hormuz Strait By Iran Gunboats And Unknown ProjectilePakistan Clears Bn UAE Debt As Saudi Extends Bn Deposit TermPakistan Army Chief Asim Munir Under US Scanner, Flagged As Risk For Trump Team’Our Relationship Very Strong’: Iran’s Abdul Majid On Hormuz Firing Incident On Indian VesselsCong, TMC, DMK Guilty’, PM Modi Blasts Oppn For Blocking Women Reservation BillIndia Summons Iran Envoy Summoned After Ships Targeted In Strait of Hormuz | WatchWomen’s Reservation Amendment Fails In Lok Sabha, Delimitation Bill Put On HoldYogi Adityanath Alleges ‘Identity Crisis’ In Bengal, Targets TMC Over Governance123PhotostoriesAs Deepika Padukone and Ranveer Singh announce second pregnancy, a look at Bollywood’s cutest pregnancy announcementsInside Cristiano Ronaldo and Georgina Rodríguez’s parenting style: How they’re raising grounded, disciplined teen sons7 factors driving property price growth in Indian metro citiesFrom lotus feet darshan to reopening of Gangotri Temple: 5 rare spiritual journeys to experience this Akshaya TritiyaSamay Raina reveals financial struggles after India’s Got Latent controversy; says, ‘I lost everything, I feared going broke and in debt’Why Mumbai’s Churchgate–Virar, CSMT–Kalyan routes are being considered for underground shiftBaby names inspired by everyday qualities parents quietly admireWorm or snake? Woman finds a crawly inside a cabbage: FSSAI’s safety guidelines on how to clean veggies and fruits‘Bigg Boss Marathi Season 6’: From Raqesh Bapat-Vishal Kotian’s ugly clash to Rakhi Sawant’s fiery face-offs, moments that defined the seasonInside Anil Kumble’s crores worth Bangalore villa: A thoughtfully designed abode with lush gardens, sunlit interiors and family living123Hot PicksIran warDelimitation Bill DefeatPurple cap winnerOrange cap winnerIPL Points TablePublic holidays April 2026Bank Holidays AprilTop TrendingIPL Orange Cap 2026VijayPM Modi LiveWorld Largest EconomySue BirdIce SpicePahalgam Pony Wallah StoryWomen Quota BillE Coli Smuggling CaseErika Kirk Event

Prime Minister Narendra Modi and West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee (File photo) The 2026 West Bengal Assembly election is once again being fought not just on governance, welfare, or corruption, but on something far more visceral. The identity. As the campaign sharpens, the familiar charge of “bohiragoto” has returned to the centre of the political stage, with the All India Trinamool Congress (TMC) reviving a narrative that helped it decisively blunt the rise of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) five years ago. The immediate trigger this time, as seen in the reaction to Leander Paes joining the BJP, shows how quickly the labels are deployed as “outsider, parachuted, not one of us”.But if the TMC has revived the “outsider” charge, the BJP in 2026 is attempting to respond with a different line of argument rather than engaging only in denial. The party has increasingly foregrounded the issue of illegal infiltration, alleging that the state government has been “lenient” towards undocumented migrants and that this has implications for Bengal’s demographic and cultural landscape.From the BJP’s perspective, this shifts the debate from whether it is an “outsider” political force to a broader question of who constitutes an “outsider” within Bengal itself. The TMC, however, has rejected these claims and framed them as “politically motivated”, maintaining that the BJP is raising such concerns to counter the perception of being culturally disconnected from the state. This marks a significant evolution in the insider-outsider politics of Bengal or or “bhadralok vs bohiragoto” narrative.The insider versus outsider framing did not originate in 2026, but the 2021 West Bengal Assembly elections marked its most effective deployment. Faced with an aggressive BJP expansion, CM Mamata Banerjee transformed what could have been a standard anti-incumbency battle into a referendum on identity. Her message was simple and politically potent that Bengal must be governed by those who belong to it.The 2021 slogan “Bangla Nijer Meyekei Chay” reframed the contest as belonging versus intrusion. The BJP, led prominently in the state campaign by figures like Narendra Modi and Amit Shah, was cast as an external force attempting to capture Bengal politically and culturally.The BJP did have a growing base in Bengal and several Bengali leaders, but the visibility of central leadership and the party’s campaign style allowed the TMC to successfully construct the image of an “outsider party”.The results of 2021 reinforced its effectiveness. The TMC returned to power with a commanding mandate, and the outsider narrative was widely seen as one of the factors that consolidated support across regions and demographics. However, what has changed in 2026 is the BJP’s strategic response.Instead of only asserting its local credentials, the BJP is reframing the identity debate around demographics and citizenship. It has consistently accused the TMC of accommodating illegal immigrants, particularly from neighbouring Bangladesh, and argued that this is altering the cultural and electoral character of the state. In this telling, the question is no longer whether the BJP is an outsider, but whether Bengal itself is being transformed from within.The argument maybe politically loaded but it appears BJP has been trying to reposition itself not as an external force, but as a “protector” of Bengali identity as the party has claimed that unchecked infiltration would dilute local culture, strain resources, and reshape voting patterns, and that the TMC’s alleged tolerance of this process is “driven by vote-bank politics”.In a direct inversion of the TMC’s framing where Mamata Banerjee positions herself as the defender of Bengal against outsiders from Delhi, the BJP positions itself as the defender of Bengal against outsiders crossing the border.Alongside this, the BJP has also sharpened its argument to counter the “outsider party” label. It frequently invoked Syama Prasad Mukherjee, the founder of the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, the ideological predecessor of the BJP, who was himself a Bengali and a prominent figure in the state’s political history. By doing so, the BJP attempts to anchor its legitimacy within Bengal’s own political lineage.This may just not be symbolic. It is also an attempt by the BJP to counter the TMC’s framing by pointing to its ideological lineage, including figures like Syama Prasad Mukherjee, who was from Bengal. The argument, as put forward by the party’s local unit, is that its roots are not entirely external to the state, even if its current leadership and structure are national in character.At the same time, the BJP has sought to localise its campaign more carefully than in 2021, placing greater emphasis on Bengali leadership, cultural references, and region-specific messaging. This reflects an acknowledgement that electoral contests in West Bengal are shaped significantly by perceptions of cultural familiarity and regional connect.Even so, a structural tension persists. The BJP’s political model is anchored in a strong central leadership and a national identity, while West Bengal’s political culture has historically responded more strongly to regional idioms and locally rooted leadership. Managing this balance remains an ongoing challenge for the party.Fish-ing for votesIn the polls, even food has become a flashpoint in the 2026 campaign. CM Mamata Banerjee has alleged the BJP could restrict fish, meat and egg consumption, framing it as a threat to Bengali culture. The BJP has rejected this, with leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi, countering the claims and making visible efforts to signal alignment with local food traditions.In Pandaveswar, BJP candidate Jitendra Nath Tiwari filed nomination papers with a “fish procession,” supporters carrying baskets while he held a large one. He said, “If promoting West Bengal’s culture is drama, I am proud of this drama.” CM Mamata BanerjeeThe TMC, for its part, has continued with its established framing. It emphasises language, culture, and lifestyle as markers of identity, and often questions whether the BJP’s political approach aligns with Bengal’s social and cultural context. Issues such as food habits, language use, and everyday practices are frequently invoked to underline this distinction.What makes the 2026 contest particularly notable is that both narratives are now operating simultaneously. The TMC continues to portray the BJP as an external political force, while the BJP raises concerns around illegal infiltration and its potential impact, arguing that this too is a question of identity and belonging. The TMC, however, rejects these claims and characterises them as politically motivated.The result is a layered identity debate, where the idea of an “outsider” is being defined in different ways. For voters, the choice is not only between two parties, but also between competing interpretations of belonging and representation.The outsider questionThis dynamic is not entirely unique to West Bengal, though its intensity here is distinctive.In Maharashtra, for instance, the politics of regional identity has long been associated with the Shiv Sena, which built support around the idea of protecting local interests against migrants. While the context differs, the broader linkage between identity and political legitimacy is similar.In Tamil Nadu, parties such as the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam have historically foregrounded language and regional identity, often positioning themselves against perceived cultural imposition from outside the state.Assam presents another variation, where debates around migration and citizenship have played a central role in shaping political discourse and electoral outcomes.Narrative vs strategyWhat sets West Bengal apart is the extent to which cultural identity and electoral strategy have become intertwined. The debate extends beyond economics or migration to include language, literature, food, and a broader sense of cultural self-definition. This helps explain why the narrative continues to hold relevance in 2026.The episode involving Leander Paes also highlights how fluid the definition of “insider” can be within this context. Despite his long-standing association with Kolkata, his political shift prompted questions about belonging, underscoring how identity in political discourse can be shaped by alignment as much as by background.The BJP’s emphasis on infiltration introduces an additional dimension to the debate, adding to the existing insider-outsider framing rather than replacing it. This has broadened the conversation from political identity to questions of demography and governance, even as these claims remain contested.As voters head to the polls, this layered contest is likely to influence perceptions alongside more traditional issues such as employment, development, and law and order. Both parties appear to be combining identity-based messaging with policy-oriented promises.Over the past decade, one consistent feature of West Bengal’s politics has been the centrality of belonging in electoral discourse.In 2026, that contest over belonging continues, shaped by competing narratives and evolving political strategies.About the AuthorRajeev SinghRajeev Singh is a Digital Content Producer with The Times of India. He covers politics, policies, defence, and conflicts for readers curious to know their implications. He loves digging into legal maxims and political trivia. On off days, when not turning pages or learning русский, he lives in the reverie of “what ifs” and “how abouts.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosManipur Streets Erupt As Security Forces Fire Tear Gas On Protesters | WatchManipur Horror: Retired Soldier Among Two Shot Dead In Ukhrul Highway AttackWhat We Know About Indian Ships Hit In Hormuz Strait By Iran Gunboats And Unknown ProjectilePakistan Clears $2Bn UAE Debt As Saudi Extends $3Bn Deposit TermPakistan Army Chief Asim Munir Under US Scanner, Flagged As Risk For Trump Team’Our Relationship Very Strong’: Iran’s Abdul Majid On Hormuz Firing Incident On Indian VesselsCong, TMC, DMK Guilty’, PM Modi Blasts Oppn For Blocking Women Reservation BillIndia Summons Iran Envoy Summoned After Ships Targeted In Strait of Hormuz | WatchWomen’s Reservation Amendment Fails In Lok Sabha, Delimitation Bill Put On HoldYogi Adityanath Alleges ‘Identity Crisis’ In Bengal, Targets TMC Over Governance123PhotostoriesAs Deepika Padukone and Ranveer Singh announce second pregnancy, a look at Bollywood’s cutest pregnancy announcementsInside Cristiano Ronaldo and Georgina Rodríguez’s parenting style: How they’re raising grounded, disciplined teen sons7 factors driving property price growth in Indian metro citiesFrom lotus feet darshan to reopening of Gangotri Temple: 5 rare spiritual journeys to experience this Akshaya TritiyaSamay Raina reveals financial struggles after India’s Got Latent controversy; says, ‘I lost everything, I feared going broke and in debt’Why Mumbai’s Churchgate–Virar, CSMT–Kalyan routes are being considered for underground shiftBaby names inspired by everyday qualities parents quietly admireWorm or snake? Woman finds a crawly inside a cabbage: FSSAI’s safety guidelines on how to clean veggies and fruits‘Bigg Boss Marathi Season 6’: From Raqesh Bapat-Vishal Kotian’s ugly clash to Rakhi Sawant’s fiery face-offs, moments that defined the seasonInside Anil Kumble’s crores worth Bangalore villa: A thoughtfully designed abode with lush gardens, sunlit interiors and family living123Hot PicksIran warDelimitation Bill DefeatPurple cap winnerOrange cap winnerIPL Points TablePublic holidays April 2026Bank Holidays AprilTop TrendingIPL Orange Cap 2026VijayPM Modi LiveWorld Largest EconomySue BirdIce SpicePahalgam Pony Wallah StoryWomen Quota BillE Coli Smuggling CaseErika Kirk Event

Vamsikrishna 0
‘MK Stalin wants to make his son CM’: Amit Shah slams DMK dynasty politics NEW DELHI: Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Sunday intensified the BJP’s campaign in Tamil Nadu with a high-profile roadshow in the Modakurichi Assembly constituency, launching a blistering attack on the ruling DMK’s record on corruption and dynastic politics while expressing confidence in the NDA-AIADMK alliance’s prospects in the April 23 election.Campaigning for BJP candidate Kirthika Shivkumar, Shah vowed to clean up the state administration and alleged that Chief Minister M.K. Stalin’s primary objective was to secure power for the next generation of his family. Watch Women’s Reservation Amendment Fails In Lok Sabha, Delimitation Bill Put On Hold “Our government will end the DMK’s corruption,” Shah told supporters during the roadshow. “I want to appeal to ensure the victory of the NDA’s BJP candidate, Kirthika Shivkumar, with a landslide victory.”Nepotism and CorruptionA central theme of Shah’s address was the criticism of the DMK’s dynastic politics. He targeted Chief Minister M.K. Stalin, claiming his primary objective was to secure power for the next generation of his family. “MK Stalin wants to make his son (Udhayanidhi Stalin) the new Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu,” Shah alleged, noting the succession from M. Karunanidhi to M.K. Stalin, and now to Udhayanidhi. “This family nepotism will never do good for the people of Tamil Nadu,” he added.The Women’s Reservation TangleShah also used the platform to target the opposition on the issue of legislative representation for women. He accused both the Congress and the DMK of actively blocking progress and hindering Tamil Nadu’s growth in terms of parliamentary seats. “Congress and DMK stopped women from coming to Parliament, and they also declined the seat increment of Tamil Nadu,” he alleged.This came a day after Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, campaigning in the state, alleged that Prime Minister Modi and Amit Shah had “lied” to the nation about the Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill, claiming the “diabolical idea” hidden behind it was to change the electoral map and weaken southern states.NDA’s Show of UnityShah reaffirmed the strength of the partnership between the NDA and the AIADMK, projecting a victory for the alliance under the leadership of Edappadi K. Palaniswami . “We are confident of forming an NDA government here, together with the AIADMK, under the leadership of Edappadi Palaniswami,” Shah said.Tamil Nadu will go to the polls in a single phase on April 23, with counting scheduled for May 4. The main contest is expected between the DMK-led Secular Progressive Alliance, which includes the Congress, DMDK and VCK, and the NDA led by AIADMK, with the BJP and PMK as allies.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosManipur Horror: Retired Soldier Among Two Shot Dead In Ukhrul Highway AttackWhat We Know About Indian Ships Hit In Hormuz Strait By Iran Gunboats And Unknown ProjectilePakistan Clears Bn UAE Debt As Saudi Extends Bn Deposit TermPakistan Army Chief Asim Munir Under US Scanner, Flagged As Risk For Trump Team’Our Relationship Very Strong’: Iran’s Abdul Majid On Hormuz Firing Incident On Indian VesselsCong, TMC, DMK Guilty’, PM Modi Blasts Oppn For Blocking Women Reservation BillIndia Summons Iran Envoy Summoned After Ships Targeted In Strait of Hormuz | WatchWomen’s Reservation Amendment Fails In Lok Sabha, Delimitation Bill Put On HoldYogi Adityanath Alleges ‘Identity Crisis’ In Bengal, Targets TMC Over GovernanceBJP Leaders Protest Outside Rahul’s Residence Over Women Quota Bill; Hema Malini, Bansuri Lead123PhotostoriesSamay Raina reveals financial struggles after India’s Got Latent controversy; says, ‘I lost everything, I feared going broke and in debt’Why Mumbai’s Churchgate–Virar, CSMT–Kalyan routes are being considered for underground shiftBaby names inspired by everyday qualities parents quietly admireWorm or snake? Woman finds a crawly inside a cabbage: FSSAI’s safety guidelines on how to clean veggies and fruits‘Bigg Boss Marathi Season 6’: From Raqesh Bapat-Vishal Kotian’s ugly clash to Rakhi Sawant’s fiery face-offs, moments that defined the seasonInside Anil Kumble’s crores worth Bangalore villa: A thoughtfully designed abode with lush gardens, sunlit interiors and family livingWhy whale vomit is worth millions for humans150-km road network, 46km of flyovers, underpasses: Delhi plans major push to ease traffic congestionSandra Bullock’s best movies to watch on OTT: ‘Speed’, ‘Bird Box’ and moreDhurandhar actor Ranveer Singh loves this spread innovated in the 1940s: Here are 6 ways you can enjoy it too123Hot PicksIran warDelimitation Bill DefeatPurple cap winnerOrange cap winnerIPL Points TablePublic holidays April 2026Bank Holidays AprilTop TrendingIPL Orange Cap 2026VijayPM Modi LiveWorld Largest EconomySue BirdIce SpicePahalgam Pony Wallah StoryWomen Quota BillE Coli Smuggling CaseErika Kirk Event

‘MK Stalin wants to make his son CM’: Amit Shah slams DMK dynasty politics NEW DELHI: Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Sunday intensified the BJP’s campaign in Tamil Nadu with a high-profile roadshow in the Modakurichi Assembly constituency, launching a blistering attack on the ruling DMK’s record on corruption and dynastic politics while expressing confidence in the NDA-AIADMK alliance’s prospects in the April 23 election.Campaigning for BJP candidate Kirthika Shivkumar, Shah vowed to clean up the state administration and alleged that Chief Minister M.K. Stalin’s primary objective was to secure power for the next generation of his family. Watch Women’s Reservation Amendment Fails In Lok Sabha, Delimitation Bill Put On Hold “Our government will end the DMK’s corruption,” Shah told supporters during the roadshow. “I want to appeal to ensure the victory of the NDA’s BJP candidate, Kirthika Shivkumar, with a landslide victory.”Nepotism and CorruptionA central theme of Shah’s address was the criticism of the DMK’s dynastic politics. He targeted Chief Minister M.K. Stalin, claiming his primary objective was to secure power for the next generation of his family. “MK Stalin wants to make his son (Udhayanidhi Stalin) the new Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu,” Shah alleged, noting the succession from M. Karunanidhi to M.K. Stalin, and now to Udhayanidhi. “This family nepotism will never do good for the people of Tamil Nadu,” he added.The Women’s Reservation TangleShah also used the platform to target the opposition on the issue of legislative representation for women. He accused both the Congress and the DMK of actively blocking progress and hindering Tamil Nadu’s growth in terms of parliamentary seats. “Congress and DMK stopped women from coming to Parliament, and they also declined the seat increment of Tamil Nadu,” he alleged.This came a day after Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, campaigning in the state, alleged that Prime Minister Modi and Amit Shah had “lied” to the nation about the Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill, claiming the “diabolical idea” hidden behind it was to change the electoral map and weaken southern states.NDA’s Show of UnityShah reaffirmed the strength of the partnership between the NDA and the AIADMK, projecting a victory for the alliance under the leadership of Edappadi K. Palaniswami . “We are confident of forming an NDA government here, together with the AIADMK, under the leadership of Edappadi Palaniswami,” Shah said.Tamil Nadu will go to the polls in a single phase on April 23, with counting scheduled for May 4. The main contest is expected between the DMK-led Secular Progressive Alliance, which includes the Congress, DMDK and VCK, and the NDA led by AIADMK, with the BJP and PMK as allies.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosManipur Horror: Retired Soldier Among Two Shot Dead In Ukhrul Highway AttackWhat We Know About Indian Ships Hit In Hormuz Strait By Iran Gunboats And Unknown ProjectilePakistan Clears $2Bn UAE Debt As Saudi Extends $3Bn Deposit TermPakistan Army Chief Asim Munir Under US Scanner, Flagged As Risk For Trump Team’Our Relationship Very Strong’: Iran’s Abdul Majid On Hormuz Firing Incident On Indian VesselsCong, TMC, DMK Guilty’, PM Modi Blasts Oppn For Blocking Women Reservation BillIndia Summons Iran Envoy Summoned After Ships Targeted In Strait of Hormuz | WatchWomen’s Reservation Amendment Fails In Lok Sabha, Delimitation Bill Put On HoldYogi Adityanath Alleges ‘Identity Crisis’ In Bengal, Targets TMC Over GovernanceBJP Leaders Protest Outside Rahul’s Residence Over Women Quota Bill; Hema Malini, Bansuri Lead123PhotostoriesSamay Raina reveals financial struggles after India’s Got Latent controversy; says, ‘I lost everything, I feared going broke and in debt’Why Mumbai’s Churchgate–Virar, CSMT–Kalyan routes are being considered for underground shiftBaby names inspired by everyday qualities parents quietly admireWorm or snake? Woman finds a crawly inside a cabbage: FSSAI’s safety guidelines on how to clean veggies and fruits‘Bigg Boss Marathi Season 6’: From Raqesh Bapat-Vishal Kotian’s ugly clash to Rakhi Sawant’s fiery face-offs, moments that defined the seasonInside Anil Kumble’s crores worth Bangalore villa: A thoughtfully designed abode with lush gardens, sunlit interiors and family livingWhy whale vomit is worth millions for humans150-km road network, 46km of flyovers, underpasses: Delhi plans major push to ease traffic congestionSandra Bullock’s best movies to watch on OTT: ‘Speed’, ‘Bird Box’ and moreDhurandhar actor Ranveer Singh loves this spread innovated in the 1940s: Here are 6 ways you can enjoy it too123Hot PicksIran warDelimitation Bill DefeatPurple cap winnerOrange cap winnerIPL Points TablePublic holidays April 2026Bank Holidays AprilTop TrendingIPL Orange Cap 2026VijayPM Modi LiveWorld Largest EconomySue BirdIce SpicePahalgam Pony Wallah StoryWomen Quota BillE Coli Smuggling CaseErika Kirk Event

Vamsikrishna 0