Government proposes stricter anti-paper leak laws to safeguard against leaks NEW DELHI: Tightening the noose around individuals, service providers and organised gangs involved in paper leaks, the Centre has proposed longer jail terms, steeper fines, and time-bound investigation and disposal of trials and appeals.According to the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill circulated to Members of Parliament, the minimum jail term for offences committed by individuals, as well as directors, senior management personnel or persons in charge of service providers conducting public examinations, has been increased to three years. In cases involving organised crime, the minimum imprisonment has been proposed at seven years.CJP Jantar Mantar Protest UpdatesDharmendra Pradhan resigns as Union education minister amid massive student protests’We won’t go’: CJP’s Dipke says protests to continue till all demands metFresh clashes at Jantar Mantar after Pradhan’s exit; tear gas fired, stones peltedThe Bill proposes that any person resorting to unfair means or committing offences under the law shall be punished with imprisonment of at least five years, which may extend to 10 years, along with a fine of up to Rs 50 lakh.It also proposes that any service provider found guilty would face a fine of up to Rs 5 crore — a five-fold increase over the existing provision — and would be barred from conducting public examinations for eight years, compared with the current four-year debarment.If an investigation establishes that an offence was committed with the consent or connivance of any director, senior management personnel or person in charge of a service provider, such individuals would be liable to a minimum imprisonment of five years, extendable up to 10 years. The proposed maximum fine has also been increased from the existing Rs 1 crore to Rs 5 crore.Seeking to amend Section 11 of the 2024 Act dealing with organised crime, the Bill proposes that if a person or group of persons, including an examination authority, service provider or any other institution, commits an organised crime, the minimum jail term would be increased to eight years from the current five years. The maximum penalty would also be raised tenfold to Rs 10 crore.To ensure speedy investigations, the Bill proposes that the government may constitute a Central Investigation Agency or a Special Task Force (STF). Where an STF has been constituted, it would carry out the investigation. The Bill also seeks to insert a new provision mandating that every investigation be completed within two months.For faster trials, the Bill provides for day-to-day proceedings and empowers states to establish Special Fast Track Courts in consultation with the Chief Justice of the respective High Court. It mandates that trial proceedings shall continue on a day-to-day basis until all witnesses in attendance have been examined.The Special Fast Track Courts would be required to dispose of cases within three months from the date of filing of the chargesheet.The Bill further proposes that any appeal against an order of a Special Fast Track Court shall be heard by a division bench of the High Court, which must dispose of the appeal within three months. It also mandates that every appeal be filed within 30 days from the date of the order.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideos’Proof That We Can Take Anyone’s Resignation’: Abhijeet Dipke After Pradhan Quits | Jantar MantarEducation Minister Dharmendra Pradhan Resigns After Month-Long Protests, Lathi Charge Fury’No Information On Foreign Funding’ MEA Claims As CJP Protest Intensifies NationwideCJP Founder Abhijeet Dipke Diagnosed With Typhoid, Says Protest Continues Until Pradhan ResignsIndia Rejects Pakistan’s Flood Allegation, Says Chenab Surge Caused By Heavy Monsoon Rainfall AloneDelhi Police Flags 400 People With Criminal Records Near CJP Protest Using Facial Recognition SystemIndia Rejects Pakistan’s Flood Allegation, Says Chenab Surge Caused By Heavy Monsoon Rainfall AloneDelhi Police Flags 400 People With Criminal Records Near CJP Protest Using Facial Recognition SystemCJP To Collect Protest Videos, Identify Police Personnel, Seek FIRs Over July 20 CrackdownCabinet Approves Tougher Anti-Paper Leak Bill; Up To 10-Year Jail And Rs 10 Crore Fine Proposed123Photostories5 most unusual things people have travelled for around the worldPriyanka Chahar Choudhary’s Greek inspired lavish Mumbai home: A massive living room, a jacuzzi and more5 best ways to stand up for yourself at work without damaging professional relationshipsFSSAI classifies packaged drinking water as ‘high-risk’ category: 5 things to check when buying bottled waterWhy do forks have four prongs? The surprising history behind one of the world’s most-used utensilsFrom flax to fenugreek: 5 seeds to consume after soaking in water for faster hair growth5 life lessons from Lord Hanuman that can inspire your everyday life‘Ramayan’ stars let their brooches do the talking as Ranbir’s Tiranga meets Yash’s Trishul at San Diego Comic-Con10 foods Indians pronounce differently from the rest of the worldCoastal destinations in India travellers need to plan carefully this monsoon123Hot PicksSchool holiday todayDelhi metroCJP ProtestMumbai rainGujarat RainAIIMS notificationNEET paper controversyAAI recruitment 2026Caitline ClarkTop TrendingMP NEET Arpirant RapeNEET Paper LeakCJP Protester AssaultedKerala IPS Ajith Kumar SuspensionAssam Flood DeathsDelhi Metro Stations ClosedMumbai ProtestUP Amroha WeddingHarbhajan singhIND U19 vs Sri Lanka U19

Government proposes stricter anti-paper leak laws to safeguard against leaks NEW DELHI: Tightening the noose around individuals, service providers and organised gangs involved in paper leaks, the Centre has proposed longer jail terms, steeper fines, and time-bound investigation and disposal of trials and appeals.According to the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill circulated to Members of Parliament, the minimum jail term for offences committed by individuals, as well as directors, senior management personnel or persons in charge of service providers conducting public examinations, has been increased to three years. In cases involving organised crime, the minimum imprisonment has been proposed at seven years.CJP Jantar Mantar Protest UpdatesDharmendra Pradhan resigns as Union education minister amid massive student protests’We won’t go’: CJP’s Dipke says protests to continue till all demands metFresh clashes at Jantar Mantar after Pradhan’s exit; tear gas fired, stones peltedThe Bill proposes that any person resorting to unfair means or committing offences under the law shall be punished with imprisonment of at least five years, which may extend to 10 years, along with a fine of up to Rs 50 lakh.It also proposes that any service provider found guilty would face a fine of up to Rs 5 crore — a five-fold increase over the existing provision — and would be barred from conducting public examinations for eight years, compared with the current four-year debarment.If an investigation establishes that an offence was committed with the consent or connivance of any director, senior management personnel or person in charge of a service provider, such individuals would be liable to a minimum imprisonment of five years, extendable up to 10 years. The proposed maximum fine has also been increased from the existing Rs 1 crore to Rs 5 crore.Seeking to amend Section 11 of the 2024 Act dealing with organised crime, the Bill proposes that if a person or group of persons, including an examination authority, service provider or any other institution, commits an organised crime, the minimum jail term would be increased to eight years from the current five years. The maximum penalty would also be raised tenfold to Rs 10 crore.To ensure speedy investigations, the Bill proposes that the government may constitute a Central Investigation Agency or a Special Task Force (STF). Where an STF has been constituted, it would carry out the investigation. The Bill also seeks to insert a new provision mandating that every investigation be completed within two months.For faster trials, the Bill provides for day-to-day proceedings and empowers states to establish Special Fast Track Courts in consultation with the Chief Justice of the respective High Court. It mandates that trial proceedings shall continue on a day-to-day basis until all witnesses in attendance have been examined.The Special Fast Track Courts would be required to dispose of cases within three months from the date of filing of the chargesheet.The Bill further proposes that any appeal against an order of a Special Fast Track Court shall be heard by a division bench of the High Court, which must dispose of the appeal within three months. It also mandates that every appeal be filed within 30 days from the date of the order.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideos’Proof That We Can Take Anyone’s Resignation’: Abhijeet Dipke After Pradhan Quits | Jantar MantarEducation Minister Dharmendra Pradhan Resigns After Month-Long Protests, Lathi Charge Fury’No Information On Foreign Funding’ MEA Claims As CJP Protest Intensifies NationwideCJP Founder Abhijeet Dipke Diagnosed With Typhoid, Says Protest Continues Until Pradhan ResignsIndia Rejects Pakistan’s Flood Allegation, Says Chenab Surge Caused By Heavy Monsoon Rainfall AloneDelhi Police Flags 400 People With Criminal Records Near CJP Protest Using Facial Recognition SystemIndia Rejects Pakistan’s Flood Allegation, Says Chenab Surge Caused By Heavy Monsoon Rainfall AloneDelhi Police Flags 400 People With Criminal Records Near CJP Protest Using Facial Recognition SystemCJP To Collect Protest Videos, Identify Police Personnel, Seek FIRs Over July 20 CrackdownCabinet Approves Tougher Anti-Paper Leak Bill; Up To 10-Year Jail And Rs 10 Crore Fine Proposed123Photostories5 most unusual things people have travelled for around the worldPriyanka Chahar Choudhary’s Greek inspired lavish Mumbai home: A massive living room, a jacuzzi and more5 best ways to stand up for yourself at work without damaging professional relationshipsFSSAI classifies packaged drinking water as ‘high-risk’ category: 5 things to check when buying bottled waterWhy do forks have four prongs? The surprising history behind one of the world’s most-used utensilsFrom flax to fenugreek: 5 seeds to consume after soaking in water for faster hair growth5 life lessons from Lord Hanuman that can inspire your everyday life‘Ramayan’ stars let their brooches do the talking as Ranbir’s Tiranga meets Yash’s Trishul at San Diego Comic-Con10 foods Indians pronounce differently from the rest of the worldCoastal destinations in India travellers need to plan carefully this monsoon123Hot PicksSchool holiday todayDelhi metroCJP ProtestMumbai rainGujarat RainAIIMS notificationNEET paper controversyAAI recruitment 2026Caitline ClarkTop TrendingMP NEET Arpirant RapeNEET Paper LeakCJP Protester AssaultedKerala IPS Ajith Kumar SuspensionAssam Flood DeathsDelhi Metro Stations ClosedMumbai ProtestUP Amroha WeddingHarbhajan singhIND U19 vs Sri Lanka U19


Government proposes stricter anti-paper leak law, faster investigation and trials
Government proposes stricter anti-paper leak laws to safeguard against leaks

NEW DELHI: Tightening the noose around individuals, service providers and organised gangs involved in paper leaks, the Centre has proposed longer jail terms, steeper fines, and time-bound investigation and disposal of trials and appeals.According to the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill circulated to Members of Parliament, the minimum jail term for offences committed by individuals, as well as directors, senior management personnel or persons in charge of service providers conducting public examinations, has been increased to three years. In cases involving organised crime, the minimum imprisonment has been proposed at seven years.

CJP Jantar Mantar Protest Updates

The Bill proposes that any person resorting to unfair means or committing offences under the law shall be punished with imprisonment of at least five years, which may extend to 10 years, along with a fine of up to Rs 50 lakh.It also proposes that any service provider found guilty would face a fine of up to Rs 5 crore — a five-fold increase over the existing provision — and would be barred from conducting public examinations for eight years, compared with the current four-year debarment.If an investigation establishes that an offence was committed with the consent or connivance of any director, senior management personnel or person in charge of a service provider, such individuals would be liable to a minimum imprisonment of five years, extendable up to 10 years. The proposed maximum fine has also been increased from the existing Rs 1 crore to Rs 5 crore.Seeking to amend Section 11 of the 2024 Act dealing with organised crime, the Bill proposes that if a person or group of persons, including an examination authority, service provider or any other institution, commits an organised crime, the minimum jail term would be increased to eight years from the current five years. The maximum penalty would also be raised tenfold to Rs 10 crore.To ensure speedy investigations, the Bill proposes that the government may constitute a Central Investigation Agency or a Special Task Force (STF). Where an STF has been constituted, it would carry out the investigation. The Bill also seeks to insert a new provision mandating that every investigation be completed within two months.For faster trials, the Bill provides for day-to-day proceedings and empowers states to establish Special Fast Track Courts in consultation with the Chief Justice of the respective High Court. It mandates that trial proceedings shall continue on a day-to-day basis until all witnesses in attendance have been examined.The Special Fast Track Courts would be required to dispose of cases within three months from the date of filing of the chargesheet.The Bill further proposes that any appeal against an order of a Special Fast Track Court shall be heard by a division bench of the High Court, which must dispose of the appeal within three months. It also mandates that every appeal be filed within 30 days from the date of the order.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *