August 18, 2026

File photo: Karnataka CM DK Shivkumar and Tamil Nadu CM Vijay NEW DELHI: Karnataka deputy chief minister D K Shivakumar on Tuesday warned Tamil Nadu politicians against interfering in the state’s administration over the killing of three suspected poachers in Chamarajanagar, asserting that Karnataka would protect the sanctity of its territory.Shivakumar also rejected demands from a section of Tamil Nadu politicians for a CBI inquiry into the deaths of the three men, who were residents of villages in Hanur taluk of Karnataka and were described as Tamils.“This is a federal structure. No state should interfere with the administration of any other state. People should have this basic understanding. I cannot get involved in any of the law and order problems of Tamil Nadu. Every state has its own problems,” he told reporters.The remarks came as the issue was raised in the Tamil Nadu assembly on Tuesday, with members across party lines demanding a high-level probe into the August 15 firing by the Karnataka forest department.’We know how to protect our state’Shivakumar said he did not want to respond to every statement coming from Tamil Nadu but stressed that Karnataka would handle the matter within its own administrative framework.“They should also know that we know how to protect our state. Let them do their job; we will do ours… I don’t want to interfere in their administration. We have to protect whatever sanctity there is of our state,” he said.“I don’t want to comment on everything. This is a general issue. They should do their job; we should do our job,” he added.The three men, Anthony Samy, John Rose Peter and Kumar, were shot dead by Karnataka forest personnel in the Cauvery Wildlife Sanctuary area in the early hours of August 15.According to Karnataka officials, the forest personnel were carrying out an anti-poaching operation when they came under fire from the group. The officials said the personnel returned fire in self-defence, resulting in the deaths of three people.However, the circumstances surrounding the incident have been disputed by the victims’ families and Tamil Nadu political leaders.Tamil Nadu parties seek probe into deathsTamil Nadu chief minister C Joseph Vijay had strongly condemned the alleged killings and called for a fair investigation by a high-level committee. He had also said the explanation offered by the Karnataka forest department was unacceptable.In the Tamil Nadu Assembly, former chief minister and AIADMK leader Edappadi K Palaniswami demanded a CBI probe, citing allegations by the families that the three men were shot dead while a fourth person was injured and later received treatment in Mysuru.Palaniswami said the incident required an investigation to establish the facts, particularly as the area lies close to the Karnataka-Tamil Nadu border.Other legislators also demanded an impartial investigation. DMK MLA Manoj Pandian described the incident as a “fake encounter” and alleged a serious human rights violation, while seeking a judicial inquiry. Congress member Tharahai Cuthbert also demanded a CBI probe.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesBJP MLA Bhojarajan backed an impartial inquiry, saying the incident had raised concerns among Tamils living in Karnataka.Karnataka orders magisterial inquiryKarnataka has already ordered a magisterial inquiry into the deaths, according to the Tamil Nadu government’s statement in the assembly.The Karnataka government also announced interim relief of Rs 5 lakh each for the families of the three deceased.The bodies were handed over to their families after postmortems on August 17 for the last rites.The fourth person, identified as Mahimadan, was injured in the incident and was admitted to a hospital.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosVijay Apologises In Assembly After Karunanidhi Remark Sparks DMK Uproar Over Decorum BreachCriminal Cases Against Netas: 4,192 Trials Pending, 170 Lok Sabha MPs Face Serious ChargesJSSC-CGL CANCELLED: Jharkhand Students Celebrate After Government Accepts Key Demands“No Compensation, Build A School”: CJP Volunteer Emotional Tribute To Father Leaves Ranka In TearsAsish Banerjee Death Mystery: Threat, Blackmail Angle Probed As Note And Phones Face ScrutinyBJP’s Big Shake-Up: Ram Madhav Returns, Smriti Irani Gets Key Role In Nitin Nabin’s New Team‘Will Rise For Vande Mataram, But Won’t Sing’: Congress MP Imran Masood Amid Sonia Gandhi Row‘Personally Meet Students’: Rahul Gandhi Writes To CM Hemant Soren Over Jharkhand Protests7 Charred To Death, Several Injured In Fire At Hotel Near Tarapith Temple In Bengal’s Birbhum‘Electric Pole Fell’: 7 Women Dead, Many Injured In Stampede At Temple In Bihar’s Lakhisarai123PhotostoriesYou may feel completely fine, but these 6 everyday habits could be hurting your kidneysClassic Kasavu to rich Kanjeevaram:5 South Indian sarees to wear for Onam 2026From handloom cotton to merino wool: 6 fabrics every woman should choose this autumn for comfort, skin health and style10 vegetarian dishes from around the world that Indians will genuinely loveCharu Asopa breaks silence on financial struggles, debt and claims of keeping Ziana away from grandparents amid divorceSun Ketu in Leo 2026: Remedies you can perform according to your zodiac signWhy does dal foam while boiling? Should you actually remove it?Why does aluminium foil have a shiny and dull side? Here’s the science behind it5 Snakes that thrive in extreme climates: Here’s how they survive harsh weather conditionsForget quinoa: 9 ways to add dalia to your daily breakfast123Hot PicksArshdeep Singh DangBank holidays this weekBihar STET 2026BJP new teamJharkhand ProtestJSSC-CGL exam cancelledAbhijeet DipkeSupreme Court HolidayTwisha SharmaTop TrendingTwisha SharmaDelhi Draft PollMadhya Pradesh AccidentKolkata Airport Building FireAbhijeet DipkeKiren RijijuBengaluru Double MurderWeather TomorrowBengaluru RapidoBen Gvir

Vamsikrishna04 mins mins
File photo: Karnataka CM DK Shivkumar and Tamil Nadu CM Vijay NEW DELHI: Karnataka deputy chief minister D K Shivakumar on Tuesday warned Tamil Nadu politicians against interfering in the state’s administration over the killing of three suspected poachers in Chamarajanagar, asserting that Karnataka would protect the sanctity of its territory.Shivakumar also rejected demands from a section of Tamil Nadu politicians for a CBI inquiry into the deaths of the three men, who were residents of villages in Hanur taluk of Karnataka and were described as Tamils.“This is a federal structure. No state should interfere with the administration of any other state. People should have this basic understanding. I cannot get involved in any of the law and order problems of Tamil Nadu. Every state has its own problems,” he told reporters.The remarks came as the issue was raised in the Tamil Nadu assembly on Tuesday, with members across party lines demanding a high-level probe into the August 15 firing by the Karnataka forest department.’We know how to protect our state’Shivakumar said he did not want to respond to every statement coming from Tamil Nadu but stressed that Karnataka would handle the matter within its own administrative framework.“They should also know that we know how to protect our state. Let them do their job; we will do ours… I don’t want to interfere in their administration. We have to protect whatever sanctity there is of our state,” he said.“I don’t want to comment on everything. This is a general issue. They should do their job; we should do our job,” he added.The three men, Anthony Samy, John Rose Peter and Kumar, were shot dead by Karnataka forest personnel in the Cauvery Wildlife Sanctuary area in the early hours of August 15.According to Karnataka officials, the forest personnel were carrying out an anti-poaching operation when they came under fire from the group. The officials said the personnel returned fire in self-defence, resulting in the deaths of three people.However, the circumstances surrounding the incident have been disputed by the victims’ families and Tamil Nadu political leaders.Tamil Nadu parties seek probe into deathsTamil Nadu chief minister C Joseph Vijay had strongly condemned the alleged killings and called for a fair investigation by a high-level committee. He had also said the explanation offered by the Karnataka forest department was unacceptable.In the Tamil Nadu Assembly, former chief minister and AIADMK leader Edappadi K Palaniswami demanded a CBI probe, citing allegations by the families that the three men were shot dead while a fourth person was injured and later received treatment in Mysuru.Palaniswami said the incident required an investigation to establish the facts, particularly as the area lies close to the Karnataka-Tamil Nadu border.Other legislators also demanded an impartial investigation. DMK MLA Manoj Pandian described the incident as a “fake encounter” and alleged a serious human rights violation, while seeking a judicial inquiry. Congress member Tharahai Cuthbert also demanded a CBI probe.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesBJP MLA Bhojarajan backed an impartial inquiry, saying the incident had raised concerns among Tamils living in Karnataka.Karnataka orders magisterial inquiryKarnataka has already ordered a magisterial inquiry into the deaths, according to the Tamil Nadu government’s statement in the assembly.The Karnataka government also announced interim relief of Rs 5 lakh each for the families of the three deceased.The bodies were handed over to their families after postmortems on August 17 for the last rites.The fourth person, identified as Mahimadan, was injured in the incident and was admitted to a hospital.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosVijay Apologises In Assembly After Karunanidhi Remark Sparks DMK Uproar Over Decorum BreachCriminal Cases Against Netas: 4,192 Trials Pending, 170 Lok Sabha MPs Face Serious ChargesJSSC-CGL CANCELLED: Jharkhand Students Celebrate After Government Accepts Key Demands“No Compensation, Build A School”: CJP Volunteer Emotional Tribute To Father Leaves Ranka In TearsAsish Banerjee Death Mystery: Threat, Blackmail Angle Probed As Note And Phones Face ScrutinyBJP’s Big Shake-Up: Ram Madhav Returns, Smriti Irani Gets Key Role In Nitin Nabin’s New Team‘Will Rise For Vande Mataram, But Won’t Sing’: Congress MP Imran Masood Amid Sonia Gandhi Row‘Personally Meet Students’: Rahul Gandhi Writes To CM Hemant Soren Over Jharkhand Protests7 Charred To Death, Several Injured In Fire At Hotel Near Tarapith Temple In Bengal’s Birbhum‘Electric Pole Fell’: 7 Women Dead, Many Injured In Stampede At Temple In Bihar’s Lakhisarai123PhotostoriesYou may feel completely fine, but these 6 everyday habits could be hurting your kidneysClassic Kasavu to rich Kanjeevaram:5 South Indian sarees to wear for Onam 2026From handloom cotton to merino wool: 6 fabrics every woman should choose this autumn for comfort, skin health and style10 vegetarian dishes from around the world that Indians will genuinely loveCharu Asopa breaks silence on financial struggles, debt and claims of keeping Ziana away from grandparents amid divorceSun Ketu in Leo 2026: Remedies you can perform according to your zodiac signWhy does dal foam while boiling? Should you actually remove it?Why does aluminium foil have a shiny and dull side? Here’s the science behind it5 Snakes that thrive in extreme climates: Here’s how they survive harsh weather conditionsForget quinoa: 9 ways to add dalia to your daily breakfast123Hot PicksArshdeep Singh DangBank holidays this weekBihar STET 2026BJP new teamJharkhand ProtestJSSC-CGL exam cancelledAbhijeet DipkeSupreme Court HolidayTwisha SharmaTop TrendingTwisha SharmaDelhi Draft PollMadhya Pradesh AccidentKolkata Airport Building FireAbhijeet DipkeKiren RijijuBengaluru Double MurderWeather TomorrowBengaluru RapidoBen Gvir


‘No state should interfere’: Karnataka CM Shivakumar warns Tamil Nadu over Chamarajanagar killings
File photo: Karnataka CM DK Shivkumar and Tamil Nadu CM Vijay

NEW DELHI: Karnataka deputy chief minister D K Shivakumar on Tuesday warned Tamil Nadu politicians against interfering in the state’s administration over the killing of three suspected poachers in Chamarajanagar, asserting that Karnataka would protect the sanctity of its territory.Shivakumar also rejected demands from a section of Tamil Nadu politicians for a CBI inquiry into the deaths of the three men, who were residents of villages in Hanur taluk of Karnataka and were described as Tamils.“This is a federal structure. No state should interfere with the administration of any other state. People should have this basic understanding. I cannot get involved in any of the law and order problems of Tamil Nadu. Every state has its own problems,” he told reporters.The remarks came as the issue was raised in the Tamil Nadu assembly on Tuesday, with members across party lines demanding a high-level probe into the August 15 firing by the Karnataka forest department.

‘We know how to protect our state’

Shivakumar said he did not want to respond to every statement coming from Tamil Nadu but stressed that Karnataka would handle the matter within its own administrative framework.“They should also know that we know how to protect our state. Let them do their job; we will do ours… I don’t want to interfere in their administration. We have to protect whatever sanctity there is of our state,” he said.“I don’t want to comment on everything. This is a general issue. They should do their job; we should do our job,” he added.The three men, Anthony Samy, John Rose Peter and Kumar, were shot dead by Karnataka forest personnel in the Cauvery Wildlife Sanctuary area in the early hours of August 15.According to Karnataka officials, the forest personnel were carrying out an anti-poaching operation when they came under fire from the group. The officials said the personnel returned fire in self-defence, resulting in the deaths of three people.However, the circumstances surrounding the incident have been disputed by the victims’ families and Tamil Nadu political leaders.

Tamil Nadu parties seek probe into deaths

Tamil Nadu chief minister C Joseph Vijay had strongly condemned the alleged killings and called for a fair investigation by a high-level committee. He had also said the explanation offered by the Karnataka forest department was unacceptable.In the Tamil Nadu Assembly, former chief minister and AIADMK leader Edappadi K Palaniswami demanded a CBI probe, citing allegations by the families that the three men were shot dead while a fourth person was injured and later received treatment in Mysuru.Palaniswami said the incident required an investigation to establish the facts, particularly as the area lies close to the Karnataka-Tamil Nadu border.Other legislators also demanded an impartial investigation. DMK MLA Manoj Pandian described the incident as a “fake encounter” and alleged a serious human rights violation, while seeking a judicial inquiry. Congress member Tharahai Cuthbert also demanded a CBI probe.

Share your thoughts in the comments

Related News

The Teesta begins in the Himalayas and flows through Sikkim and West Bengal before entering Bangladesh. Bangladesh does not want its relations with India to suffer because of the long-running dispute over sharing the waters of the Teesta river, country’s water resources minister Shahiduddin Chowdhury Anee said.Speaking at a seminar in Dhaka on Sunday, Anee said Bangladesh recognised India as a friendly neighbour but wanted New Delhi to consider Dhaka’s interests while pursuing its own.”The neighbouring country is a friendly country. They have to think that while they have their interests, we also have ours,” news agency PTI reported citing news portal tbsnews.net.”A friend should protect the interests of a friend. We never want our friendly relations with them to deteriorate,” he said.Bangladesh pushes for Teesta solutionThe comments come as Bangladesh’s new government steps up efforts to find a solution to the Teesta dispute. Dhaka is also pursuing a broader Teesta River Comprehensive Management and Restoration Project, with China offering support.The proposed project aims to address recurring floods, river erosion and shortages of water during the dry season in northern Bangladesh, where the river is crucial for farming and livelihoods.Anee said the government had held several seminars and consultations since the February election to gather expert views on the project. A detailed study based on those recommendations would help the government decide its next steps.The minister said people in five to six northern districts had high expectations from the project after years of suffering from erosion and other river-related problems.”If we fail to implement it, the damage and problems faced by families in those areas will continue to increase. We have to overcome this challenge anyhow,” he said.Anee said prime minister Tarique Rahman regularly discusses the project and that government departments are also reviewing its progress.Calling for an agreement on the river, he said, “Whether it is called the Teesta treaty or the Teesta master plan, or whatever is necessary to implement this project, we will move towards implementation.”Why the Teesta matters to India and BangladeshThe Teesta begins in the Himalayas and flows through Sikkim and West Bengal before entering Bangladesh. It eventually joins the Jamuna, which is the Bangladeshi name for the Brahmaputra.The river is particularly important to northern Bangladesh, where farmers depend on its water. It is also important to West Bengal for irrigation and power generation, with several districts in North Bengal relying on its waters.India and Bangladesh have been discussing the sharing of Teesta waters since the 1980s. An interim arrangement reached in 1983 allocated 39 per cent of the water to India and 36 per cent to Bangladesh, leaving 25 per cent unallocated.The two sides continued negotiations but failed to reach a long-term agreement. A draft interim deal was finalised in 2011, but it could not be signed after the West Bengal government opposed it over concerns about water availability in the state.China’s role adds a strategic angleBangladesh’s renewed push for the Teesta project has gained a wider strategic dimension because of China’s involvement.During his visit to Beijing in June, Rahman held talks with Chinese leaders and secured a commitment from Beijing to speed up a technical feasibility study for the proposed Teesta restoration project.For India, greater Chinese involvement in northern Bangladesh is sensitive because the region lies close to the Siliguri Corridor. The narrow corridor is India’s crucial land link between the northeastern states and the rest of the country.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesIndia has maintained that the Teesta issue should be discussed with all relevant stakeholders, including West Bengal.External affairs ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said in July that India’s position on the proposed Teesta project had already been conveyed to Bangladesh. He said India would consider “all related developments” as part of its “overall approach to the Teesta issue”.Teesta separate from Ganges treatyThe Teesta negotiations are separate from the India-Bangladesh Ganges Water Sharing Treaty signed in 1996.That treaty is valid for 30 years and is due to expire in December 2026. India and Bangladesh share 54 transboundary rivers and use the Joint Rivers Commission to address issues related to their common water resources.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorTOI World DeskAt TOI World Desk, our dedicated team of seasoned journalists and passionate writers tirelessly sifts through the vast tapestry of global events to bring you the latest news and diverse perspectives round the clock. With an unwavering commitment to accuracy, depth, and timeliness, we strive to keep you informed about the ever-evolving world, delivering a nuanced understanding of international affairs to our readers. Join us on a journey across continents as we unravel the stories that shape our interconnected world.Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosVijay Apologises In Assembly After Karunanidhi Remark Sparks DMK Uproar Over Decorum BreachCriminal Cases Against Netas: 4,192 Trials Pending, 170 Lok Sabha MPs Face Serious ChargesJSSC-CGL CANCELLED: Jharkhand Students Celebrate After Government Accepts Key Demands“No Compensation, Build A School”: CJP Volunteer Emotional Tribute To Father Leaves Ranka In TearsAsish Banerjee Death Mystery: Threat, Blackmail Angle Probed As Note And Phones Face ScrutinyBJP’s Big Shake-Up: Ram Madhav Returns, Smriti Irani Gets Key Role In Nitin Nabin’s New Team‘Will Rise For Vande Mataram, But Won’t Sing’: Congress MP Imran Masood Amid Sonia Gandhi Row‘Personally Meet Students’: Rahul Gandhi Writes To CM Hemant Soren Over Jharkhand Protests7 Charred To Death, Several Injured In Fire At Hotel Near Tarapith Temple In Bengal’s Birbhum‘Electric Pole Fell’: 7 Women Dead, Many Injured In Stampede At Temple In Bihar’s Lakhisarai123PhotostoriesAditi Rao Hydari’s two iconic festive ensembles just made everyone else look underpreparedYou may feel completely fine, but these 6 everyday habits could be hurting your kidneysClassic Kasavu to rich Kanjeevaram:5 South Indian sarees to wear for Onam 2026From handloom cotton to merino wool: 6 fabrics every woman should choose this autumn for comfort, skin health and style10 vegetarian dishes from around the world that Indians will genuinely loveCharu Asopa breaks silence on financial struggles, debt and claims of keeping Ziana away from grandparents amid divorceSun Ketu in Leo 2026: Remedies you can perform according to your zodiac signWhy does dal foam while boiling? Should you actually remove it?Why does aluminium foil have a shiny and dull side? Here’s the science behind it5 Snakes that thrive in extreme climates: Here’s how they survive harsh weather conditions123Hot PicksArshdeep Singh DangBank holidays this weekBihar STET 2026BJP new teamJharkhand ProtestJSSC-CGL exam cancelledAbhijeet DipkeSupreme Court HolidayTwisha SharmaTop TrendingTwisha SharmaDelhi Draft PollMadhya Pradesh AccidentKolkata Airport Building FireAbhijeet DipkeKiren RijijuBengaluru Double MurderWeather TomorrowBengaluru RapidoBen Gvir

The Teesta begins in the Himalayas and flows through Sikkim and West Bengal before entering Bangladesh. Bangladesh does not want its relations with India to suffer because of the long-running dispute over sharing the waters of the Teesta river, country’s water resources minister Shahiduddin Chowdhury Anee said.Speaking at a seminar in Dhaka on Sunday, Anee said Bangladesh recognised India as a friendly neighbour but wanted New Delhi to consider Dhaka’s interests while pursuing its own.”The neighbouring country is a friendly country. They have to think that while they have their interests, we also have ours,” news agency PTI reported citing news portal tbsnews.net.”A friend should protect the interests of a friend. We never want our friendly relations with them to deteriorate,” he said.Bangladesh pushes for Teesta solutionThe comments come as Bangladesh’s new government steps up efforts to find a solution to the Teesta dispute. Dhaka is also pursuing a broader Teesta River Comprehensive Management and Restoration Project, with China offering support.The proposed project aims to address recurring floods, river erosion and shortages of water during the dry season in northern Bangladesh, where the river is crucial for farming and livelihoods.Anee said the government had held several seminars and consultations since the February election to gather expert views on the project. A detailed study based on those recommendations would help the government decide its next steps.The minister said people in five to six northern districts had high expectations from the project after years of suffering from erosion and other river-related problems.”If we fail to implement it, the damage and problems faced by families in those areas will continue to increase. We have to overcome this challenge anyhow,” he said.Anee said prime minister Tarique Rahman regularly discusses the project and that government departments are also reviewing its progress.Calling for an agreement on the river, he said, “Whether it is called the Teesta treaty or the Teesta master plan, or whatever is necessary to implement this project, we will move towards implementation.”Why the Teesta matters to India and BangladeshThe Teesta begins in the Himalayas and flows through Sikkim and West Bengal before entering Bangladesh. It eventually joins the Jamuna, which is the Bangladeshi name for the Brahmaputra.The river is particularly important to northern Bangladesh, where farmers depend on its water. It is also important to West Bengal for irrigation and power generation, with several districts in North Bengal relying on its waters.India and Bangladesh have been discussing the sharing of Teesta waters since the 1980s. An interim arrangement reached in 1983 allocated 39 per cent of the water to India and 36 per cent to Bangladesh, leaving 25 per cent unallocated.The two sides continued negotiations but failed to reach a long-term agreement. A draft interim deal was finalised in 2011, but it could not be signed after the West Bengal government opposed it over concerns about water availability in the state.China’s role adds a strategic angleBangladesh’s renewed push for the Teesta project has gained a wider strategic dimension because of China’s involvement.During his visit to Beijing in June, Rahman held talks with Chinese leaders and secured a commitment from Beijing to speed up a technical feasibility study for the proposed Teesta restoration project.For India, greater Chinese involvement in northern Bangladesh is sensitive because the region lies close to the Siliguri Corridor. The narrow corridor is India’s crucial land link between the northeastern states and the rest of the country.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesIndia has maintained that the Teesta issue should be discussed with all relevant stakeholders, including West Bengal.External affairs ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said in July that India’s position on the proposed Teesta project had already been conveyed to Bangladesh. He said India would consider “all related developments” as part of its “overall approach to the Teesta issue”.Teesta separate from Ganges treatyThe Teesta negotiations are separate from the India-Bangladesh Ganges Water Sharing Treaty signed in 1996.That treaty is valid for 30 years and is due to expire in December 2026. India and Bangladesh share 54 transboundary rivers and use the Joint Rivers Commission to address issues related to their common water resources.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorTOI World DeskAt TOI World Desk, our dedicated team of seasoned journalists and passionate writers tirelessly sifts through the vast tapestry of global events to bring you the latest news and diverse perspectives round the clock. With an unwavering commitment to accuracy, depth, and timeliness, we strive to keep you informed about the ever-evolving world, delivering a nuanced understanding of international affairs to our readers. Join us on a journey across continents as we unravel the stories that shape our interconnected world.Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosVijay Apologises In Assembly After Karunanidhi Remark Sparks DMK Uproar Over Decorum BreachCriminal Cases Against Netas: 4,192 Trials Pending, 170 Lok Sabha MPs Face Serious ChargesJSSC-CGL CANCELLED: Jharkhand Students Celebrate After Government Accepts Key Demands“No Compensation, Build A School”: CJP Volunteer Emotional Tribute To Father Leaves Ranka In TearsAsish Banerjee Death Mystery: Threat, Blackmail Angle Probed As Note And Phones Face ScrutinyBJP’s Big Shake-Up: Ram Madhav Returns, Smriti Irani Gets Key Role In Nitin Nabin’s New Team‘Will Rise For Vande Mataram, But Won’t Sing’: Congress MP Imran Masood Amid Sonia Gandhi Row‘Personally Meet Students’: Rahul Gandhi Writes To CM Hemant Soren Over Jharkhand Protests7 Charred To Death, Several Injured In Fire At Hotel Near Tarapith Temple In Bengal’s Birbhum‘Electric Pole Fell’: 7 Women Dead, Many Injured In Stampede At Temple In Bihar’s Lakhisarai123PhotostoriesAditi Rao Hydari’s two iconic festive ensembles just made everyone else look underpreparedYou may feel completely fine, but these 6 everyday habits could be hurting your kidneysClassic Kasavu to rich Kanjeevaram:5 South Indian sarees to wear for Onam 2026From handloom cotton to merino wool: 6 fabrics every woman should choose this autumn for comfort, skin health and style10 vegetarian dishes from around the world that Indians will genuinely loveCharu Asopa breaks silence on financial struggles, debt and claims of keeping Ziana away from grandparents amid divorceSun Ketu in Leo 2026: Remedies you can perform according to your zodiac signWhy does dal foam while boiling? Should you actually remove it?Why does aluminium foil have a shiny and dull side? Here’s the science behind it5 Snakes that thrive in extreme climates: Here’s how they survive harsh weather conditions123Hot PicksArshdeep Singh DangBank holidays this weekBihar STET 2026BJP new teamJharkhand ProtestJSSC-CGL exam cancelledAbhijeet DipkeSupreme Court HolidayTwisha SharmaTop TrendingTwisha SharmaDelhi Draft PollMadhya Pradesh AccidentKolkata Airport Building FireAbhijeet DipkeKiren RijijuBengaluru Double MurderWeather TomorrowBengaluru RapidoBen Gvir

Vamsikrishna 0
Supreme Court of India. Photo credit: ANI NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday sought responses from the Centre and state governments on a PIL seeking directions to confiscate the movable and immovable properties of those accused in examination paper leak cases. The plea also sought confiscation of properties belonging to their family members.A bench of Justices PS Narasimha and Alok Aradhe issued notice to the Union of India and the states on a plea filed by advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay.During the hearing, Upadhyay said he was not pressing his prayer seeking measures for time-bound investigations and trials in paper leak cases, citing the passage of the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026, which tightens laws against examination-related malpractice.The court fixed September 25 for the next hearing.The plea, filed through advocate Ashwani Kumar Dubey, also sought directions for a comprehensive assessment of the properties held by alleged perpetrators and their family members and for appropriate action under the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Money Laundering Act, the Benami Property Act and the Black Money Act.The petitioner further sought a direction that sentences imposed in paper leak cases should run consecutively rather than concurrently.“Direct and declare that sentence in paper leak shall be consecutive, not concurrent, in order to prevent such incidents in future. Alternatively, direct the Law Commission to examine international practices and prepare a report on paper leak within three months,” the plea said.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesThe petition argued that repeated failures by authorities to prevent, investigate and prosecute those responsible for question paper leaks had resulted in violations of students’ fundamental rights under Articles 14, 16, 19 and 21 of the Constitution.It also pointed to gaps in the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024, despite its enactment in June last year, particularly the absence of provisions mandating time-bound investigations and trials.The plea highlighted the wider impact of examination leaks on students and their families, citing mental and physical trauma, loss of educational and employment opportunities, mounting financial liabilities from unpaid loans and an increase in student suicides.The Centre and the states will now be required to respond to the petition before the matter comes up for further hearing on September 25.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosVijay Apologises In Assembly After Karunanidhi Remark Sparks DMK Uproar Over Decorum BreachCriminal Cases Against Netas: 4,192 Trials Pending, 170 Lok Sabha MPs Face Serious ChargesJSSC-CGL CANCELLED: Jharkhand Students Celebrate After Government Accepts Key Demands“No Compensation, Build A School”: CJP Volunteer Emotional Tribute To Father Leaves Ranka In TearsAsish Banerjee Death Mystery: Threat, Blackmail Angle Probed As Note And Phones Face ScrutinyBJP’s Big Shake-Up: Ram Madhav Returns, Smriti Irani Gets Key Role In Nitin Nabin’s New Team‘Will Rise For Vande Mataram, But Won’t Sing’: Congress MP Imran Masood Amid Sonia Gandhi Row‘Personally Meet Students’: Rahul Gandhi Writes To CM Hemant Soren Over Jharkhand Protests7 Charred To Death, Several Injured In Fire At Hotel Near Tarapith Temple In Bengal’s Birbhum‘Electric Pole Fell’: 7 Women Dead, Many Injured In Stampede At Temple In Bihar’s Lakhisarai123PhotostoriesClassic Kasavu to rich Kanjeevaram:5 South Indian sarees to wear for Onam 2026From handloom cotton to merino wool: 6 fabrics every woman should choose this autumn for comfort, skin health and style10 vegetarian dishes from around the world that Indians will genuinely loveCharu Asopa breaks silence on financial struggles, debt and claims of keeping Ziana away from grandparents amid divorceSun Ketu in Leo 2026: Remedies you can perform according to your zodiac signWhy does dal foam while boiling? Should you actually remove it?Why does aluminium foil have a shiny and dull side? Here’s the science behind it5 Snakes that thrive in extreme climates: Here’s how they survive harsh weather conditionsForget quinoa: 9 ways to add dalia to your daily breakfast7 email habits that can make you look careless at work even when your actual work is good123Hot PicksArshdeep Singh DangBank holidays this weekBihar STET 2026BJP new teamJharkhand ProtestJSSC-CGL exam cancelledAbhijeet DipkeSupreme Court HolidayTwisha SharmaTop TrendingTwisha SharmaDelhi Draft PollMadhya Pradesh AccidentKolkata Airport Building FireAbhijeet DipkeKiren RijijuBengaluru Double MurderWeather TomorrowBengaluru RapidoBen Gvir

Supreme Court of India. Photo credit: ANI NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday sought responses from the Centre and state governments on a PIL seeking directions to confiscate the movable and immovable properties of those accused in examination paper leak cases. The plea also sought confiscation of properties belonging to their family members.A bench of Justices PS Narasimha and Alok Aradhe issued notice to the Union of India and the states on a plea filed by advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay.During the hearing, Upadhyay said he was not pressing his prayer seeking measures for time-bound investigations and trials in paper leak cases, citing the passage of the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026, which tightens laws against examination-related malpractice.The court fixed September 25 for the next hearing.The plea, filed through advocate Ashwani Kumar Dubey, also sought directions for a comprehensive assessment of the properties held by alleged perpetrators and their family members and for appropriate action under the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Money Laundering Act, the Benami Property Act and the Black Money Act.The petitioner further sought a direction that sentences imposed in paper leak cases should run consecutively rather than concurrently.“Direct and declare that sentence in paper leak shall be consecutive, not concurrent, in order to prevent such incidents in future. Alternatively, direct the Law Commission to examine international practices and prepare a report on paper leak within three months,” the plea said.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesThe petition argued that repeated failures by authorities to prevent, investigate and prosecute those responsible for question paper leaks had resulted in violations of students’ fundamental rights under Articles 14, 16, 19 and 21 of the Constitution.It also pointed to gaps in the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024, despite its enactment in June last year, particularly the absence of provisions mandating time-bound investigations and trials.The plea highlighted the wider impact of examination leaks on students and their families, citing mental and physical trauma, loss of educational and employment opportunities, mounting financial liabilities from unpaid loans and an increase in student suicides.The Centre and the states will now be required to respond to the petition before the matter comes up for further hearing on September 25.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosVijay Apologises In Assembly After Karunanidhi Remark Sparks DMK Uproar Over Decorum BreachCriminal Cases Against Netas: 4,192 Trials Pending, 170 Lok Sabha MPs Face Serious ChargesJSSC-CGL CANCELLED: Jharkhand Students Celebrate After Government Accepts Key Demands“No Compensation, Build A School”: CJP Volunteer Emotional Tribute To Father Leaves Ranka In TearsAsish Banerjee Death Mystery: Threat, Blackmail Angle Probed As Note And Phones Face ScrutinyBJP’s Big Shake-Up: Ram Madhav Returns, Smriti Irani Gets Key Role In Nitin Nabin’s New Team‘Will Rise For Vande Mataram, But Won’t Sing’: Congress MP Imran Masood Amid Sonia Gandhi Row‘Personally Meet Students’: Rahul Gandhi Writes To CM Hemant Soren Over Jharkhand Protests7 Charred To Death, Several Injured In Fire At Hotel Near Tarapith Temple In Bengal’s Birbhum‘Electric Pole Fell’: 7 Women Dead, Many Injured In Stampede At Temple In Bihar’s Lakhisarai123PhotostoriesClassic Kasavu to rich Kanjeevaram:5 South Indian sarees to wear for Onam 2026From handloom cotton to merino wool: 6 fabrics every woman should choose this autumn for comfort, skin health and style10 vegetarian dishes from around the world that Indians will genuinely loveCharu Asopa breaks silence on financial struggles, debt and claims of keeping Ziana away from grandparents amid divorceSun Ketu in Leo 2026: Remedies you can perform according to your zodiac signWhy does dal foam while boiling? Should you actually remove it?Why does aluminium foil have a shiny and dull side? Here’s the science behind it5 Snakes that thrive in extreme climates: Here’s how they survive harsh weather conditionsForget quinoa: 9 ways to add dalia to your daily breakfast7 email habits that can make you look careless at work even when your actual work is good123Hot PicksArshdeep Singh DangBank holidays this weekBihar STET 2026BJP new teamJharkhand ProtestJSSC-CGL exam cancelledAbhijeet DipkeSupreme Court HolidayTwisha SharmaTop TrendingTwisha SharmaDelhi Draft PollMadhya Pradesh AccidentKolkata Airport Building FireAbhijeet DipkeKiren RijijuBengaluru Double MurderWeather TomorrowBengaluru RapidoBen Gvir

Vamsikrishna 0
‘Platoon-level weapon’ (IANS photo) NEW DELHI: The Bihar government has told the Supreme Court that a constable deployed during student protests in Siwan fired four rounds from an AK-47 only after he was “trapped and surrounded by protesters.”A video showing a policeman firing an AK-47 during the protests went viral, triggering widespread outrage and backlash.The Samrat Choudhary government said the firing was directed into the air and did not injure any protesters.The government’s response was filed before the apex court in connection with petitions alleging excessive police force during protests linked to the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP)-led student movement.According to the affidavit, the AK-47 incident took place on July 25 near JP Chowk in Siwan. Constable Abhishek Kumar was allegedly surrounded by protesters.The State said Kumar “got trapped in the crowd” and fired four rounds from his AK-47 “in the air” to deal with the situation. It maintained that no protester was injured in this firing.The government, however, said three protesters suffered minor firearm injuries during the police action that day. It clarified that the injuries were not caused by Kumar’s AK-47 firing and that the injured protesters were not present at the spot where he opened fire.The affidavit also mentioned another firing incident during the protests. Assistant Sub-Inspector Nilesh Kumar Singh allegedly fired two rounds from his 9mm pistol near Hathi Chowk to disperse the crowd.The Bihar government maintained that police exercised restraint during the protests and did not use disproportionate force.The state government said Kumar’s firing occurred only after he was surrounded by the crowd. It also pointed out that the AK-47 was not intended for routine crowd-control or regular law-and-order duties.Kumar has since been suspended over what the government called “undesired conduct”, and departmental proceedings have been initiated against him.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesThe state govt further told the court that the AK-47 carried by Kumar was a “platoon-level weapon” meant for special operations and not for routine law-and-order deployment.The use of an assault rifle during a protest is among the issues raised before the Supreme Court, with petitioners alleging excessive use of force by police.While the Bihar government has defended the circumstances of the July 25 firing, the petitions have raised wider concerns over police action against protesters.The Samrat Choudhary government’s affidavit forms part of the ongoing proceedings before the Supreme Court. The court is examining allegations about the police response, including the circumstances of the firing, injuries reported during the protests and whether the force used was proportionate.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorAbhishek MishraAbhishek Mishra is a Digital Content Producer at The Times of India, working with the news desk. He writes with a keen eye on foreign policy, defence developments, and the shifting currents of geopolitics-and yes, Indian politics always finds a way onto his radar too.Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosVijay Apologises In Assembly After Karunanidhi Remark Sparks DMK Uproar Over Decorum BreachCriminal Cases Against Netas: 4,192 Trials Pending, 170 Lok Sabha MPs Face Serious ChargesJSSC-CGL CANCELLED: Jharkhand Students Celebrate After Government Accepts Key Demands“No Compensation, Build A School”: CJP Volunteer Emotional Tribute To Father Leaves Ranka In TearsAsish Banerjee Death Mystery: Threat, Blackmail Angle Probed As Note And Phones Face ScrutinyBJP’s Big Shake-Up: Ram Madhav Returns, Smriti Irani Gets Key Role In Nitin Nabin’s New Team‘Will Rise For Vande Mataram, But Won’t Sing’: Congress MP Imran Masood Amid Sonia Gandhi Row‘Personally Meet Students’: Rahul Gandhi Writes To CM Hemant Soren Over Jharkhand Protests7 Charred To Death, Several Injured In Fire At Hotel Near Tarapith Temple In Bengal’s Birbhum‘Electric Pole Fell’: 7 Women Dead, Many Injured In Stampede At Temple In Bihar’s Lakhisarai123PhotostoriesYou may feel completely fine, but these 6 everyday habits could be hurting your kidneysClassic Kasavu to rich Kanjeevaram:5 South Indian sarees to wear for Onam 2026From handloom cotton to merino wool: 6 fabrics every woman should choose this autumn for comfort, skin health and style10 vegetarian dishes from around the world that Indians will genuinely loveCharu Asopa breaks silence on financial struggles, debt and claims of keeping Ziana away from grandparents amid divorceSun Ketu in Leo 2026: Remedies you can perform according to your zodiac signWhy does dal foam while boiling? Should you actually remove it?Why does aluminium foil have a shiny and dull side? Here’s the science behind it5 Snakes that thrive in extreme climates: Here’s how they survive harsh weather conditionsForget quinoa: 9 ways to add dalia to your daily breakfast123Hot PicksArshdeep Singh DangBank holidays this weekBihar STET 2026BJP new teamJharkhand ProtestJSSC-CGL exam cancelledAbhijeet DipkeSupreme Court HolidayTwisha SharmaTop TrendingTwisha SharmaDelhi Draft PollMadhya Pradesh AccidentKolkata Airport Building FireAbhijeet DipkeKiren RijijuBengaluru Double MurderWeather TomorrowBengaluru RapidoBen Gvir

‘Platoon-level weapon’ (IANS photo) NEW DELHI: The Bihar government has told the Supreme Court that a constable deployed during student protests in Siwan fired four rounds from an AK-47 only after he was “trapped and surrounded by protesters.”A video showing a policeman firing an AK-47 during the protests went viral, triggering widespread outrage and backlash.The Samrat Choudhary government said the firing was directed into the air and did not injure any protesters.The government’s response was filed before the apex court in connection with petitions alleging excessive police force during protests linked to the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP)-led student movement.According to the affidavit, the AK-47 incident took place on July 25 near JP Chowk in Siwan. Constable Abhishek Kumar was allegedly surrounded by protesters.The State said Kumar “got trapped in the crowd” and fired four rounds from his AK-47 “in the air” to deal with the situation. It maintained that no protester was injured in this firing.The government, however, said three protesters suffered minor firearm injuries during the police action that day. It clarified that the injuries were not caused by Kumar’s AK-47 firing and that the injured protesters were not present at the spot where he opened fire.The affidavit also mentioned another firing incident during the protests. Assistant Sub-Inspector Nilesh Kumar Singh allegedly fired two rounds from his 9mm pistol near Hathi Chowk to disperse the crowd.The Bihar government maintained that police exercised restraint during the protests and did not use disproportionate force.The state government said Kumar’s firing occurred only after he was surrounded by the crowd. It also pointed out that the AK-47 was not intended for routine crowd-control or regular law-and-order duties.Kumar has since been suspended over what the government called “undesired conduct”, and departmental proceedings have been initiated against him.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesThe state govt further told the court that the AK-47 carried by Kumar was a “platoon-level weapon” meant for special operations and not for routine law-and-order deployment.The use of an assault rifle during a protest is among the issues raised before the Supreme Court, with petitioners alleging excessive use of force by police.While the Bihar government has defended the circumstances of the July 25 firing, the petitions have raised wider concerns over police action against protesters.The Samrat Choudhary government’s affidavit forms part of the ongoing proceedings before the Supreme Court. The court is examining allegations about the police response, including the circumstances of the firing, injuries reported during the protests and whether the force used was proportionate.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorAbhishek MishraAbhishek Mishra is a Digital Content Producer at The Times of India, working with the news desk. He writes with a keen eye on foreign policy, defence developments, and the shifting currents of geopolitics-and yes, Indian politics always finds a way onto his radar too.Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosVijay Apologises In Assembly After Karunanidhi Remark Sparks DMK Uproar Over Decorum BreachCriminal Cases Against Netas: 4,192 Trials Pending, 170 Lok Sabha MPs Face Serious ChargesJSSC-CGL CANCELLED: Jharkhand Students Celebrate After Government Accepts Key Demands“No Compensation, Build A School”: CJP Volunteer Emotional Tribute To Father Leaves Ranka In TearsAsish Banerjee Death Mystery: Threat, Blackmail Angle Probed As Note And Phones Face ScrutinyBJP’s Big Shake-Up: Ram Madhav Returns, Smriti Irani Gets Key Role In Nitin Nabin’s New Team‘Will Rise For Vande Mataram, But Won’t Sing’: Congress MP Imran Masood Amid Sonia Gandhi Row‘Personally Meet Students’: Rahul Gandhi Writes To CM Hemant Soren Over Jharkhand Protests7 Charred To Death, Several Injured In Fire At Hotel Near Tarapith Temple In Bengal’s Birbhum‘Electric Pole Fell’: 7 Women Dead, Many Injured In Stampede At Temple In Bihar’s Lakhisarai123PhotostoriesYou may feel completely fine, but these 6 everyday habits could be hurting your kidneysClassic Kasavu to rich Kanjeevaram:5 South Indian sarees to wear for Onam 2026From handloom cotton to merino wool: 6 fabrics every woman should choose this autumn for comfort, skin health and style10 vegetarian dishes from around the world that Indians will genuinely loveCharu Asopa breaks silence on financial struggles, debt and claims of keeping Ziana away from grandparents amid divorceSun Ketu in Leo 2026: Remedies you can perform according to your zodiac signWhy does dal foam while boiling? Should you actually remove it?Why does aluminium foil have a shiny and dull side? Here’s the science behind it5 Snakes that thrive in extreme climates: Here’s how they survive harsh weather conditionsForget quinoa: 9 ways to add dalia to your daily breakfast123Hot PicksArshdeep Singh DangBank holidays this weekBihar STET 2026BJP new teamJharkhand ProtestJSSC-CGL exam cancelledAbhijeet DipkeSupreme Court HolidayTwisha SharmaTop TrendingTwisha SharmaDelhi Draft PollMadhya Pradesh AccidentKolkata Airport Building FireAbhijeet DipkeKiren RijijuBengaluru Double MurderWeather TomorrowBengaluru RapidoBen Gvir

Vamsikrishna 0
Student protest in Jantar Mantar ( File Image) NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday said it would constitute a high-powered committee to examine allegations of police excesses during recent student protests in Delhi.A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana will pass the order on Wednesday after receiving suggestions from the parties on other members to be included in the panel.The bench further stated it will direct the authorities to hand over video footage and CCTV recordings of the violence during the July 20 Parliament march in Delhi to the committee for examination.The panel will also examine complaints and allegations made by female protesters who were reportedly targeted during the march and in other areas.During the hearing, the bench asked Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, to provide details of FIRs registered against student protesters that could be quashed, indicating that the court may exercise its plenary powers under Article 142 of the Constitution.“It is the life of students, which is at stake. We have to consider this. They have a future ahead. They have the right to protest under Article 19,” the bench told a counsel opposing the quashing of cases against student protesters without them tendering an apology.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesOn August 3, the Supreme Court clarified that the expression “criminal antecedents” in its order on the release of student protesters referred only to those involved in grave and heinous offences. It also clarified that states could close or withdraw FIRs against other students in accordance with the law.The clarification came after the Centre submitted that it was “serious” about not pursuing FIRs against students who participated in demonstrations over the NEET examination paper leak, including the July 20 Parliament march in Delhi, provided they did not have criminal antecedents.The top court had earlier observed that police excesses or a “lathi charge” could not be justified merely because there was an agitation and underlined that the right to peaceful protest was “absolutely guaranteed”.The Cockroach Janta Party (CJP)-led march on July 20 in Delhi witnessed clashes between protesters and security personnel, who used lathis and teargas shells to disperse crowds attempting to move towards Parliament.(With PTI inputs)Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosVijay Apologises In Assembly After Karunanidhi Remark Sparks DMK Uproar Over Decorum BreachCriminal Cases Against Netas: 4,192 Trials Pending, 170 Lok Sabha MPs Face Serious ChargesJSSC-CGL CANCELLED: Jharkhand Students Celebrate After Government Accepts Key Demands“No Compensation, Build A School”: CJP Volunteer Emotional Tribute To Father Leaves Ranka In TearsAsish Banerjee Death Mystery: Threat, Blackmail Angle Probed As Note And Phones Face ScrutinyBJP’s Big Shake-Up: Ram Madhav Returns, Smriti Irani Gets Key Role In Nitin Nabin’s New Team‘Will Rise For Vande Mataram, But Won’t Sing’: Congress MP Imran Masood Amid Sonia Gandhi Row‘Personally Meet Students’: Rahul Gandhi Writes To CM Hemant Soren Over Jharkhand Protests7 Charred To Death, Several Injured In Fire At Hotel Near Tarapith Temple In Bengal’s Birbhum‘Electric Pole Fell’: 7 Women Dead, Many Injured In Stampede At Temple In Bihar’s Lakhisarai123PhotostoriesYou may feel completely fine, but these 6 everyday habits could be hurting your kidneysClassic Kasavu to rich Kanjeevaram:5 South Indian sarees to wear for Onam 2026From handloom cotton to merino wool: 6 fabrics every woman should choose this autumn for comfort, skin health and style10 vegetarian dishes from around the world that Indians will genuinely loveCharu Asopa breaks silence on financial struggles, debt and claims of keeping Ziana away from grandparents amid divorceSun Ketu in Leo 2026: Remedies you can perform according to your zodiac signWhy does dal foam while boiling? Should you actually remove it?Why does aluminium foil have a shiny and dull side? Here’s the science behind it5 Snakes that thrive in extreme climates: Here’s how they survive harsh weather conditionsForget quinoa: 9 ways to add dalia to your daily breakfast123Hot PicksArshdeep Singh DangBank holidays this weekBihar STET 2026BJP new teamJharkhand ProtestJSSC-CGL exam cancelledAbhijeet DipkeSupreme Court HolidayTwisha SharmaTop TrendingTwisha SharmaDelhi Draft PollMadhya Pradesh AccidentKolkata Airport Building FireAbhijeet DipkeKiren RijijuBengaluru Double MurderWeather TomorrowBengaluru RapidoBen Gvir

Student protest in Jantar Mantar ( File Image) NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday said it would constitute a high-powered committee to examine allegations of police excesses during recent student protests in Delhi.A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana will pass the order on Wednesday after receiving suggestions from the parties on other members to be included in the panel.The bench further stated it will direct the authorities to hand over video footage and CCTV recordings of the violence during the July 20 Parliament march in Delhi to the committee for examination.The panel will also examine complaints and allegations made by female protesters who were reportedly targeted during the march and in other areas.During the hearing, the bench asked Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, to provide details of FIRs registered against student protesters that could be quashed, indicating that the court may exercise its plenary powers under Article 142 of the Constitution.“It is the life of students, which is at stake. We have to consider this. They have a future ahead. They have the right to protest under Article 19,” the bench told a counsel opposing the quashing of cases against student protesters without them tendering an apology.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesOn August 3, the Supreme Court clarified that the expression “criminal antecedents” in its order on the release of student protesters referred only to those involved in grave and heinous offences. It also clarified that states could close or withdraw FIRs against other students in accordance with the law.The clarification came after the Centre submitted that it was “serious” about not pursuing FIRs against students who participated in demonstrations over the NEET examination paper leak, including the July 20 Parliament march in Delhi, provided they did not have criminal antecedents.The top court had earlier observed that police excesses or a “lathi charge” could not be justified merely because there was an agitation and underlined that the right to peaceful protest was “absolutely guaranteed”.The Cockroach Janta Party (CJP)-led march on July 20 in Delhi witnessed clashes between protesters and security personnel, who used lathis and teargas shells to disperse crowds attempting to move towards Parliament.(With PTI inputs)Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosVijay Apologises In Assembly After Karunanidhi Remark Sparks DMK Uproar Over Decorum BreachCriminal Cases Against Netas: 4,192 Trials Pending, 170 Lok Sabha MPs Face Serious ChargesJSSC-CGL CANCELLED: Jharkhand Students Celebrate After Government Accepts Key Demands“No Compensation, Build A School”: CJP Volunteer Emotional Tribute To Father Leaves Ranka In TearsAsish Banerjee Death Mystery: Threat, Blackmail Angle Probed As Note And Phones Face ScrutinyBJP’s Big Shake-Up: Ram Madhav Returns, Smriti Irani Gets Key Role In Nitin Nabin’s New Team‘Will Rise For Vande Mataram, But Won’t Sing’: Congress MP Imran Masood Amid Sonia Gandhi Row‘Personally Meet Students’: Rahul Gandhi Writes To CM Hemant Soren Over Jharkhand Protests7 Charred To Death, Several Injured In Fire At Hotel Near Tarapith Temple In Bengal’s Birbhum‘Electric Pole Fell’: 7 Women Dead, Many Injured In Stampede At Temple In Bihar’s Lakhisarai123PhotostoriesYou may feel completely fine, but these 6 everyday habits could be hurting your kidneysClassic Kasavu to rich Kanjeevaram:5 South Indian sarees to wear for Onam 2026From handloom cotton to merino wool: 6 fabrics every woman should choose this autumn for comfort, skin health and style10 vegetarian dishes from around the world that Indians will genuinely loveCharu Asopa breaks silence on financial struggles, debt and claims of keeping Ziana away from grandparents amid divorceSun Ketu in Leo 2026: Remedies you can perform according to your zodiac signWhy does dal foam while boiling? Should you actually remove it?Why does aluminium foil have a shiny and dull side? Here’s the science behind it5 Snakes that thrive in extreme climates: Here’s how they survive harsh weather conditionsForget quinoa: 9 ways to add dalia to your daily breakfast123Hot PicksArshdeep Singh DangBank holidays this weekBihar STET 2026BJP new teamJharkhand ProtestJSSC-CGL exam cancelledAbhijeet DipkeSupreme Court HolidayTwisha SharmaTop TrendingTwisha SharmaDelhi Draft PollMadhya Pradesh AccidentKolkata Airport Building FireAbhijeet DipkeKiren RijijuBengaluru Double MurderWeather TomorrowBengaluru RapidoBen Gvir

Vamsikrishna 0