Dharmendra Pradhan (Image/PTI) NEW DELHI: Union education minister Dharmendra Pradhan on Thursday said that “we have utmost respect for judiciary” and action will be taken against those responsible for drafting a controversial chapter on judicial corruption in the Class 8 NCERT textbook. The remarks follow the Supreme Court’s directive to ban the book, seize physical copies and remove its digital versions.Reacting to the apex court’s order, Pradhan said, “Accountability will be fixed, and action will be taken against those involved in drafting the chapter on judicial corruption.” He added, “We have utmost respect for the judiciary, and the court’s directives will be complied with.”The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) also expressed support for the judiciary. Party spokesperson Sambit Patra described the issue as “sensitive”.Speaking about the ruling Patra said, “So far as the NCERT issue is concerned, it’s a sensitive matter. I would like to put forth the party’s stand as its spokesperson that there is no other institution, I would say not only in India but in this whole world, that is as independent and as deserving as the Indian judiciary is.” He further highlighted that Solicitor General Tushar Mehta assured the court that the government stands with the judiciary.The controversy arose after the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, raised objections to the chapter titled “The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society” in the newly introduced Class 8 social science textbook. The top court termed the content on corruption, backlogs and inadequate number of judges as “objectionable” and a possible “well-orchestrated conspiracy to defame the judiciary.” A three-judge bench, including Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M Pancholi, took suo motu cognisance of the matter following representations by senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Singhvi.The apex body also issued a show-cause notice to the NCERT Director and the School Education Secretary, demanding explanations on why action should not be taken against them. CJI Surya Kant stated, “It is my duty to find out who is responsible; heads must roll.” The top court also warned of serious consequences if the directions to enforce the blanket ban on the textbook were ignored.NCERT promptly apologised for the inappropriate content, withdrew the book from its website and halted further distribution. The council stated that the book will be rewritten in consultation with relevant authorities to ensure compliance with the apex court’s directions. Out of the 2.25 lakh printed copies, 38 copies had already been sold, which are being retrieved.The chapter had outlined India’s judicial system while referencing corruption, backlogs of cases and insufficient judges. This prompted the apex court to intervene to protect the institution’s integrity and maintain public confidence in the judiciary.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosUmmah Politics Erupts As Pakistan Targets Israel’s Hexagon Alliance Plan Naming India A Key AllyIndian Army Showcases Combat Power Near India-Pak BorderRare Husband-Wife Debate In Assembly: Mehtab Chandee Questions Meghalaya CM On Livestock Projects’Namaste’ In Japan: Young Indian Origin Boy Touches Yogi Adityanath Feet Recites Sacred ShlokasFrom Selfies To Shared Ride: PM Modi’s Day One In Israel Signals Strong Strategic Bond With IndiaFrom Accusations To Engagement: Canada Changes Tone On Indian Interference Before Carney Visit’Living In La La Land’: India Destroys Pakistan At UN, Says J&K’s Budget Is Double Of IMF BailoutDelhi And Himachal Police Face Off Over Arrest Of Protesting Youth Congress Workers At AI SummitRed Carpet Welcome For PM Modi In Israel, Congress Slams Visit Over Gaza ‘Genocide’ | Headlines@8Big Honour for India: PM Modi Becomes First to Receive Knesset Speaker’s Medal123Photostories5 yoga stretches to ease sitting-induced pain and release spinal tensionFrequent bloating isn’t always acidity: When to check your gut seriouslyBhojshala showdown: ASI flags temple remains, legal storm erupts in Madhya PradeshTop 6 real estate investment hotspots in Kolkata for 2026Rashmika Mandanna’s Kodava wedding saree look: Inside the royal Coorg bridal tradition and its signature draping style10 oldest universities in the world — and where they areChandra Grahan 2026 explained: Frequently asked questions about the March 3 eclipseYour heart is talking: 10 signs of an unhealthy heart you should not ignore9 quintals of adulterated mawa seized in Kanpur: 5 methods to check mawa purity at homeMercury Retrograde 2026 survival guide for every zodiac sign123Hot PicksNew Indian Railways reformsSaudi poultry import banGold rate todayBihar wedding shootIncome Tax CalculatorPublic holidays February 2026Bank Holidays februaryTop TrendingThe RockJason KelceBrittany MahomesHow to get Iron Man Skin in FortniteBank Holidays in MarchIman Shumpert ExSaudi Arabia Poultry BansKamal Maula Mosque DisputeBhojshala Madhya PradeshSalman Agha Wife
NEW DELHI: Union education minister Dharmendra Pradhan on Thursday said that “we have utmost respect for judiciary” and action will be taken against those responsible for drafting a controversial chapter on judicial corruption in the Class 8 NCERT textbook. The remarks follow the Supreme Court’s directive to ban the book, seize physical copies and remove its digital versions.Reacting to the apex court’s order, Pradhan said, “Accountability will be fixed, and action will be taken against those involved in drafting the chapter on judicial corruption.” He added, “We have utmost respect for the judiciary, and the court’s directives will be complied with.”The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) also expressed support for the judiciary. Party spokesperson Sambit Patra described the issue as “sensitive”.Speaking about the ruling Patra said, “So far as the NCERT issue is concerned, it’s a sensitive matter. I would like to put forth the party’s stand as its spokesperson that there is no other institution, I would say not only in India but in this whole world, that is as independent and as deserving as the Indian judiciary is.” He further highlighted that Solicitor General Tushar Mehta assured the court that the government stands with the judiciary.The controversy arose after the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, raised objections to the chapter titled “The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society” in the newly introduced Class 8 social science textbook. The top court termed the content on corruption, backlogs and inadequate number of judges as “objectionable” and a possible “well-orchestrated conspiracy to defame the judiciary.” A three-judge bench, including Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M Pancholi, took suo motu cognisance of the matter following representations by senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Singhvi.The apex body also issued a show-cause notice to the NCERT Director and the School Education Secretary, demanding explanations on why action should not be taken against them. CJI Surya Kant stated, “It is my duty to find out who is responsible; heads must roll.” The top court also warned of serious consequences if the directions to enforce the blanket ban on the textbook were ignored.NCERT promptly apologised for the inappropriate content, withdrew the book from its website and halted further distribution. The council stated that the book will be rewritten in consultation with relevant authorities to ensure compliance with the apex court’s directions. Out of the 2.25 lakh printed copies, 38 copies had already been sold, which are being retrieved.The chapter had outlined India’s judicial system while referencing corruption, backlogs of cases and insufficient judges. This prompted the apex court to intervene to protect the institution’s integrity and maintain public confidence in the judiciary.
