June 4, 2026

Delhi Police opposed bail for Umar Khalid and others in the 2020 riots UAPA case, citing chats about Donald Trump as evidence of a pre-planned, pan-India conspiracy. The affidavit claims the plot aimed to attract international media attention and portray the CAA as a pogrom against Muslims, leading to 53 deaths and property damage. NEW DELHI: The Delhi Police has opposed the bail plea of Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam and others in the UAPA case linked to “larger conspiracy” behind the 2020 north-east Delhi riots. In an affidavit to the Supreme Court on Thursday, it said that the “materials and chats” on record referring to Donald Trump indicated that the “conspiracy was pre-planned and sought to be replicated and executed pan India.”The counsel for Umar Khalid, on Tuesday argued before a Delhi court that no criminality could be attributed to Khalid in the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case. He contended that there was no evidence of any criminal act by Khalid, emphasizing that mere membership in a WhatsApp group did not constitute a crime, especially since Khalid had not sent any messages in the group.Delhi Encounter: Four Most Wanted Bihar Gangsters Killed in Joint OperationThe affidavit further said that the “conspiracy” was aimed at drawing attention of the “international media” and portray the Citizenship Amendment Act as “an act pogrom of Muslims community in India,” ANI reported citing the statement.The issue of CAA was carefully chosen as to serve as a “radicalising catalyst” camouflaged in the name of “peaceful protest”, affidavit said, according to the news agency.It said that the “deep-rooted, premeditated and pre-planned conspiracy” led to the death of 53 people and large-scale damage to public property.Kahild’s counsel, however, has pointed out inconsistencies in the police’s claims, noting that Trump’s visit was only reported on February 13, yet the FIR alleged that conspirators knew the date by February 8. He also highlighted call detail records showing Khalid was not present at a December 8, 2019 meeting in Jangpura where the alleged conspiracy was planned, and referred to a protected witness’s statement about a separate secret meeting supposedly tied to the conspiracy.The affidavit came after SC criticized the Delhi Police for not filing its reply to the bail applications of Sharjeel Imam, Umar Khalid, Gulfisha Fatima, Meeran Haider, and Shifa Ur Rehman. The pleas challenge the Delhi high court’s order denying them bail in the UAPA case concerning the alleged larger conspiracy behind the 2020 northeast Delhi riots.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosIndian-origin Woman Confronts JD Vance On Wife Usha’s Faith And Trump’s Immigration CrackdownPM Modi Targets RJD-Congress Over Rahul Gandhi’s Chhath ‘Nautanki’ Remark, Calls Out Jungle RajVindicated But Not Free: Indian-American Man’s 43-Year Nightmare Continues, Faces DeportationIndian Workers Face New Challenge as US Tightens Work Visa Rules Amid Crackdown on H-1B AbuseBJP Tears Into Congress for Reciting Bangladesh’s National Anthem in AssamFrom Deep-Tech To Defence: Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal Urges End To India’s Foreign DependenceHardeep Puri Announces Plan to Cut Freight Costs with India’s Own Crude Oil Tanker FleetBangladesh Next Afghanistan? Security Expert Warns As Yunus Woos Zakir Naik, Hafiz Aide’They Talk, We Act’: JDU’s Bijendra Prasad Yadav Slams Tejashwi, Rubbishes Mahagathbandhan ManifestoBJP’s Neeraj Kumar Singh Exudes Confidence Of Bihar Poll Win With ‘Big Majority’ | Exclusive123 Photostories Your Hidden Fear As Per Your Birth DateThe Witch’s Pantry: Real herbs once used in dark rituals (and now in your kitchen)From Vicky Jain to Hina Khan, Karan Kundrra and more:Richest Bigg Boss contestants of all time10 baby names that are considered to be auspicious for a familyMcDonald’s Picks Hyderabad: Opens first Global Office — its largest outside the US — a 1.56-lakh sq ft hub where data, design and decisions shape its global futureBengaluru’s Long Wait Ends: Hosakerehalli Flyover near PES College finally set to open; a 500-metre marvel marking new progress in city’s smart mobility pushMost iconic Halloween scenes from Hollywood moviesFrom UP’s Zardozi to Bihar’s Sujani: 10 legacy embroideries from different Indian states10 beautiful Mughal Gardens that still exist in all their beauty and charmSaif Ali Khan, Aditi Rao Hydari, Bhagyashree, and more: Bollywood celebrities who belong to royal lineage123Hot PicksCyclone MonthaBank Holiday TodayBihar Election 2025Gold rate todaySilver rate todayPublic Holidays NovemberBank Holidays NovemberTop TrendingKaelin Bradshaw Cause of DeathPrince HarryAnthony DavisJimmy TataRonda Rousey and Travis Net WorthH1B BanKash PatelNick MangoldLos Angeles Lakers vs Minnesota TimberwolvesConnor McDavid Wife

Vamsikrishna02 mins mins
Delhi Police opposed bail for Umar Khalid and others in the 2020 riots UAPA case, citing chats about Donald Trump as evidence of a pre-planned, pan-India conspiracy. The affidavit claims the plot aimed to attract international media attention and portray the CAA as a pogrom against Muslims, leading to 53 deaths and property damage. NEW DELHI: The Delhi Police has opposed the bail plea of Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam and others in the UAPA case linked to “larger conspiracy” behind the 2020 north-east Delhi riots. In an affidavit to the Supreme Court on Thursday, it said that the “materials and chats” on record referring to Donald Trump indicated that the “conspiracy was pre-planned and sought to be replicated and executed pan India.”The counsel for Umar Khalid, on Tuesday argued before a Delhi court that no criminality could be attributed to Khalid in the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case. He contended that there was no evidence of any criminal act by Khalid, emphasizing that mere membership in a WhatsApp group did not constitute a crime, especially since Khalid had not sent any messages in the group.Delhi Encounter: Four Most Wanted Bihar Gangsters Killed in Joint OperationThe affidavit further said that the “conspiracy” was aimed at drawing attention of the “international media” and portray the Citizenship Amendment Act as “an act pogrom of Muslims community in India,” ANI reported citing the statement.The issue of CAA was carefully chosen as to serve as a “radicalising catalyst” camouflaged in the name of “peaceful protest”, affidavit said, according to the news agency.It said that the “deep-rooted, premeditated and pre-planned conspiracy” led to the death of 53 people and large-scale damage to public property.Kahild’s counsel, however, has pointed out inconsistencies in the police’s claims, noting that Trump’s visit was only reported on February 13, yet the FIR alleged that conspirators knew the date by February 8. He also highlighted call detail records showing Khalid was not present at a December 8, 2019 meeting in Jangpura where the alleged conspiracy was planned, and referred to a protected witness’s statement about a separate secret meeting supposedly tied to the conspiracy.The affidavit came after SC criticized the Delhi Police for not filing its reply to the bail applications of Sharjeel Imam, Umar Khalid, Gulfisha Fatima, Meeran Haider, and Shifa Ur Rehman. The pleas challenge the Delhi high court’s order denying them bail in the UAPA case concerning the alleged larger conspiracy behind the 2020 northeast Delhi riots.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosIndian-origin Woman Confronts JD Vance On Wife Usha’s Faith And Trump’s Immigration CrackdownPM Modi Targets RJD-Congress Over Rahul Gandhi’s Chhath ‘Nautanki’ Remark, Calls Out Jungle RajVindicated But Not Free: Indian-American Man’s 43-Year Nightmare Continues, Faces DeportationIndian Workers Face New Challenge as US Tightens Work Visa Rules Amid Crackdown on H-1B AbuseBJP Tears Into Congress for Reciting Bangladesh’s National Anthem in AssamFrom Deep-Tech To Defence: Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal Urges End To India’s Foreign DependenceHardeep Puri Announces Plan to Cut Freight Costs with India’s Own Crude Oil Tanker FleetBangladesh Next Afghanistan? Security Expert Warns As Yunus Woos Zakir Naik, Hafiz Aide’They Talk, We Act’: JDU’s Bijendra Prasad Yadav Slams Tejashwi, Rubbishes Mahagathbandhan ManifestoBJP’s Neeraj Kumar Singh Exudes Confidence Of Bihar Poll Win With ‘Big Majority’ | Exclusive123 Photostories Your Hidden Fear As Per Your Birth DateThe Witch’s Pantry: Real herbs once used in dark rituals (and now in your kitchen)From Vicky Jain to Hina Khan, Karan Kundrra and more:Richest Bigg Boss contestants of all time10 baby names that are considered to be auspicious for a familyMcDonald’s Picks Hyderabad: Opens first Global Office — its largest outside the US — a 1.56-lakh sq ft hub where data, design and decisions shape its global futureBengaluru’s Long Wait Ends: Hosakerehalli Flyover near PES College finally set to open; a 500-metre marvel marking new progress in city’s smart mobility pushMost iconic Halloween scenes from Hollywood moviesFrom UP’s Zardozi to Bihar’s Sujani: 10 legacy embroideries from different Indian states10 beautiful Mughal Gardens that still exist in all their beauty and charmSaif Ali Khan, Aditi Rao Hydari, Bhagyashree, and more: Bollywood celebrities who belong to royal lineage123Hot PicksCyclone MonthaBank Holiday TodayBihar Election 2025Gold rate todaySilver rate todayPublic Holidays NovemberBank Holidays NovemberTop TrendingKaelin Bradshaw Cause of DeathPrince HarryAnthony DavisJimmy TataRonda Rousey and Travis Net WorthH1B BanKash PatelNick MangoldLos Angeles Lakers vs Minnesota TimberwolvesConnor McDavid Wife


2020 riots case: 'Timed for Donald Trump visit, planned pan-India stir' -- Delhi police's big charge against Umar Khalid and others

NEW DELHI: The Delhi Police has opposed the bail plea of Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam and others in the UAPA case linked to “larger conspiracy” behind the 2020 north-east Delhi riots. In an affidavit to the Supreme Court on Thursday, it said that the “materials and chats” on record referring to Donald Trump indicated that the “conspiracy was pre-planned and sought to be replicated and executed pan India.“The counsel for Umar Khalid, on Tuesday argued before a Delhi court that no criminality could be attributed to Khalid in the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case. He contended that there was no evidence of any criminal act by Khalid, emphasizing that mere membership in a WhatsApp group did not constitute a crime, especially since Khalid had not sent any messages in the group.

Delhi Encounter: Four Most Wanted Bihar Gangsters Killed in Joint Operation

The affidavit further said that the “conspiracy” was aimed at drawing attention of the “international media” and portray the Citizenship Amendment Act as “an act pogrom of Muslims community in India,” ANI reported citing the statement.The issue of CAA was carefully chosen as to serve as a “radicalising catalyst” camouflaged in the name of “peaceful protest”, affidavit said, according to the news agency.It said that the “deep-rooted, premeditated and pre-planned conspiracy” led to the death of 53 people and large-scale damage to public property.Kahild’s counsel, however, has pointed out inconsistencies in the police’s claims, noting that Trump’s visit was only reported on February 13, yet the FIR alleged that conspirators knew the date by February 8. He also highlighted call detail records showing Khalid was not present at a December 8, 2019 meeting in Jangpura where the alleged conspiracy was planned, and referred to a protected witness’s statement about a separate secret meeting supposedly tied to the conspiracy.The affidavit came after SC criticized the Delhi Police for not filing its reply to the bail applications of Sharjeel Imam, Umar Khalid, Gulfisha Fatima, Meeran Haider, and Shifa Ur Rehman. The pleas challenge the Delhi high court’s order denying them bail in the UAPA case concerning the alleged larger conspiracy behind the 2020 northeast Delhi riots.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related News

Representative image “If you’re a bachelor/young couple with kids, as much as possible, avoid high rises”A software engineer’s recent words in a viral social media post warning bachelors and young couples against living in high-rise societies reignited a debate that has simmered in Indian cities for years. The post, which criticised resident welfare associations (RWAs) for being intrusive and overly controlling, struck a chord with thousands of young urban residents who shared similar experiences of visitor restrictions, moral policing and constant scrutiny.But beneath the outrage lies a deeper question. Why do so many housing societies continue to view bachelors with suspicion? Why do landlords often prefer families over single tenants? And are these concerns rooted in reality, stereotypes, or a mix of both?From metro to tier-III cities, the debate over who makes an “ideal resident” has become one of the tensions of urban housing. As Indian cities grow denser and younger professionals migrate in large numbers for work, housing societies are increasingly becoming places where different generations and lifestyles collide.Why housing societies have rulesModern apartment complexes often house hundreds or even thousands of residents. They function almost like small towns, with shared infrastructure, security systems, parking spaces, lifts, clubhouses and common areas. Rules governing visitor access, noise levels, parking, security verification and maintenance are often created to ensure that such large communities function smoothly.Most residents would agree that some level of regulation is necessary. Few would object to security checks, tenant verification or restrictions designed to prevent genuine nuisance.The problem begins when residents feel that society moves beyond regulation and into interference.Over the years, multiple disputes have emerged over restrictions on visitors, use of common spaces, tenant screening and lifestyle choices. In some cases, RWAs have tightened regulations following specific incidents or security concerns. Some justify it as necessary, while others question the logic. For instance, on the viral techie’s post, one person replied, “I agree excessive monitoring is wrong, but nuisance and late-night disturbance cannot be justified in the name of ‘privacy’. Community living requires basic civic sense and consideration for others, irrespective of whether it’s a high-rise or low-rise apartment.”On the contrary, many questioned the norms while sharing their own experiences of being judged without reason, with one calling it “misplaced frustrations.”The bachelor experienceFor many young professionals, finding a house can be difficult, not just in getting the right facilities but also in dealing with the challenge of not being stereotyped.Across cities, bachelors frequently report being rejected by landlords, asked to pay higher deposits or subjected to stricter conditions than families. Housing societies often require additional approvals, while some landlords openly advertise flats as “family only”.The assumptions are familiar.Bachelors are often associated with late-night parties, alcohol consumption, loud music, poor upkeep of property and frequent visitors. Even when none of these applies, many say they begin the rental process carrying that burden.Recalling her experience of finding a place, Purwa, a working professional, said, “What makes it harder is the constant scrutiny many bachelors face. There are questions about who visits you, when you come home, and how you choose to live. Sometimes it feels like you are being watched all the time. Many owners genuinely care about their property, but at times the constant checking and interference can make tenants feel less like residents and more like people who have to keep explaining themselves”“Young professionals are not looking for special treatment. They simply want to be trusted and treated fairly. Housing societies have every right to maintain security and discipline, but people should be judged by their behaviour, not by stereotypes attached to their marital status. At the end of the day, a rented house is not just a property. For someone living alone in a new city, it is the closest thing to home,” she added.Many owners genuinely care about their property, but at times the constant checking and interference can make tenants feel less like residents and more like people who have to keep explaining themselves.Purwa, young working bachelor, renting in a high riseSimilar concerns were echoed by other young tenants, who said the issue often extends beyond house-hunting and continues even after moving in. “While I may not have been outright denied housing, I have experienced how societies and rental arrangements often treat bachelors differently from owners. There is a clear power imbalance where tenants, especially single tenants, are viewed with suspicion and given less respect,” said Sonali Verma, another bachelor, living in a Noida high rise.Recalling an earlier rental experience, Verma alleged that a flatmate repeatedly violated her privacy by entering her room without permission and monitoring her activities, while her complaints were not taken seriously because she was a bachelor tenant. The episode left her feeling that “as a tenant, my rights and personal space mattered less than those of someone who owned the property”. She further argued that bachelors are often unfairly stereotyped as disruptive, despite her experience showing that problematic behaviour can be found across age groups. Recalling encounters with older residents who behaved in a rude and intimidating manner in public spaces, adding that the issue was “simply individual behaviour”, not age or marital status.I have often noticed that guards, maintenance staff, and society management tend to treat bachelors as if they are temporary occupants who need to be constantly monitored. There is an underlying assumption that tenants, especially young working professionals, are more likely to create problems, which affects how they are treated on a daily basis.Sonali Verma, a bachelor living in Noida high riseThe issue is not new. More than a decade ago, TOI had also reported that many housing societies either discouraged or outright opposed renting homes to single tenants, citing concerns about nuisance and property maintenance.In recent years, social media has amplified these experiences. A Bengaluru housing society’s rules for bachelors became a hot topic after restrictions reportedly included limits on guests and use of common areas.Young couples often find themselves facing similar scrutiny. Unmarried couples in particular complain of moral policing, questions about visitors and discomfort over being constantly monitored and questioned on every little thing.What landlords and families have to sayThe other side of the story cannot be ignored.Many landlords point to instances of property damage, noise complaints, parking disputes or late-night disturbances involving tenants. Like, in May, an X user posted, “As a bachelor and also owner of the PGs, I can say bachelors are the most unhinged creatures lives in the room. Smoking, drinking, party in stricly prohibited areas, Not respecting boundary of the landlord, 0 civics sense. This is not called living in 1970s this is just how life works if you can’t live like normal person don’t blame others for being harsh.”Post on X (@sopyaaaa_xd)Others say bachelors tend to move frequently, making them less stable tenants than families.In a TOI report from earlier this year, an RWA director in Indore was quoted as saying, “In our township, flats are given on rent through brokers. We have instructed them not to give flats to bachelors or for commercial activity. As we cannot ban them legally, so when some bachelors stay, we do a background check, inform the police regarding the tenant, keep a copy of their documents, and observe them strictly. If some residents complain against them, then they are issued a notice and in serious cases police are informed.”Another RWA member from a Noida high rise mentioned how some have resorted to blanket rules due to past instances but did emphasise that it shouldn’t be the norm and rules should be general and for all irrespective of age or marital status. ” Over the years, some societies have faced issues related to late-night disturbances, parking conflicts, or non-compliance with community rules, and those experiences sometimes shape perceptions. That said, it is important to recognise that not every bachelor or young tenant is the same,” he said.Echoing similar thoughts, some have chosen to take it case-by-case. Like Veenit Tiwari, SCC Sapphire, Rajnagar Extension, Ghaziabad, who said, “I’ve rented my flat in Rajnagar Extension, Ghaziabad to a young couple and the experience has been largely positive. They’re responsible, respectful of shared spaces, and communicate well. The concerns many landlords have about young tenants are often overstated — in my experience, maturity isn’t defined by age or marital status.”In my experience, maturity isn’t defined by age or marital status.Veenit Tiwari, landlord with flat at SCC Sapphire, Rajnagar Extension, GhaziabadMeanwhile, there is also a generational dimension to the debate.Older residents and those living with families often prioritise security, predictability and a sense of neighbourhood order. Younger residents, particularly those who have moved cities for work, tend to place greater emphasis on privacy and personal autonomy.The result is a clash between two very different ideas of community living.One side sees rules as essential for maintaining harmony. The other sees many of those same rules as intrusive and unnecessary.The danger of stereotypesThe biggest problem with this debate is that both sides often rely on generalisations.There is no denying that some tenants create problems. Every city has examples of flats that become sources of repeated complaints over noise, parking or irresponsible behaviour.But it is equally true that disruptive behaviour is not limited to bachelors.Anyone who has lived in a housing society knows that disputes frequently involve families as well. Parking battles, maintenance disagreements, neighbour feuds, WhatsApp group wars and conflicts over common areas often have little to do with marital status.Being married does not automatically make someone a considerate resident. Being single does not automatically make someone a troublesome one.Yet isolated incidents often end up shaping collective perceptions.Yet some residents say perceptions can change once people get to know their neighbours. Aniket, who lives with his family in a housing society, said initial complaints about bachelor tenants in his community eventually faded. “Only in early phases I heard people complaining about loud music from their flat but since then no complaints have been heard about them,” he said, adding that, “to judge an individual’s behaviour you require some time and interactions. In societies people generally live among themselves or interact with the 2-3 families where they have mutual understanding. Everyone is busy in themselves thus at first glance they judge tenants on age,and other superficial factors like marital status.”I think to judge individual’s behaviour you require some time and interactions. In societies people generally live among themselves or interact with the 2-3 families where they have mutual understanding. Everyone is busy in themseleves thus in first glance they judge tenants on age,and otherAniket, living with his familyThus, when a few tenants create problems, entire groups can become targets of suspicion. Housing policies then begin to reflect assumptions rather than individual behaviour.Aparna Gupta, a 30-year-old finance professional and bachelor in a Gurugram high-rise, said, “While society rules are generally fair, informal expectations can sometimes lead to greater scrutiny of our guests, social lives, and lifestyle choices. I believe community rules should focus on mutual respect and responsible behavior rather than stereotypes about what an ‘ideal’ resident looks like.”Aparna Gupta, a bachelor residing in Gurugram high riseThe rise of WhatsApp governanceAnother factor transforming housing society life is technology.Many disputes that once remained private now play out publicly on resident WhatsApp groups and community platforms.Complaints about visitors, pets, parking, deliveries and noise can quickly become neighbourhood controversies. Residents often describe feeling watched, judged or publicly called out for relatively minor issues.Supporters argue that these platforms improve accountability and communication. Critics say they encourage surveillance and amplify conflicts that could otherwise be resolved through private conversation.The viral post that sparked the latest debate is itself a reflection of this phenomenon. A dispute that began inside one housing society eventually became a national discussion about how urban communities function.What does the law sayLegally, the position is clearer than many people assume.Housing societies do have the power to frame rules, but those powers are not unlimited.Most apartment complexes function under state-specific cooperative housing laws, apartment ownership acts and society bye-laws. These generally allow societies to set procedures related to security, tenant registration, visitor management, maintenance and the use of common areas.In practice, many restrictions emerge through resolutions passed by managing committees or through society bye-laws adopted by residents. Societies may require police verification of tenants, registration of occupants and compliance with security protocols. They can also establish reasonable rules aimed at maintaining safety and order within the community.The debate begins when such rules move beyond administration and into regulating personal choices.That concern was at the heart of software engineer Shravan Venkataraman’s viral post. Criticising life in large gated communities, he alleged that some RWAs attempt to dictate “how one should live in a home they are renting/owning”, including “who can come for a visit, who can’t” and other aspects of residents’ personal lives. His remarks resonated with many users who shared similar experiences involving visitor restrictions, scrutiny of bachelors and what they viewed as moral policing.The issue, however, is hardly new.In 2022, residents of Emerald Court in Noida’s Sector 93A issued notices asking bachelor tenants and students staying in paying guest accommodations to vacate following complaints from some residents. The controversy reignited a long-running debate over whether housing societies should be able to impose restrictions based on marital status or lifestyle choices.Legal experts note that while societies can regulate security and administrative matters, there is no specific law in India that prohibits a person from renting a home simply because they are unmarried or a bachelor. Housing societies generally cannot impose blanket bans solely based on marital status.The reality, however, is that most such disputes never reach a courtroom. Faced with resistance from landlords or housing societies, many tenants simply look elsewhere rather than challenge the decision through legal channels.Additionally, in Maharashtra, for instance, cooperative housing societies function under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, related rules and approved bye-laws. Any restriction imposed by a society is expected to be legally valid, reasonable and consistent with governing laws.As a result, the debate over bachelors and housing societies continues to be shaped as much by social attitudes and community norms as by the law itself.Finding a middle groundThe debate over bachelors in housing societies is ultimately about trust.Landlords and RWAs have legitimate concerns about security, accountability and peaceful living. Young professionals and tenants have equally legitimate concerns about privacy, dignity and freedom from stereotypes.Neither side benefits when individual incidents are used to judge entire groups.A society cannot function if every bachelor is treated as a potential problem. Nor can it function if residents dismiss all community concerns as interference.As Shamli Gupta, living in a Noida high-rise, with her family, talked about potential solutions for harmony. “Behaviour depends on the individual, not on whether someone is a bachelor or part of a family. Many bachelors are responsible and respectful, just as there can be families who may cause disturbances. While I understand that societies want to maintain discipline and harmony, imposing blanket restrictions on bachelors may not be entirely fair,” she said.“A better approach would be to have clear rules regarding noise, security, and community conduct that apply equally to all residents,” she added.Instead of banning bachelors, societies should have clear rules for everyone—like noise limits and visitor guidelines.Shamli Gupta, a woman living in a joint family in a Noida high risePallavi Joshi, a resident at Veer Banda Bairagi Apartment, Dwarka, who’s with her husband and a baby, echoed this call for mutual understanding. “It’s always good to be with like-minded people and if they are young and with a similar age group that’s even better. It’s easy to build conversations, share ideas and make use of even modern advancements to make the society better,” she said.“One’s behaviour and positive attitude towards society and life encourages you. The younger generation is more aware and has a great outlook towards life. After all, it’s not about the biodata but the person he/she is!” she added.Pallavi Joshi and her partner Virain BhattaAs India’s cities become more mobile, diverse and interconnected, housing societies will have to adapt to changing realities. The challenge is not choosing between rules and freedom. It is creating communities where rules are applied fairly, residents are judged by their conduct rather than their marital status, and differences in lifestyle do not automatically become grounds for exclusion.Because in the end, good neighbours are defined not by whether they are bachelors, families or retirees, but by how they share the space around them.About the AuthorTrisha MahajanTrisha Mahajan is a journalist with The Times of India digital, with keen interest in covering business and corporate affairs. She also reports on key national and world developments and global news trends. A keen reader with a strong interest in storytelling that adds context, clarity, and depth to complex issues.Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosPune IT Firm Abruptly Closes Operations, Over 700 Employees And Interns Left JoblessCongress Tells Cadre To Ignore CJP, Stay Focused On NEET-CBSE AgitationWhy IRCTC Is Verifying 6 Crore Users And Deploying AI Cameras In 800 KitchensBeyond Roads And Troops: Why India Is Building A Model Village Near The LACBJP Alleges TMC MLA Linked To Land Grab, Compensation Fraud And Illegal Construction; Seeks ED ProbeBihar Hospital Fire Claims Four Lives; CM Announces Rs 4 Lakh AidViral Marriage Proposal By Army Captain Draws Scrutiny Over Military ProtocolPermission Pending As CJP Mobilises Supporters For June 6 Jantar Mantar ProtestDelhi Government Orders Crackdown After Fatal Hotel Fire In Malviya NagarIndia’s Naval Power Grows With Induction Of Five Indigenous Warships123PhotostoriesMillions of women live with period pain, PMOS and UTIs: But experts say that doesn’t make them normalFrom Spiti to Antarctica: World’s most unusual post offices every traveller should visitToo much screen time? Here are 8 things parents can do to set healthy boundaries for kidsAamir Ali’s luxurious Mumbai house: A massive living room, art collection, walk-in wardrobe and moreThe most powerful Devi Mantras to enhance your inner power and strengthIs your child ready for pre-school? These 8 signs can help you decideWhich Hindu holy book should you read during difficult times?When is a headache more than just a headache? Doctor explains the brain tumor warning signs people often ignoreMadhuri Dixit just gave denim fabric a couture upgrade with a saree, and the internet can’t look away10 countries where it is safe to drink tap water while travelling123Hot PicksDelhi Restaurant FireManchester CityDelhi Airport FlightTS LAWCET 2026Lovkesh BajajAnnapurna Bhandar schemeNEET re-exam 2026Annapurna schemeKCET Result 2026Top TrendingDelhi Malviya Nagar Restaurant FireBengaluru MurderK AnnamalaiAnnapurna BhandarFirhad HakimDK ShivakumarKerala MonsoonAbhishek BanerjeeMamata BanerjeeKoyambedu Baw Brawl

Representative image “If you’re a bachelor/young couple with kids, as much as possible, avoid high rises”A software engineer’s recent words in a viral social media post warning bachelors and young couples against living in high-rise societies reignited a debate that has simmered in Indian cities for years. The post, which criticised resident welfare associations (RWAs) for being intrusive and overly controlling, struck a chord with thousands of young urban residents who shared similar experiences of visitor restrictions, moral policing and constant scrutiny.But beneath the outrage lies a deeper question. Why do so many housing societies continue to view bachelors with suspicion? Why do landlords often prefer families over single tenants? And are these concerns rooted in reality, stereotypes, or a mix of both?From metro to tier-III cities, the debate over who makes an “ideal resident” has become one of the tensions of urban housing. As Indian cities grow denser and younger professionals migrate in large numbers for work, housing societies are increasingly becoming places where different generations and lifestyles collide.Why housing societies have rulesModern apartment complexes often house hundreds or even thousands of residents. They function almost like small towns, with shared infrastructure, security systems, parking spaces, lifts, clubhouses and common areas. Rules governing visitor access, noise levels, parking, security verification and maintenance are often created to ensure that such large communities function smoothly.Most residents would agree that some level of regulation is necessary. Few would object to security checks, tenant verification or restrictions designed to prevent genuine nuisance.The problem begins when residents feel that society moves beyond regulation and into interference.Over the years, multiple disputes have emerged over restrictions on visitors, use of common spaces, tenant screening and lifestyle choices. In some cases, RWAs have tightened regulations following specific incidents or security concerns. Some justify it as necessary, while others question the logic. For instance, on the viral techie’s post, one person replied, “I agree excessive monitoring is wrong, but nuisance and late-night disturbance cannot be justified in the name of ‘privacy’. Community living requires basic civic sense and consideration for others, irrespective of whether it’s a high-rise or low-rise apartment.”On the contrary, many questioned the norms while sharing their own experiences of being judged without reason, with one calling it “misplaced frustrations.”The bachelor experienceFor many young professionals, finding a house can be difficult, not just in getting the right facilities but also in dealing with the challenge of not being stereotyped.Across cities, bachelors frequently report being rejected by landlords, asked to pay higher deposits or subjected to stricter conditions than families. Housing societies often require additional approvals, while some landlords openly advertise flats as “family only”.The assumptions are familiar.Bachelors are often associated with late-night parties, alcohol consumption, loud music, poor upkeep of property and frequent visitors. Even when none of these applies, many say they begin the rental process carrying that burden.Recalling her experience of finding a place, Purwa, a working professional, said, “What makes it harder is the constant scrutiny many bachelors face. There are questions about who visits you, when you come home, and how you choose to live. Sometimes it feels like you are being watched all the time. Many owners genuinely care about their property, but at times the constant checking and interference can make tenants feel less like residents and more like people who have to keep explaining themselves”“Young professionals are not looking for special treatment. They simply want to be trusted and treated fairly. Housing societies have every right to maintain security and discipline, but people should be judged by their behaviour, not by stereotypes attached to their marital status. At the end of the day, a rented house is not just a property. For someone living alone in a new city, it is the closest thing to home,” she added.Many owners genuinely care about their property, but at times the constant checking and interference can make tenants feel less like residents and more like people who have to keep explaining themselves.Purwa, young working bachelor, renting in a high riseSimilar concerns were echoed by other young tenants, who said the issue often extends beyond house-hunting and continues even after moving in. “While I may not have been outright denied housing, I have experienced how societies and rental arrangements often treat bachelors differently from owners. There is a clear power imbalance where tenants, especially single tenants, are viewed with suspicion and given less respect,” said Sonali Verma, another bachelor, living in a Noida high rise.Recalling an earlier rental experience, Verma alleged that a flatmate repeatedly violated her privacy by entering her room without permission and monitoring her activities, while her complaints were not taken seriously because she was a bachelor tenant. The episode left her feeling that “as a tenant, my rights and personal space mattered less than those of someone who owned the property”. She further argued that bachelors are often unfairly stereotyped as disruptive, despite her experience showing that problematic behaviour can be found across age groups. Recalling encounters with older residents who behaved in a rude and intimidating manner in public spaces, adding that the issue was “simply individual behaviour”, not age or marital status.I have often noticed that guards, maintenance staff, and society management tend to treat bachelors as if they are temporary occupants who need to be constantly monitored. There is an underlying assumption that tenants, especially young working professionals, are more likely to create problems, which affects how they are treated on a daily basis.Sonali Verma, a bachelor living in Noida high riseThe issue is not new. More than a decade ago, TOI had also reported that many housing societies either discouraged or outright opposed renting homes to single tenants, citing concerns about nuisance and property maintenance.In recent years, social media has amplified these experiences. A Bengaluru housing society’s rules for bachelors became a hot topic after restrictions reportedly included limits on guests and use of common areas.Young couples often find themselves facing similar scrutiny. Unmarried couples in particular complain of moral policing, questions about visitors and discomfort over being constantly monitored and questioned on every little thing.What landlords and families have to sayThe other side of the story cannot be ignored.Many landlords point to instances of property damage, noise complaints, parking disputes or late-night disturbances involving tenants. Like, in May, an X user posted, “As a bachelor and also owner of the PGs, I can say bachelors are the most unhinged creatures lives in the room. Smoking, drinking, party in stricly prohibited areas, Not respecting boundary of the landlord, 0 civics sense. This is not called living in 1970s this is just how life works if you can’t live like normal person don’t blame others for being harsh.”Post on X (@sopyaaaa_xd)Others say bachelors tend to move frequently, making them less stable tenants than families.In a TOI report from earlier this year, an RWA director in Indore was quoted as saying, “In our township, flats are given on rent through brokers. We have instructed them not to give flats to bachelors or for commercial activity. As we cannot ban them legally, so when some bachelors stay, we do a background check, inform the police regarding the tenant, keep a copy of their documents, and observe them strictly. If some residents complain against them, then they are issued a notice and in serious cases police are informed.”Another RWA member from a Noida high rise mentioned how some have resorted to blanket rules due to past instances but did emphasise that it shouldn’t be the norm and rules should be general and for all irrespective of age or marital status. ” Over the years, some societies have faced issues related to late-night disturbances, parking conflicts, or non-compliance with community rules, and those experiences sometimes shape perceptions. That said, it is important to recognise that not every bachelor or young tenant is the same,” he said.Echoing similar thoughts, some have chosen to take it case-by-case. Like Veenit Tiwari, SCC Sapphire, Rajnagar Extension, Ghaziabad, who said, “I’ve rented my flat in Rajnagar Extension, Ghaziabad to a young couple and the experience has been largely positive. They’re responsible, respectful of shared spaces, and communicate well. The concerns many landlords have about young tenants are often overstated — in my experience, maturity isn’t defined by age or marital status.”In my experience, maturity isn’t defined by age or marital status.Veenit Tiwari, landlord with flat at SCC Sapphire, Rajnagar Extension, GhaziabadMeanwhile, there is also a generational dimension to the debate.Older residents and those living with families often prioritise security, predictability and a sense of neighbourhood order. Younger residents, particularly those who have moved cities for work, tend to place greater emphasis on privacy and personal autonomy.The result is a clash between two very different ideas of community living.One side sees rules as essential for maintaining harmony. The other sees many of those same rules as intrusive and unnecessary.The danger of stereotypesThe biggest problem with this debate is that both sides often rely on generalisations.There is no denying that some tenants create problems. Every city has examples of flats that become sources of repeated complaints over noise, parking or irresponsible behaviour.But it is equally true that disruptive behaviour is not limited to bachelors.Anyone who has lived in a housing society knows that disputes frequently involve families as well. Parking battles, maintenance disagreements, neighbour feuds, WhatsApp group wars and conflicts over common areas often have little to do with marital status.Being married does not automatically make someone a considerate resident. Being single does not automatically make someone a troublesome one.Yet isolated incidents often end up shaping collective perceptions.Yet some residents say perceptions can change once people get to know their neighbours. Aniket, who lives with his family in a housing society, said initial complaints about bachelor tenants in his community eventually faded. “Only in early phases I heard people complaining about loud music from their flat but since then no complaints have been heard about them,” he said, adding that, “to judge an individual’s behaviour you require some time and interactions. In societies people generally live among themselves or interact with the 2-3 families where they have mutual understanding. Everyone is busy in themselves thus at first glance they judge tenants on age,and other superficial factors like marital status.”I think to judge individual’s behaviour you require some time and interactions. In societies people generally live among themselves or interact with the 2-3 families where they have mutual understanding. Everyone is busy in themseleves thus in first glance they judge tenants on age,and otherAniket, living with his familyThus, when a few tenants create problems, entire groups can become targets of suspicion. Housing policies then begin to reflect assumptions rather than individual behaviour.Aparna Gupta, a 30-year-old finance professional and bachelor in a Gurugram high-rise, said, “While society rules are generally fair, informal expectations can sometimes lead to greater scrutiny of our guests, social lives, and lifestyle choices. I believe community rules should focus on mutual respect and responsible behavior rather than stereotypes about what an ‘ideal’ resident looks like.”Aparna Gupta, a bachelor residing in Gurugram high riseThe rise of WhatsApp governanceAnother factor transforming housing society life is technology.Many disputes that once remained private now play out publicly on resident WhatsApp groups and community platforms.Complaints about visitors, pets, parking, deliveries and noise can quickly become neighbourhood controversies. Residents often describe feeling watched, judged or publicly called out for relatively minor issues.Supporters argue that these platforms improve accountability and communication. Critics say they encourage surveillance and amplify conflicts that could otherwise be resolved through private conversation.The viral post that sparked the latest debate is itself a reflection of this phenomenon. A dispute that began inside one housing society eventually became a national discussion about how urban communities function.What does the law sayLegally, the position is clearer than many people assume.Housing societies do have the power to frame rules, but those powers are not unlimited.Most apartment complexes function under state-specific cooperative housing laws, apartment ownership acts and society bye-laws. These generally allow societies to set procedures related to security, tenant registration, visitor management, maintenance and the use of common areas.In practice, many restrictions emerge through resolutions passed by managing committees or through society bye-laws adopted by residents. Societies may require police verification of tenants, registration of occupants and compliance with security protocols. They can also establish reasonable rules aimed at maintaining safety and order within the community.The debate begins when such rules move beyond administration and into regulating personal choices.That concern was at the heart of software engineer Shravan Venkataraman’s viral post. Criticising life in large gated communities, he alleged that some RWAs attempt to dictate “how one should live in a home they are renting/owning”, including “who can come for a visit, who can’t” and other aspects of residents’ personal lives. His remarks resonated with many users who shared similar experiences involving visitor restrictions, scrutiny of bachelors and what they viewed as moral policing.The issue, however, is hardly new.In 2022, residents of Emerald Court in Noida’s Sector 93A issued notices asking bachelor tenants and students staying in paying guest accommodations to vacate following complaints from some residents. The controversy reignited a long-running debate over whether housing societies should be able to impose restrictions based on marital status or lifestyle choices.Legal experts note that while societies can regulate security and administrative matters, there is no specific law in India that prohibits a person from renting a home simply because they are unmarried or a bachelor. Housing societies generally cannot impose blanket bans solely based on marital status.The reality, however, is that most such disputes never reach a courtroom. Faced with resistance from landlords or housing societies, many tenants simply look elsewhere rather than challenge the decision through legal channels.Additionally, in Maharashtra, for instance, cooperative housing societies function under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, related rules and approved bye-laws. Any restriction imposed by a society is expected to be legally valid, reasonable and consistent with governing laws.As a result, the debate over bachelors and housing societies continues to be shaped as much by social attitudes and community norms as by the law itself.Finding a middle groundThe debate over bachelors in housing societies is ultimately about trust.Landlords and RWAs have legitimate concerns about security, accountability and peaceful living. Young professionals and tenants have equally legitimate concerns about privacy, dignity and freedom from stereotypes.Neither side benefits when individual incidents are used to judge entire groups.A society cannot function if every bachelor is treated as a potential problem. Nor can it function if residents dismiss all community concerns as interference.As Shamli Gupta, living in a Noida high-rise, with her family, talked about potential solutions for harmony. “Behaviour depends on the individual, not on whether someone is a bachelor or part of a family. Many bachelors are responsible and respectful, just as there can be families who may cause disturbances. While I understand that societies want to maintain discipline and harmony, imposing blanket restrictions on bachelors may not be entirely fair,” she said.“A better approach would be to have clear rules regarding noise, security, and community conduct that apply equally to all residents,” she added.Instead of banning bachelors, societies should have clear rules for everyone—like noise limits and visitor guidelines.Shamli Gupta, a woman living in a joint family in a Noida high risePallavi Joshi, a resident at Veer Banda Bairagi Apartment, Dwarka, who’s with her husband and a baby, echoed this call for mutual understanding. “It’s always good to be with like-minded people and if they are young and with a similar age group that’s even better. It’s easy to build conversations, share ideas and make use of even modern advancements to make the society better,” she said.“One’s behaviour and positive attitude towards society and life encourages you. The younger generation is more aware and has a great outlook towards life. After all, it’s not about the biodata but the person he/she is!” she added.Pallavi Joshi and her partner Virain BhattaAs India’s cities become more mobile, diverse and interconnected, housing societies will have to adapt to changing realities. The challenge is not choosing between rules and freedom. It is creating communities where rules are applied fairly, residents are judged by their conduct rather than their marital status, and differences in lifestyle do not automatically become grounds for exclusion.Because in the end, good neighbours are defined not by whether they are bachelors, families or retirees, but by how they share the space around them.About the AuthorTrisha MahajanTrisha Mahajan is a journalist with The Times of India digital, with keen interest in covering business and corporate affairs. She also reports on key national and world developments and global news trends. A keen reader with a strong interest in storytelling that adds context, clarity, and depth to complex issues.Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosPune IT Firm Abruptly Closes Operations, Over 700 Employees And Interns Left JoblessCongress Tells Cadre To Ignore CJP, Stay Focused On NEET-CBSE AgitationWhy IRCTC Is Verifying 6 Crore Users And Deploying AI Cameras In 800 KitchensBeyond Roads And Troops: Why India Is Building A Model Village Near The LACBJP Alleges TMC MLA Linked To Land Grab, Compensation Fraud And Illegal Construction; Seeks ED ProbeBihar Hospital Fire Claims Four Lives; CM Announces Rs 4 Lakh AidViral Marriage Proposal By Army Captain Draws Scrutiny Over Military ProtocolPermission Pending As CJP Mobilises Supporters For June 6 Jantar Mantar ProtestDelhi Government Orders Crackdown After Fatal Hotel Fire In Malviya NagarIndia’s Naval Power Grows With Induction Of Five Indigenous Warships123PhotostoriesMillions of women live with period pain, PMOS and UTIs: But experts say that doesn’t make them normalFrom Spiti to Antarctica: World’s most unusual post offices every traveller should visitToo much screen time? Here are 8 things parents can do to set healthy boundaries for kidsAamir Ali’s luxurious Mumbai house: A massive living room, art collection, walk-in wardrobe and moreThe most powerful Devi Mantras to enhance your inner power and strengthIs your child ready for pre-school? These 8 signs can help you decideWhich Hindu holy book should you read during difficult times?When is a headache more than just a headache? Doctor explains the brain tumor warning signs people often ignoreMadhuri Dixit just gave denim fabric a couture upgrade with a saree, and the internet can’t look away10 countries where it is safe to drink tap water while travelling123Hot PicksDelhi Restaurant FireManchester CityDelhi Airport FlightTS LAWCET 2026Lovkesh BajajAnnapurna Bhandar schemeNEET re-exam 2026Annapurna schemeKCET Result 2026Top TrendingDelhi Malviya Nagar Restaurant FireBengaluru MurderK AnnamalaiAnnapurna BhandarFirhad HakimDK ShivakumarKerala MonsoonAbhishek BanerjeeMamata BanerjeeKoyambedu Baw Brawl

Vamsikrishna 0
Representational image NEW DELHI: The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Thursday accused Kerala’s ruling Congress of preferring “sharia over Constitution” in response to a youth’s announcement about opening an “Islam-friendly gym.”BJP spokesperson Pradeep Bhandari alleged that the Congress in Kerala is “bending to the diktats” of its ally, the Indian Union Muslim League (IUML).”In Kerala, Congress is being remote-controlled by IUML. It is allowing sharia-compliant gyms on IUML’s directions. This clearly shows that the Congress has chose sharia over Constitution,” Bhandari said in a video on his X account.”It is proven clearly that because of Muslim appeasement, the Congress party is now keeping on back, and believing in sharia over Constitution…Because of Muslim appeasement, the Congress party is becoming a threat to security and safety of Hindus in Kerala,” he added.IUML, with 22 MLAs, is the second-largest constituent of the Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF) in the southern state. The UDF holds 102 seats in the 140-member Kerala legislative assembly.The controversy centres on a fitness facility in Puthunagaram, in Palakkad district. It recently announced plans to transform itself into an “Islam-friendly gym” operating under “Sharia-based guidelines.”The announcement, which was later deleted, was posted on the Instagram account “Nawaz Muthu T.” It stated that the fitness centre, in operation for the past 15 years, would introduce a new set of rules for its members.Under the proposed guidelines, music would be prohibited inside the facility, separate workout timings would be designated for men and women, and members would be required to follow a dress code ensuring that their “awrah” — body parts that Islamic teachings prescribe should be covered — remains concealed while exercising.The proposed changes also stipulate that men and women would not be allowed to work out together, with separate schedules arranged for each group.Women members would be required to wear attire, including a hijab, that covers the body in accordance with the stated religious guidelines.The announcement has sparked debate, drawing mixed reactions from various quarters. Supporters have described the initiative as an effort to provide a fitness environment that accommodates religious preferences, while critics have questioned the implications and broader impact of operating a gym based on faith-specific guidelines.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosPune IT Firm Abruptly Closes Operations, Over 700 Employees And Interns Left JoblessCongress Tells Cadre To Ignore CJP, Stay Focused On NEET-CBSE AgitationWhy IRCTC Is Verifying 6 Crore Users And Deploying AI Cameras In 800 KitchensBeyond Roads And Troops: Why India Is Building A Model Village Near The LACBJP Alleges TMC MLA Linked To Land Grab, Compensation Fraud And Illegal Construction; Seeks ED ProbeBihar Hospital Fire Claims Four Lives; CM Announces Rs 4 Lakh AidViral Marriage Proposal By Army Captain Draws Scrutiny Over Military ProtocolPermission Pending As CJP Mobilises Supporters For June 6 Jantar Mantar ProtestDelhi Government Orders Crackdown After Fatal Hotel Fire In Malviya NagarIndia’s Naval Power Grows With Induction Of Five Indigenous Warships123PhotostoriesMillions of women live with period pain, PMOS and UTIs: But experts say that doesn’t make them normalFrom Spiti to Antarctica: World’s most unusual post offices every traveller should visitToo much screen time? Here are 8 things parents can do to set healthy boundaries for kidsAamir Ali’s luxurious Mumbai house: A massive living room, art collection, walk-in wardrobe and moreThe most powerful Devi Mantras to enhance your inner power and strengthIs your child ready for pre-school? These 8 signs can help you decideWhich Hindu holy book should you read during difficult times?When is a headache more than just a headache? Doctor explains the brain tumor warning signs people often ignoreMadhuri Dixit just gave denim fabric a couture upgrade with a saree, and the internet can’t look away10 countries where it is safe to drink tap water while travelling123Hot PicksDelhi Restaurant FireManchester CityPiyush GoyalTS LAWCET 2026Lovkesh BajajAnnapurna Bhandar schemeNEET re-exam 2026Annapurna schemeKCET Result 2026Top TrendingDelhi Malviya Nagar Restaurant FireBengaluru MurderK AnnamalaiAnnapurna BhandarFirhad HakimDK ShivakumarKerala MonsoonAbhishek BanerjeeMamata BanerjeeKoyambedu Baw Brawl

Representational image NEW DELHI: The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Thursday accused Kerala’s ruling Congress of preferring “sharia over Constitution” in response to a youth’s announcement about opening an “Islam-friendly gym.”BJP spokesperson Pradeep Bhandari alleged that the Congress in Kerala is “bending to the diktats” of its ally, the Indian Union Muslim League (IUML).”In Kerala, Congress is being remote-controlled by IUML. It is allowing sharia-compliant gyms on IUML’s directions. This clearly shows that the Congress has chose sharia over Constitution,” Bhandari said in a video on his X account.”It is proven clearly that because of Muslim appeasement, the Congress party is now keeping on back, and believing in sharia over Constitution…Because of Muslim appeasement, the Congress party is becoming a threat to security and safety of Hindus in Kerala,” he added.IUML, with 22 MLAs, is the second-largest constituent of the Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF) in the southern state. The UDF holds 102 seats in the 140-member Kerala legislative assembly.The controversy centres on a fitness facility in Puthunagaram, in Palakkad district. It recently announced plans to transform itself into an “Islam-friendly gym” operating under “Sharia-based guidelines.”The announcement, which was later deleted, was posted on the Instagram account “Nawaz Muthu T.” It stated that the fitness centre, in operation for the past 15 years, would introduce a new set of rules for its members.Under the proposed guidelines, music would be prohibited inside the facility, separate workout timings would be designated for men and women, and members would be required to follow a dress code ensuring that their “awrah” — body parts that Islamic teachings prescribe should be covered — remains concealed while exercising.The proposed changes also stipulate that men and women would not be allowed to work out together, with separate schedules arranged for each group.Women members would be required to wear attire, including a hijab, that covers the body in accordance with the stated religious guidelines.The announcement has sparked debate, drawing mixed reactions from various quarters. Supporters have described the initiative as an effort to provide a fitness environment that accommodates religious preferences, while critics have questioned the implications and broader impact of operating a gym based on faith-specific guidelines.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosPune IT Firm Abruptly Closes Operations, Over 700 Employees And Interns Left JoblessCongress Tells Cadre To Ignore CJP, Stay Focused On NEET-CBSE AgitationWhy IRCTC Is Verifying 6 Crore Users And Deploying AI Cameras In 800 KitchensBeyond Roads And Troops: Why India Is Building A Model Village Near The LACBJP Alleges TMC MLA Linked To Land Grab, Compensation Fraud And Illegal Construction; Seeks ED ProbeBihar Hospital Fire Claims Four Lives; CM Announces Rs 4 Lakh AidViral Marriage Proposal By Army Captain Draws Scrutiny Over Military ProtocolPermission Pending As CJP Mobilises Supporters For June 6 Jantar Mantar ProtestDelhi Government Orders Crackdown After Fatal Hotel Fire In Malviya NagarIndia’s Naval Power Grows With Induction Of Five Indigenous Warships123PhotostoriesMillions of women live with period pain, PMOS and UTIs: But experts say that doesn’t make them normalFrom Spiti to Antarctica: World’s most unusual post offices every traveller should visitToo much screen time? Here are 8 things parents can do to set healthy boundaries for kidsAamir Ali’s luxurious Mumbai house: A massive living room, art collection, walk-in wardrobe and moreThe most powerful Devi Mantras to enhance your inner power and strengthIs your child ready for pre-school? These 8 signs can help you decideWhich Hindu holy book should you read during difficult times?When is a headache more than just a headache? Doctor explains the brain tumor warning signs people often ignoreMadhuri Dixit just gave denim fabric a couture upgrade with a saree, and the internet can’t look away10 countries where it is safe to drink tap water while travelling123Hot PicksDelhi Restaurant FireManchester CityPiyush GoyalTS LAWCET 2026Lovkesh BajajAnnapurna Bhandar schemeNEET re-exam 2026Annapurna schemeKCET Result 2026Top TrendingDelhi Malviya Nagar Restaurant FireBengaluru MurderK AnnamalaiAnnapurna BhandarFirhad HakimDK ShivakumarKerala MonsoonAbhishek BanerjeeMamata BanerjeeKoyambedu Baw Brawl

Vamsikrishna 0