CHANDIGARH: In a significant ruling affecting thousands of former Armed Forces personnel, the Supreme Court (SC) has held that eligible ex-servicemen (ESM) are entitled to full arrears of disability pension from the applicable cut-off dates, either January 1, 1996, or January 1, 2006, without restriction to a three-year limitation period. The SC also made it clear that “the disability pension is not a matter of largesse, but a recognition of sacrifice made in service of the nation.” “Right to receive disability pension is a valuable right and once found due, the benefit of the same has to be given from the date it became due. The same cannot be curtailed by restricting the benefit to a period of three years preceding the filing of the original application,” the apex court has clarified.A bench comprising Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Justice Alok Aradhe passed these orders while dismissing the appeals by the central government and allowing those filed by ex-servicemen seeking complete arrears. The main issue of consideration before the apex court was if the arrears of disability pension be restricted to three years prior to filing the claim before the armed forces tribunal (AFT).The dispute traces back to the Supreme Court’s landmark 2014 judgment titled Union of India versus Ram Avtar, where a three-judge bench ruled that Armed Forces personnel who retired with disabilities attributable to or aggravated by military service were entitled to “broad banding” of disability pension, even if they were not invalidated out of service.Following that ruling, many ex-servicemen approached the AFT seeking re-computation of their disability pension and payment of arrears. While some tribunal benches granted arrears from the date of retirement or applicable pay commission cut-off, others restricted arrears to three years, citing limitation principles.In its appeal, the central government represented by Attorney General submitted that the grievance of the government is confined to the direction to pay arrears of disability pension beyond a period of three years. It was contended that claims for arrears of disability pension are governed by the provisions of the Limitation Act, 1963, as well as Section 22 of the Act, and that even in cases of continuing wrong, arrears cannot extend beyond the prescribed period of limitation.However, rejecting the centre’s plea, the SC observed that pension is not a matter of charity or executive discretion. It is a “deferred portion of compensation” and constitutes a vested property right protected under Article 300A of the Constitution. “The contention advanced on behalf of the Union of India that the claim for arrears of disability pension is barred by Limitation Act, cannot be accepted,” held the SC in its 17-pages detailed order.About the AuthorAjay SuraAjay Sura is Senior Assistant Editor with The Times of India Chandigarh. He covers news concerning the State of Haryana, Punjab & Haryana High Court and Defence & Military Affairs. He likes to analyse political developments and decoding judicial pronouncements. His hobbies include travelling, mountaineering and trekking.Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideos’Symbols Of British Empire’: PM Modi On North & South Block In 1st Address From Seva Teerth’Umar Bhar Yahi Bhool’: Yogi Adityanath Quotes Mirza Ghalib In UP Assembly To Target SP’s RecordBNP Demands Sheikh Hasina’s Extradition From India After Bangladesh Poll WinCongress Demands Union Minister Hardeep Puri Resignation Over Alleged Jeffrey Epstein Links RowPM Modi Speaks To BNP Chief Tarique Rahman, Congratulates On ‘Remarkable’ Bangladesh Poll Win6-Year-Old Dead, 5 Injured As Speeding Car Hits Pedestrians On Busy Lucknow Road; CCTV Shows HorrorKiren Rijiju Explains Why Modi Govt Paused Privilege Notice Against Rahul Gandhi After Dubey’s MoveTarique Rahman’s BNP Heads For Landslide In Bangladesh Election, Rivals Cry FoulPM Modi Unveils Seva Teerth, A New PMO Hub Marking Governance Shift In National Capital DelhiRafale To Be Built In India For The First Time Outside France After DAC Nod For 114 Fighter Jets123Photostories5 national parks in India that are excellent for birdwatchingTop 5 real estate hotspots in Noida to watch in 2026Seva Teerth opens doors: PM Modi launches new PMO complex in New Delhi – see picsAbs don’t equal healthy arteries: Doctor explains why appearance isn’t a health report card5 key features that make adventure bikes perfect for long-distance touring5 ways to remove pesticides from grapes and strawberries, tips for storage, and easy dishesFrom built-in air conditioners to radar ears: 5 animals with the weirdest ears and how they use themValentine’s Day 2026: 7 romantic red cocktails for Valentine’s Day celebrationFrom Titan Arum to Bulbophyllum Phalaenopsis: 7 worst smelling flowers of the worldDid you know Shahid Kapoor was rejected 100 times before his debut in ‘Ishq Vishk’? 6 lesser-known facts about ‘O Romeo’ actor123Hot PicksIT Stocks CrashGold Silver PricesBangladesh Election ResultsTelangana Municipal Elections ResultsIncome Tax CalculatorPublic holidays February 2026Bank Holidays februaryTop TrendingMarvel Rivals Season 6.5 Release dateErika KirkBad BunnyCatherine Polli Net WorthSeahawks Super Bowl paradeKayla NicoleAnthony JoshuaChloe KimCardi BMax Muncy
CHANDIGARH: In a significant ruling affecting thousands of former Armed Forces personnel, the Supreme Court (SC) has held that eligible ex-servicemen (ESM) are entitled to full arrears of disability pension from the applicable cut-off dates, either January 1, 1996, or January 1, 2006, without restriction to a three-year limitation period. The SC also made it clear that “the disability pension is not a matter of largesse, but a recognition of sacrifice made in service of the nation.” “Right to receive disability pension is a valuable right and once found due, the benefit of the same has to be given from the date it became due. The same cannot be curtailed by restricting the benefit to a period of three years preceding the filing of the original application,” the apex court has clarified.A bench comprising Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Justice Alok Aradhe passed these orders while dismissing the appeals by the central government and allowing those filed by ex-servicemen seeking complete arrears. The main issue of consideration before the apex court was if the arrears of disability pension be restricted to three years prior to filing the claim before the armed forces tribunal (AFT).The dispute traces back to the Supreme Court’s landmark 2014 judgment titled Union of India versus Ram Avtar, where a three-judge bench ruled that Armed Forces personnel who retired with disabilities attributable to or aggravated by military service were entitled to “broad banding” of disability pension, even if they were not invalidated out of service.Following that ruling, many ex-servicemen approached the AFT seeking re-computation of their disability pension and payment of arrears. While some tribunal benches granted arrears from the date of retirement or applicable pay commission cut-off, others restricted arrears to three years, citing limitation principles.In its appeal, the central government represented by Attorney General submitted that the grievance of the government is confined to the direction to pay arrears of disability pension beyond a period of three years. It was contended that claims for arrears of disability pension are governed by the provisions of the Limitation Act, 1963, as well as Section 22 of the Act, and that even in cases of continuing wrong, arrears cannot extend beyond the prescribed period of limitation.However, rejecting the centre’s plea, the SC observed that pension is not a matter of charity or executive discretion. It is a “deferred portion of compensation” and constitutes a vested property right protected under Article 300A of the Constitution. “The contention advanced on behalf of the Union of India that the claim for arrears of disability pension is barred by Limitation Act, cannot be accepted,” held the SC in its 17-pages detailed order.
