Centre tells SC existing transgender ID cards will remain valid till pleas against new law are decided. NEW DELHI: Transgender identity cards issued before the 2026 amendment to the law protecting transgender persons will continue to remain valid, the Centre told the Supreme Court on Monday, offering interim relief to cardholders whose legal status had come under question following the new legislation.Solicitor general Tushar Mehta gave the assurance before a bench headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and comprising Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana, which was hearing around 15 petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the amended law.“I have taken instructions. The TGI ID cards issued earlier will continue to operate subject to the outcome (on the petitions),” news agency PTI quoted Mehta as saying.A Transgender Identity (TGI) card is issued through the government’s transgender portal and serves as official recognition of a person’s self-identified gender. It can also be used to facilitate changes to a person’s name and gender in official documents.The 2026 amendment has been challenged principally over changes to the earlier framework on gender self-identification. Petitioners have argued that the new law undermines the right recognised by the Supreme Court in its landmark 2014 NALSA judgment, which affirmed the right of transgender persons to determine their gender identity.During the hearing, senior advocate Jayna Kothari, appearing for one of the petitioners, sought directions for restoration of TGI cards that had already been cancelled. The bench declined to issue a blanket order and asked petitioners to bring individual cases before it.Kothari also sought protection for those who had applied for identity cards under the earlier framework but were still waiting for them to be issued. The court said it would consider the issue after receiving the Centre’s reply affidavit.Senior advocate Rajiv Shakdhar backed the request, submitting that the balance of convenience lay with the petitioners and that benefits already available to transgender persons should not be disrupted.Justice Bagchi, however, said such questions would have to be examined in light of the facts and circumstances of individual cases.Senior advocate Arundhati Katju argued that the 2019 legislation was based on the principle of self-identification and that benefits arising from the earlier law should not automatically cease with the 2026 amendment.The Centre informed the court that it would file its response to the challenges. The bench recorded the submissions and listed the petitions for final hearing after three weeks.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesParliament passed the amendment bill on March 25, and it received presidential assent on March 30. Among other changes, the amended legislation excludes social orientations from its ambit and provides for graded punishment depending on the gravity of harm inflicted on transgender persons.One of the petitions has sought a declaration that the right to self-identification of gender, recognised in the NALSA ruling, is a fundamental right under Article 21 and “no legislation may make conditional upon bureaucratic certification, medical procedure, surgical intervention, or any clinical gateway of the State’s choosing”.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideos‘Will Rise For Vande Mataram, But Won’t Sing’: Congress MP Imran Masood Amid Sonia Gandhi Row‘Personally Meet Students’: Rahul Gandhi Writes To CM Hemant Soren Over Jharkhand Protests7 Charred To Death, Several Injured In Fire At Hotel Near Tarapith Temple In Bengal’s Birbhum‘Electric Pole Fell’: 7 Women Dead, Many Injured In Stampede At Temple In Bihar’s Lakhisarai‘Only These…’: Rijiju Shares 3 Categories Of ‘Dimagi Naxals’ After Oppn’s Attack On PM Modi‘Process Vitiated…’: Bangladesh Links Tarique Rahman’s India Visit To Sheikh Hasina Extradition‘Will Never Be Forgiven’: Amit Shah Slams Sonia Gandhi; BJP Lodges Complaint Over Vande Mataram RowAir India Express Passenger Booked After Pistol Goes Off At Varanasi Airport During Security Check‘Derogatory’: PM Modi’s ‘Dimaagi Naxals’ Remark Triggers Row; Congress, CJP, Left Parties Hit BackActivist Devendra Mahto Stopped From Tiranga March As Jharkhand Student Protest Escalates On I-Day123PhotostoriesChef Sanjeev Kapoor shares 9 basics of baking for every new and casual bakerDeepika Padukone makes maternity fashion look too easy in an oversized blue shirt and baggy jeans6 Korean dining etiquette rules that may surprise IndiansOptical illusion personality test: What you see first reveals if you’re a deep thinker or a natural problem-solver5 investments that matter more than expensive toys for your child: From books to conversations, give them what money can’t buyGeorgina Rodríguez’s white Gucci skirt suit became the real showstopper at her wedding to Cristiano RonaldoFrom Himanshi Khurana to Rakhi Sawant: Bigg Boss contestants who claimed to experience paranormal activities inside the houseRaising boys differently: 4 things every Indian mother can normalise at home to help change societyShe thought it was gas after dinner for 2 years; tests finally revealed a serious heart problem, doctor explains8 protein-rich breakfast dishes you can make with kala chana123Hot PicksKarnataka PG Dental admissionBank holidays this weekRBI new rulesBJP new teamJharkhand ProtestUS green cardGaurav SenSupreme Court HolidayUP NEET UG counsellingTop TrendingK AnnamalaiBengal Hotel FireNoida Biker AccidentTamil Nadu Double MurderAbhijeet DipkeHyderabad MurderMuzaffarnagar Kanwariya MurderWeather TomorrowBengaluru RapidoBen Gvir
NEW DELHI: Transgender identity cards issued before the 2026 amendment to the law protecting transgender persons will continue to remain valid, the Centre told the Supreme Court on Monday, offering interim relief to cardholders whose legal status had come under question following the new legislation.Solicitor general Tushar Mehta gave the assurance before a bench headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and comprising Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana, which was hearing around 15 petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the amended law.“I have taken instructions. The TGI ID cards issued earlier will continue to operate subject to the outcome (on the petitions),” news agency PTI quoted Mehta as saying.A Transgender Identity (TGI) card is issued through the government’s transgender portal and serves as official recognition of a person’s self-identified gender. It can also be used to facilitate changes to a person’s name and gender in official documents.The 2026 amendment has been challenged principally over changes to the earlier framework on gender self-identification. Petitioners have argued that the new law undermines the right recognised by the Supreme Court in its landmark 2014 NALSA judgment, which affirmed the right of transgender persons to determine their gender identity.During the hearing, senior advocate Jayna Kothari, appearing for one of the petitioners, sought directions for restoration of TGI cards that had already been cancelled. The bench declined to issue a blanket order and asked petitioners to bring individual cases before it.Kothari also sought protection for those who had applied for identity cards under the earlier framework but were still waiting for them to be issued. The court said it would consider the issue after receiving the Centre’s reply affidavit.Senior advocate Rajiv Shakdhar backed the request, submitting that the balance of convenience lay with the petitioners and that benefits already available to transgender persons should not be disrupted.Justice Bagchi, however, said such questions would have to be examined in light of the facts and circumstances of individual cases.Senior advocate Arundhati Katju argued that the 2019 legislation was based on the principle of self-identification and that benefits arising from the earlier law should not automatically cease with the 2026 amendment.The Centre informed the court that it would file its response to the challenges. The bench recorded the submissions and listed the petitions for final hearing after three weeks.
Share your thoughts in the comments
Be respectful · TOI community guidelines
Parliament passed the amendment bill on March 25, and it received presidential assent on March 30. Among other changes, the amended legislation excludes social orientations from its ambit and provides for graded punishment depending on the gravity of harm inflicted on transgender persons.One of the petitions has sought a declaration that the right to self-identification of gender, recognised in the NALSA ruling, is a fundamental right under Article 21 and “no legislation may make conditional upon bureaucratic certification, medical procedure, surgical intervention, or any clinical gateway of the State’s choosing”.
