July 19, 2026

CBSE 2nd Board results: 3 lakh students improve scores | India News

Vamsikrishna02 mins mins
CBSE 2nd Board results: 3 lakh students improve scores | India News


CBSE 2nd Board results: 3 lakh students improve scores
CBSE results for 2nd edition class 10 board exams out

NEW DELHI: CBSE Saturday declared the results of the Class X Second Board Examination 2026, taking the overall pass percentage — after combining the main and second exam results — to nearly 96.8.In the main board examination, CBSE had recorded an overall Class X pass percentage of 93.7. Nearly 3.1 lakh of the 5.1 lakh students, around 60%, who appeared for the improvement examination recorded higher scores than in the main examination.Meanwhile, of the 1.5 lakh students who appeared in the compartment category in the second exam, 78,503 passed, resulting in a compartment pass percentage of 52.4, up from around 48.7 last year.Under CBSE’s new two-board examination system for Class X, introduced this year under the National Education Policy 2020, the main board examination is compulsory, the second examination is optional. For regular candidates, the final marksheet reflects the better score obtained across the two examinations.Under the new structure, the main board examination was conducted from Feb 17 to March 11, followed by the second board examination from May 15 to May 21.“Students can retain the higher score obtained across the two attempts, ensuring that a single exam does not determine their final performance. The policy is intended to promote competency-based assessment, reduce dependence on high-stakes testing and coaching, and provide greater academic flexibility,” said a CBSE official.For the second board exam, CBSE said, students can access their results through the DigiLocker results portal. School-wise results have also been shared with schools through their registered email addresses, while digital academic documents can be accessed through the CBSE repository using credentials already provided to schools.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related News

NEW DELHI: Drawing a distinction between using abuse language and the offence of obscenity, Supreme Court has said that use of mere swear words, profanities and vulgar expletives, however distasteful or uncivil they may be, cannot be equated with obscenity and is not an offence. It set aside conviction under Section 294 for a person who had used abusive slurs for mother and sister during an altercation.A bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and Vipul M Pancholi said obscenity which is an offence under IPC is not synonymous with “vulgarity”, “abuse” or “profanity”. “Words which are merely vulgar or abusive may evoke a feeling of disgust, revulsion or shock, but that by itself does not make them obscene in law. It is for this reason that this Court, through various judicial pronouncements, has held that the use of abusive, vulgar or profane language does not necessarily constitute obscenity. Abusive words lacked lascivious element: SC This Court in Samaresh Bose v. Amal Mitra case, while considering a Bengali novel, held that the use of slang, unconventional words or vulgar language may create a feeling of disgust or revulsion, but that does not necessarily amount to obscenity,” the bench said.It said the test to determine whether the words complained of are obscene or not is to see whether the words fulfil three ingredients – (i) it should be lascivious; (ii) appeals to prurient interests of people; and (iii) has a tendency to deprave and corrupt persons who are likely to see, hear or read it. “Further, it must also be shown that the use of such words has caused annoyance to others. Unless presence of essential ingredients is established, the offence of obscenity cannot be said to be made out,” the court said while examining the ambit of Section 294Section 294 says Whoever, to the annoyance of others, (a) does any obscene act in any public place, or (b) sings, recites or utters any obscene song, ballad or words, in or near any public place, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three months. The court said that in order to constitute an offence under the Section, the words uttered must contain some lascivious element capable of arousing sexual thoughts or feelings and must further be shown to have caused annoyance to others.”In the present case, during an altercation, the appellant allegedly uttered: ‘Hey Mother…r! You son of a w….e! Are you coming in support of your elder sister’s son? Just f…k off, you ‘K….a’ F…r’…’. It is this which is sought to be invoked under Section 294(b) of the IPC. Going by the version of Prosecution witnesses-1 himself, the words and verbal slang used by the appellant were, at best, abusive or vulgar in nature. The Collins English Dictionary defines the word “abusive” as a language which ‘is extremely rude and insulting’ Whereas the word ‘vulgar’ is defined by the Cambridge Dictionary as “rude and likely to upset or anger people, especially by referring to sex and the body in an unpleasant way” These definitions clearly show that words may be insulting, offensive or unpleasant without necessarily being obscene in law,” the bench said.”For an utterance to be considered obscene, it must be shown that it was lascivious, appealed to prurient interests and had the tendency to deprave and corrupt the minds of those who are exposed to it. Tested on this anvil, even if all the allegations levelled in the complaint are taken at their face value and accepted to be true in entirety, the same cannot be held to be obscene. Such words, howsoever abusive, unpalatable or uncivil, do not satisfy the requirement of Section 294(b) IPC for there being nothing on record to show that they had any one or all three elements referred to hereinabove. Further, it is nobody’s case that use of such words causes annoyance to others in a public place, which is a mandatory ingredient of the Section, much less to the complainant . In absence thereof, we find that the offence under Section 294(b) IPC is not made out,” the bench said.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosJantar Mantar Ground Report: What’s Happening at CJP Protest Site After Sonam Wangchuk’s Removal?’Police Beat Us, Dragged Sonam Sir Away Like a Sack’: Eyewitnesses Describe How Wangchuk Was RemovedMHA Replaces Delhi Police Chief, Hours Later Sonam Wangchuk ‘Forcefully Removed’ From Jantar MantarDMK’s ‘Not Yet’ on Delimitation Bill Boosts NDA Hope for Two-Thirds Majority In Lok Sabha | StalinSC Says Election Commission Cannot Decide Citizenship, Seeks Replies From WB Govt And ECBulldozers Roll In As TMC MP Abhishek Banerjee’s Amtala Office Faces Demolition | West BengalVikram-1 Reaches Orbit, Making India A Global Leader In Private Space Launch Capability | WatchNCP-NCP(SP) Merger Buzz Grows As BJP Eyes Stronger NDA Ahead Of Crucial Parliament VotesCJP’s Abhijeet Dipke Begins Indefinite Hunger Strike After Sonam Wangchuk Is HospitalisedSonam Wangchuk’s Wife Opposes Medical Treatment Without Consent; Abhijeet Dipke Begins Hunger Strike123PhotostoriesTwo seeds that can boost hair growth instantlyThink cataracts only happen after 60? Doctor warns that diabetes is making this eye condition appear decades earlierWhen words wound: Five phrases in a relationship that quietly kill new love”I have replaced rice with…”: National award winner Yam Gautam enjoys this fiber-rich seed for lunch and dinner; 8 ways you can enjoy it tooYou may be ageing your brain without knowing it: Neurologists reveal how poor sleep and everyday habits could affect memory and cognitive healthYou can lose up to 80% of kidney function without knowing it: Doctors explain the warning signs of chronic kidney disease6 historic colonial-era homes in India that stand as timeless architectural treasuresAnne Hathaway’s houses: A look inside the ‘Odyssey’ star’s most notable properties over the yearsFrom ‘Pan’s Labyrinth’ to ‘The Green Knight’: Top 5 dark fantasy movies to add to your watch listFrom blue streets to yellow houses; 7 colourful towns around the world that look straight out of a fairytale123Hot PicksFIFA World Cup LiveNITI AayogSonam Wangchuk educationAIBE XXI resultAbhijeet DipkeAMRUT 2.0 water projectISRO scientists resignMahadev betting appSkyroot AerospaceTop TrendingKolkata Airport Mosque BanMurshidabad School Van AccidentFIFA World Cup 2026Mangaluru MurderCJP Hunger StrikeAndhra Pradesh Covid 19 DeathNEET ResultIshowspeedGujarat RapeIran war

NEW DELHI: Drawing a distinction between using abuse language and the offence of obscenity, Supreme Court has said that use of mere swear words, profanities and vulgar expletives, however distasteful or uncivil they may be, cannot be equated with obscenity and is not an offence. It set aside conviction under Section 294 for a person who had used abusive slurs for mother and sister during an altercation.A bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and Vipul M Pancholi said obscenity which is an offence under IPC is not synonymous with “vulgarity”, “abuse” or “profanity”. “Words which are merely vulgar or abusive may evoke a feeling of disgust, revulsion or shock, but that by itself does not make them obscene in law. It is for this reason that this Court, through various judicial pronouncements, has held that the use of abusive, vulgar or profane language does not necessarily constitute obscenity. Abusive words lacked lascivious element: SC This Court in Samaresh Bose v. Amal Mitra case, while considering a Bengali novel, held that the use of slang, unconventional words or vulgar language may create a feeling of disgust or revulsion, but that does not necessarily amount to obscenity,” the bench said.It said the test to determine whether the words complained of are obscene or not is to see whether the words fulfil three ingredients – (i) it should be lascivious; (ii) appeals to prurient interests of people; and (iii) has a tendency to deprave and corrupt persons who are likely to see, hear or read it. “Further, it must also be shown that the use of such words has caused annoyance to others. Unless presence of essential ingredients is established, the offence of obscenity cannot be said to be made out,” the court said while examining the ambit of Section 294Section 294 says Whoever, to the annoyance of others, (a) does any obscene act in any public place, or (b) sings, recites or utters any obscene song, ballad or words, in or near any public place, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three months. The court said that in order to constitute an offence under the Section, the words uttered must contain some lascivious element capable of arousing sexual thoughts or feelings and must further be shown to have caused annoyance to others.”In the present case, during an altercation, the appellant allegedly uttered: ‘Hey Mother…r! You son of a w….e! Are you coming in support of your elder sister’s son? Just f…k off, you ‘K….a’ F…r’…’. It is this which is sought to be invoked under Section 294(b) of the IPC. Going by the version of Prosecution witnesses-1 himself, the words and verbal slang used by the appellant were, at best, abusive or vulgar in nature. The Collins English Dictionary defines the word “abusive” as a language which ‘is extremely rude and insulting’ Whereas the word ‘vulgar’ is defined by the Cambridge Dictionary as “rude and likely to upset or anger people, especially by referring to sex and the body in an unpleasant way” These definitions clearly show that words may be insulting, offensive or unpleasant without necessarily being obscene in law,” the bench said.”For an utterance to be considered obscene, it must be shown that it was lascivious, appealed to prurient interests and had the tendency to deprave and corrupt the minds of those who are exposed to it. Tested on this anvil, even if all the allegations levelled in the complaint are taken at their face value and accepted to be true in entirety, the same cannot be held to be obscene. Such words, howsoever abusive, unpalatable or uncivil, do not satisfy the requirement of Section 294(b) IPC for there being nothing on record to show that they had any one or all three elements referred to hereinabove. Further, it is nobody’s case that use of such words causes annoyance to others in a public place, which is a mandatory ingredient of the Section, much less to the complainant . In absence thereof, we find that the offence under Section 294(b) IPC is not made out,” the bench said.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosJantar Mantar Ground Report: What’s Happening at CJP Protest Site After Sonam Wangchuk’s Removal?’Police Beat Us, Dragged Sonam Sir Away Like a Sack’: Eyewitnesses Describe How Wangchuk Was RemovedMHA Replaces Delhi Police Chief, Hours Later Sonam Wangchuk ‘Forcefully Removed’ From Jantar MantarDMK’s ‘Not Yet’ on Delimitation Bill Boosts NDA Hope for Two-Thirds Majority In Lok Sabha | StalinSC Says Election Commission Cannot Decide Citizenship, Seeks Replies From WB Govt And ECBulldozers Roll In As TMC MP Abhishek Banerjee’s Amtala Office Faces Demolition | West BengalVikram-1 Reaches Orbit, Making India A Global Leader In Private Space Launch Capability | WatchNCP-NCP(SP) Merger Buzz Grows As BJP Eyes Stronger NDA Ahead Of Crucial Parliament VotesCJP’s Abhijeet Dipke Begins Indefinite Hunger Strike After Sonam Wangchuk Is HospitalisedSonam Wangchuk’s Wife Opposes Medical Treatment Without Consent; Abhijeet Dipke Begins Hunger Strike123PhotostoriesTwo seeds that can boost hair growth instantlyThink cataracts only happen after 60? Doctor warns that diabetes is making this eye condition appear decades earlierWhen words wound: Five phrases in a relationship that quietly kill new love”I have replaced rice with…”: National award winner Yam Gautam enjoys this fiber-rich seed for lunch and dinner; 8 ways you can enjoy it tooYou may be ageing your brain without knowing it: Neurologists reveal how poor sleep and everyday habits could affect memory and cognitive healthYou can lose up to 80% of kidney function without knowing it: Doctors explain the warning signs of chronic kidney disease6 historic colonial-era homes in India that stand as timeless architectural treasuresAnne Hathaway’s houses: A look inside the ‘Odyssey’ star’s most notable properties over the yearsFrom ‘Pan’s Labyrinth’ to ‘The Green Knight’: Top 5 dark fantasy movies to add to your watch listFrom blue streets to yellow houses; 7 colourful towns around the world that look straight out of a fairytale123Hot PicksFIFA World Cup LiveNITI AayogSonam Wangchuk educationAIBE XXI resultAbhijeet DipkeAMRUT 2.0 water projectISRO scientists resignMahadev betting appSkyroot AerospaceTop TrendingKolkata Airport Mosque BanMurshidabad School Van AccidentFIFA World Cup 2026Mangaluru MurderCJP Hunger StrikeAndhra Pradesh Covid 19 DeathNEET ResultIshowspeedGujarat RapeIran war

Vamsikrishna 0