CBI, Sunetra Pawar’s brother Padamsinh Patil (File photo) NEW DELHI: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) will appeal against the acquittal of all accused in the 2006 Pawanraje Nimbalkar double murder case before the Bombay high court, Maharashtra deputy chief minister Eknath Shinde said on Saturday, hours after a special CBI court cleared nine accused, including former NCP leader Padamsinh Patil.The acquittal came nearly two decades after Congress leader Pawanraje Nimbalkar and his driver Samad Kazi were shot dead in Navi Mumbai in June 2006. The trial saw the examination of 128 witnesses and became one of Maharashtra’s most closely watched political murder cases.Also read: 20 years, 128 witnesses later, Sunetra Pawar’s brother Padamsinh Patil acquitted in Congress leader Pavanraje Nimbalkar murder caseSpeaking to ANI, Shinde said the state government had already spoken to Union Home Minister Amit Shah regarding the verdict.”I myself, and chief minister Devendra Fadnavis, have spoken with Union home minister Amit Shah. Amit Shah ji has stated that the CBI will appeal this decision in the High Court and contest the case. The Union Home Minister has issued these instructions to the CBI,” Shinde said.Expressing disappointment over the verdict, Shinde said the family had expected the accused to be convicted.”This is a very unfortunate incident; it is a very tragic event because Pawanraje Nimbalkar ji and two others were murdered in broad daylight. This was a very serious and grave matter. The family and many others believed that the accused would be punished. However, unfortunately, the CBI court has acquitted them,” he said.The special CBI court acquitted all nine accused, including Padamsinh Patil, brother of Maharashtra deputy chief minister Sunetra Pawar and a former state minister. Patil had been accused of masterminding the killing of his cousin, Pawanraje Nimbalkar, allegedly over political and business rivalry.Special Judge SR Navandar based the acquittal largely on the failure of the prosecution’s key witness, accused-turned-approver Parasmal Jain. According to court observations reported by TOI, the judge discarded Jain’s testimony, describing him as unreliable and noting inconsistencies in his statements throughout the trial.The court observed that 127 witnesses had deposed before Jain became the 128th witness after turning approver and receiving a pardon. However, the judge found several aspects of his testimony doubtful, including his claims regarding the planning and execution of the murder.The court also held that the prosecution failed to conclusively establish that the vehicle seized during the investigation was the same one used in the crime. It further noted there was no evidence to support the claim that Jain had contacted Nimbalkar from a public call office before the murder under the pretext of a land deal.The CBI had argued that Nimbalkar’s murder was the result of long-standing political rivalry with Patil. The prosecution alleged that the conflict stemmed from disputes over the management of the Terna Sugar Factory and Nimbalkar’s decision to contest against Patil in the 2004 Maharashtra Assembly elections.Nimbalkar was shot dead on June 3, 2006, while travelling on the Mumbai-Pune Expressway. His driver, Samad Kazi, was also killed in the attack.The investigation was transferred to the CBI in 2008 after the Bombay high court, acting on a petition filed by Nimbalkar’s wife Anandibai Nimbalkar, criticised the state police probe as “desultory and lackadaisical”. The trial was later shifted following allegations that Patil was exerting influence over the proceedings.The approver had alleged that he was recruited by two associates of Patil to coordinate the contract killing and had provided details about the recruitment of shooters from Uttar Pradesh, the purchase of a vehicle under an assumed identity and surveillance of Nimbalkar before the attack.The verdict also carries political significance because Pawanraje Nimbalkar was the father of Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Omprakash Rajenimbalkar, who was present in court along with family members when the judgment was delivered.The case has remained a focal point in Maharashtra politics for nearly 20 years, intertwining allegations of political rivalry, influence and a prolonged legal battle. With the CBI now set to challenge the acquittal before the Bombay high court, the legal fight over one of the state’s most prominent political murder cases appears far from over.Get the latest India news and live updates. Download the TOI App.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosNEET-UG Re-Exam Blunder: Nagpur Student Assigned Abu Dhabi Centre, NTA Corrects Error After OutcryDhaka Erupts In Protest As Hindus Hit Streets With ‘Jai Shri Ram’ Chants | WatchNEET Retest Tragedy: 12 Students Die By Suicide In 37 Days After Exam Cancellation’Just A Trailer’: Eknath Shinde Signals More Shiv Sena (UBT) Defections Amid Operation Tiger BuzzShashi Tharoor Welcomes Modi-Trump Warmth, Says US Relations With Pakistan Need Not Affect IndiaWest Bengal Police Launch Probe Into TMC Bank Accounts Holding ₹535 Crore After MLA’s ComplaintTMC, BJP Workers Clash Outside Kolkata Airport During Abhishek Banerjee’s Return From Delhi”Ready To Step Down”: Uddhav Thackeray’s Emotional Message As MP Revolt Rocks Shiv Sena (UBT)Trump Calls PM Modi A ‘Tough Cookie’, Names Him Among World Leaders He Admires MostContradicting Supreme Court and Tribunal Orders?: TN Assembly’s Firm Stand Against Project123PhotostoriesVitamin D supplements not working? 3 common mistakes people make, heart surgeon revealsTeenagers who feel close to their parents make safer choices: 7 activities parents can do with their teens to build deeper connection5 things Vastu says you should remove from your office desk immediatelyThe parenting lessons that Priyanka Chopra learned from her father: From making eye contact to being courageousHow to grow pudina at home fromstore-bought leaves and stem:A step-by-step beginner’s guide for a healthy harvestInside Barun Sobti’s lavish Mumbai house: A massive living room, stunning balconies, elegant decor and moreFrom witchcraft to beauty icon: The surprising history of red lipstick10 signs a couple is losing emotional intimacyBridal colour trends 2026: The wedding hues replacing traditional redTimes ‘Moana’ star Dwayne Johnson proved he loves being a girl dad123Hot PicksNeeraj ChopraScotland Vs MoroccoBrazil Vs HaltiJIO IPOUddhav ThackerayAbhishek BanerjeeEknath ShindeSamanta BullockLondon Train TragedyTop TrendingBihar gang-rapeUS-Iran Peace DealStock Market LiveFIFA World Cup 2026What is Legacy BadgeBEST bus strikeAIIMS BSc Nursing Admit CardMHT CET PCM 2nd attempt resultsGold rate todayIndia-UK FTA
NEW DELHI: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) will appeal against the acquittal of all accused in the 2006 Pawanraje Nimbalkar double murder case before the Bombay high court, Maharashtra deputy chief minister Eknath Shinde said on Saturday, hours after a special CBI court cleared nine accused, including former NCP leader Padamsinh Patil.The acquittal came nearly two decades after Congress leader Pawanraje Nimbalkar and his driver Samad Kazi were shot dead in Navi Mumbai in June 2006. The trial saw the examination of 128 witnesses and became one of Maharashtra’s most closely watched political murder cases.Also read: 20 years, 128 witnesses later, Sunetra Pawar’s brother Padamsinh Patil acquitted in Congress leader Pavanraje Nimbalkar murder caseSpeaking to ANI, Shinde said the state government had already spoken to Union Home Minister Amit Shah regarding the verdict.“I myself, and chief minister Devendra Fadnavis, have spoken with Union home minister Amit Shah. Amit Shah ji has stated that the CBI will appeal this decision in the High Court and contest the case. The Union Home Minister has issued these instructions to the CBI,” Shinde said.Expressing disappointment over the verdict, Shinde said the family had expected the accused to be convicted.“This is a very unfortunate incident; it is a very tragic event because Pawanraje Nimbalkar ji and two others were murdered in broad daylight. This was a very serious and grave matter. The family and many others believed that the accused would be punished. However, unfortunately, the CBI court has acquitted them,” he said.The special CBI court acquitted all nine accused, including Padamsinh Patil, brother of Maharashtra deputy chief minister Sunetra Pawar and a former state minister. Patil had been accused of masterminding the killing of his cousin, Pawanraje Nimbalkar, allegedly over political and business rivalry.Special Judge SR Navandar based the acquittal largely on the failure of the prosecution’s key witness, accused-turned-approver Parasmal Jain. According to court observations reported by TOI, the judge discarded Jain’s testimony, describing him as unreliable and noting inconsistencies in his statements throughout the trial.The court observed that 127 witnesses had deposed before Jain became the 128th witness after turning approver and receiving a pardon. However, the judge found several aspects of his testimony doubtful, including his claims regarding the planning and execution of the murder.The court also held that the prosecution failed to conclusively establish that the vehicle seized during the investigation was the same one used in the crime. It further noted there was no evidence to support the claim that Jain had contacted Nimbalkar from a public call office before the murder under the pretext of a land deal.The CBI had argued that Nimbalkar’s murder was the result of long-standing political rivalry with Patil. The prosecution alleged that the conflict stemmed from disputes over the management of the Terna Sugar Factory and Nimbalkar’s decision to contest against Patil in the 2004 Maharashtra Assembly elections.Nimbalkar was shot dead on June 3, 2006, while travelling on the Mumbai-Pune Expressway. His driver, Samad Kazi, was also killed in the attack.The investigation was transferred to the CBI in 2008 after the Bombay high court, acting on a petition filed by Nimbalkar’s wife Anandibai Nimbalkar, criticised the state police probe as “desultory and lackadaisical”. The trial was later shifted following allegations that Patil was exerting influence over the proceedings.The approver had alleged that he was recruited by two associates of Patil to coordinate the contract killing and had provided details about the recruitment of shooters from Uttar Pradesh, the purchase of a vehicle under an assumed identity and surveillance of Nimbalkar before the attack.The verdict also carries political significance because Pawanraje Nimbalkar was the father of Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Omprakash Rajenimbalkar, who was present in court along with family members when the judgment was delivered.The case has remained a focal point in Maharashtra politics for nearly 20 years, intertwining allegations of political rivalry, influence and a prolonged legal battle. With the CBI now set to challenge the acquittal before the Bombay high court, the legal fight over one of the state’s most prominent political murder cases appears far from over.
