July 23, 2026

Apex court acquits 1996 blast accused after he spends 23 years in prison NEW DELHI: Supreme Court Wednesday acquitted a man accused in the 1996 Rajasthan bomb blast case after finding no evidence against him, though he had already spent 23 years in jail. The court found the prosecution case against him “to be woefully wanting and lacking in merit” and directed his release.A bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sanjay Karol and Sandeep Mehta said there was no evidence against him, and the trial court and Rajasthan high court wrongly convicted him on the basis of his confessional statements, “which themselves suffer from serious infirmities”, and the police failed to place any independent and reliable material against him.In this case, only two accused were convicted – the main accused, Dr Abdul Hameed, was awarded a death sentence, and this man, Pappu, alias Salim, was given life imprisonment.As Hameed was not given proper legal aid to defend himself, SC quashed his conviction and ordered a fresh trial against him but acquitted Salim on merit for lack of evidence.Hameed has remained in jail for the last 29 years. Salim, however, was released on parole during pendency of the case when he completed 23 years in jail.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosBiryani, Langar, Medicines: How India Rallied Behind CJP Protesters At Jantar MantarSC Declines Urgent Hearing On Police Action During ‘Chalo Sansad’ Protest‘Mujhe Maaro, Sir’: CJP Protester Seen In Viral Lathi-Charge Video Recounts Standoff With Cops70 Km To 500 Metres: How India’s Two New Ladakh Bridges Could Transform Border ConnectivityIndia-China Ties Improving? Jaishankar Welcomes Confidence-Building Steps, Raises Supply Concerns‘Pradhan Literally Destroyed…’: Rahul Gandhi Shares 3 Demands, Reacts To PM House DetentionCJP Pushes New Demand To Safeguard Protestors; Standoff With Centre ContinuesTVK Takes ‘Uncompromising Stand’ Over Abolition Of NEET, Proposes Key Constitutional ShiftsAkhilesh Yadav Demands PM Modi’s Statement On ‘Lathi Charge’; As Govt Offers Discussion On NEET LeakJ&K Police Arrest Mosque Cleric For Allegedly Providing Shelter And Logistics To Pak Terrorists123PhotostoriesWhy rosemary dies in many Indian homes, and the simple changes that can help this fragrant herb flourish insteadJimin’s Dior, V’s Celine, and J-Hope’s Louis Vuitton just started K-Pop’s biggest fashion battle10 enchanting baby girl names inspired by beautiful birds from around the globeBigg Boss Malayalam 8: Celebrities netizens wish to see on the show10 common mistakes travellers make at cultural and religious sitesFrom Emilia Clarke to Joni Mitchell: 6 celebrities who faced a life-threatening brain aneurysmAneet Padda’s romantic butter-yellow dress added a golden glow to ‘Saiyaara’s one-year celebration with Ahaan PandayBeat the rain, not your style: 6 quick-dry fabrics every working woman needs this monsoonThese are the 10 least travel-friendly countries in the world in 2026, according to a new reportThe Universe May Be Blessing You: Watch for These 4 Signs123Hot PicksTaylor Swift and Travis kelce WeddingDelhi metroCJP ProtestDonald TrumpNEET ProtestRahul GandhiNHL Trade RumorsDharmendra PradhanRRB JE RecruitmentTop TrendingThane MurderSandad Chalo MarchJantar Mantar ProtestCJP ProtestAbhijeet DipkeUttarakhand High CourtJohn AbrahamZlatan ibrahimovicHarbhajan singhIND U19 vs Sri Lanka U19

Vamsikrishna02 mins mins
Apex court acquits 1996 blast accused after he spends 23 years in prison NEW DELHI: Supreme Court Wednesday acquitted a man accused in the 1996 Rajasthan bomb blast case after finding no evidence against him, though he had already spent 23 years in jail. The court found the prosecution case against him “to be woefully wanting and lacking in merit” and directed his release.A bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sanjay Karol and Sandeep Mehta said there was no evidence against him, and the trial court and Rajasthan high court wrongly convicted him on the basis of his confessional statements, “which themselves suffer from serious infirmities”, and the police failed to place any independent and reliable material against him.In this case, only two accused were convicted – the main accused, Dr Abdul Hameed, was awarded a death sentence, and this man, Pappu, alias Salim, was given life imprisonment.As Hameed was not given proper legal aid to defend himself, SC quashed his conviction and ordered a fresh trial against him but acquitted Salim on merit for lack of evidence.Hameed has remained in jail for the last 29 years. Salim, however, was released on parole during pendency of the case when he completed 23 years in jail.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosBiryani, Langar, Medicines: How India Rallied Behind CJP Protesters At Jantar MantarSC Declines Urgent Hearing On Police Action During ‘Chalo Sansad’ Protest‘Mujhe Maaro, Sir’: CJP Protester Seen In Viral Lathi-Charge Video Recounts Standoff With Cops70 Km To 500 Metres: How India’s Two New Ladakh Bridges Could Transform Border ConnectivityIndia-China Ties Improving? Jaishankar Welcomes Confidence-Building Steps, Raises Supply Concerns‘Pradhan Literally Destroyed…’: Rahul Gandhi Shares 3 Demands, Reacts To PM House DetentionCJP Pushes New Demand To Safeguard Protestors; Standoff With Centre ContinuesTVK Takes ‘Uncompromising Stand’ Over Abolition Of NEET, Proposes Key Constitutional ShiftsAkhilesh Yadav Demands PM Modi’s Statement On ‘Lathi Charge’; As Govt Offers Discussion On NEET LeakJ&K Police Arrest Mosque Cleric For Allegedly Providing Shelter And Logistics To Pak Terrorists123PhotostoriesWhy rosemary dies in many Indian homes, and the simple changes that can help this fragrant herb flourish insteadJimin’s Dior, V’s Celine, and J-Hope’s Louis Vuitton just started K-Pop’s biggest fashion battle10 enchanting baby girl names inspired by beautiful birds from around the globeBigg Boss Malayalam 8: Celebrities netizens wish to see on the show10 common mistakes travellers make at cultural and religious sitesFrom Emilia Clarke to Joni Mitchell: 6 celebrities who faced a life-threatening brain aneurysmAneet Padda’s romantic butter-yellow dress added a golden glow to ‘Saiyaara’s one-year celebration with Ahaan PandayBeat the rain, not your style: 6 quick-dry fabrics every working woman needs this monsoonThese are the 10 least travel-friendly countries in the world in 2026, according to a new reportThe Universe May Be Blessing You: Watch for These 4 Signs123Hot PicksTaylor Swift and Travis kelce WeddingDelhi metroCJP ProtestDonald TrumpNEET ProtestRahul GandhiNHL Trade RumorsDharmendra PradhanRRB JE RecruitmentTop TrendingThane MurderSandad Chalo MarchJantar Mantar ProtestCJP ProtestAbhijeet DipkeUttarakhand High CourtJohn AbrahamZlatan ibrahimovicHarbhajan singhIND U19 vs Sri Lanka U19


SC acquits blast accused in jail for 23 years
Apex court acquits 1996 blast accused after he spends 23 years in prison

NEW DELHI: Supreme Court Wednesday acquitted a man accused in the 1996 Rajasthan bomb blast case after finding no evidence against him, though he had already spent 23 years in jail. The court found the prosecution case against him “to be woefully wanting and lacking in merit” and directed his release.A bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sanjay Karol and Sandeep Mehta said there was no evidence against him, and the trial court and Rajasthan high court wrongly convicted him on the basis of his confessional statements, “which themselves suffer from serious infirmities”, and the police failed to place any independent and reliable material against him.In this case, only two accused were convicted – the main accused, Dr Abdul Hameed, was awarded a death sentence, and this man, Pappu, alias Salim, was given life imprisonment.As Hameed was not given proper legal aid to defend himself, SC quashed his conviction and ordered a fresh trial against him but acquitted Salim on merit for lack of evidence.Hameed has remained in jail for the last 29 years. Salim, however, was released on parole during pendency of the case when he completed 23 years in jail.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related News

Opposition MPs stage protest against govt at Parliament in black clothes NEW DELHI: Govt and opposition were locked in intense discussions Wednesday to break the deadlock in Parliament, as the aftermath of the police crackdown on student protests led to a hardening of stance by the anti-BJP bloc – with both Houses witnessing a washout of proceedings for the third consecutive day.Opposition is sticking to its demand for education minister Pradhan’s resignation – termed “non-negotiable” by Rahul Gandhi and SP chief Akhilesh Yadav. Govt is not ready to accede even as it offers a discussion on paper leaks.Sources said LS Speaker Om Birla reached out to Congress’ K C Venugopal while parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju called on Congress chief Mallikarjun Kharge. Opposition said a final view will be taken at a meeting of parties in Kharge’s chamber Thursday morning.Sources privy to the discussion feel that among the options a compromise is possible on an adjournment motion — discussion under Rule 56 in Lok Sabha and Rule 267 in Rajya Sabha.Amid the deadlock, LS and RS failed to transact any business for the third day. In the lower House, Congress’s Venugopal demanded Pradhan’s resignation, even as he sought a discussion under the adjournment motion. But Union minister Rijiju merely reiterated govt’s willingness to hold a discussion, with the rule to be decided by the speaker and the parties.Amid the back and forth, Akhilesh expressed anguish that while BJP and Congress members are allowed to speak, he does not get a chance to air his views. He asked if a deal has been reached, asserting that the issue is not about political parties but about students. The feeling in opposition camp is that BJP is on the defensive, and they should leverage the situation to maximum.At the same time, the opposition is wary of coming across as letting down the students. There are multiple players ranging from the political class to civil society to Sonam Wangchuk in the mix. As a result, a joint stand will be taken by opposition parties only after considering all the possible options.The difficulty in reaching a middle ground was visible through the day as the leader of the opposition in Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, attacked the Modi govt, drawing a furious response from Union health minister and Leader of Rajya Sabha J P Nadda. Rahul said while police were dragging him away outside the PM’s residence on Tuesday, they were whispering in his ears “remove this govt”.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosBiryani, Langar, Medicines: How India Rallied Behind CJP Protesters At Jantar MantarSC Declines Urgent Hearing On Police Action During ‘Chalo Sansad’ Protest‘Mujhe Maaro, Sir’: CJP Protester Seen In Viral Lathi-Charge Video Recounts Standoff With Cops70 Km To 500 Metres: How India’s Two New Ladakh Bridges Could Transform Border ConnectivityIndia-China Ties Improving? Jaishankar Welcomes Confidence-Building Steps, Raises Supply Concerns‘Pradhan Literally Destroyed…’: Rahul Gandhi Shares 3 Demands, Reacts To PM House DetentionCJP Pushes New Demand To Safeguard Protestors; Standoff With Centre ContinuesTVK Takes ‘Uncompromising Stand’ Over Abolition Of NEET, Proposes Key Constitutional ShiftsAkhilesh Yadav Demands PM Modi’s Statement On ‘Lathi Charge’; As Govt Offers Discussion On NEET LeakJ&K Police Arrest Mosque Cleric For Allegedly Providing Shelter And Logistics To Pak Terrorists123PhotostoriesWhy rosemary dies in many Indian homes, and the simple changes that can help this fragrant herb flourish insteadJimin’s Dior, V’s Celine, and J-Hope’s Louis Vuitton just started K-Pop’s biggest fashion battle10 enchanting baby girl names inspired by beautiful birds from around the globeBigg Boss Malayalam 8: Celebrities netizens wish to see on the show10 common mistakes travellers make at cultural and religious sitesFrom Emilia Clarke to Joni Mitchell: 6 celebrities who faced a life-threatening brain aneurysmAneet Padda’s romantic butter-yellow dress added a golden glow to ‘Saiyaara’s one-year celebration with Ahaan PandayBeat the rain, not your style: 6 quick-dry fabrics every working woman needs this monsoonThese are the 10 least travel-friendly countries in the world in 2026, according to a new reportThe Universe May Be Blessing You: Watch for These 4 Signs123Hot PicksTaylor Swift and Travis kelce WeddingDelhi metroCJP ProtestDonald TrumpNEET ProtestRahul GandhiNHL Trade RumorsDharmendra PradhanRRB JE RecruitmentTop TrendingThane MurderSandad Chalo MarchJantar Mantar ProtestCJP ProtestAbhijeet DipkeUttarakhand High CourtJohn AbrahamZlatan ibrahimovicHarbhajan singhIND U19 vs Sri Lanka U19

Opposition MPs stage protest against govt at Parliament in black clothes NEW DELHI: Govt and opposition were locked in intense discussions Wednesday to break the deadlock in Parliament, as the aftermath of the police crackdown on student protests led to a hardening of stance by the anti-BJP bloc – with both Houses witnessing a washout of proceedings for the third consecutive day.Opposition is sticking to its demand for education minister Pradhan’s resignation – termed “non-negotiable” by Rahul Gandhi and SP chief Akhilesh Yadav. Govt is not ready to accede even as it offers a discussion on paper leaks.Sources said LS Speaker Om Birla reached out to Congress’ K C Venugopal while parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju called on Congress chief Mallikarjun Kharge. Opposition said a final view will be taken at a meeting of parties in Kharge’s chamber Thursday morning.Sources privy to the discussion feel that among the options a compromise is possible on an adjournment motion — discussion under Rule 56 in Lok Sabha and Rule 267 in Rajya Sabha.Amid the deadlock, LS and RS failed to transact any business for the third day. In the lower House, Congress’s Venugopal demanded Pradhan’s resignation, even as he sought a discussion under the adjournment motion. But Union minister Rijiju merely reiterated govt’s willingness to hold a discussion, with the rule to be decided by the speaker and the parties.Amid the back and forth, Akhilesh expressed anguish that while BJP and Congress members are allowed to speak, he does not get a chance to air his views. He asked if a deal has been reached, asserting that the issue is not about political parties but about students. The feeling in opposition camp is that BJP is on the defensive, and they should leverage the situation to maximum.At the same time, the opposition is wary of coming across as letting down the students. There are multiple players ranging from the political class to civil society to Sonam Wangchuk in the mix. As a result, a joint stand will be taken by opposition parties only after considering all the possible options.The difficulty in reaching a middle ground was visible through the day as the leader of the opposition in Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, attacked the Modi govt, drawing a furious response from Union health minister and Leader of Rajya Sabha J P Nadda. Rahul said while police were dragging him away outside the PM’s residence on Tuesday, they were whispering in his ears “remove this govt”.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosBiryani, Langar, Medicines: How India Rallied Behind CJP Protesters At Jantar MantarSC Declines Urgent Hearing On Police Action During ‘Chalo Sansad’ Protest‘Mujhe Maaro, Sir’: CJP Protester Seen In Viral Lathi-Charge Video Recounts Standoff With Cops70 Km To 500 Metres: How India’s Two New Ladakh Bridges Could Transform Border ConnectivityIndia-China Ties Improving? Jaishankar Welcomes Confidence-Building Steps, Raises Supply Concerns‘Pradhan Literally Destroyed…’: Rahul Gandhi Shares 3 Demands, Reacts To PM House DetentionCJP Pushes New Demand To Safeguard Protestors; Standoff With Centre ContinuesTVK Takes ‘Uncompromising Stand’ Over Abolition Of NEET, Proposes Key Constitutional ShiftsAkhilesh Yadav Demands PM Modi’s Statement On ‘Lathi Charge’; As Govt Offers Discussion On NEET LeakJ&K Police Arrest Mosque Cleric For Allegedly Providing Shelter And Logistics To Pak Terrorists123PhotostoriesWhy rosemary dies in many Indian homes, and the simple changes that can help this fragrant herb flourish insteadJimin’s Dior, V’s Celine, and J-Hope’s Louis Vuitton just started K-Pop’s biggest fashion battle10 enchanting baby girl names inspired by beautiful birds from around the globeBigg Boss Malayalam 8: Celebrities netizens wish to see on the show10 common mistakes travellers make at cultural and religious sitesFrom Emilia Clarke to Joni Mitchell: 6 celebrities who faced a life-threatening brain aneurysmAneet Padda’s romantic butter-yellow dress added a golden glow to ‘Saiyaara’s one-year celebration with Ahaan PandayBeat the rain, not your style: 6 quick-dry fabrics every working woman needs this monsoonThese are the 10 least travel-friendly countries in the world in 2026, according to a new reportThe Universe May Be Blessing You: Watch for These 4 Signs123Hot PicksTaylor Swift and Travis kelce WeddingDelhi metroCJP ProtestDonald TrumpNEET ProtestRahul GandhiNHL Trade RumorsDharmendra PradhanRRB JE RecruitmentTop TrendingThane MurderSandad Chalo MarchJantar Mantar ProtestCJP ProtestAbhijeet DipkeUttarakhand High CourtJohn AbrahamZlatan ibrahimovicHarbhajan singhIND U19 vs Sri Lanka U19

Vamsikrishna 0
SC said that once a high court grants bail to an accused, it must be treated as final NEW DELHI: In an important exposition on the working of criminal justice process without diluting the primacy of individual liberty, the Supreme Court on Wednesday said that once a high court grants bail to an accused, it must be treated as final and SC must not entertain appeals against the order by the state, reports DhananjayMahapatra.A bench of CJI Surya Kant, and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana made the statement as they disposed of Chhattisgarh govt’s appeal against grant of bail to Chaitanya Baghel, son of ex-CM Bhupesh Baghel, despite having serious reservations about HC’s order, and said judicial system must get back to the trend during 1980s, when then CJI P N Bhagwati had said HC’s orders granting bail should be final.CJI Surya Kant said HCs appear to have become very conservative in granting bail and write 40-50 pages while granting or rejecting bail without realising the impact of long discussions on merits of the case in a fair and impartial trial. The bail orders should not exceed three to four pages.Justice Bagchi suggested that appeals to SC in matters of bail should be made in cases where it has been denied. “Cases where liberty is deprived stand on a completely different footing in SC which is the enforcer of fundamental rights. When it is cancellation of bail, that is diminution of liberty, we must weigh it against victim’s rights and the societal interest. These are the guiding principles.”The bench said the states’ penchant for challenging bails granted by HCs in the last two decades is the single largest reason for the burgeoning of appeals in SC. “Every day each bench of SC deals with at least ten such petitions. This is the concern of the court,” he said.”Why we are concerned -if a prosecutor and investigator rests so much on interlocutory relief, the ultimate effort for securing conviction is lessened… by seeking cancellation of bail you (state) can ensure that an undertrial prisoner continues to be incarcerated while absolving yourself of the higher responsibility of ensuring fair and just trial to secure conviction, which the victims of crime desire,” the bench said.”In most cases there is no honourable acquittal. The accused is not convicted because the investigator slips and the prosecution fails to present evidence properly. This is where the state must fasten accountability and not seek cancellation of bail. We are making these observations out of serious concern,” it further said.Justice Bagchi said, “The HCs are passing 50-page bail orders in UAPA cases, 40-page orders in PMLA cases. Why? Do the judges understand the consequences of such lengthy bail orders?” When Kapil Sibal attempted to argue in favour of upholding Baghel’s bail, the bench said, “Please do not bring up the facts of your case. There are some very serious reservations about your case.”The bench said even in MISA (Maintenance of Internal Security Act enforced during the Emergency) detentions, HCs used to release detenues by passing one-page orders – “we are not satisfied with grounds of arrest, as communicated, and hence detention order is set aside”.Justice Bagchi said CJI Kant-authored judgment in K A Najeeb case in 2021 had laid down guidelines for grant of bail and cleared doubts in minds of HC judges who were finding it difficult to strike a balance between liberty and continued detention. In Najeeb judgment, SC had said courts can grant bail to the accused on the ground of long incarceration even in UAPA cases.Solicitor general Tushar Mehta had argued Baghel’s case was no ordinary one. “This case involves a peculiarity. A large number of WhatsApp texts… were exchanged between two constitutional authorities – the judge and then Chhattisgarh advocate general.”Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosBiryani, Langar, Medicines: How India Rallied Behind CJP Protesters At Jantar MantarSC Declines Urgent Hearing On Police Action During ‘Chalo Sansad’ Protest‘Mujhe Maaro, Sir’: CJP Protester Seen In Viral Lathi-Charge Video Recounts Standoff With Cops70 Km To 500 Metres: How India’s Two New Ladakh Bridges Could Transform Border ConnectivityIndia-China Ties Improving? Jaishankar Welcomes Confidence-Building Steps, Raises Supply Concerns‘Pradhan Literally Destroyed…’: Rahul Gandhi Shares 3 Demands, Reacts To PM House DetentionCJP Pushes New Demand To Safeguard Protestors; Standoff With Centre ContinuesTVK Takes ‘Uncompromising Stand’ Over Abolition Of NEET, Proposes Key Constitutional ShiftsAkhilesh Yadav Demands PM Modi’s Statement On ‘Lathi Charge’; As Govt Offers Discussion On NEET LeakJ&K Police Arrest Mosque Cleric For Allegedly Providing Shelter And Logistics To Pak Terrorists123PhotostoriesWhy rosemary dies in many Indian homes, and the simple changes that can help this fragrant herb flourish insteadJimin’s Dior, V’s Celine, and J-Hope’s Louis Vuitton just started K-Pop’s biggest fashion battle10 enchanting baby girl names inspired by beautiful birds from around the globeBigg Boss Malayalam 8: Celebrities netizens wish to see on the show10 common mistakes travellers make at cultural and religious sitesFrom Emilia Clarke to Joni Mitchell: 6 celebrities who faced a life-threatening brain aneurysmAneet Padda’s romantic butter-yellow dress added a golden glow to ‘Saiyaara’s one-year celebration with Ahaan PandayBeat the rain, not your style: 6 quick-dry fabrics every working woman needs this monsoonThese are the 10 least travel-friendly countries in the world in 2026, according to a new reportThe Universe May Be Blessing You: Watch for These 4 Signs123Hot PicksTaylor Swift and Travis kelce WeddingDelhi metroCJP ProtestDonald TrumpNEET ProtestRahul GandhiNHL Trade RumorsDharmendra PradhanRRB JE RecruitmentTop TrendingThane MurderSandad Chalo MarchJantar Mantar ProtestCJP ProtestAbhijeet DipkeUttarakhand High CourtJohn AbrahamZlatan ibrahimovicHarbhajan singhIND U19 vs Sri Lanka U19

SC said that once a high court grants bail to an accused, it must be treated as final NEW DELHI: In an important exposition on the working of criminal justice process without diluting the primacy of individual liberty, the Supreme Court on Wednesday said that once a high court grants bail to an accused, it must be treated as final and SC must not entertain appeals against the order by the state, reports DhananjayMahapatra.A bench of CJI Surya Kant, and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana made the statement as they disposed of Chhattisgarh govt’s appeal against grant of bail to Chaitanya Baghel, son of ex-CM Bhupesh Baghel, despite having serious reservations about HC’s order, and said judicial system must get back to the trend during 1980s, when then CJI P N Bhagwati had said HC’s orders granting bail should be final.CJI Surya Kant said HCs appear to have become very conservative in granting bail and write 40-50 pages while granting or rejecting bail without realising the impact of long discussions on merits of the case in a fair and impartial trial. The bail orders should not exceed three to four pages.Justice Bagchi suggested that appeals to SC in matters of bail should be made in cases where it has been denied. “Cases where liberty is deprived stand on a completely different footing in SC which is the enforcer of fundamental rights. When it is cancellation of bail, that is diminution of liberty, we must weigh it against victim’s rights and the societal interest. These are the guiding principles.”The bench said the states’ penchant for challenging bails granted by HCs in the last two decades is the single largest reason for the burgeoning of appeals in SC. “Every day each bench of SC deals with at least ten such petitions. This is the concern of the court,” he said.”Why we are concerned -if a prosecutor and investigator rests so much on interlocutory relief, the ultimate effort for securing conviction is lessened… by seeking cancellation of bail you (state) can ensure that an undertrial prisoner continues to be incarcerated while absolving yourself of the higher responsibility of ensuring fair and just trial to secure conviction, which the victims of crime desire,” the bench said.”In most cases there is no honourable acquittal. The accused is not convicted because the investigator slips and the prosecution fails to present evidence properly. This is where the state must fasten accountability and not seek cancellation of bail. We are making these observations out of serious concern,” it further said.Justice Bagchi said, “The HCs are passing 50-page bail orders in UAPA cases, 40-page orders in PMLA cases. Why? Do the judges understand the consequences of such lengthy bail orders?” When Kapil Sibal attempted to argue in favour of upholding Baghel’s bail, the bench said, “Please do not bring up the facts of your case. There are some very serious reservations about your case.”The bench said even in MISA (Maintenance of Internal Security Act enforced during the Emergency) detentions, HCs used to release detenues by passing one-page orders – “we are not satisfied with grounds of arrest, as communicated, and hence detention order is set aside”.Justice Bagchi said CJI Kant-authored judgment in K A Najeeb case in 2021 had laid down guidelines for grant of bail and cleared doubts in minds of HC judges who were finding it difficult to strike a balance between liberty and continued detention. In Najeeb judgment, SC had said courts can grant bail to the accused on the ground of long incarceration even in UAPA cases.Solicitor general Tushar Mehta had argued Baghel’s case was no ordinary one. “This case involves a peculiarity. A large number of WhatsApp texts… were exchanged between two constitutional authorities – the judge and then Chhattisgarh advocate general.”Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosBiryani, Langar, Medicines: How India Rallied Behind CJP Protesters At Jantar MantarSC Declines Urgent Hearing On Police Action During ‘Chalo Sansad’ Protest‘Mujhe Maaro, Sir’: CJP Protester Seen In Viral Lathi-Charge Video Recounts Standoff With Cops70 Km To 500 Metres: How India’s Two New Ladakh Bridges Could Transform Border ConnectivityIndia-China Ties Improving? Jaishankar Welcomes Confidence-Building Steps, Raises Supply Concerns‘Pradhan Literally Destroyed…’: Rahul Gandhi Shares 3 Demands, Reacts To PM House DetentionCJP Pushes New Demand To Safeguard Protestors; Standoff With Centre ContinuesTVK Takes ‘Uncompromising Stand’ Over Abolition Of NEET, Proposes Key Constitutional ShiftsAkhilesh Yadav Demands PM Modi’s Statement On ‘Lathi Charge’; As Govt Offers Discussion On NEET LeakJ&K Police Arrest Mosque Cleric For Allegedly Providing Shelter And Logistics To Pak Terrorists123PhotostoriesWhy rosemary dies in many Indian homes, and the simple changes that can help this fragrant herb flourish insteadJimin’s Dior, V’s Celine, and J-Hope’s Louis Vuitton just started K-Pop’s biggest fashion battle10 enchanting baby girl names inspired by beautiful birds from around the globeBigg Boss Malayalam 8: Celebrities netizens wish to see on the show10 common mistakes travellers make at cultural and religious sitesFrom Emilia Clarke to Joni Mitchell: 6 celebrities who faced a life-threatening brain aneurysmAneet Padda’s romantic butter-yellow dress added a golden glow to ‘Saiyaara’s one-year celebration with Ahaan PandayBeat the rain, not your style: 6 quick-dry fabrics every working woman needs this monsoonThese are the 10 least travel-friendly countries in the world in 2026, according to a new reportThe Universe May Be Blessing You: Watch for These 4 Signs123Hot PicksTaylor Swift and Travis kelce WeddingDelhi metroCJP ProtestDonald TrumpNEET ProtestRahul GandhiNHL Trade RumorsDharmendra PradhanRRB JE RecruitmentTop TrendingThane MurderSandad Chalo MarchJantar Mantar ProtestCJP ProtestAbhijeet DipkeUttarakhand High CourtJohn AbrahamZlatan ibrahimovicHarbhajan singhIND U19 vs Sri Lanka U19

Vamsikrishna 0