NEW DELHI: Congress leader Sonia Gandhi has opposed a criminal revision petition filed against her in the Rouse Avenue Court, calling it “wholly misconceived, frivolous, politically motivated and an abuse of the process of law.” She argued that matters of citizenship and electoral rolls cannot be turned into criminal proceedings four decades later.The reply, filed through her counsel before the court of special judge (CBI) Vishal Gogne, contests allegations that she was included in the electoral rolls before acquiring Indian citizenship.She urged that the plea be dismissed as baseless and speculative.According to her response, the complainant’s accusations rest on assumptions, media reports and personal presumptions and not on authentic government records.The reply further emphasises that no specific document has been identified as forged or fabricated, rendering the charges void of material substance. Matters of citizenship, it maintains, fall solely under the jurisdiction of the Central Government, while the Election Commission of India is responsible for maintaining electoral rolls.Arguing that criminal courts cannot assume jurisdiction in such matters, the reply states that entertaining the petition would amount to interference in the electoral process.It further denies that Gandhi’s name was ever re‑entered in the voter list based on any forged or improper application, saying the complainant has failed to produce any authentic document or effort to lawfully obtain one.Sonia Gandhi’s reply also dismisses as “baseless” the assertions that fabricated identity documents were used or that Gandhi had voted in the 1980 general election. It also objects to the complainant’s reliance on decades‑old media reports, noting such sources carry no legal weight and cannot serve as a foundation for criminal proceedings.The response underscores that the complaint seeks to revive a matter from 1980–83—over four decades later—without foundational proof, making it both stale and legally untenable.Procedural objections have also been raised, alleging non‑compliance with mandatory requirements under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNSS), including the absence of a valid affidavit, which, Gandhi’s counsel argues, deprives the court of jurisdiction.The revision petition, filed by advocate Vikas Tripathi, challenges a September 2025 order of the Magistrate Court that had dismissed his earlier complaint at the threshold. The Magistrate had held that questions of citizenship and electoral registration fall within the purview of the Central Government and Election Commission, and cannot be adjudicated through a criminal complaint.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosFrom Design To Silicon, India Signals Semiconductor Breakout With Semicon 2.0 RoadmapMP Minister Vijay Shah Finally Apologises For Comment Targeting Op Sindoor Face Col Sofia QureshiTurkey Sides With Pakistan On Kashmir At UN After Sharif’s Rhetoric On India’s ‘Integral’ Territory’Home-Grown Ills’: Islamabad Mosque Blast Triggers Blame Game As India Rejects Pakistan’s BlameEx-US Official Raymond Vickery Says India Outsmarted Donald Trump Chaos By Sticking To Trade ProcessEx-US Official Raymond Vickery Backs India Red Line On Russian Oil As US Trade Deal Drops MentionIndia-US Trade Deal Explained: What The White House Says On Tariffs, Markets And Tech ShiftsPM Modi Calls India-US Trade Pact Framework Great News For Jobs, Make In India And Exports’We Were Preparing For War’: Former DGMO Reveals Inside Story Of India-China Doklam Stand-OffGrand Welcome To Dance Record: Indian Diaspora Gears Up For PM Modi’s Malaysia Visit123PhotostoriesMumbai prepares for faster commute as WEH-BKC connector enters final stageTop 10 iconic Japanese fast foods you need to try at least once7 must-try winter street foods in ChandigarhUpcoming OTT releases for this week: ‘Kohrra Season 2’, ‘The Lincoln Lawyer Season 4,’ and moreTop luxury trekking motorbikes in 2026: Premium rides for rugged adventuresIndia’s major snow-fed rivers: Waterways that have shaped India’s landscape7 irresistible mutton dishes from Jammu and Kashmir that are a must-try in winterWhat happens if the builder does not follow the RERA order?5 national parks in India that are a part of iconic elephant reserves9 things you should avoid buying on Saturday, according to tradition123Hot PicksBudget 2026Gold Silver PricesParliament Budget SessionGCC Unified Visa 2026Income Tax CalculatorPublic holidays February 2026Bank Holidays februaryTop TrendingSuper Bowl TrophyCooper Kupp WifeKayla NicoleSuper Bowl LX TicketOliver RowlandJustin GaethjeLIV GolfLiam Paro vs Paddy Donovan Net WorthWinter Olympics 2026NBA Trade Update
NEW DELHI: Congress leader Sonia Gandhi has opposed a criminal revision petition filed against her in the Rouse Avenue Court, calling it “wholly misconceived, frivolous, politically motivated and an abuse of the process of law.” She argued that matters of citizenship and electoral rolls cannot be turned into criminal proceedings four decades later.The reply, filed through her counsel before the court of special judge (CBI) Vishal Gogne, contests allegations that she was included in the electoral rolls before acquiring Indian citizenship.She urged that the plea be dismissed as baseless and speculative.According to her response, the complainant’s accusations rest on assumptions, media reports and personal presumptions and not on authentic government records.The reply further emphasises that no specific document has been identified as forged or fabricated, rendering the charges void of material substance. Matters of citizenship, it maintains, fall solely under the jurisdiction of the Central Government, while the Election Commission of India is responsible for maintaining electoral rolls.Arguing that criminal courts cannot assume jurisdiction in such matters, the reply states that entertaining the petition would amount to interference in the electoral process.It further denies that Gandhi’s name was ever re‑entered in the voter list based on any forged or improper application, saying the complainant has failed to produce any authentic document or effort to lawfully obtain one.Sonia Gandhi’s reply also dismisses as “baseless” the assertions that fabricated identity documents were used or that Gandhi had voted in the 1980 general election. It also objects to the complainant’s reliance on decades‑old media reports, noting such sources carry no legal weight and cannot serve as a foundation for criminal proceedings.The response underscores that the complaint seeks to revive a matter from 1980–83—over four decades later—without foundational proof, making it both stale and legally untenable.Procedural objections have also been raised, alleging non‑compliance with mandatory requirements under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNSS), including the absence of a valid affidavit, which, Gandhi’s counsel argues, deprives the court of jurisdiction.The revision petition, filed by advocate Vikas Tripathi, challenges a September 2025 order of the Magistrate Court that had dismissed his earlier complaint at the threshold. The Magistrate had held that questions of citizenship and electoral registration fall within the purview of the Central Government and Election Commission, and cannot be adjudicated through a criminal complaint.
