2.44 lakh URLs flagged by states for takedown between March and July Nearly 3 lakh URLs were sent to social media platforms for takedown by government departments between March and July 2026, with states accounting for 82% of the requests, the PIB Fact Check unit said. The figures come after articles claiming that Meta had automated content blocking to meet the government’s three-hour takedown requirement, with content blocks rising during the Delhiprotests resurfaced.Of the total URLs sent for takedown, 2.44 lakh, or 82%, came from states, while 51,000 were sent by the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C). The I4C requests concerned cyber, infrastructure and stock-investment scams, the government’s fact-check body said.”During the period from March 2026 to July 2026, around 2.98 lakh URLs were sent for takedown, out of which 2.44 lakhs were sent by states (82 per cent). Of these, 51 thousand URLs were sent by I4C in the context of cyber, infrastructure, and stock-investment scams,” the PIB Fact Check account said on X.The PIB Fact Check unit also addressed reports about Meta using automated systems to block content to meet the government’s three-hour takedown requirement. It termed the reports misleading and said, “The API integration with Meta took place in 2025 at the request of Meta.”The government had amended the IT Intermediaries Rules 2021 in February to speed up the removal of unlawful content. The time given for takedowns was subsequently cut to three hours from 36 hours.Here’s what I4C flaggedAccording to the fact-check unit, most of the unlawful content flagged by I4C over the past two years was linked to transnational financial frauds, CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material), and offences related to women and children.The unit said the volume of content being posted online also made it necessary for the government to act against unlawful material. With 600 million users in India posting up to 78,703 items every 68 seconds, it said, it was reasonable to expect that, on average, one of those items may not be lawful.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelines”The State and its instrumentalities cannot abdicate their responsibilities and allow free rein to lawlessness in cyberspace,” PIB Fact Check said.The unit said social media platforms, or IT intermediaries, act on requests sent by competent authorities. It added that only authorised officers notified by the relevant ministry or state government can send requests through Sahyog for the removal of unlawful content.”Only authorised officers as notified by the concerned ministry or state government can send intimations for unlawful content takedown through Sahyog. All such intimations are reviewed by the concerned governments periodically,” the fact check unit said.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosJharkhand High Court Stays Soren Govt’s Order To Cancel JPSC Exams, AppointmentsKangana Vs Ramdev: BJP MP Fires Back After Yoga Guru Questions Her Past And Controversial Remarks’Not Mahatma Gandhi’s Congress’: FULL Vande Mataram Rejected At INC Events, BJP Doubts ‘Loyalty’US Body Opposes Mohan Bhagwat’s Visit, Seeks Sanctions on RSS Members Over Religious Freedom ClaimsDJB Tender Scam Row: AAP Questions Why Raghav Chadha Was Never Questioned By InvestigatorsMaharashtra’s Power Shift: Fadnavis Can Now Reverse Ministerial Decisions In Public InterestIndia Removes Pakistan Mission Barricades After Islamabad Move, Tensions Rise Over Kashmir RemarksModi Govt’s Gen-Z Outreach: One Union Minister To Visit One University Daily‘Fuel For Free’: Chandigarh’s ‘Petrol Langar’ Turns Chaotic, Leaves People Fuming‘No Respect For Court’: Arrest Warrant Against Mahua Moitra In Hate Speech Case123PhotostoriesFrom money plants to shankh: 5 Vastu items believed to bring good luck and positivity at homeHow much walking can reverse the health risks of sitting for 8 hours a day? Doctor explains what your body needsWhy does homemade curd turn slimy during monsoon and 3 ways to prevent itThe history of the white shirt: How a simple staple became the ultimate fashion icon10 enchanting baby girl names inspired by fantasy, mythology and folkloreSugar price hike by Rs 8 per kg: 9 natural Indian sweeteners and how to use themOptical illusion personality test: The first thing you spot reveals what’s coming next in your lifeIs apple cider vinegar good for your hair? Benefits, side effects, and the right way to use it10 One Piece characters who have lived for more than a 100 yearsWhy does reheated rice sometimes become hard and dry? 4 ways to bring it back to life123Hot PicksLily HooperConnor McDavidGTU results 2026Pennsylvania plane crashOil export IndiaFaceless assessmentRSS sanctionZepto internshipPakistan High CommissionTop TrendingHyderabad MurderPakistan High CommissionTwisha SharmaKarnataka MurderKerala MurderAbhijeet DipkeSukesh ChandrashekharRahul GandhiBengaluru RapidoBen Gvir


2.98 lakh URLs sent for takedown; I4C flags scams, CSAM and other unlawful content
2.44 lakh URLs flagged by states for takedown between March and July

Nearly 3 lakh URLs were sent to social media platforms for takedown by government departments between March and July 2026, with states accounting for 82% of the requests, the PIB Fact Check unit said. The figures come after articles claiming that Meta had automated content blocking to meet the government’s three-hour takedown requirement, with content blocks rising during the Delhiprotests resurfaced.Of the total URLs sent for takedown, 2.44 lakh, or 82%, came from states, while 51,000 were sent by the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C). The I4C requests concerned cyber, infrastructure and stock-investment scams, the government’s fact-check body said.“During the period from March 2026 to July 2026, around 2.98 lakh URLs were sent for takedown, out of which 2.44 lakhs were sent by states (82 per cent). Of these, 51 thousand URLs were sent by I4C in the context of cyber, infrastructure, and stock-investment scams,” the PIB Fact Check account said on X.The PIB Fact Check unit also addressed reports about Meta using automated systems to block content to meet the government’s three-hour takedown requirement. It termed the reports misleading and said, “The API integration with Meta took place in 2025 at the request of Meta.”The government had amended the IT Intermediaries Rules 2021 in February to speed up the removal of unlawful content. The time given for takedowns was subsequently cut to three hours from 36 hours.

Here’s what I4C flagged

According to the fact-check unit, most of the unlawful content flagged by I4C over the past two years was linked to transnational financial frauds, CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material), and offences related to women and children.The unit said the volume of content being posted online also made it necessary for the government to act against unlawful material. With 600 million users in India posting up to 78,703 items every 68 seconds, it said, it was reasonable to expect that, on average, one of those items may not be lawful.

Share your thoughts in the comments