August 21, 2026

The 2026 regulations had already been kept in abeyance by the Supreme Court on January 29. NEW DELHI: The Centre on Thursday informed the Supreme Court that the 2026 University Grants Commission (UGC) equity regulations, which seek to address caste-based discrimination in higher education institutions, are currently being reconsidered.The development came during a hearing before a bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana. The court was hearing several petitions challenging the validity of the regulations.”This is the UGC regulation matter. It is under reconsideration,” Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the bench.The Supreme Court subsequently directed the UGC to submit a comprehensive counter affidavit within four weeks. The petitioners will have two weeks after that to file their rejoinders, if any.SC had earlier put regulations on holdThe 2026 regulations had already been kept in abeyance by the top court on January 29. At the time, the court said the provisions were “prima facie vague” and could have “very sweeping consequences”, warning that they could potentially divide society and have a “dangerous impact”.The court had also asked the Centre and the UGC to respond to three petitions challenging the new framework.”In exercise of our powers under Article 142 of the Constitution, we further direct that the University Grants Commission (Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions) Regulations, 2012, will continue to operate and remain in force till further orders,” it had said.The regulations had faced opposition in several places, with student groups and other organisations calling for their immediate withdrawal.Court questioned provisions on caste discriminationWhile examining the regulations, the Supreme Court raised questions about how some of their provisions were framed.One concern related to Regulation 3(1)(c), which separately defines “caste-based discrimination”. The court questioned why a separate definition was necessary when Regulation 3(1)(e) already contains a broader definition of “discrimination”.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesThe bench also questioned the exclusion of ragging from the regulations, noting that it remains a common form of harassment in educational institutions.The court had further observed that the wording of the 2026 regulations appeared “prima facie vague” and “capable of misuse”.Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, representing one of the petitioners, had challenged Regulation 3(1)(c). The provision defines caste-based discrimination as discrimination “only on the basis of caste or tribe” against members of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorRajeev SinghRajeev Singh is a Digital Content Producer with The Times of India. He covers politics, policies, defence, and conflicts for readers curious to know their implications. He loves digging into legal maxims and political trivia. On off days, when not turning pages or learning русский, he lives in the reverie of “what ifs” and “how abouts.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosKangana Vs Ramdev: BJP MP Fires Back After Yoga Guru Questions Her Past And Controversial Remarks’Not Mahatma Gandhi’s Congress’: FULL Vande Mataram Rejected At INC Events, BJP Doubts ‘Loyalty’US Body Opposes Mohan Bhagwat’s Visit, Seeks Sanctions on RSS Members Over Religious Freedom ClaimsDJB Tender Scam Row: AAP Questions Why Raghav Chadha Was Never Questioned By InvestigatorsMaharashtra’s Power Shift: Fadnavis Can Now Reverse Ministerial Decisions In Public InterestIndia Removes Pakistan Mission Barricades After Islamabad Move, Tensions Rise Over Kashmir RemarksModi Govt’s Gen-Z Outreach: One Union Minister To Visit One University Daily‘Fuel For Free’: Chandigarh’s ‘Petrol Langar’ Turns Chaotic, Leaves People Fuming‘No Respect For Court’: Arrest Warrant Against Mahua Moitra In Hate Speech CaseUS Envoy Calls J&K ‘Important Part Of India’ During 1st Kashmir Visit After Article 370 Abrogation123PhotostoriesWhy does reheated rice sometimes become hard and dry? 4 ways to bring it back to lifeWhy are gold borders vital in Indian sarees?Exercising daily for a fitter you? Hidden heart problems that can surface when endurance exercise pushes you too hardIndoor plant leaves turning brown despite enough sunlight? Hidden problems could be the real causePooja Hegde’s New York-style streak just got dangerous in this shimmery corset saree10 foods mentioned in manga that you can actually eat5 natural ways to keep mosquitoes away from your homeGenuine care or love bombing? 7 signs to spot the red flags early in a relationshipWhich type of milk has the most protein? 7 milk varieties comparedToo much salt in curry or sabzi? 9 easy ways to fix it and the science behind them123Hot PicksSajjan KumarRhiya AhirGTU results 2026Pennsylvania plane crashOil export IndiaFaceless assessmentRSS sanctionZepto internshipPakistan High CommissionTop TrendingHyderabad MurderPakistan High CommissionTwisha SharmaKarnataka MurderKerala MurderAbhijeet DipkeSukesh ChandrashekharRahul GandhiBengaluru RapidoBen Gvir

Vamsikrishna03 mins mins
The 2026 regulations had already been kept in abeyance by the Supreme Court on January 29. NEW DELHI: The Centre on Thursday informed the Supreme Court that the 2026 University Grants Commission (UGC) equity regulations, which seek to address caste-based discrimination in higher education institutions, are currently being reconsidered.The development came during a hearing before a bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana. The court was hearing several petitions challenging the validity of the regulations.”This is the UGC regulation matter. It is under reconsideration,” Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the bench.The Supreme Court subsequently directed the UGC to submit a comprehensive counter affidavit within four weeks. The petitioners will have two weeks after that to file their rejoinders, if any.SC had earlier put regulations on holdThe 2026 regulations had already been kept in abeyance by the top court on January 29. At the time, the court said the provisions were “prima facie vague” and could have “very sweeping consequences”, warning that they could potentially divide society and have a “dangerous impact”.The court had also asked the Centre and the UGC to respond to three petitions challenging the new framework.”In exercise of our powers under Article 142 of the Constitution, we further direct that the University Grants Commission (Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions) Regulations, 2012, will continue to operate and remain in force till further orders,” it had said.The regulations had faced opposition in several places, with student groups and other organisations calling for their immediate withdrawal.Court questioned provisions on caste discriminationWhile examining the regulations, the Supreme Court raised questions about how some of their provisions were framed.One concern related to Regulation 3(1)(c), which separately defines “caste-based discrimination”. The court questioned why a separate definition was necessary when Regulation 3(1)(e) already contains a broader definition of “discrimination”.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesThe bench also questioned the exclusion of ragging from the regulations, noting that it remains a common form of harassment in educational institutions.The court had further observed that the wording of the 2026 regulations appeared “prima facie vague” and “capable of misuse”.Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, representing one of the petitioners, had challenged Regulation 3(1)(c). The provision defines caste-based discrimination as discrimination “only on the basis of caste or tribe” against members of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorRajeev SinghRajeev Singh is a Digital Content Producer with The Times of India. He covers politics, policies, defence, and conflicts for readers curious to know their implications. He loves digging into legal maxims and political trivia. On off days, when not turning pages or learning русский, he lives in the reverie of “what ifs” and “how abouts.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosKangana Vs Ramdev: BJP MP Fires Back After Yoga Guru Questions Her Past And Controversial Remarks’Not Mahatma Gandhi’s Congress’: FULL Vande Mataram Rejected At INC Events, BJP Doubts ‘Loyalty’US Body Opposes Mohan Bhagwat’s Visit, Seeks Sanctions on RSS Members Over Religious Freedom ClaimsDJB Tender Scam Row: AAP Questions Why Raghav Chadha Was Never Questioned By InvestigatorsMaharashtra’s Power Shift: Fadnavis Can Now Reverse Ministerial Decisions In Public InterestIndia Removes Pakistan Mission Barricades After Islamabad Move, Tensions Rise Over Kashmir RemarksModi Govt’s Gen-Z Outreach: One Union Minister To Visit One University Daily‘Fuel For Free’: Chandigarh’s ‘Petrol Langar’ Turns Chaotic, Leaves People Fuming‘No Respect For Court’: Arrest Warrant Against Mahua Moitra In Hate Speech CaseUS Envoy Calls J&K ‘Important Part Of India’ During 1st Kashmir Visit After Article 370 Abrogation123PhotostoriesWhy does reheated rice sometimes become hard and dry? 4 ways to bring it back to lifeWhy are gold borders vital in Indian sarees?Exercising daily for a fitter you? Hidden heart problems that can surface when endurance exercise pushes you too hardIndoor plant leaves turning brown despite enough sunlight? Hidden problems could be the real causePooja Hegde’s New York-style streak just got dangerous in this shimmery corset saree10 foods mentioned in manga that you can actually eat5 natural ways to keep mosquitoes away from your homeGenuine care or love bombing? 7 signs to spot the red flags early in a relationshipWhich type of milk has the most protein? 7 milk varieties comparedToo much salt in curry or sabzi? 9 easy ways to fix it and the science behind them123Hot PicksSajjan KumarRhiya AhirGTU results 2026Pennsylvania plane crashOil export IndiaFaceless assessmentRSS sanctionZepto internshipPakistan High CommissionTop TrendingHyderabad MurderPakistan High CommissionTwisha SharmaKarnataka MurderKerala MurderAbhijeet DipkeSukesh ChandrashekharRahul GandhiBengaluru RapidoBen Gvir


'UGC regulation under reconsideration', govt tells SC on controversial equity rules
The 2026 regulations had already been kept in abeyance by the Supreme Court on January 29.

NEW DELHI: The Centre on Thursday informed the Supreme Court that the 2026 University Grants Commission (UGC) equity regulations, which seek to address caste-based discrimination in higher education institutions, are currently being reconsidered.The development came during a hearing before a bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana. The court was hearing several petitions challenging the validity of the regulations.“This is the UGC regulation matter. It is under reconsideration,” Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the bench.The Supreme Court subsequently directed the UGC to submit a comprehensive counter affidavit within four weeks. The petitioners will have two weeks after that to file their rejoinders, if any.

SC had earlier put regulations on hold

The 2026 regulations had already been kept in abeyance by the top court on January 29. At the time, the court said the provisions were “prima facie vague” and could have “very sweeping consequences”, warning that they could potentially divide society and have a “dangerous impact”.The court had also asked the Centre and the UGC to respond to three petitions challenging the new framework.“In exercise of our powers under Article 142 of the Constitution, we further direct that the University Grants Commission (Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions) Regulations, 2012, will continue to operate and remain in force till further orders,” it had said.The regulations had faced opposition in several places, with student groups and other organisations calling for their immediate withdrawal.

Court questioned provisions on caste discrimination

While examining the regulations, the Supreme Court raised questions about how some of their provisions were framed.One concern related to Regulation 3(1)(c), which separately defines “caste-based discrimination”. The court questioned why a separate definition was necessary when Regulation 3(1)(e) already contains a broader definition of “discrimination”.

Share your thoughts in the comments

Related News

NEW DELHI: Student leaders protesting against the alleged irregularities in Jharkhand’s recruitment exams criticised the Hemant Soren-led government on Thursday after the high court blocked the government’s decision to cancel the jobs of employees who had been appointed through the 11th and 13th JPSC exams.Student leader Kunal Pratap Singh claimed that the advocate general representing the government did not appear in the high court while it was hearing the PIL challenging the cancellation of the recruitment exams.”JPSC-JSSC Reform Manch had been staging a peaceful protest for the last 26 days. What did we get in return? Deceit. If it is any case of the CM himself, advocates like Kapil Sibal come from Delhi. But when such an important matter of the students of Jharkhand is heard in high court, the advocate general doesn’t even appear before the court. No senior advocate was there either. The lawyer present there did not say even one word. This clearly shows that this was a trap – a trap to end the protest, ruin 26 days of our hard work and play with the emotions of the students of Jharkhand,” the student leader said.”The CM himself had said that a massive corrupt system is active. Despite saying that, if the CM takes us for fools, he will be committing a grave mistake. If he feels that students of Jharkhand cannot gather together once again, he should come out of this illusion. If we want, we can call lakhs of students of Jharkhand to Ranchi tomorrow. We had given you 2 months’ time after careful deliberation… But how can we trust the investigation when you are unable to properly present the case before the Court? When your advocate is not appearing before the court? Students of Jharkhand are being cheated again and again. Why?” he added.Another student leader, Ravindra Paswan, said that a “new fight” will take birth soon against the government.”With whatever we saw in the court today, it became clear that the Govt deceived the lakhs of students in Jharkhand. The govt cheated lakhs of students of Jharkhand. It was fine until you were not cancelling the exam, until you were not agreeing to a CBI investigation,” Paswan said.”But after this deceit with students, a new fight takes birth. We, the students, will give you an answer for this. We saw your intent in the court today. You deceived not only the lakhs of students in Jharkhand but also the general public and parents of the state who had been sending their children to Jaipal Singh Munda to fight for their rights,” he added.Earlier in the day, Jharkhand high court stayed the operation of notifications cancelling the appointments of government employees through the 11th and 13th Jharkhand Public Service Commission (JPSC) examinations.The high court also stayed the operation of the order cancelling the appointments of food safety officers.While hearing a bunch of petitions against the government notifications, Justice Deepak Roshan asked the state to furnish its reply by September 15, the next date of hearing.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesBy the order of the high court, the petitioners as well as other employees selected in the 11th and 13th JPSC exams and adversely affected by the government’s notification will now continue to hold their respective offices.The development came after successful candidates of the 11th and 13th JPSC examinations protested as they were afraid of losing their jobs.The court, however, made it clear that if any foul play is found in the appointment of a candidate during the investigation, the person will have to face the consequences and lose the service.After a 25-day student agitation over alleged irregularities in Jharkhand recruitment exams, the JMM-led government on the night of August 18 cancelled 22 exams and ordered a probe into 23 others conducted since 2014.PollVote & Share your viewDo you believe the Jharkhand government is handling the recruitment exam issue transparently?Yes, they are transparentNo, they are deceitful3k+ users shared opinion today 5k+ users already voted today 3k+ users shared opinion today Share OpinionGet the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorRohitashwa RanjanRohitashwa Ranjan is a digital journalist with The Times of India, where he decodes Indian politics as a carefully staged production with scripts, subtext and everything behind. His stories track elections, party dynamics and the things that often are buried beneath the headlines. When not parsing vote shares or alliances, he is usually reading between the lines, where the real story tends to reside.Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideos‘NEET, Delimitation, Cauvery, Drugs’: Vijay’s Key Requests Before Amit Shah At Tamil Nadu MeetingPolicy Shift Or Just Words? Inside US Envoy Gor’s ‘Kashmir’ Remark That Rattled PakistanJharkhand High Court Stays Soren Govt’s Order To Cancel JPSC Exams, AppointmentsKangana Vs Ramdev: BJP MP Fires Back After Yoga Guru Questions Her Past And Controversial Remarks’Not Mahatma Gandhi’s Congress’: FULL Vande Mataram Rejected At INC Events, BJP Doubts ‘Loyalty’US Body Opposes Mohan Bhagwat’s Visit, Seeks Sanctions on RSS Members Over Religious Freedom ClaimsDJB Tender Scam Row: AAP Questions Why Raghav Chadha Was Never Questioned By InvestigatorsMaharashtra’s Power Shift: Fadnavis Can Now Reverse Ministerial Decisions In Public InterestIndia Removes Pakistan Mission Barricades After Islamabad Move, Tensions Rise Over Kashmir RemarksModi Govt’s Gen-Z Outreach: One Union Minister To Visit One University Daily123PhotostoriesFrom money plants to shankh: 5 Vastu items believed to bring good luck and positivity at homeHow much walking can reverse the health risks of sitting for 8 hours a day? Doctor explains what your body needsWhy does homemade curd turn slimy during monsoon and 3 ways to prevent itThe history of the white shirt: How a simple staple became the ultimate fashion icon10 enchanting baby girl names inspired by fantasy, mythology and folkloreSugar price hike by Rs 8 per kg: 9 natural Indian sweeteners and how to use themOptical illusion personality test: The first thing you spot reveals what’s coming next in your lifeIs apple cider vinegar good for your hair? Benefits, side effects, and the right way to use it10 One Piece characters who have lived for more than a 100 yearsWhy does reheated rice sometimes become hard and dry? 4 ways to bring it back to life123Hot PicksLily HooperConnor McDavidGTU results 2026Pennsylvania plane crashOil export IndiaFaceless assessmentRSS sanctionZepto internshipPakistan High CommissionTop TrendingHyderabad MurderPakistan High CommissionTwisha SharmaKarnataka MurderKerala MurderAbhijeet DipkeSukesh ChandrashekharRahul GandhiBengaluru RapidoBen Gvir

NEW DELHI: Student leaders protesting against the alleged irregularities in Jharkhand’s recruitment exams criticised the Hemant Soren-led government on Thursday after the high court blocked the government’s decision to cancel the jobs of employees who had been appointed through the 11th and 13th JPSC exams.Student leader Kunal Pratap Singh claimed that the advocate general representing the government did not appear in the high court while it was hearing the PIL challenging the cancellation of the recruitment exams.”JPSC-JSSC Reform Manch had been staging a peaceful protest for the last 26 days. What did we get in return? Deceit. If it is any case of the CM himself, advocates like Kapil Sibal come from Delhi. But when such an important matter of the students of Jharkhand is heard in high court, the advocate general doesn’t even appear before the court. No senior advocate was there either. The lawyer present there did not say even one word. This clearly shows that this was a trap – a trap to end the protest, ruin 26 days of our hard work and play with the emotions of the students of Jharkhand,” the student leader said.”The CM himself had said that a massive corrupt system is active. Despite saying that, if the CM takes us for fools, he will be committing a grave mistake. If he feels that students of Jharkhand cannot gather together once again, he should come out of this illusion. If we want, we can call lakhs of students of Jharkhand to Ranchi tomorrow. We had given you 2 months’ time after careful deliberation… But how can we trust the investigation when you are unable to properly present the case before the Court? When your advocate is not appearing before the court? Students of Jharkhand are being cheated again and again. Why?” he added.Another student leader, Ravindra Paswan, said that a “new fight” will take birth soon against the government.”With whatever we saw in the court today, it became clear that the Govt deceived the lakhs of students in Jharkhand. The govt cheated lakhs of students of Jharkhand. It was fine until you were not cancelling the exam, until you were not agreeing to a CBI investigation,” Paswan said.”But after this deceit with students, a new fight takes birth. We, the students, will give you an answer for this. We saw your intent in the court today. You deceived not only the lakhs of students in Jharkhand but also the general public and parents of the state who had been sending their children to Jaipal Singh Munda to fight for their rights,” he added.Earlier in the day, Jharkhand high court stayed the operation of notifications cancelling the appointments of government employees through the 11th and 13th Jharkhand Public Service Commission (JPSC) examinations.The high court also stayed the operation of the order cancelling the appointments of food safety officers.While hearing a bunch of petitions against the government notifications, Justice Deepak Roshan asked the state to furnish its reply by September 15, the next date of hearing.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesBy the order of the high court, the petitioners as well as other employees selected in the 11th and 13th JPSC exams and adversely affected by the government’s notification will now continue to hold their respective offices.The development came after successful candidates of the 11th and 13th JPSC examinations protested as they were afraid of losing their jobs.The court, however, made it clear that if any foul play is found in the appointment of a candidate during the investigation, the person will have to face the consequences and lose the service.After a 25-day student agitation over alleged irregularities in Jharkhand recruitment exams, the JMM-led government on the night of August 18 cancelled 22 exams and ordered a probe into 23 others conducted since 2014.PollVote & Share your viewDo you believe the Jharkhand government is handling the recruitment exam issue transparently?Yes, they are transparentNo, they are deceitful3k+ users shared opinion today 5k+ users already voted today 3k+ users shared opinion today Share OpinionGet the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorRohitashwa RanjanRohitashwa Ranjan is a digital journalist with The Times of India, where he decodes Indian politics as a carefully staged production with scripts, subtext and everything behind. His stories track elections, party dynamics and the things that often are buried beneath the headlines. When not parsing vote shares or alliances, he is usually reading between the lines, where the real story tends to reside.Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideos‘NEET, Delimitation, Cauvery, Drugs’: Vijay’s Key Requests Before Amit Shah At Tamil Nadu MeetingPolicy Shift Or Just Words? Inside US Envoy Gor’s ‘Kashmir’ Remark That Rattled PakistanJharkhand High Court Stays Soren Govt’s Order To Cancel JPSC Exams, AppointmentsKangana Vs Ramdev: BJP MP Fires Back After Yoga Guru Questions Her Past And Controversial Remarks’Not Mahatma Gandhi’s Congress’: FULL Vande Mataram Rejected At INC Events, BJP Doubts ‘Loyalty’US Body Opposes Mohan Bhagwat’s Visit, Seeks Sanctions on RSS Members Over Religious Freedom ClaimsDJB Tender Scam Row: AAP Questions Why Raghav Chadha Was Never Questioned By InvestigatorsMaharashtra’s Power Shift: Fadnavis Can Now Reverse Ministerial Decisions In Public InterestIndia Removes Pakistan Mission Barricades After Islamabad Move, Tensions Rise Over Kashmir RemarksModi Govt’s Gen-Z Outreach: One Union Minister To Visit One University Daily123PhotostoriesFrom money plants to shankh: 5 Vastu items believed to bring good luck and positivity at homeHow much walking can reverse the health risks of sitting for 8 hours a day? Doctor explains what your body needsWhy does homemade curd turn slimy during monsoon and 3 ways to prevent itThe history of the white shirt: How a simple staple became the ultimate fashion icon10 enchanting baby girl names inspired by fantasy, mythology and folkloreSugar price hike by Rs 8 per kg: 9 natural Indian sweeteners and how to use themOptical illusion personality test: The first thing you spot reveals what’s coming next in your lifeIs apple cider vinegar good for your hair? Benefits, side effects, and the right way to use it10 One Piece characters who have lived for more than a 100 yearsWhy does reheated rice sometimes become hard and dry? 4 ways to bring it back to life123Hot PicksLily HooperConnor McDavidGTU results 2026Pennsylvania plane crashOil export IndiaFaceless assessmentRSS sanctionZepto internshipPakistan High CommissionTop TrendingHyderabad MurderPakistan High CommissionTwisha SharmaKarnataka MurderKerala MurderAbhijeet DipkeSukesh ChandrashekharRahul GandhiBengaluru RapidoBen Gvir

Vamsikrishna 0

2.44 lakh URLs flagged by states for takedown between March and July Nearly 3 lakh URLs were sent to social media platforms for takedown by government departments between March and July 2026, with states accounting for 82% of the requests, the PIB Fact Check unit said. The figures come after articles claiming that Meta had automated content blocking to meet the government’s three-hour takedown requirement, with content blocks rising during the Delhiprotests resurfaced.Of the total URLs sent for takedown, 2.44 lakh, or 82%, came from states, while 51,000 were sent by the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C). The I4C requests concerned cyber, infrastructure and stock-investment scams, the government’s fact-check body said.”During the period from March 2026 to July 2026, around 2.98 lakh URLs were sent for takedown, out of which 2.44 lakhs were sent by states (82 per cent). Of these, 51 thousand URLs were sent by I4C in the context of cyber, infrastructure, and stock-investment scams,” the PIB Fact Check account said on X.The PIB Fact Check unit also addressed reports about Meta using automated systems to block content to meet the government’s three-hour takedown requirement. It termed the reports misleading and said, “The API integration with Meta took place in 2025 at the request of Meta.”The government had amended the IT Intermediaries Rules 2021 in February to speed up the removal of unlawful content. The time given for takedowns was subsequently cut to three hours from 36 hours.Here’s what I4C flaggedAccording to the fact-check unit, most of the unlawful content flagged by I4C over the past two years was linked to transnational financial frauds, CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material), and offences related to women and children.The unit said the volume of content being posted online also made it necessary for the government to act against unlawful material. With 600 million users in India posting up to 78,703 items every 68 seconds, it said, it was reasonable to expect that, on average, one of those items may not be lawful.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelines”The State and its instrumentalities cannot abdicate their responsibilities and allow free rein to lawlessness in cyberspace,” PIB Fact Check said.The unit said social media platforms, or IT intermediaries, act on requests sent by competent authorities. It added that only authorised officers notified by the relevant ministry or state government can send requests through Sahyog for the removal of unlawful content.”Only authorised officers as notified by the concerned ministry or state government can send intimations for unlawful content takedown through Sahyog. All such intimations are reviewed by the concerned governments periodically,” the fact check unit said.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosJharkhand High Court Stays Soren Govt’s Order To Cancel JPSC Exams, AppointmentsKangana Vs Ramdev: BJP MP Fires Back After Yoga Guru Questions Her Past And Controversial Remarks’Not Mahatma Gandhi’s Congress’: FULL Vande Mataram Rejected At INC Events, BJP Doubts ‘Loyalty’US Body Opposes Mohan Bhagwat’s Visit, Seeks Sanctions on RSS Members Over Religious Freedom ClaimsDJB Tender Scam Row: AAP Questions Why Raghav Chadha Was Never Questioned By InvestigatorsMaharashtra’s Power Shift: Fadnavis Can Now Reverse Ministerial Decisions In Public InterestIndia Removes Pakistan Mission Barricades After Islamabad Move, Tensions Rise Over Kashmir RemarksModi Govt’s Gen-Z Outreach: One Union Minister To Visit One University Daily‘Fuel For Free’: Chandigarh’s ‘Petrol Langar’ Turns Chaotic, Leaves People Fuming‘No Respect For Court’: Arrest Warrant Against Mahua Moitra In Hate Speech Case123PhotostoriesFrom money plants to shankh: 5 Vastu items believed to bring good luck and positivity at homeHow much walking can reverse the health risks of sitting for 8 hours a day? Doctor explains what your body needsWhy does homemade curd turn slimy during monsoon and 3 ways to prevent itThe history of the white shirt: How a simple staple became the ultimate fashion icon10 enchanting baby girl names inspired by fantasy, mythology and folkloreSugar price hike by Rs 8 per kg: 9 natural Indian sweeteners and how to use themOptical illusion personality test: The first thing you spot reveals what’s coming next in your lifeIs apple cider vinegar good for your hair? Benefits, side effects, and the right way to use it10 One Piece characters who have lived for more than a 100 yearsWhy does reheated rice sometimes become hard and dry? 4 ways to bring it back to life123Hot PicksLily HooperConnor McDavidGTU results 2026Pennsylvania plane crashOil export IndiaFaceless assessmentRSS sanctionZepto internshipPakistan High CommissionTop TrendingHyderabad MurderPakistan High CommissionTwisha SharmaKarnataka MurderKerala MurderAbhijeet DipkeSukesh ChandrashekharRahul GandhiBengaluru RapidoBen Gvir

Vamsikrishna 0
Parliamentary panel flags NGT staff shortages, case backlogs, weak digital infra, recommends urgent reforms. NEW DELHI: A parliamentary panel has identified critical operational gaps at the National Green Tribunal (NGT), including severe staffing shortage and reliance on contractual workers, inadequate digital infrastructure, prolonged pendency of cases across benches and weak enforcement mechanism, and recommended various measures to make it more efficient.The panel — parliamentary standing committee on law and justice — that tabled its report in Parliament during the recently concluded monsoon session also found it unusual that at a time when govt is vigorously promoting digitalisation, an institution as important as the NGT continues to function without a dedicated computer/IT section and the required technical posts.“The Committee, therefore, recommends that a dedicated Computer/IT Section, with appropriate technical posts and supporting staff, be established and operationalized at all the Benches of the Tribunal to ensure reliable digital infrastructure and effective use of technology in its functioning,” said the report.Though the panel appreciated the steps already taken by the Tribunal on e-filing, hybrid hearings and case information systems, it recommended that digital tools be further used to improve listing, case tracking, transparency and access for litigants from remote and environmentally vulnerable areas, so that the benefits such as quicker listing, fewer adjournments and better monitoring are fully realised in practice.During the deliberation, the Tribunal – established in 2010 as a specialised body for the effective and expeditious disposal of cases related to environmental protection, conservation of forests and natural resources – informed the Committee that a total of 55,619 cases had been received since its inception, out of which 49,740 had been disposed of and 5,879 cases were pending, as on June 30, 2026.The zone-wise pendency of cases before NGT as on May 31, 2026 shows that the highest number of pending cases was before Principal Bench at New Delhi (2,318), followed by Western Zone Bench at Pune (1,730), Southern Zone Bench at Chennai (887), Eastern Zone Bench at Kolkata (587), and Central Zone Bench at Bhopal (277).The Tribunal, however, underlined that during the last five years, a majority of cases at Principal Bench, New Delhi, have been decided within the six-month period as contemplated in the NGT Act, 2010.The panel noted that the prolonged pendency may weaken deterrence, reduce the practical impact of remedial directions and permit environmental harm to continue or worsen over time, particularly where interim arrangements and partial compliance are allowed to persist without time-bound final resolution.“The Committee, therefore, recommends that a separate mechanism be evolved for identification and tracking of cases pending for more than three years, including a categorization of such matters based on the stage of adjudication in order to help distinguish unavoidable delay from remediable delay and permit more focused intervention,” said the report.It also emphasised the urgent need to fill vacancies of judicial and expert members so that the Tribunal can function in accordance with the NGT Act, 2010.The panel also highlighted weaknesses in enforcement of NGT orders due to dependence on outside authorities, and recommended stronger follow-up through action-taken reports, joint committees and clear responsibility. It further suggested clearer internal mechanisms for prioritising suo motu action on recurring and serious environmental problems, while respecting the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesNoting the gap between public expectations and actual interventions of Tribunal in some high-visibility environmental issues such as Delhi’s recurring air-quality crisis, illegal mining and long-standing pollution hotspots, the panel suggested that institutional responses in such matters “need to be timely, visible and commensurate with their gravity”, while respecting statutory limits and the primacy of Supreme Court where it is seized of particular issues.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorVishwa MohanVishwa Mohan is Senior Editor at The Times of India. He writes on environment, climate change, agriculture, water resources and clean energy, tracking policy issues and climate diplomacy. He has been covering Parliament since 2003 to see how politics shaped up domestic policy and India’s position at global platform. Before switching over to explore sustainable development issues, Vishwa had covered internal security and investigative agencies for more than a decade.Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosJharkhand High Court Stays Soren Govt’s Order To Cancel JPSC Exams, AppointmentsKangana Vs Ramdev: BJP MP Fires Back After Yoga Guru Questions Her Past And Controversial Remarks’Not Mahatma Gandhi’s Congress’: FULL Vande Mataram Rejected At INC Events, BJP Doubts ‘Loyalty’US Body Opposes Mohan Bhagwat’s Visit, Seeks Sanctions on RSS Members Over Religious Freedom ClaimsDJB Tender Scam Row: AAP Questions Why Raghav Chadha Was Never Questioned By InvestigatorsMaharashtra’s Power Shift: Fadnavis Can Now Reverse Ministerial Decisions In Public InterestIndia Removes Pakistan Mission Barricades After Islamabad Move, Tensions Rise Over Kashmir RemarksModi Govt’s Gen-Z Outreach: One Union Minister To Visit One University Daily‘Fuel For Free’: Chandigarh’s ‘Petrol Langar’ Turns Chaotic, Leaves People Fuming‘No Respect For Court’: Arrest Warrant Against Mahua Moitra In Hate Speech Case123PhotostoriesFrom money plants to shankh: 5 Vastu items believed to bring good luck and positivity at homeHow much walking can reverse the health risks of sitting for 8 hours a day? Doctor explains what your body needsWhy does homemade curd turn slimy during monsoon and 3 ways to prevent itThe history of the white shirt: How a simple staple became the ultimate fashion icon10 enchanting baby girl names inspired by fantasy, mythology and folkloreSugar price hike by Rs 8 per kg: 9 natural Indian sweeteners and how to use themOptical illusion personality test: The first thing you spot reveals what’s coming next in your lifeIs apple cider vinegar good for your hair? Benefits, side effects, and the right way to use it10 One Piece characters who have lived for more than a 100 yearsWhy does reheated rice sometimes become hard and dry? 4 ways to bring it back to life123Hot PicksLily HooperConnor McDavidGTU results 2026Pennsylvania plane crashOil export IndiaFaceless assessmentRSS sanctionZepto internshipPakistan High CommissionTop TrendingHyderabad MurderPakistan High CommissionTwisha SharmaKarnataka MurderKerala MurderAbhijeet DipkeSukesh ChandrashekharRahul GandhiBengaluru RapidoBen Gvir

Parliamentary panel flags NGT staff shortages, case backlogs, weak digital infra, recommends urgent reforms. NEW DELHI: A parliamentary panel has identified critical operational gaps at the National Green Tribunal (NGT), including severe staffing shortage and reliance on contractual workers, inadequate digital infrastructure, prolonged pendency of cases across benches and weak enforcement mechanism, and recommended various measures to make it more efficient.The panel — parliamentary standing committee on law and justice — that tabled its report in Parliament during the recently concluded monsoon session also found it unusual that at a time when govt is vigorously promoting digitalisation, an institution as important as the NGT continues to function without a dedicated computer/IT section and the required technical posts.“The Committee, therefore, recommends that a dedicated Computer/IT Section, with appropriate technical posts and supporting staff, be established and operationalized at all the Benches of the Tribunal to ensure reliable digital infrastructure and effective use of technology in its functioning,” said the report.Though the panel appreciated the steps already taken by the Tribunal on e-filing, hybrid hearings and case information systems, it recommended that digital tools be further used to improve listing, case tracking, transparency and access for litigants from remote and environmentally vulnerable areas, so that the benefits such as quicker listing, fewer adjournments and better monitoring are fully realised in practice.During the deliberation, the Tribunal – established in 2010 as a specialised body for the effective and expeditious disposal of cases related to environmental protection, conservation of forests and natural resources – informed the Committee that a total of 55,619 cases had been received since its inception, out of which 49,740 had been disposed of and 5,879 cases were pending, as on June 30, 2026.The zone-wise pendency of cases before NGT as on May 31, 2026 shows that the highest number of pending cases was before Principal Bench at New Delhi (2,318), followed by Western Zone Bench at Pune (1,730), Southern Zone Bench at Chennai (887), Eastern Zone Bench at Kolkata (587), and Central Zone Bench at Bhopal (277).The Tribunal, however, underlined that during the last five years, a majority of cases at Principal Bench, New Delhi, have been decided within the six-month period as contemplated in the NGT Act, 2010.The panel noted that the prolonged pendency may weaken deterrence, reduce the practical impact of remedial directions and permit environmental harm to continue or worsen over time, particularly where interim arrangements and partial compliance are allowed to persist without time-bound final resolution.“The Committee, therefore, recommends that a separate mechanism be evolved for identification and tracking of cases pending for more than three years, including a categorization of such matters based on the stage of adjudication in order to help distinguish unavoidable delay from remediable delay and permit more focused intervention,” said the report.It also emphasised the urgent need to fill vacancies of judicial and expert members so that the Tribunal can function in accordance with the NGT Act, 2010.The panel also highlighted weaknesses in enforcement of NGT orders due to dependence on outside authorities, and recommended stronger follow-up through action-taken reports, joint committees and clear responsibility. It further suggested clearer internal mechanisms for prioritising suo motu action on recurring and serious environmental problems, while respecting the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesNoting the gap between public expectations and actual interventions of Tribunal in some high-visibility environmental issues such as Delhi’s recurring air-quality crisis, illegal mining and long-standing pollution hotspots, the panel suggested that institutional responses in such matters “need to be timely, visible and commensurate with their gravity”, while respecting statutory limits and the primacy of Supreme Court where it is seized of particular issues.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorVishwa MohanVishwa Mohan is Senior Editor at The Times of India. He writes on environment, climate change, agriculture, water resources and clean energy, tracking policy issues and climate diplomacy. He has been covering Parliament since 2003 to see how politics shaped up domestic policy and India’s position at global platform. Before switching over to explore sustainable development issues, Vishwa had covered internal security and investigative agencies for more than a decade.Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosJharkhand High Court Stays Soren Govt’s Order To Cancel JPSC Exams, AppointmentsKangana Vs Ramdev: BJP MP Fires Back After Yoga Guru Questions Her Past And Controversial Remarks’Not Mahatma Gandhi’s Congress’: FULL Vande Mataram Rejected At INC Events, BJP Doubts ‘Loyalty’US Body Opposes Mohan Bhagwat’s Visit, Seeks Sanctions on RSS Members Over Religious Freedom ClaimsDJB Tender Scam Row: AAP Questions Why Raghav Chadha Was Never Questioned By InvestigatorsMaharashtra’s Power Shift: Fadnavis Can Now Reverse Ministerial Decisions In Public InterestIndia Removes Pakistan Mission Barricades After Islamabad Move, Tensions Rise Over Kashmir RemarksModi Govt’s Gen-Z Outreach: One Union Minister To Visit One University Daily‘Fuel For Free’: Chandigarh’s ‘Petrol Langar’ Turns Chaotic, Leaves People Fuming‘No Respect For Court’: Arrest Warrant Against Mahua Moitra In Hate Speech Case123PhotostoriesFrom money plants to shankh: 5 Vastu items believed to bring good luck and positivity at homeHow much walking can reverse the health risks of sitting for 8 hours a day? Doctor explains what your body needsWhy does homemade curd turn slimy during monsoon and 3 ways to prevent itThe history of the white shirt: How a simple staple became the ultimate fashion icon10 enchanting baby girl names inspired by fantasy, mythology and folkloreSugar price hike by Rs 8 per kg: 9 natural Indian sweeteners and how to use themOptical illusion personality test: The first thing you spot reveals what’s coming next in your lifeIs apple cider vinegar good for your hair? Benefits, side effects, and the right way to use it10 One Piece characters who have lived for more than a 100 yearsWhy does reheated rice sometimes become hard and dry? 4 ways to bring it back to life123Hot PicksLily HooperConnor McDavidGTU results 2026Pennsylvania plane crashOil export IndiaFaceless assessmentRSS sanctionZepto internshipPakistan High CommissionTop TrendingHyderabad MurderPakistan High CommissionTwisha SharmaKarnataka MurderKerala MurderAbhijeet DipkeSukesh ChandrashekharRahul GandhiBengaluru RapidoBen Gvir

Vamsikrishna 0
NEW DELHI: Meghalaya chief minister Conrad Sangma on Thursday spoke to his Assam counterpart Himanta Biswa Sarma over the violence reported in Shillong after attacks on people from Assam during a students’ rally.In a social media post, Sangma said that they had agreed to work together to normalise the situation. He said designated cabinet ministers from both states will take the discussions forward and explore ways to restore peace.”Spoke with the Hon’ble chief minister of Assam, Dr. Himanta Biswa Sarma ji regarding the unfortunate violence in Shillong on 19th August and the reactions that have followed, which have affected the common people and commuters of both States,” Meghalaya CM Sangma said.”We have agreed to work together, as always, to normalise the situation. Designated cabinet ministers from both States will meet to take the discussions forward and explore ways to restore peace, trust and normalcy. Appeal to citizens of both States to maintain peace, harmony and restraint. Meghalaya and Assam share deep bonds, and we must work together to protect them,” he added.Meanwhile, Himanta labelled Assam and Meghalaya as “sister states” and said that he conveyed Assam’s concerns over the recent violence in Shillong.”I also conveyed to Shri Conrad Sangma Assam’s concern over the recent incidents in Shillong, particularly those involving Assam-registered vehicles. Hon’ble minister for border protection Shri Atul Bora has been asked to coordinate closely with the authorities in Meghalaya and work towards ensuring that peace and normalcy prevail between our two States,” Himanta said.”Assam and Meghalaya are sister states, bound by deep historical, cultural and people-to-people ties. Mutual respect, restraint and sensitivity must guide us at all times. We must do everything within our power to preserve the harmony, friendship and goodwill that have long defined the relationship between our people,” he added.Violence broke out during a Khasi Students’ Union (KSU) rally in Shillong on Wednesday, with several people reportedly injured and vehicles damaged. The incidents triggered reactions in Assam, with transport workers demanding action over the alleged attacks.The bike rally passed through various parts of Shillong, during which at least 31 vehicles were damaged, while at least two government vehicles were set ablaze, East Khasi Hills Superintendent of Police Vivek Syiem said.As tension continued along the Assam-Meghalaya border, protesters disrupted the movement of Meghalaya-bound vehicles at Jorabat. Meanwhile, Guwahati-based cab operators also blocked National Highway-27 for vehicles from Meghalaya.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesThe SP said three KSU leaders were booked under various provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita in connection with damage to public property, assaults and other offences during the rally.The arrests came hours after the KSU leaders addressed a press briefing, where they denied that members of the organisation were involved in the vandalism and arson during the rally.The KSU leaders alleged that “people with vested interests” had sneaked into the rally with the intention of derailing the KSU’s demands.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorRohitashwa RanjanRohitashwa Ranjan is a digital journalist with The Times of India, where he decodes Indian politics as a carefully staged production with scripts, subtext and everything behind. His stories track elections, party dynamics and the things that often are buried beneath the headlines. When not parsing vote shares or alliances, he is usually reading between the lines, where the real story tends to reside.Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosJharkhand High Court Stays Soren Govt’s Order To Cancel JPSC Exams, AppointmentsKangana Vs Ramdev: BJP MP Fires Back After Yoga Guru Questions Her Past And Controversial Remarks’Not Mahatma Gandhi’s Congress’: FULL Vande Mataram Rejected At INC Events, BJP Doubts ‘Loyalty’US Body Opposes Mohan Bhagwat’s Visit, Seeks Sanctions on RSS Members Over Religious Freedom ClaimsDJB Tender Scam Row: AAP Questions Why Raghav Chadha Was Never Questioned By InvestigatorsMaharashtra’s Power Shift: Fadnavis Can Now Reverse Ministerial Decisions In Public InterestIndia Removes Pakistan Mission Barricades After Islamabad Move, Tensions Rise Over Kashmir RemarksModi Govt’s Gen-Z Outreach: One Union Minister To Visit One University Daily‘Fuel For Free’: Chandigarh’s ‘Petrol Langar’ Turns Chaotic, Leaves People Fuming‘No Respect For Court’: Arrest Warrant Against Mahua Moitra In Hate Speech Case123PhotostoriesHow much walking can reverse the health risks of sitting for 8 hours a day? Doctor explains what your body needsWhy does homemade curd turn slimy during monsoon and 3 ways to prevent itThe history of the white shirt: How a simple staple became the ultimate fashion icon10 enchanting baby girl names inspired by fantasy, mythology and folkloreSugar price hike by Rs 8 per kg: 9 natural Indian sweeteners and how to use themOptical illusion personality test: The first thing you spot reveals what’s coming next in your lifeIs apple cider vinegar good for your hair? Benefits, side effects, and the right way to use it10 One Piece characters who have lived for more than a 100 yearsWhy does reheated rice sometimes become hard and dry? 4 ways to bring it back to lifeWhy are gold borders vital in Indian sarees?123Hot PicksLily HooperConnor McDavidGTU results 2026Pennsylvania plane crashOil export IndiaFaceless assessmentRSS sanctionZepto internshipPakistan High CommissionTop TrendingHyderabad MurderPakistan High CommissionTwisha SharmaKarnataka MurderKerala MurderAbhijeet DipkeSukesh ChandrashekharRahul GandhiBengaluru RapidoBen Gvir

NEW DELHI: Meghalaya chief minister Conrad Sangma on Thursday spoke to his Assam counterpart Himanta Biswa Sarma over the violence reported in Shillong after attacks on people from Assam during a students’ rally.In a social media post, Sangma said that they had agreed to work together to normalise the situation. He said designated cabinet ministers from both states will take the discussions forward and explore ways to restore peace.”Spoke with the Hon’ble chief minister of Assam, Dr. Himanta Biswa Sarma ji regarding the unfortunate violence in Shillong on 19th August and the reactions that have followed, which have affected the common people and commuters of both States,” Meghalaya CM Sangma said.”We have agreed to work together, as always, to normalise the situation. Designated cabinet ministers from both States will meet to take the discussions forward and explore ways to restore peace, trust and normalcy. Appeal to citizens of both States to maintain peace, harmony and restraint. Meghalaya and Assam share deep bonds, and we must work together to protect them,” he added.Meanwhile, Himanta labelled Assam and Meghalaya as “sister states” and said that he conveyed Assam’s concerns over the recent violence in Shillong.”I also conveyed to Shri Conrad Sangma Assam’s concern over the recent incidents in Shillong, particularly those involving Assam-registered vehicles. Hon’ble minister for border protection Shri Atul Bora has been asked to coordinate closely with the authorities in Meghalaya and work towards ensuring that peace and normalcy prevail between our two States,” Himanta said.”Assam and Meghalaya are sister states, bound by deep historical, cultural and people-to-people ties. Mutual respect, restraint and sensitivity must guide us at all times. We must do everything within our power to preserve the harmony, friendship and goodwill that have long defined the relationship between our people,” he added.Violence broke out during a Khasi Students’ Union (KSU) rally in Shillong on Wednesday, with several people reportedly injured and vehicles damaged. The incidents triggered reactions in Assam, with transport workers demanding action over the alleged attacks.The bike rally passed through various parts of Shillong, during which at least 31 vehicles were damaged, while at least two government vehicles were set ablaze, East Khasi Hills Superintendent of Police Vivek Syiem said.As tension continued along the Assam-Meghalaya border, protesters disrupted the movement of Meghalaya-bound vehicles at Jorabat. Meanwhile, Guwahati-based cab operators also blocked National Highway-27 for vehicles from Meghalaya.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesThe SP said three KSU leaders were booked under various provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita in connection with damage to public property, assaults and other offences during the rally.The arrests came hours after the KSU leaders addressed a press briefing, where they denied that members of the organisation were involved in the vandalism and arson during the rally.The KSU leaders alleged that “people with vested interests” had sneaked into the rally with the intention of derailing the KSU’s demands.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorRohitashwa RanjanRohitashwa Ranjan is a digital journalist with The Times of India, where he decodes Indian politics as a carefully staged production with scripts, subtext and everything behind. His stories track elections, party dynamics and the things that often are buried beneath the headlines. When not parsing vote shares or alliances, he is usually reading between the lines, where the real story tends to reside.Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosJharkhand High Court Stays Soren Govt’s Order To Cancel JPSC Exams, AppointmentsKangana Vs Ramdev: BJP MP Fires Back After Yoga Guru Questions Her Past And Controversial Remarks’Not Mahatma Gandhi’s Congress’: FULL Vande Mataram Rejected At INC Events, BJP Doubts ‘Loyalty’US Body Opposes Mohan Bhagwat’s Visit, Seeks Sanctions on RSS Members Over Religious Freedom ClaimsDJB Tender Scam Row: AAP Questions Why Raghav Chadha Was Never Questioned By InvestigatorsMaharashtra’s Power Shift: Fadnavis Can Now Reverse Ministerial Decisions In Public InterestIndia Removes Pakistan Mission Barricades After Islamabad Move, Tensions Rise Over Kashmir RemarksModi Govt’s Gen-Z Outreach: One Union Minister To Visit One University Daily‘Fuel For Free’: Chandigarh’s ‘Petrol Langar’ Turns Chaotic, Leaves People Fuming‘No Respect For Court’: Arrest Warrant Against Mahua Moitra In Hate Speech Case123PhotostoriesHow much walking can reverse the health risks of sitting for 8 hours a day? Doctor explains what your body needsWhy does homemade curd turn slimy during monsoon and 3 ways to prevent itThe history of the white shirt: How a simple staple became the ultimate fashion icon10 enchanting baby girl names inspired by fantasy, mythology and folkloreSugar price hike by Rs 8 per kg: 9 natural Indian sweeteners and how to use themOptical illusion personality test: The first thing you spot reveals what’s coming next in your lifeIs apple cider vinegar good for your hair? Benefits, side effects, and the right way to use it10 One Piece characters who have lived for more than a 100 yearsWhy does reheated rice sometimes become hard and dry? 4 ways to bring it back to lifeWhy are gold borders vital in Indian sarees?123Hot PicksLily HooperConnor McDavidGTU results 2026Pennsylvania plane crashOil export IndiaFaceless assessmentRSS sanctionZepto internshipPakistan High CommissionTop TrendingHyderabad MurderPakistan High CommissionTwisha SharmaKarnataka MurderKerala MurderAbhijeet DipkeSukesh ChandrashekharRahul GandhiBengaluru RapidoBen Gvir

Vamsikrishna 0