SC hears plea on Jantar Mantar as the protest venue site NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to examine a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking an alternative protest venue in Delhi, with the petitioner arguing that Jantar Mantar is no longer suitable for demonstrations because they inconvenience local residents and disrupt essential services.A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana issued notices to the Centre and other authorities and asked Solicitor General Tushar Mehta to seek instructions on the issues raised.The PIL, filed by Satish Chand Kaushik, contends that protests at Jantar Mantar create problems for local residents by affecting access, movement and the supply of essential goods and medical services.During the hearing, the Chief Justice said the plea raised important concerns.”It has been stated in the plea that Jantar Mantar is not a proper site anymore for such protests due to ingress and egress issues. Supply of medical essentials etc. I think this is important… Please take instructions, Mr Solicitor. Issue notice and list this separately,” the CJI said.The petitioner’s counsel also referred to a proposed political march and urged the court to ensure that ‘another July 20 incident should be avoided’.The bench, however, declined to comment on the proposed event.”They know how to handle it. If they cannot, come to us for mishandling. I am sure they will handle (it),” the CJI observed.The matter has been directed to be listed separately.The hearing comes after the Supreme Court declined an oral request by an advocate to take suo motu cognisance of the police action during the July 20 ‘Chalo Sansad’ protest at Jantar Mantar.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesAt the time, the bench had said it did not want to view videos of the incident during judicial proceedings and asked the advocate not to raise issues that were not before the court.Following the protests, the Supreme Court Bar Association had passed a resolution condemning the alleged use of excessive force against students and lawyers and called for an impartial, time-bound inquiry into the incident.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorPriyanshi RastogiPriyanshi Rastogi is a journalist with The Times of India. She primarily covers national and international news, along with business affairs. Her work focuses on the latest political events, in-depth explainers, features, offbeat articles and viral social media trending stories.Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosDelhi Police To Not Register Case Against Minor Who Abused PM Modi, Say Sources‘Jihad-Producing Factories’: Taslima Nasreen Speaks On Mosques, Madrasas In Bangladesh; Demands UCCON CAM: Clash Erupts At Pappu Yadav’s Delhi Press Meet, Man Carrying Knife Detained‘Mekedatu Dam Is Permanent Solution’: Karnataka CM Shivakumar After All-Party Meet On Cauvery Water’₹18 Crore Stolen Every Year’ At Mumbai’s Siddhivinayak Temple: Raj Thackeray’s Donation Theft Claim‘Enemy Nations Conspiring To Hurt India’: PM Modi During ‘Nasha Mukt Yuva’ Campaign LaunchIndian Navy Launches Final Diving Support Craft, Completes Indigenous Five Ship ProgrammeMother Of Noida Teen Seeks Protection, FIR Withdrawal After PM Modi’s Appeal For Compassion’Why Do Killings Happen When…’: Farooq Abdullah’s Remarks On Kulgam Terror Attack Spark BJP-NC RowRam Temple Skit Row: Rahul Gandhi, Pappu Yadav, Awadhesh Prasad Booked123PhotostoriesInside Shehnaaz Gill’s stunning Mumbai home: cozy corners, luxe vibes and moreWhat did Titanic passengers eat? Inside the ship’s famous menusAt 108, Susan Young Browne takes only one medicine, drives her blue car still: 5 tips from her for a long, healthy, fulfilling life8 delicious no onion, no garlic lunch ideas for flavourful everyday mealsStop throwing away banana peels and mix them with baking soda: The chemistry behind the combination and 3 smart usesAluminium foil isn’t just for cooking: 7 practical ways it quietly solves common household problems5 quiet luxury brands fashion insiders are secretly buying right nowThe return of Madras check: Why this South Indian textile is dominating fashion in 2026Eggs and cholesterol: Are they really bad for your heart, or have we misunderstood one of the world’s most nutritious foods?7 signs you’re confusing loneliness with love (and how to tell the difference)123Hot PicksBypoll resultsPM ModiBankipur bypoll resultCET CAP Round 1 allotmentRBI FD rulePrashant KishorE20 petrol debateAssam floodsKanwar Yatra 2026Top TrendingCJP WarningBrij bhushanMadhya Pradesh Baby MurderGhaziabad Psychiatrist SuicideJeM Operative GirlfriendRuchika SharmaHamim Mondal ArrestWomen Wrestlers Sexual Harassment CaseBypoll Election Result 2026Shradha Singh
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to examine a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking an alternative protest venue in Delhi, with the petitioner arguing that Jantar Mantar is no longer suitable for demonstrations because they inconvenience local residents and disrupt essential services.A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana issued notices to the Centre and other authorities and asked Solicitor General Tushar Mehta to seek instructions on the issues raised.The PIL, filed by Satish Chand Kaushik, contends that protests at Jantar Mantar create problems for local residents by affecting access, movement and the supply of essential goods and medical services.During the hearing, the Chief Justice said the plea raised important concerns.“It has been stated in the plea that Jantar Mantar is not a proper site anymore for such protests due to ingress and egress issues. Supply of medical essentials etc. I think this is important… Please take instructions, Mr Solicitor. Issue notice and list this separately,” the CJI said.The petitioner’s counsel also referred to a proposed political march and urged the court to ensure that ‘another July 20 incident should be avoided’.The bench, however, declined to comment on the proposed event.“They know how to handle it. If they cannot, come to us for mishandling. I am sure they will handle (it),” the CJI observed.The matter has been directed to be listed separately.The hearing comes after the Supreme Court declined an oral request by an advocate to take suo motu cognisance of the police action during the July 20 ‘Chalo Sansad’ protest at Jantar Mantar.
Share your thoughts in the comments
Be respectful · TOI community guidelines
At the time, the bench had said it did not want to view videos of the incident during judicial proceedings and asked the advocate not to raise issues that were not before the court.Following the protests, the Supreme Court Bar Association had passed a resolution condemning the alleged use of excessive force against students and lawyers and called for an impartial, time-bound inquiry into the incident.
