Walking a fundamental right, footpath must for all roads: Supreme CourtWalking a fundamental right, footpath must for all roads: Supreme CourtWalking a fundamental right, footpath must for all roads: Supreme Court12 NEW DELHI: Supreme Court on Friday ruled that citizens have a fundamental right to walk, and this was part of their right to life and free movement. It urged the Union govt to enact a law mandating well-demarcated footpaths for every road to guarantee people’s right to walk in safety.The on-road death of a five-year-old boy on way to a neighbourhood school stirred the bench of Justices P S Narasimha and A S Chandurkar, which ruled, “Right to walk is a fundamental right under Part III of the Constitution. It is integral to the right to movement guaranteed under Article 19(1)(d), read with Article 19(1)(a), Article 19(1) (b), Article 19(1) (c) and Article 21 of the Constitution.”Writing the judgment for the bench, Justice Narasimha said, “The fundamental right to walk will take within its sweep the right to demarcated footpaths. These rights are primary and shall have priority over movement by motorised vehicles.”SC said, “If a road exists, there must then be a duty to ensure that a footpath is demarcated and maintained for walkers. This is an enforceable duty. The fundamental right to walk on demarcated footpaths shall override the privilege of a motorised vehicle.”Casting a constitutional duty on the govt and civic bodies in the three-tier governance system, SC said, “The duty bearers are the urban development authorities, municipal corporations, municipalities and even panchayats, who must endeavour to demarcate, construct, maintain and safeguard footpaths and other necessary pedestrian infrastructure, as walking is integral to life.”Interestingly, SC said violation of the right to walk, being a fundamental right, would entitle citizens to file writ petitions before SC and HCs to seek remedies against civic authorities and govts concerned for restitution and compensation. Right to move constitutional courts would be independent of the citizens’ right to seek compensation through motor accident claims tribunals under the Motor Vehicles Act, it said.Rechristening the individual claims case as ‘Re: Fundamental Right to Walk and Footpath’, the bench said though right to walk on demarcated footpath was integral to right to life and right to free movement, guaranteed under Articles 21 and 19, there was no legislation to guarantee this right. Asking SC registry to send a copy of the judgment to the Union ministries of housing and urban affairs, rural development, and road transport and highways so as to enable them to reflect on “the compelling necessity for initiating the necessary legal framework”, the bench said it was high time to frame a statutory mechanism “not only for declaring the right, but also to recognise the duty bearers”.It also urged the Law Commission to examine formulating a statutory framework for protecting the right, identify the duty bearers and lay down remedies. “Constitutional courts also have a duty to declare with clarity the existence of this fundamental right and ensure that the existing civil and the constitutional remedies are accessible and effective,” Justices Narasimha and Chandurkar said.While awarding a compensation of 11.5 lakh to the father of the deceased minor, the bench said, “A wide, well-demarcated and uninterrupted footpath can change the beauty of, and equitable access to, our cities and towns and could truly be transformative of our urban and rural living.”In reality, how much does it take to create a well-demarcated footpath wherever a road exists? All that the fundamental right to walk demands is a comfortable space for an easy and carefree walk. Should this not be the minimum of the minimum duty that a municipal authority owes to the citizens?”Get the latest India news and live updates. Download the TOI App.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosContradicting Supreme Court and Tribunal Orders?: TN Assembly’s Firm Stand Against ProjectRare Handshake At LoC During Pakistani National’s Repatriation Draws Attention Across BorderJaishankar Says Global Appreciation For Indian Talent Is Growing RapidlyCongress Wins 5 Of 7 Karnataka MLC Seats, BJP Probes Suspected Cross-VotingRSS At 100: Why The Organisation Remains Unregistered And Why The Issue Keeps Returning?From Net-Zero Design To Cargo Hub: What Makes Jewar Airport Different?Why Brahmins Are Suddenly At The Centre Of UP’s 2027 Political Battle | SP vs BSP vs BJP ExplainedTMC Escalates Battle To Delhi As Abhishek Banerjee Seeks Action On Rebel MPsJio Files DRHP With SEBI | Mukesh Ambani Hands IPO Leadership To Isha, Akash & AnantFrom ‘Brother-in-Ideals’ To A Cold Greeting: Stalin’s Message Exposes DMK-Congress Rift123PhotostoriesLove Poha for breakfast? 6 ways to add 20 gms protein to each servingNew York’s first lady Rama Duwaji made bootleg Knicks merch look runway-readyFrom earning Rs 700 in his first job to doing plays with Dilip Joshi and Disha Vakani: When Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah’s Tanmay Vekaria Aka Bagha got candid about his life5 signs of emotional manipulation in relationships, as per mental health counselor10 regional jackfruit dishes from across the world and why it is celebrated so muchFrom respecting Gauri Khan’s space to teaching his sons to respect women: 5 times Shah Rukh Khan proved he is Bollywood’s ultimate green flag10 baby girl names that mean pure in different languagesFrom Alia Bhatt to Katrina Kaif: Inside the pilates routine that keeps these Bollywood divas fit6 most beautiful hidden villages in India that are absolutely worth a tripWhy were women banned from doing makeup on Bollywood sets? Sonam Kapoor’s makeup artist explains the breaking of the 59-year-old barrier123Hot PicksEngland vs New ZealandYuvraj SinghUSA Vs AustraliaAP SSC resultsKannur University FYUGP TrialShiv SenaJD VanceStrait of HormuzHormoz nuclear power plantTop TrendingBihar gang-rapeUS-Iran Peace DealStock Market LiveFIFA World Cup 2026What is Legacy BadgeBEST bus strikeAIIMS BSc Nursing Admit CardMHT CET PCM 2nd attempt resultsGold rate todayIndia-UK FTA
NEW DELHI: Supreme Court on Friday ruled that citizens have a fundamental right to walk, and this was part of their right to life and free movement. It urged the Union govt to enact a law mandating well-demarcated footpaths for every road to guarantee people’s right to walk in safety.The on-road death of a five-year-old boy on way to a neighbourhood school stirred the bench of Justices P S Narasimha and A S Chandurkar, which ruled, “Right to walk is a fundamental right under Part III of the Constitution. It is integral to the right to movement guaranteed under Article 19(1)(d), read with Article 19(1)(a), Article 19(1) (b), Article 19(1) (c) and Article 21 of the Constitution.”Writing the judgment for the bench, Justice Narasimha said, “The fundamental right to walk will take within its sweep the right to demarcated footpaths. These rights are primary and shall have priority over movement by motorised vehicles.”SC said, “If a road exists, there must then be a duty to ensure that a footpath is demarcated and maintained for walkers. This is an enforceable duty. The fundamental right to walk on demarcated footpaths shall override the privilege of a motorised vehicle.”Casting a constitutional duty on the govt and civic bodies in the three-tier governance system, SC said, “The duty bearers are the urban development authorities, municipal corporations, municipalities and even panchayats, who must endeavour to demarcate, construct, maintain and safeguard footpaths and other necessary pedestrian infrastructure, as walking is integral to life.”Interestingly, SC said violation of the right to walk, being a fundamental right, would entitle citizens to file writ petitions before SC and HCs to seek remedies against civic authorities and govts concerned for restitution and compensation. Right to move constitutional courts would be independent of the citizens’ right to seek compensation through motor accident claims tribunals under the Motor Vehicles Act, it said.Rechristening the individual claims case as ‘Re: Fundamental Right to Walk and Footpath’, the bench said though right to walk on demarcated footpath was integral to right to life and right to free movement, guaranteed under Articles 21 and 19, there was no legislation to guarantee this right. Asking SC registry to send a copy of the judgment to the Union ministries of housing and urban affairs, rural development, and road transport and highways so as to enable them to reflect on “the compelling necessity for initiating the necessary legal framework”, the bench said it was high time to frame a statutory mechanism “not only for declaring the right, but also to recognise the duty bearers”.It also urged the Law Commission to examine formulating a statutory framework for protecting the right, identify the duty bearers and lay down remedies. “Constitutional courts also have a duty to declare with clarity the existence of this fundamental right and ensure that the existing civil and the constitutional remedies are accessible and effective,” Justices Narasimha and Chandurkar said.While awarding a compensation of 11.5 lakh to the father of the deceased minor, the bench said, “A wide, well-demarcated and uninterrupted footpath can change the beauty of, and equitable access to, our cities and towns and could truly be transformative of our urban and rural living.“In reality, how much does it take to create a well-demarcated footpath wherever a road exists? All that the fundamental right to walk demands is a comfortable space for an easy and carefree walk. Should this not be the minimum of the minimum duty that a municipal authority owes to the citizens?”
