12 NEW DELHI: The Election Commission shall, as directed by the Supreme Court, forward the list of electors deleted as part of the special intensive revision (SIR) across 13 states – primarily those classified as ‘others’, separate from the absent, shifted, dead, duplicate (ASDD) electors and, thus, of ‘suspect’ citizenship as well as the ones excluded from the roll based on adjudication during which they could not explain logical discrepancies in their mapping with the roll from last SIR – to the competent authority under the Citizenship Act 1955, for examining their citizenship.EC officials welcomed the judgement, saying SIR and all its processes, including seeking further clarification from electors based on logical discrepancies – mismatch with father’s name, gender mismatch, being over 45 years but never enrolled, being one of over six progeny of the same parent, less than 15 years or over 50 years age gap with mapped parent and less than 40 years gap with mapped grandparent – and deleting ones who failed to explain the discrepancies, have been validated by SC. Those challenging SIR had earlier called these logical discrepancies an exercise in disenfranchisement.”The EC was, is and will always be with the voters,” said chief election commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.As per EC data for a dozen states covered in the second round of SIR, nearly 6.5 crore ASDD electors were deleted. Over 12.7 lakh were excluded from the roll and classified as ‘others’, which sources said are essentially “suspect illegal immigrants”. Another 63.2 lakh were deleted through Form 7 and adjudication; these include over 27 lakh dropped from the Bengal roll after their appeals were rejected by officers.The SC direction to EC to hand over the ‘suspect’ citizen cases to the competent authority under the Citizenship Act was already there in the SIR order. The order had instructed the electoral registration officer (ERO) and assistant ERO to “forward cases of suspected foreign nationals to the ‘competent authority’ under the Citizenship Act, 1955”. Sources said the competent authority is the foreigners registration office (FRO) or foreigners regional registration office (FRRO), and the ERO/SDM may forward the ‘suspect’ cases to them for verification. In case the citizenship is verified, the FRO/FRRO may refer back the case to EC authorities who will then add the person to the roll. Else, the FRO/FRRO may order the suspect to be sent to a detention or holding centre.Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Bakrid wishes, messages and eid 2026!About the AuthorBharti JainBharti Jain is senior editor with The Times of India, New Delhi. She has been writing on security matters since 1996. Having covered the Union home ministry, security agencies, Election Commission and the ‘prime’ political beat, the Congress, for The Economic Times all these years, she moved to TOI in August 2012. Her repertoire of news stories delves into the whole gamut of issues related to terrorism and internal strife, besides probing strategic affairs in India’s neighbourhood.Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosExplained: What Is The CMRL-Exalogic Case Linked To ED Raids On Ex-Kerala CM Pinarayi VijayanTMC MLAs Stage Sit-In Over Delay In LoP Status, Office Space AllocationGiant Messi Statue Strapped With Ropes As Kolkata Prepares Removal After It Was ‘Swaying In Wind’India’s Private Sector Is Building a Stealth Fighter. Here’s What That Really Means.Amit Shah Orders Crackdown On Illegal Structures Near Indo-Pak Border, Seeks Demolition Within 15 KMMassive Drug Haul In Gujarat As ATS Recovers 100 Kg Cocaine From European Ship Near KutchLavish Celebration Clip Reignites Debate On Money Power In Pune Crash CaseAssam Assembly Passes Uniform Civil Code Bill, CM Himanta Hails It As ‘Historic’Tamil Nadu AIADMK Unity Restored As Rebel MLAs Patch Up With Edappadi Palaniswami CampBig Blow To Mamata: TMC MP Kakoli Ghosh Dastidar Resigns From All Party Posts123PhotostoriesThese animals have fewer than 100 left on earth—and their stories are heartbreaking6 high-protein sandwiches for a quick summer breakfastExclusive – Khatron Ke Khiladi 15: From talking about her show preparations to reuniting with Gaurav Khanna; Farrhana Bhatt gets candidOne monochrome saree, unlimited main-character energy, and this time Madhuri Dixit means pure businessAmerica by rail: 5 iconic train journeys in the U.S. every traveller must experience once in a lifetimeVaibhav Sooryavanshi Home: Vaibhav Sooryavanshi’s modest home in Samastipur, Bihar tells the story of hard work, determination and family sacrificesHow to delete stress from your life7 painful truths about love and relationships people often don’t talk aboutBhindi to Lauki: Why we remove the crown of these 7 everyday vegetablesPregnancy nutrition: Superfoods every mother-to-be should add to her plate123Hot PicksSRH vs RRNHL Trade RumorsVaibhav SooryavanshiNFL Trade RumorEmma Raducanu net worthShreyas IyerPSSSB Excise Inspector Admit CardTop TrendingByju’s founder RaveendranBank holiday todayIndian Air ForceDelhi temperatureRed BalloonBengaluru Ebola CasePune curfewRahul GandhiHDFC ShareIndian Rupee

12 NEW DELHI: The Election Commission shall, as directed by the Supreme Court, forward the list of electors deleted as part of the special intensive revision (SIR) across 13 states – primarily those classified as ‘others’, separate from the absent, shifted, dead, duplicate (ASDD) electors and, thus, of ‘suspect’ citizenship as well as the ones excluded from the roll based on adjudication during which they could not explain logical discrepancies in their mapping with the roll from last SIR – to the competent authority under the Citizenship Act 1955, for examining their citizenship.EC officials welcomed the judgement, saying SIR and all its processes, including seeking further clarification from electors based on logical discrepancies – mismatch with father’s name, gender mismatch, being over 45 years but never enrolled, being one of over six progeny of the same parent, less than 15 years or over 50 years age gap with mapped parent and less than 40 years gap with mapped grandparent – and deleting ones who failed to explain the discrepancies, have been validated by SC. Those challenging SIR had earlier called these logical discrepancies an exercise in disenfranchisement.”The EC was, is and will always be with the voters,” said chief election commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.As per EC data for a dozen states covered in the second round of SIR, nearly 6.5 crore ASDD electors were deleted. Over 12.7 lakh were excluded from the roll and classified as ‘others’, which sources said are essentially “suspect illegal immigrants”. Another 63.2 lakh were deleted through Form 7 and adjudication; these include over 27 lakh dropped from the Bengal roll after their appeals were rejected by officers.The SC direction to EC to hand over the ‘suspect’ citizen cases to the competent authority under the Citizenship Act was already there in the SIR order. The order had instructed the electoral registration officer (ERO) and assistant ERO to “forward cases of suspected foreign nationals to the ‘competent authority’ under the Citizenship Act, 1955”. Sources said the competent authority is the foreigners registration office (FRO) or foreigners regional registration office (FRRO), and the ERO/SDM may forward the ‘suspect’ cases to them for verification. In case the citizenship is verified, the FRO/FRRO may refer back the case to EC authorities who will then add the person to the roll. Else, the FRO/FRRO may order the suspect to be sent to a detention or holding centre.Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Bakrid wishes, messages and eid 2026!About the AuthorBharti JainBharti Jain is senior editor with The Times of India, New Delhi. She has been writing on security matters since 1996. Having covered the Union home ministry, security agencies, Election Commission and the ‘prime’ political beat, the Congress, for The Economic Times all these years, she moved to TOI in August 2012. Her repertoire of news stories delves into the whole gamut of issues related to terrorism and internal strife, besides probing strategic affairs in India’s neighbourhood.Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosExplained: What Is The CMRL-Exalogic Case Linked To ED Raids On Ex-Kerala CM Pinarayi VijayanTMC MLAs Stage Sit-In Over Delay In LoP Status, Office Space AllocationGiant Messi Statue Strapped With Ropes As Kolkata Prepares Removal After It Was ‘Swaying In Wind’India’s Private Sector Is Building a Stealth Fighter. Here’s What That Really Means.Amit Shah Orders Crackdown On Illegal Structures Near Indo-Pak Border, Seeks Demolition Within 15 KMMassive Drug Haul In Gujarat As ATS Recovers 100 Kg Cocaine From European Ship Near KutchLavish Celebration Clip Reignites Debate On Money Power In Pune Crash CaseAssam Assembly Passes Uniform Civil Code Bill, CM Himanta Hails It As ‘Historic’Tamil Nadu AIADMK Unity Restored As Rebel MLAs Patch Up With Edappadi Palaniswami CampBig Blow To Mamata: TMC MP Kakoli Ghosh Dastidar Resigns From All Party Posts123PhotostoriesThese animals have fewer than 100 left on earth—and their stories are heartbreaking6 high-protein sandwiches for a quick summer breakfastExclusive – Khatron Ke Khiladi 15: From talking about her show preparations to reuniting with Gaurav Khanna; Farrhana Bhatt gets candidOne monochrome saree, unlimited main-character energy, and this time Madhuri Dixit means pure businessAmerica by rail: 5 iconic train journeys in the U.S. every traveller must experience once in a lifetimeVaibhav Sooryavanshi Home: Vaibhav Sooryavanshi’s modest home in Samastipur, Bihar tells the story of hard work, determination and family sacrificesHow to delete stress from your life7 painful truths about love and relationships people often don’t talk aboutBhindi to Lauki: Why we remove the crown of these 7 everyday vegetablesPregnancy nutrition: Superfoods every mother-to-be should add to her plate123Hot PicksSRH vs RRNHL Trade RumorsVaibhav SooryavanshiNFL Trade RumorEmma Raducanu net worthShreyas IyerPSSSB Excise Inspector Admit CardTop TrendingByju’s founder RaveendranBank holiday todayIndian Air ForceDelhi temperatureRed BalloonBengaluru Ebola CasePune curfewRahul GandhiHDFC ShareIndian Rupee



NEW DELHI: The Election Commission shall, as directed by the Supreme Court, forward the list of electors deleted as part of the special intensive revision (SIR) across 13 states – primarily those classified as ‘others’, separate from the absent, shifted, dead, duplicate (ASDD) electors and, thus, of ‘suspect’ citizenship as well as the ones excluded from the roll based on adjudication during which they could not explain logical discrepancies in their mapping with the roll from last SIR – to the competent authority under the Citizenship Act 1955, for examining their citizenship.EC officials welcomed the judgement, saying SIR and all its processes, including seeking further clarification from electors based on logical discrepancies – mismatch with father’s name, gender mismatch, being over 45 years but never enrolled, being one of over six progeny of the same parent, less than 15 years or over 50 years age gap with mapped parent and less than 40 years gap with mapped grandparent – and deleting ones who failed to explain the discrepancies, have been validated by SC. Those challenging SIR had earlier called these logical discrepancies an exercise in disenfranchisement.“The EC was, is and will always be with the voters,” said chief election commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.As per EC data for a dozen states covered in the second round of SIR, nearly 6.5 crore ASDD electors were deleted. Over 12.7 lakh were excluded from the roll and classified as ‘others’, which sources said are essentially “suspect illegal immigrants”. Another 63.2 lakh were deleted through Form 7 and adjudication; these include over 27 lakh dropped from the Bengal roll after their appeals were rejected by officers.The SC direction to EC to hand over the ‘suspect’ citizen cases to the competent authority under the Citizenship Act was already there in the SIR order. The order had instructed the electoral registration officer (ERO) and assistant ERO to “forward cases of suspected foreign nationals to the ‘competent authority’ under the Citizenship Act, 1955”. Sources said the competent authority is the foreigners registration office (FRO) or foreigners regional registration office (FRRO), and the ERO/SDM may forward the ‘suspect’ cases to them for verification. In case the citizenship is verified, the FRO/FRRO may refer back the case to EC authorities who will then add the person to the roll. Else, the FRO/FRRO may order the suspect to be sent to a detention or holding centre.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *