The Union home ministry clarified that the central government has no plans to introduce a bill altering Chandigarh’s governance or administrative structure in the upcoming Parliament session. This statement followed a political controversy over a proposal to bring Chandigarh under Article 240 of the Constitution, which had sparked concerns about Punjab’s rights over the city. NEW DELHI: The ministry of home affairs on Sunday clarified that the central government had no intention to introduce any bill to “alter Chandigarh’s governance or administrative structure” in the upcoming Winter Session of Parliament. This came after a political row erupted over its plans to place Chandigarh under Article 240 of the Constitution through the 131st Amendment Bill in the upcoming winter session, bringing it in line with UTs such as the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Lakshadweep, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, and Daman and Diu.”The proposal only to simplify the Central Government’s law-making process for the Union Territory of Chandigarh is still under consideration with the Central Government. No final decision has been taken on this proposal. The proposal in no way seeks to alter Chandigarh’s governance or administrative structure, nor does it aim to change the traditional arrangements between Chandigarh and the States of Punjab or Haryana,” MHA said in a statement.”A suitable decision will be taken only after adequate consultations with all stakeholders, keeping in mind the interests of Chandigarh. There is no need for any concern on this matter. The Central Government has no intention of introducing any Bill to this effect in the upcoming Winter Session of Parliament,” it added.Why the controversy erupted?The BJP-led Centre had proposed bringing the Union Territory of Chandigarh under Article 240 of the Constitution. This would allow the President to appoint a lieutenant governor for the city and make regulations directly. The MHA, however, clarified that the proposal would “simplify the Central Government’s law-making process Chandigarh” and it was “still under consideration with the Central Government.”The move triggered sharp reactions across Punjab’s political spectrum, with several leaders calling it an attack on Punjab’s rights over Chandigarh.Punjab chief minister Bhagwant Mann strongly criticised the move, calling it “a conspiracy to snatch” Punjab’s capital. In his statement, he said “Chandigarh was, is and will always remain an integral part of the state.” Mann argued that Punjab, as the “parent state,” has full rights over Chandigarh and accused the Centre of acting unjustly.If cleared, the proposal could allow the Centre to appoint an independent administrator for Chandigarh, similar to how the UT earlier had its own chief secretary. The idea already met strong opposition from the ruling Aam Aadmi Party, Congress, and Shiromani Akali Dal.AAP supremo Arvind Kejriwal also launched a sharp attack on the central government. In a post on X, he said the proposed amendment was “a direct assault on Punjab’s identity and its constitutional rights” and accused the Centre of “tearing apart the federal structure”. He added that Punjab was being deprived of its rightful share, writing that it amounted to “wounding the very soul of Punjab”. He declared that “Chandigarh belongs to Punjab and shall remain Punjab’s”.Chandigarh currently serves as the shared capital of Punjab and Haryana. For decades, both states have claimed full rights over the city, but it has remained a Union Territory since 1966.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideos”Govt Is Making Sure Muslims Never Raise Their Heads”: Jamiat Chief On Al-Falah ActionIAF Officer Namansh Syal Flown Back to India After Tejas Jet Crash in Dubai Air ShowShah Rukh Khan Pays Tribute To Victims Of Pahalgam And Delhi Blasts at Global Peace Honours 2025Piyush Goyal Completes Three Day Israel Visit Emphasizing Strengthened Ties And Future CooperationTrump Says He Brokered Eight Peace Deals Including India And Pakistan During Mamdani MeetUP Gears Up For Biggest Crackdown Yet As CM Yogi Mandates Detention Hubs For Illegal ImmigrantsModi, Meloni Share Warm Laughter on G20 Sidelines in Johannesburg‘In memory of our brothers’: Russian Pilot’s Heartfelt Note For Indian Tejas Pilot After Dubai Crash’Objective Is To Destroy The Enemy’: Op Sindoor Echoes As Indian Army Vows Stronger Response to PakIndian Army Chief Reveals How A Trusted Orchestra Crushed Nine Targets in Operation Sindoor Blitz123PhotostoriesNaga Chaitanya birthday special: A look at adorable social media moments with wife Sobhita DhulipalaTrailblazing Bollywood women who changed what it means to be a heroine on screenDelhi to Get 20 New Parking Facilities as MCD Targets Roadside Parking CrisisWalking: 5 reasons why this simple exercise is good for womenDipika Kakar and Shoaib Ibrahim’s love story: From filming together to battling through cancer as one teamSmriti Mandhana and Palash Muchhal wedding: Fun facts about India’s century queen and the youngest composerSadhguru’s top 6 parenting tips for new-generation parentsThe amazing benefits of okra water (and how to consume it without getting icky)Smriti Mandhana and Palash Muchhal: The couple’s most romantic pics that you must see ahead of their weddingForgotten Bollywood actor returns for one last big film chance123Hot PicksDelhi AQI TodayBihar Minister List 2025Bihar CM Oath CeremonyGold rate todaySilver rate todayPublic Holidays NovemberBank Holidays NovemberTop TrendingAuston Matthews InjuryKim KardashianBrittany MahomesTaylor SwiftDelhi School AdmissionsSmriti MandhanaJosh Allen InjuryCharvarius WardFortnite Chapter 7 LeakedCade Cunningham
NEW DELHI: The ministry of home affairs on Sunday clarified that the central government had no intention to introduce any bill to “alter Chandigarh’s governance or administrative structure” in the upcoming Winter Session of Parliament. This came after a political row erupted over its plans to place Chandigarh under Article 240 of the Constitution through the 131st Amendment Bill in the upcoming winter session, bringing it in line with UTs such as the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Lakshadweep, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, and Daman and Diu.“The proposal only to simplify the Central Government’s law-making process for the Union Territory of Chandigarh is still under consideration with the Central Government. No final decision has been taken on this proposal. The proposal in no way seeks to alter Chandigarh’s governance or administrative structure, nor does it aim to change the traditional arrangements between Chandigarh and the States of Punjab or Haryana,” MHA said in a statement.“A suitable decision will be taken only after adequate consultations with all stakeholders, keeping in mind the interests of Chandigarh. There is no need for any concern on this matter. The Central Government has no intention of introducing any Bill to this effect in the upcoming Winter Session of Parliament,” it added.
Why the controversy erupted?
The BJP-led Centre had proposed bringing the Union Territory of Chandigarh under Article 240 of the Constitution. This would allow the President to appoint a lieutenant governor for the city and make regulations directly. The MHA, however, clarified that the proposal would “simplify the Central Government’s law-making process Chandigarh” and it was “still under consideration with the Central Government.”The move triggered sharp reactions across Punjab’s political spectrum, with several leaders calling it an attack on Punjab’s rights over Chandigarh.Punjab chief minister Bhagwant Mann strongly criticised the move, calling it “a conspiracy to snatch” Punjab’s capital. In his statement, he said “Chandigarh was, is and will always remain an integral part of the state.” Mann argued that Punjab, as the “parent state,” has full rights over Chandigarh and accused the Centre of acting unjustly.If cleared, the proposal could allow the Centre to appoint an independent administrator for Chandigarh, similar to how the UT earlier had its own chief secretary. The idea already met strong opposition from the ruling Aam Aadmi Party, Congress, and Shiromani Akali Dal.AAP supremo Arvind Kejriwal also launched a sharp attack on the central government. In a post on X, he said the proposed amendment was “a direct assault on Punjab’s identity and its constitutional rights” and accused the Centre of “tearing apart the federal structure”. He added that Punjab was being deprived of its rightful share, writing that it amounted to “wounding the very soul of Punjab”. He declared that “Chandigarh belongs to Punjab and shall remain Punjab’s”.Chandigarh currently serves as the shared capital of Punjab and Haryana. For decades, both states have claimed full rights over the city, but it has remained a Union Territory since 1966.
