NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday raised concerns over reports of Booth Level Officers (BLOs) being threatened and obstructed while carrying out the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in West Bengal and other states, PTI reported.“Bring to our notice instances of lack of cooperation, threatening of BLOs; we’ll pass orders,” the bench told the Election Commission of India (ECI) after it claimed that its work was being “hindered” in some states.The ECI later stated that if the situation continues to worsen, it would have no option but to take police under deputation. The Commission told the Supreme Court that it has all constitutional powers to deal with the threatening of BLOs and other officials engaged in SIR work.“Deal with situation or it will cause anarchy,” the SC warned the ECI, referring to the lack of cooperation from certain state governments in facilitating the SIR exercise.The apex court asked the Election Commission to take a firm view of the lack of cooperation from state governments and ensure the exercise is carried out without intimidation or interference.During an earlier hearing, the bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant had flagged the heavy workload placed on BLOs, noting claims of severe stress, pressure, and even deaths linked to the SIR drive. The court directed states to immediately deploy additional manpower, reduce working hours, and consider exemption requests on an individual basis where justified. It reiterated that governments are duty-bound to provide adequate staff. Mamata Banerjee Warns BJP With Nation-Shaking Threat As SIR Battle Erupts In Bengal Ahead Of Polls The EC has repeatedly defended SIR as a constitutionally mandated obligation to “clean” the voter lists. It argues that maintaining correct and current electoral rolls is essential to the integrity of the electoral process, and that it retains the exclusive discretion to decide when and how to revise rolls.’This came after several petitions and PILs were filed before the Supreme Court, contending that the design and implementation of SIR threatens the fundamental right to vote of large numbers of genuine voters. Petitioners argue that the documentation requirements, tight deadlines, and house-to-house enumeration make the exercise arbitrary and could lead to large-scale disenfranchisement, particularly of marginalised, poor, migrant, or otherwise vulnerable populations. They contend that the new procedures deviate from older rules, create a “citizenship test,” and fail to ensure proper notice or due process before deleting names. On June 24, the EC issued an order triggering SIR, starting with the Bihar, which was due for assembly elections, and indicating that other states and union territories would follow in a phased drive.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosPM Modi’s Wish For Khaleda Zia’s Recovery Earns BNP Praise, Marking A Rare Diplomatic Shift In DhakaPakistan’s Asim Munir Threatens India With ‘Severe Response’ In First Speech After Becoming CDFRaghuram Rajan Claims Trump Tariffs Stemmed From Ego Clash Over Indo-Pak Ceasefire Credit Battle”Nehru’s False Sense Of Secularism”: BJP Fires Back At Priyanka Gandhi”Love For India Not Conditional” Owaisi Rejects Vande Mataram As Test Of PatriotismTrump Warns India On Rice Dumping As US Farmers Demand Action Against Cheap Imports’Nonchalant, Lackadaisical Attitude’: Ex-AirAsia CFO Breaks Down Indigo Fiasco’It Was Treated Like An Extra’: Rajnath Singh Slams Congress For ‘Injustice’ To Vande Mataram’Biggest Mistake’: TMC’s Mahua Moitra Blasts PM Modi, Dares BJP To Win Bengal With Divisive PoliticsIndia Issues Warning To China Over Targeting Indians, Blasts Pakistan’s Remarks On Arunachal Pradesh123PhotostoriesSara Ali Khan commemorates ‘Kedarnath’ milestone, highlights lessons learned with Sushant Singh Rajput- See pics5 famous doors the world still isn’t allowed to open, including 2 in IndiaClove water: How to prepare this herbal drink at home5 best foods that help lower cholesterol & sugar naturally and the right way to consume them’Simha’, ‘Legend’, ‘Narasimha Naidu’ and others: Nandamuri Balakrishna films to revisit while you wait for ‘Akhanda 2’Elon Musk says ditch these 6 habits if you want to succeed, starting todayChanakya Niti Based On Your Date of BirthKidney health: Coconut water and other unexpected foods that stress your kidneysHow to make Instant Oats Idli for breakfastBhagavad Gita lesson for each birth month (powerful guide)123Hot PicksIndigo Flight DelayPutin India VisitWorld NewsGold rate todaySilver rate todayPublic Holidays NovemberBank Holidays NovemberTop TrendingJalen HurtsDonald TrumpSophie RainMariasharapova and Alexander Net worthAryna Sabalenka Net WorthAlix EarleRafael Nadal and Mery Net WorthCandace OwensTop US Colleges Co-OpProgramsF-1 students US
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday raised concerns over reports of Booth Level Officers (BLOs) being threatened and obstructed while carrying out the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in West Bengal and other states, PTI reported.“Bring to our notice instances of lack of cooperation, threatening of BLOs; we’ll pass orders,” the bench told the Election Commission of India (ECI) after it claimed that its work was being “hindered” in some states.The ECI later stated that if the situation continues to worsen, it would have no option but to take police under deputation. The Commission told the Supreme Court that it has all constitutional powers to deal with the threatening of BLOs and other officials engaged in SIR work.“Deal with situation or it will cause anarchy,” the SC warned the ECI, referring to the lack of cooperation from certain state governments in facilitating the SIR exercise.The apex court asked the Election Commission to take a firm view of the lack of cooperation from state governments and ensure the exercise is carried out without intimidation or interference.During an earlier hearing, the bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant had flagged the heavy workload placed on BLOs, noting claims of severe stress, pressure, and even deaths linked to the SIR drive. The court directed states to immediately deploy additional manpower, reduce working hours, and consider exemption requests on an individual basis where justified. It reiterated that governments are duty-bound to provide adequate staff.
The EC has repeatedly defended SIR as a constitutionally mandated obligation to “clean” the voter lists. It argues that maintaining correct and current electoral rolls is essential to the integrity of the electoral process, and that it retains the exclusive discretion to decide when and how to revise rolls.’This came after several petitions and PILs were filed before the Supreme Court, contending that the design and implementation of SIR threatens the fundamental right to vote of large numbers of genuine voters. Petitioners argue that the documentation requirements, tight deadlines, and house-to-house enumeration make the exercise arbitrary and could lead to large-scale disenfranchisement, particularly of marginalised, poor, migrant, or otherwise vulnerable populations. They contend that the new procedures deviate from older rules, create a “citizenship test,” and fail to ensure proper notice or due process before deleting names. On June 24, the EC issued an order triggering SIR, starting with the Bihar, which was due for assembly elections, and indicating that other states and union territories would follow in a phased drive.
