An Allahabad High Court judge, Justice Yashwant Varma, has approached the Supreme Court challenging the Lok Sabha Speaker’s inquiry committee formed to probe corruption allegations against him. He argues the committee’s constitution by the Speaker alone is a procedural lapse, as such a panel should be jointly formed by both Houses of Parliament. Cash discovery row: Justice Yashwant Varma (File Photo) NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to hear a plea by Allahabad high court’s Justice Yashwant Varma challenging the constitution of an inquiry committee set up by the Lok Sabha Speaker to probe corruption charges against him.A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih issued notices to the Lok Sabha Speaker’s office and the secretaries-general of both Houses of Parliament, seeking their responses after senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Justice Varma, flagged a “procedural lapse” in the constitution of the Lok Sabha inquiry panel.Rohatgi submitted that the introduction of a motion in both Houses of Parliament to remove a judge requires the inquiry panel to be formed jointly by the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, and cannot be constituted unilaterally by the Lok Sabha Speaker.IPL Auction 2026MI, RR, CSK, KKR: As it happened – How Green became a ‘Knight’ after intense bidding warIPL Auction: Uncapped duo hit jackpot as CSK spend Rs 28.4 crore on Prashant and KartikIPL 2026 team and squad List: Updated players for all 10 Teams; who got whom”Where the notices of the motion are ‘given’ to the Houses on the same date, no committee will be constituted, unless the motion is being admitted in both Houses. And where such motion is admitted in both Houses, the committee shall be constituted jointly by the Lok Sabha Speaker and the Rajya Sabha Chairman,” PTI quoted Rohatgi as saying.In his plea, Justice Varma has also sought that the admission of the Lok Sabha motion to remove him be declared “contrary to law.”The matter has been posted for the next hearing on January 7.On March 14, large sums of currency were found at Justice Varma’s official residence in Delhi, where he was then serving as a high court judge. He was later transferred to the Allahabad high court in Uttar Pradesh. Following the discovery, then-Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna initiated an in-house probe into the allegations and set up a three-member panel, which submitted its report on May 4. The panel found Justice Varma guilty of misconduct.After receiving the report, the then-CJI asked Justice Varma to resign or face impeachment proceedings. Following the judge’s refusal to resign, the report was forwarded to President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.On August 7, the Supreme Court dismissed Justice Varma’s plea seeking to invalidate the in-house inquiry report. On August 12, Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla constituted a separate three-member committee to probe the charges against the judge.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosPM Modi Lands In Addis Ababa, Indian Diaspora In Ethiopia Awaits To Meet PMFrom Kolkata Chaos to Delhi Celebration: Lionel Messi’s G.O.A.T India Tour At A GlancePM Modi Pitches New Economic Corridor As King Abdullah Praises India’s Growth At Jordan Forum MeetPriyanka Gandhi Targets VB-G RAM G Bill Over MGNREGA, Blasts Centre’s Name Change TacticsSonia Gandhi Targets Modi Govt On ASHA, Anganwadi Workers In Rajya SabhaNational Herald Case: Court Declines To Act On ED Chargesheet, Congress Claims Truth Has PrevailedEverything Fine, Says Shashi Tharoor After Skipping Congress Rally Amid Growing Speculation of RiftDelhi-Agra Expressway Crash: Multiple Buses Catch Fire, 4 Dead, 25 InjuredPM Modi Praises Jordan’s Fight Against Terrorism As India And Jordan Strengthen Strategic RelationsIndia Slams Pakistan As ‘Global Epicentre Of Terror’, Vows To Counter Pak-Sponsored Attacks At UN123PhotostoriesThrowback to electrifying performances by Ranveer Singh, Hrithik Roshan,AR Rahmanat IPL opening ceremonies over the years7 essential life lessons and wisdom to embrace from Brené Brown’s book “The Gifts of Imperfection”Shah Rukh Khan to Preity Zinta: Celebrities who own IPL teamsHutton-Mdivani Jadeite Necklace to L’Incomparable Necklace: Unveiling the world’s top 5 most expensive necklaces ever made6 desi-style Hummus recipes to try with snacks this party seasonLove eating walnuts? Then soak them for boosting their efficacyTop 7 Indian cities with AQI under 50 (where to breath clean air in 2025)10 words people googled the most in 2025 as per Google Trends reportMumbai–Pune: Where Shivaji once triumphed, engineers now build India’s tallest cable-stayed bridge8 common mistakes people mostly commit while worshipping the Tulsi plant123Hot Picksilia TopuriaCorona RemediesJetBlue flight VenezuelaGold rate todaySilver rate todayPublic Holidays NovemberBank Holidays NovemberTop TrendingPrashant VeerAuston MatthewsVanessa BryantJalen Hurts Wife Net WorthBukayo Saka and Tolami Benson Net WorthConnor McDavidVenkatesh iyerMatheesha PathiranaSOF ICO resultFortnite Bleach Characters
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to hear a plea by Allahabad high court’s Justice Yashwant Varma challenging the constitution of an inquiry committee set up by the Lok Sabha Speaker to probe corruption charges against him.A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih issued notices to the Lok Sabha Speaker’s office and the secretaries-general of both Houses of Parliament, seeking their responses after senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Justice Varma, flagged a “procedural lapse” in the constitution of the Lok Sabha inquiry panel.Rohatgi submitted that the introduction of a motion in both Houses of Parliament to remove a judge requires the inquiry panel to be formed jointly by the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, and cannot be constituted unilaterally by the Lok Sabha Speaker.“Where the notices of the motion are ‘given’ to the Houses on the same date, no committee will be constituted, unless the motion is being admitted in both Houses. And where such motion is admitted in both Houses, the committee shall be constituted jointly by the Lok Sabha Speaker and the Rajya Sabha Chairman,” PTI quoted Rohatgi as saying.In his plea, Justice Varma has also sought that the admission of the Lok Sabha motion to remove him be declared “contrary to law.”The matter has been posted for the next hearing on January 7.On March 14, large sums of currency were found at Justice Varma’s official residence in Delhi, where he was then serving as a high court judge. He was later transferred to the Allahabad high court in Uttar Pradesh. Following the discovery, then-Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna initiated an in-house probe into the allegations and set up a three-member panel, which submitted its report on May 4. The panel found Justice Varma guilty of misconduct.After receiving the report, the then-CJI asked Justice Varma to resign or face impeachment proceedings. Following the judge’s refusal to resign, the report was forwarded to President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.On August 7, the Supreme Court dismissed Justice Varma’s plea seeking to invalidate the in-house inquiry report. On August 12, Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla constituted a separate three-member committee to probe the charges against the judge.
