Bombay HC NAGPUR: In a ruling clarifying the legal status of electronic communication in criminal proceedings, the Nagpur bench of Bombay high court last week held that summons issued through WhatsApp is legally valid under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, and set aside an order imposing costs on a police personnel for effecting such service,.Justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke quashed a Jan 21 order of a Pocso court in Nagpur which directed recovery of costs from constable Santosh Ramteke on the ground that summons served through a mobile phone was “not allowed”. The court faulted the trial court for ignoring amended provisions under BNSS.The Pocso court noted that two prosecution witnesses in a pending case were absent and that the summons was served via mobile phone, resulting in delay in recording evidence. The court imposed costs on the constable for not serving the summons through a “legal mode”. The Maharashtra govt challenged the trial court order, filing a criminal plea on behalf of Lakadganj police station.The state argued that the trial court overlooked BNSS section 70 under which electronically served summons are deemed legally valid, and section 530 which permits trials, inquiries and proceedings, including service of summons, to be conducted in electronic mode.Justice Joshi-Phalke observed that the purpose of service is to put a person on notice and that “the mode is surely irrelevant”.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideos”Will Simplify Visas And Admin”: Macron’s Big Announcement For Indian StGalgotias University Turns A Robodog Into National Embarrassment, Thrown Out Of AI Summit”Don’t Want To Be Dependent On US Or China…” Macron On AI Innovation’Proud Moment For Humanity!’ Social Media Roasts Galgotias University, China Reacts To Robo Dog Row’India A Major Global Talent Hub’: Says Jaishankar At European Legal Gateway Office LaunchSundar Pichai Unveils ‘India-America Connect’ to Power Massive Subsea Cable ExpansionCCTV Captures Delhi Teen’s Speeding SUV Seconds Before Fatal Dwarka CrashIndia to Add $26 Trillion to Economy, Negotiating FTAs from Strength: Piyush Goyal’Can’t Wait For Trump To Go’: Hillary Clinton Hails India, Pushes Others For Climate Change MovesUS Panel Asks If Trump Needs To Cut Ties With Pakistan To Make India Happy. Here’s What Experts Said123PhotostoriesHow to make Aloo Tikki Chaat at homeNithya Menen birthday special: From ‘Thiruchitrambalam’ to ‘Ishq’ – Films to watch on OTT5 snake-related paintings and symbols that are believed to remove negativityExclusive – Elvish Yadav opens up about hosting Engaged Season 2, shares his take on love and confirms he will get married soon10 vegetarian koftas to make your meals extra deliciousFrom Daulat Ki Chaat to Bhutte Ka Kees: 8 rare Indian dishes the world needs to try5 famous embroideries India gifted to the world5 real estate hotspots in Lucknow driving the residential market in 20265 things foreign tourists secretly dislike about travelling in India6 luxury cars with interiors that feel like five-star lounges123Hot PicksCigarette price hikeGold rate todayITC shareMadhya Pradesh budget 2026–27Income Tax CalculatorPublic holidays February 2026Bank Holidays februaryTop TrendingRashee Rice LawsuitLarry WheelsRampage JacksonPatrick MahomesSidney Crosby GirlfriendLindsey VonnLogan PaulMick CroninNBA Trade NewsJake Paul Fiance

Bombay HC NAGPUR: In a ruling clarifying the legal status of electronic communication in criminal proceedings, the Nagpur bench of Bombay high court last week held that summons issued through WhatsApp is legally valid under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, and set aside an order imposing costs on a police personnel for effecting such service,.Justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke quashed a Jan 21 order of a Pocso court in Nagpur which directed recovery of costs from constable Santosh Ramteke on the ground that summons served through a mobile phone was “not allowed”. The court faulted the trial court for ignoring amended provisions under BNSS.The Pocso court noted that two prosecution witnesses in a pending case were absent and that the summons was served via mobile phone, resulting in delay in recording evidence. The court imposed costs on the constable for not serving the summons through a “legal mode”. The Maharashtra govt challenged the trial court order, filing a criminal plea on behalf of Lakadganj police station.The state argued that the trial court overlooked BNSS section 70 under which electronically served summons are deemed legally valid, and section 530 which permits trials, inquiries and proceedings, including service of summons, to be conducted in electronic mode.Justice Joshi-Phalke observed that the purpose of service is to put a person on notice and that “the mode is surely irrelevant”.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideos”Will Simplify Visas And Admin”: Macron’s Big Announcement For Indian StGalgotias University Turns A Robodog Into National Embarrassment, Thrown Out Of AI Summit”Don’t Want To Be Dependent On US Or China…” Macron On AI Innovation’Proud Moment For Humanity!’ Social Media Roasts Galgotias University, China Reacts To Robo Dog Row’India A Major Global Talent Hub’: Says Jaishankar At European Legal Gateway Office LaunchSundar Pichai Unveils ‘India-America Connect’ to Power Massive Subsea Cable ExpansionCCTV Captures Delhi Teen’s Speeding SUV Seconds Before Fatal Dwarka CrashIndia to Add  Trillion to Economy, Negotiating FTAs from Strength: Piyush Goyal’Can’t Wait For Trump To Go’: Hillary Clinton Hails India, Pushes Others For Climate Change MovesUS Panel Asks If Trump Needs To Cut Ties With Pakistan To Make India Happy. Here’s What Experts Said123PhotostoriesHow to make Aloo Tikki Chaat at homeNithya Menen birthday special: From ‘Thiruchitrambalam’ to ‘Ishq’ – Films to watch on OTT5 snake-related paintings and symbols that are believed to remove negativityExclusive – Elvish Yadav opens up about hosting Engaged Season 2, shares his take on love and confirms he will get married soon10 vegetarian koftas to make your meals extra deliciousFrom Daulat Ki Chaat to Bhutte Ka Kees: 8 rare Indian dishes the world needs to try5 famous embroideries India gifted to the world5 real estate hotspots in Lucknow driving the residential market in 20265 things foreign tourists secretly dislike about travelling in India6 luxury cars with interiors that feel like five-star lounges123Hot PicksCigarette price hikeGold rate todayITC shareMadhya Pradesh budget 2026–27Income Tax CalculatorPublic holidays February 2026Bank Holidays februaryTop TrendingRashee Rice LawsuitLarry WheelsRampage JacksonPatrick MahomesSidney Crosby GirlfriendLindsey VonnLogan PaulMick CroninNBA Trade NewsJake Paul Fiance


'Electronic service valid under BNSS': Bombay HC upholds summons via WhatsApp

NAGPUR: In a ruling clarifying the legal status of electronic communication in criminal proceedings, the Nagpur bench of Bombay high court last week held that summons issued through WhatsApp is legally valid under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, and set aside an order imposing costs on a police personnel for effecting such service,.Justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke quashed a Jan 21 order of a Pocso court in Nagpur which directed recovery of costs from constable Santosh Ramteke on the ground that summons served through a mobile phone was “not allowed”. The court faulted the trial court for ignoring amended provisions under BNSS.The Pocso court noted that two prosecution witnesses in a pending case were absent and that the summons was served via mobile phone, resulting in delay in recording evidence. The court imposed costs on the constable for not serving the summons through a “legal mode”. The Maharashtra govt challenged the trial court order, filing a criminal plea on behalf of Lakadganj police station.The state argued that the trial court overlooked BNSS section 70 under which electronically served summons are deemed legally valid, and section 530 which permits trials, inquiries and proceedings, including service of summons, to be conducted in electronic mode.Justice Joshi-Phalke observed that the purpose of service is to put a person on notice and that “the mode is surely irrelevant”.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *