NEW DELHI: Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to reconstitute a five-member high-powered committee set up to probe alleged police excesses against student protesters in Delhi, saying that the committee was formed with the highest standards of fairness and transparency.This comes after a plea was filed in the apex court alleging that one of the members of the committee was a close friend of a high functionary who is involved in the matter.A bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana observed that the allegations against the panel were based on “conjecture and preconceived notions” even before it had commenced its enquiry.”We are not inclined to effect any alteration in the constitution of the Committee, particularly where the prayer for such reconstitution proceeds on nothing more than conjecture and preconceived notions, articulated even before the HPEC has embarked upon its enquiry,” the bench said.”With respect to the concerns voiced over the treatment of witnesses and of those who may wish to come forward before the HPEC to furnish their account and voice their grievances, we request the HPEC that such vulnerable witnesses be extended due protection and their identities be kept confidential and undisclosed,” it added.The bench directed that Senior Advocate Monika Gusain, along with advocate C Solomon, shall assist it as a representative of the HPEC, and shall further act as an independent arbiter between the parties.”Similarly, we also request the HPEC to appoint a member secretary at the earliest, so as to facilitate any such logistical or other secretarial assistance as the HPEC may require in the discharge of its functions,” the bench said.Earlier, advocate Prashant Bhushan raised doubts over one of the members of the panel, who was a former DGP of a northeastern state, and said he was under a “conflict of interest” as he was a close friend of a high functionary who was likely to be under investigation.Bhushan’s views were backed by senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan.Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, however, opposed the reconstitution of the committee and urged the apex court to ignore such allegations.The apex court formed the HPEC, headed by former top court judge R Subhash Reddy, to examine allegations of police excesses against student protesters during the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP)-led protest march on July 20 in Delhi and violence against police personnel.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesThe committee comprises former Punjab and Haryana high court chief justice Ravi Shankar Jha, former Delhi high court judge Shalinder Kaur, former CBI director Rishi Kumar Shukla and retired Meghalaya DGP L R Bishnoi.”This HPEC has been constituted bearing in mind a wide variety of considerations, including the individual expertise and experience of each of its members, as well as the diversity of the committee, among other factors,” the bench had said.The July 20 march saw clashes between protesters and security personnel, who used lathis and teargas shells to disperse crowds.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorRohitashwa RanjanRohitashwa Ranjan is a digital journalist with The Times of India, where he decodes Indian politics as a carefully staged production with scripts, subtext and everything behind. His stories track elections, party dynamics and the things that often are buried beneath the headlines. When not parsing vote shares or alliances, he is usually reading between the lines, where the real story tends to reside.Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosBengal Govt Transfers IPS Officer Bushra Bano After ‘Assalam Aleikum’ Video Row100% Tariffs On India?: US House Advances Bill Enabling Trump To Target Top Russian Oil BuyersModi Govt Announces UPI Charges: 0.4% MDR Above ₹2000 From Oct 15 | Who Will Pay And Who Won’t?Omar Abdullah LAUDS India’s Foreign Policy Over BRICS Pahalgam Mention, Reacts To China’s PraiseRajasthan Civic Polls: BJP Dominates, But AAP, CPM Wins BIG Alarm For Congress Ahead Of 2028UPI ₹2,000 Rule Explained: Will You Pay Extra For ₹5,000 Or ₹10,000 Payments? Here’s The TruthGhatkopar MLA Parag Shah Turns Beggar For 3 Hours, Even His Own Family Members Fail To Recognise Him‘UPI Charges’ Row: Rahul Gandhi SLAMS Modi Govt, Accuses PM Of ‘Surrendering To US Pressure’SSR & Disha Salian Case: Raut Says CBI Probe as ‘Political Conspiracy’; Supriya Sule Breaks SilenceNandigram Showdown: BJP’s Adhikari Eyes 50K+ Win As Mamata’s TMC Fields Sanchita Pradhan123Hot PicksEPFO WhatsApp ServiceEngineers day 2026Stock Market TodayRajasthan Election ResultCrude oil price todayKVS NVS Tier 2 resultBank of Baroda LBO recruitmentPunjab Lecturer Cadre admit cardUPI transactionsTop TrendingDisha Salian CaseUmar KhalidGuwahati Murder CaseCole HockerLebron JamesStephanie VaquerGurgaon Hit and RunRajasthan Election ResultUS Iran WarGuwahati Murder Case
NEW DELHI: Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to reconstitute a five-member high-powered committee set up to probe alleged police excesses against student protesters in Delhi, saying that the committee was formed with the highest standards of fairness and transparency.This comes after a plea was filed in the apex court alleging that one of the members of the committee was a close friend of a high functionary who is involved in the matter.A bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana observed that the allegations against the panel were based on “conjecture and preconceived notions” even before it had commenced its enquiry.“We are not inclined to effect any alteration in the constitution of the Committee, particularly where the prayer for such reconstitution proceeds on nothing more than conjecture and preconceived notions, articulated even before the HPEC has embarked upon its enquiry,” the bench said.“With respect to the concerns voiced over the treatment of witnesses and of those who may wish to come forward before the HPEC to furnish their account and voice their grievances, we request the HPEC that such vulnerable witnesses be extended due protection and their identities be kept confidential and undisclosed,” it added.The bench directed that Senior Advocate Monika Gusain, along with advocate C Solomon, shall assist it as a representative of the HPEC, and shall further act as an independent arbiter between the parties.“Similarly, we also request the HPEC to appoint a member secretary at the earliest, so as to facilitate any such logistical or other secretarial assistance as the HPEC may require in the discharge of its functions,” the bench said.Earlier, advocate Prashant Bhushan raised doubts over one of the members of the panel, who was a former DGP of a northeastern state, and said he was under a “conflict of interest” as he was a close friend of a high functionary who was likely to be under investigation.Bhushan’s views were backed by senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan.Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, however, opposed the reconstitution of the committee and urged the apex court to ignore such allegations.The apex court formed the HPEC, headed by former top court judge R Subhash Reddy, to examine allegations of police excesses against student protesters during the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP)-led protest march on July 20 in Delhi and violence against police personnel.
Share your thoughts in the comments
Be respectful · TOI community guidelines
The committee comprises former Punjab and Haryana high court chief justice Ravi Shankar Jha, former Delhi high court judge Shalinder Kaur, former CBI director Rishi Kumar Shukla and retired Meghalaya DGP L R Bishnoi.“This HPEC has been constituted bearing in mind a wide variety of considerations, including the individual expertise and experience of each of its members, as well as the diversity of the committee, among other factors,” the bench had said.The July 20 march saw clashes between protesters and security personnel, who used lathis and teargas shells to disperse crowds.
