Discussions with Meta have focused heavily on the company’s handling of CSAM and other harmful online content (representative image) NEW DELHI: The government has made it clear to Meta that safe-harbour protection will not be available if the company violates Indian law, with sources saying the message has been conveyed during recent discussions between the two sides over content moderation and child sexual abuse material (CSAM).“Seen some action on CSAM issue; govt clear no safe harbour if law violated; message has gone home,” government sources said, according to news agency PTI.The discussions with Meta have focused heavily on the company’s handling of CSAM and other harmful online content, as well as its compliance with India’s legal framework.According to sources cited by news agency ANI, Meta has become more cautious about CSAM-related content and is taking steps to filter out unlawful material.The government has also conveyed that it has acted strictly within the powers available under the existing legal and statutory framework.The government has maintained that its objective is not to censor social media platforms or suppress legitimate speech, but to ensure that platforms operating in India comply with Indian laws and do not create circumstances that could adversely affect the country’s social fabric.Govt seeks stronger local sensitivity in content moderationThe discussions have also focused on Meta’s content moderation systems, with the government stressing the need for greater sensitivity to India’s linguistic and cultural diversity.Government sources said moderation teams cannot rely solely on global standards and need a better understanding of Indian languages and cultural contexts when making decisions about content.The government has also raised concerns over deepfakes and other forms of synthetically generated content. Sources said AI-generated material should be clearly labelled so users can distinguish between synthetic and authentic content.This, the government said, is a matter of the “user’s right to know” whether the content they are viewing is genuine or AI-generated.Earlier discussions had also examined Meta’s recommendation and virality systems, including concerns over why flagged synthetic content could continue to resurface or be amplified. The government had sought details of the company’s safeguards and content moderation mechanisms, while stressing that material identified as unlawful or harmful should not continue to be recommended.WhatsApp usernames, platform regulation also under scrutinyThe government is separately examining the issue of WhatsApp usernames from an industry-wide perspective, rather than treating it as an issue specific to Meta.Sources said the Centre would continue to monitor the matter across messaging platforms.The broader discussions have covered Meta’s compliance with Indian law, its content policies, moderation systems and safeguards.The government has previously questioned the company’s eligibility for safe-harbour protection under Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, which provides intermediaries protection from liability for third-party content subject to specified conditions.Government sources said similar debates over platform regulation have emerged in Western liberal democracies as well, underlining that the challenge is not unique to India.At the same time, officials stressed that cultural and social contexts differ between countries and that reasonable restrictions on freedom of speech remain constitutionally applicable in India.The latest discussions follow several rounds of engagement between Meta’s global team and the ministry of electronics and information technology over CSAM, deepfakes, bots, synthetic content, recommendation algorithms and compliance with Indian laws.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesThe government has maintained that it is not seeking a wholesale overhaul of Meta’s algorithms, but wants the company’s platforms and moderation mechanisms to operate in accordance with Indian law and account adequately for the country’s linguistic and cultural context.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosVijay Apologises In Assembly After Karunanidhi Remark Sparks DMK Uproar Over Decorum BreachCriminal Cases Against Netas: 4,192 Trials Pending, 170 Lok Sabha MPs Face Serious ChargesJSSC-CGL CANCELLED: Jharkhand Students Celebrate After Government Accepts Key Demands“No Compensation, Build A School”: CJP Volunteer Emotional Tribute To Father Leaves Ranka In TearsAsish Banerjee Death Mystery: Threat, Blackmail Angle Probed As Note And Phones Face ScrutinyBJP’s Big Shake-Up: Ram Madhav Returns, Smriti Irani Gets Key Role In Nitin Nabin’s New Team‘Will Rise For Vande Mataram, But Won’t Sing’: Congress MP Imran Masood Amid Sonia Gandhi Row‘Personally Meet Students’: Rahul Gandhi Writes To CM Hemant Soren Over Jharkhand Protests7 Charred To Death, Several Injured In Fire At Hotel Near Tarapith Temple In Bengal’s Birbhum‘Electric Pole Fell’: 7 Women Dead, Many Injured In Stampede At Temple In Bihar’s Lakhisarai123Photostories10 vegetarian dishes from around the world that Indians will genuinely loveCharu Asopa breaks silence on financial struggles, debt and claims of keeping Ziana away from grandparents amid divorceSun Ketu in Leo 2026: Remedies you can perform according to your zodiac signWhy does dal foam while boiling? Should you actually remove it?Why does aluminium foil have a shiny and dull side? Here’s the science behind it5 Snakes that thrive in extreme climates: Here’s how they survive harsh weather conditionsForget quinoa: 9 ways to add dalia to your daily breakfast7 email habits that can make you look careless at work even when your actual work is goodGeorgina Rodríguez’s wedding jewellery was pure Kalahari luxury, and the diamonds clearly came to competePriyanka Chopra’s maroon backless gown just gave desi Disney princess energy with a trail that refused to behave123Hot PicksArshdeep Singh DangBank holidays this weekBihar STET 2026BJP new teamJharkhand ProtestJSSC-CGL exam cancelledAbhijeet DipkeSupreme Court HolidayTwisha SharmaTop TrendingTwisha SharmaDelhi Draft PollMadhya Pradesh AccidentKolkata Airport Building FireAbhijeet DipkeKiren RijijuMuzaffarnagar Kanwariya MurderWeather TomorrowBengaluru RapidoBen Gvir
NEW DELHI: The government has made it clear to Meta that safe-harbour protection will not be available if the company violates Indian law, with sources saying the message has been conveyed during recent discussions between the two sides over content moderation and child sexual abuse material (CSAM).“Seen some action on CSAM issue; govt clear no safe harbour if law violated; message has gone home,” government sources said, according to news agency PTI.The discussions with Meta have focused heavily on the company’s handling of CSAM and other harmful online content, as well as its compliance with India’s legal framework.According to sources cited by news agency ANI, Meta has become more cautious about CSAM-related content and is taking steps to filter out unlawful material.The government has also conveyed that it has acted strictly within the powers available under the existing legal and statutory framework.The government has maintained that its objective is not to censor social media platforms or suppress legitimate speech, but to ensure that platforms operating in India comply with Indian laws and do not create circumstances that could adversely affect the country’s social fabric.
Govt seeks stronger local sensitivity in content moderation
The discussions have also focused on Meta’s content moderation systems, with the government stressing the need for greater sensitivity to India’s linguistic and cultural diversity.Government sources said moderation teams cannot rely solely on global standards and need a better understanding of Indian languages and cultural contexts when making decisions about content.The government has also raised concerns over deepfakes and other forms of synthetically generated content. Sources said AI-generated material should be clearly labelled so users can distinguish between synthetic and authentic content.This, the government said, is a matter of the “user’s right to know” whether the content they are viewing is genuine or AI-generated.Earlier discussions had also examined Meta’s recommendation and virality systems, including concerns over why flagged synthetic content could continue to resurface or be amplified. The government had sought details of the company’s safeguards and content moderation mechanisms, while stressing that material identified as unlawful or harmful should not continue to be recommended.
WhatsApp usernames, platform regulation also under scrutiny
The government is separately examining the issue of WhatsApp usernames from an industry-wide perspective, rather than treating it as an issue specific to Meta.Sources said the Centre would continue to monitor the matter across messaging platforms.The broader discussions have covered Meta’s compliance with Indian law, its content policies, moderation systems and safeguards.The government has previously questioned the company’s eligibility for safe-harbour protection under Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, which provides intermediaries protection from liability for third-party content subject to specified conditions.Government sources said similar debates over platform regulation have emerged in Western liberal democracies as well, underlining that the challenge is not unique to India.At the same time, officials stressed that cultural and social contexts differ between countries and that reasonable restrictions on freedom of speech remain constitutionally applicable in India.The latest discussions follow several rounds of engagement between Meta’s global team and the ministry of electronics and information technology over CSAM, deepfakes, bots, synthetic content, recommendation algorithms and compliance with Indian laws.
Share your thoughts in the comments
Be respectful · TOI community guidelines
The government has maintained that it is not seeking a wholesale overhaul of Meta’s algorithms, but wants the company’s platforms and moderation mechanisms to operate in accordance with Indian law and account adequately for the country’s linguistic and cultural context.
