Shiv Sena (UBT) chief Uddhav Thackeray addresses a press conference, at Bandra, in Mumbai. (PTI Photo) NEW DELHI: The Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena (UBT) on Thursday told the Supreme Court that constitutional provisions cannot be interpreted in a way that encourages the very conduct the anti-defection law was enacted to prevent. Appearing before a bench headed by Chief Justice Surya Kant during the fifth day of hearings on the party symbol dispute, senior advocate Kapil Sibal argued that the Constitution should not be read in a manner that rewards defections and weakens democratic safeguards.A bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana was hearing petitions filed by the Thackeray faction challenging the Election Commission’s decision to recognise the Eknath Shinde-led faction as the real Shiv Sena and allot it the party’s name and the ‘bow and arrow’ symbol.”You can’t interpret the provisions of the Constitution to give encouragement to the very sin which the anti-defection law sought to prevent,” Sibal told the bench.Sibal argued that the legal test for disqualification is fundamentally different from the test for determining whether a political party has split. “Split is completely different, and disqualification is completely different,” he said, adding that subsequent events may be relevant in disqualification proceedings but not when deciding whether a split had occurred.He told the court that the case presented an opportunity to lay down the law for the future of Indian democracy. Calling the situation a “very sad state of affairs”, Sibal said governments often ensure that disqualification proceedings remain undecided.When he argued that the burden of preserving democracy rested on the judiciary, the bench responded that it was a “collective responsibility”. “We are conscious of our role. The Constitution is lived by the people,” the bench observed.The Chief Justice added, “Let us not underestimate our other institutions. They are also quite committed.”Sibal replied that while Parliament could continue enacting laws, it was ultimately the Supreme Court that had the authority to interpret and test those laws against the Constitution.The hearing has been adjourned and will continue on 18 August.During Wednesday’s proceedings, the Supreme Court had observed that it would first have to determine whether a split had occurred within the Shiv Sena, noting that a division could originate in the legislature party and later spread through the party organisation and primary membership.Responding to that observation, Sibal argued that a split in the legislature party could not by itself amount to a split in the political party. “As a proposition of law, a split in the political party can never arise merely from a split in the legislature party. That has been decided by the Constitution Bench (in a judgment),” he said.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesHe also questioned the Election Commission’s approach in deciding whether there was a genuine dispute within the Shiv Sena and whether the faction approaching it had exhausted the internal remedies available under the party constitution. Sibal challenged the Commission’s assessment of the Shiv Sena’s organisational structure, including the powers of the party chief and the process for appointing organisational office-bearers.The bench is hearing two petitions filed by the Thackeray faction in 2024 challenging the Election Commission’s order allotting the ‘bow and arrow’ symbol to the Eknath Shinde-led faction and the Commission’s 17 February 2023 decision recognising it as the original Shiv Sena.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosAir India Tightens Pilot Safety Checks After AI2379 Altitude Loss And Positive Marijuana TestJPSC-JSSC Stir Enters Day 20: Police Book 600 After Assembly March, Students Refuse To Back DownAkali Dal chief Sukhbir Singh Badal Near Hazur Sahib Gurdwara, Assailant Uses Sharp Weapon | WatchPrajwal Revanna’s Jail Phone Had 90 Porn Videos, Senior Prison Official Suspended After Search’Is This The Way In Democracy?’Kharge Fumes, Raises Haldwani ‘Purification’ Row, Nadda Assures ProbeRed Fort Blast: UN Security Council Body Links Deadly Attack To AQIS; Reveals Grisly DetailsPit Bull Attack in Patiala Couple Suffers Multiple Injuries- Wife Undergoes SurgeryThreat Letter Targets Kashmiri Pandits In Kashmir, Employees Asked To Stay Alert Amid Security FearChilling Crash Video: Atiq Ahmed’s Son’s Creta Flips After Losing Control On Highway | WatchUdhayanidhi Backs CM Vijay’s Tamil Nadu Delimitation Stand, Demands No Cut In State’s LS Seats123Photostories10 baby names inspired by the “first light of dawn”Why defrosting your fridge is important and 3 smart ways to do itWhy do train tracks have small stones around them? Here’s what they actually doYour balcony can be more than a laundry zone: 8 clever makeover ideas to turn a small Indian apartment balcony into a space you will actually useAlia Bhatt’s hairstylist Amit Thakur reveals the truth about hair spas!Kangana Ranaut turns heads on her first Teej in a Kanjeevaram lime green saree, proving traditional never means boringWhy do onions make you cry? 3 tricks that actually work6 foods soldiers ate during World War IIHuskies to Bulldogs: Why some of India’s most ‘trendy’ dog breeds struggle to cope with the summer heat10 most hated foods in the world and why people can’t stand them123Hot PicksKaroline LeavittNCERTTrump SocialJharkhand protestN ChandrasekaranNEET PG 2026 city slipIran warKarnataka bandhUP NEET UG counsellingTop TrendingChhattisgarh NH-30 AccidentKarnataka Closed TodayMallikarjun KhargeBengaluru Mother AccidentGermany Haryana Youth MurderGujarat SuicideSouth Delhi MurderAbhijeet DipkeWeather TomorrowShakeel Noorani
NEW DELHI: The Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena (UBT) on Thursday told the Supreme Court that constitutional provisions cannot be interpreted in a way that encourages the very conduct the anti-defection law was enacted to prevent. Appearing before a bench headed by Chief Justice Surya Kant during the fifth day of hearings on the party symbol dispute, senior advocate Kapil Sibal argued that the Constitution should not be read in a manner that rewards defections and weakens democratic safeguards.A bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana was hearing petitions filed by the Thackeray faction challenging the Election Commission’s decision to recognise the Eknath Shinde-led faction as the real Shiv Sena and allot it the party’s name and the ‘bow and arrow’ symbol.“You can’t interpret the provisions of the Constitution to give encouragement to the very sin which the anti-defection law sought to prevent,” Sibal told the bench.Sibal argued that the legal test for disqualification is fundamentally different from the test for determining whether a political party has split. “Split is completely different, and disqualification is completely different,” he said, adding that subsequent events may be relevant in disqualification proceedings but not when deciding whether a split had occurred.He told the court that the case presented an opportunity to lay down the law for the future of Indian democracy. Calling the situation a “very sad state of affairs”, Sibal said governments often ensure that disqualification proceedings remain undecided.When he argued that the burden of preserving democracy rested on the judiciary, the bench responded that it was a “collective responsibility”. “We are conscious of our role. The Constitution is lived by the people,” the bench observed.The Chief Justice added, “Let us not underestimate our other institutions. They are also quite committed.”Sibal replied that while Parliament could continue enacting laws, it was ultimately the Supreme Court that had the authority to interpret and test those laws against the Constitution.The hearing has been adjourned and will continue on 18 August.During Wednesday’s proceedings, the Supreme Court had observed that it would first have to determine whether a split had occurred within the Shiv Sena, noting that a division could originate in the legislature party and later spread through the party organisation and primary membership.Responding to that observation, Sibal argued that a split in the legislature party could not by itself amount to a split in the political party. “As a proposition of law, a split in the political party can never arise merely from a split in the legislature party. That has been decided by the Constitution Bench (in a judgment),” he said.
Share your thoughts in the comments
Be respectful · TOI community guidelines
He also questioned the Election Commission’s approach in deciding whether there was a genuine dispute within the Shiv Sena and whether the faction approaching it had exhausted the internal remedies available under the party constitution. Sibal challenged the Commission’s assessment of the Shiv Sena’s organisational structure, including the powers of the party chief and the process for appointing organisational office-bearers.The bench is hearing two petitions filed by the Thackeray faction in 2024 challenging the Election Commission’s order allotting the ‘bow and arrow’ symbol to the Eknath Shinde-led faction and the Commission’s 17 February 2023 decision recognising it as the original Shiv Sena.
