With Nitish Kumar stepping down as CM on April 15, the council of ministers was dissolved; Samrat Choudhary’s council, constituted on May 7, included Prakash NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday sought records from the Bihar government relating to the appointment of Deepak Prakash, who was not a member of the assembly, as a minister in Nov last year, his re-induction into the cabinet in May and his recent hurried nomination as an MLC allegedly to skirt around the six-month deadline within which such a minister must get elected to the House.A PIL has challenged his continuance as minister after the expiry of the six-month deadline within which a person, who is not a member of the assembly or legislative council, must get elected as a member of either house.Solicitor general Tushar Mehta, for the Bihar government, told a bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justices Joymalya Bagchi, and V Mohana that the minister has since been nominated as an MLC by the governor; hence, his continuance was not unconstitutional.However, the petitioner, relying on the SC’s 2001 judgment in the SR Chaudhari case, which had categorically stated that the six-month deadline was non-negotiable, said the six-month deadline expired on May 20. With Nitish Kumar stepping down as CM on April 15, the council of ministers was dissolved. The new council of ministers was constituted under Samrat Choudhary on May 7, which included Prakash. The bench asked the Bihar government to place on record all documents relating to the appointment of Prakash in the first instance, his re-induction and subsequent nomination as MLC.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesIn its 2001 judgment by a three-judge bench, SC had ruled, “Permitting a non-legislator minister to be re-appointed, without getting elected within the period prescribed by Article 164(4) (six months), would amount to ignoring the electorate in having its say as to who should represent it – a position which is wholly unacceptable.”The seductive temptations to cling to office regardless of constitutional restraint must be totally eschewed. Will of the people cannot be permitted to be subordinated to political expediency of the prime minister or the chief minister as the case may be, to have in his cabinet a non-legislator as a minister for an indefinite period by repeated re-appointments without the individual seeking popular mandate of the electorate.”The SC added, “Chief ministers or governors must… not sacrifice either political responsibility or parliamentary conventions at the altar of political expediency.”Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosOMCs Say E20 Petrol Meets Quality Standards After Nationwide Testing, Reject Contamination ClaimsNeha Bora Inked During Jharkhand Student Protest: AISA Alleges Political Attack, Accused DetainedJharkhand JPSC Protest: Hunger Striker Hospitalised After Four Days As Students Continue AgitationTamil Nadu CM Vijay’s Wife Sangeetha Withdraws Divorce Petition, Family Court Allows Withdrawal’Proof Of Corruption?’ JPSC Aspirant Makes Explosive Claims As Student Protests Intensify In RanchiExplained: Why PM Modi Asked NDA MPs To Avoid The ‘Lutyens’ Web’ And Stay Focused On Public OutreachBeyond BrahMos: Why Drones And Smart Weapons Could Become India’s Next Defence Export Boom?Gen-Alpha Grabs Spotlight At Ranchi JPSC-JSSC Protest As 13-Year-Old Zaid’s Appeal Goes ViralCentre Opposes Creamy Layer For SC-ST Quota, Says Discrimination Goes Beyond Economic StatusIAF’s : Bhawana Kanth Earns ‘Top Gun’ Title, Shivani Sehrawat Becomes Army Chief’s ADC123PhotostoriesEven with the same diet, why do some people develop kidney disease while others don’t? Doctor explains what really makes the differenceExclusive – Farrhana Bhatt on Khatron Ke Khiladi 15, Shagun Sharma’s bullying claims against Gaurav Khanna and his divorce from Akanksha Chamola9 traditional South Indian Chicken Curries perfect for weekend dinnerHow to Wear a Tulsi Mala: 7 Important Things to Remember10 unique baby girl names that sound modern yet timelessKriti Sanon owns the night in a midnight-blue Gaurav Gupta couture gown embellished with 5,500 striking crystalsWhy marinating meat is important and 6 mistakes to avoid5 budget-friendly celebrity beauty hacks that actually work7 traditional Goan breads you need to try at least onceTaarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah fame Shailesh Lodha’s luxurious home: A cozy lounge, a stunning balcony and more123Hot PicksThailand School ShootingUPI TransactionsAsk Me AnythingJharkhand protestGurgaon rainNICL Assistant RecruitmentAnkur WarikooIndia Labour CodesGold rate todayTop TrendingJapanese Quote of the dayNagpur Rape CaseAbhijeet DipkeGujarat Mystery WellJPSC ProtestDelhi RainDelhi Wife MurderEknath ShindeTamil Nadu BudgetPraveen Nettaru Murder Case
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday sought records from the Bihar government relating to the appointment of Deepak Prakash, who was not a member of the assembly, as a minister in Nov last year, his re-induction into the cabinet in May and his recent hurried nomination as an MLC allegedly to skirt around the six-month deadline within which such a minister must get elected to the House.A PIL has challenged his continuance as minister after the expiry of the six-month deadline within which a person, who is not a member of the assembly or legislative council, must get elected as a member of either house.Solicitor general Tushar Mehta, for the Bihar government, told a bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justices Joymalya Bagchi, and V Mohana that the minister has since been nominated as an MLC by the governor; hence, his continuance was not unconstitutional.However, the petitioner, relying on the SC’s 2001 judgment in the SR Chaudhari case, which had categorically stated that the six-month deadline was non-negotiable, said the six-month deadline expired on May 20. With Nitish Kumar stepping down as CM on April 15, the council of ministers was dissolved. The new council of ministers was constituted under Samrat Choudhary on May 7, which included Prakash. The bench asked the Bihar government to place on record all documents relating to the appointment of Prakash in the first instance, his re-induction and subsequent nomination as MLC.
Share your thoughts in the comments
Be respectful · TOI community guidelines
In its 2001 judgment by a three-judge bench, SC had ruled, “Permitting a non-legislator minister to be re-appointed, without getting elected within the period prescribed by Article 164(4) (six months), would amount to ignoring the electorate in having its say as to who should represent it – a position which is wholly unacceptable.“The seductive temptations to cling to office regardless of constitutional restraint must be totally eschewed. Will of the people cannot be permitted to be subordinated to political expediency of the prime minister or the chief minister as the case may be, to have in his cabinet a non-legislator as a minister for an indefinite period by repeated re-appointments without the individual seeking popular mandate of the electorate.“The SC added, “Chief ministers or governors must… not sacrifice either political responsibility or parliamentary conventions at the altar of political expediency.”
