Bhojshala complex row: SC asks govt to provide nearby site with ‘mutual consent’ for Friday namaz NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday directed the Madhya Pradesh government to make suitable arrangements for members of the Muslim community to offer Friday prayers at a site adjacent to the disputed Bhojshala-Kamal Maula complex in Dhar. The court also said that, if required, another nearby location could be identified with the mutual consent of both sides.The order came after the Muslim side told the court that the alternate site identified by the state government was too far from the disputed complex and did not comply with the apex court’s earlier directions.A bench headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant clarified its interim order passed earlier this month and said members of the Muslim community would be permitted to offer Friday namaz between 1 pm and 3 pm at Khasra No 596, which was stated to be Dargah land adjoining the disputed site.The bench directed the Madhya Pradesh government to make the necessary arrangements to facilitate prayers at the site.The top court also observed that if the identified land was found to be unsuitable, the state government and the Muslim community could identify another nearby place with mutual consent.According to the court, the site plan placed before it showed that Khasra No 596 had an independent access road and appeared to be suitable as it was adjacent to the disputed premises.The clarification came on an application filed by the Muslim side, which said the interim arrangement currently in place required worshippers to offer Friday prayers at a location around one kilometre away from the Bhojshala complex.Earlier this week, senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi, appearing for the Muslim side, told the court that the land identified by the state government was much farther than what the court had intended while directing that an adjacent site be provided.Representing the Madhya Pradesh government, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta had assured the court that he would personally examine the issue after the Muslim side objected to the distance of the alternate site.The dispute relates to the Bhojshala-Kamal Maula complex in Madhya Pradesh’s Dhar district. Earlier this month, the Supreme Court had said the existing arrangement at the disputed site would remain temporary and subject to the final outcome of the pending appeals challenging the Madhya Pradesh high court’s judgment declaring Bhojshala to be a temple dedicated to Goddess Saraswati.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesThe apex court had also directed that if the Archaeological Survey of India undertakes any structural alterations at the disputed complex, they should not be implemented without its permission. The matter remains pending before the Supreme Court.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorPriyanshi RastogiPriyanshi Rastogi is a journalist with The Times of India. She primarily covers national and international news, along with business affairs. Her work focuses on the latest political events, in-depth explainers, features, offbeat articles and viral social media trending stories.Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosSC Questions Blanket Ban On Pellet Guns, Orders Preservation Of RAF Ammunition LogOver 1 Lakh Schools Across India Have Only One Teacher; Andhra Pradesh Records Highest NumberStudent Allegedly Hacks IIT Kanpur- IIT Madras Websites After Admission RejectionAbhijeet Dipke Says PM Modi Should “Become An Influencer”, Warns Of Fresh Student Protest‘Vasteguna Huiya, Kuchu-Puchu, FOMO’: Viral Gen Z Vocabulary Echoes In ParliamentBihar Man Claims He Was Booked In NEET Leak Protest Viral Video Sparks Questions Over Protest FIRs’Dear Saurav…’ BJP MP Kangana Ranaut Tells CJP’s Saurav Das To ‘Learn Some Skill’ | Watch’Detaining Activists Is Normal’: JP Nadda Defends Police Crackdown On CJP ProtestersWho Is V Kamakoti? IIT Madras Director And Exam Reforms Task Force Member Draws Political FireKhawaja Asif Calls POK Protesters “Enemies Like India” Amid Deadly Crackdown; Statement Sparks Stir123Photostories5 times Kangana Ranaut made traditional sarees look unapologetically powerful8 Healthy high-protein breakfasts that take 15 minutes or less’Love Island UK’ couples who are still together in love: From Olivia Buckland-Alex Bowen to Jessie Wynter-Will Young6 Indian dishes that are over 1,000 years old and still loved todayEvery Sawan, millions of devotees visit these 6 Jyotirlingas; here’s what makes them most-visited and why every traveller should experience them at least once in a lifetimeFrom Popatlal’s emotional moment to Asit Modi’s revelation about Champak Chacha aka Amit Bhatt’s bald look: Highlights from the Taarak Mehta 18-Year celebrationMillions still get this wrong about HIV: Doctor explains exactly how the virus spreads, and how it doesn’tBreakfasts from 12 countries that look nothing alikeYour balcony railing is wasted space: 5 DIY ways to turn it into a vertical garden7 fashion mistakes that are secretly making you look older than you are123Hot PicksAugust School HolidaysNEET UG CounsellingKerala Engineering rank listSamsung Q2 resultsByelection todayBengaluru restaurantsFed meetingKanwar Yatra securityNew anti-paper leak billTop TrendingIPS Trainee Rape CasePM ModiNanakdin Bhurji DeathSonam RaghuvanshiNagpur MurderGujarat MurderHardoi Double SuicideMohammad Ali Jauhar University demolitionWeather TomorrowStock Market Up

Bhojshala complex row: SC asks govt to provide nearby site with ‘mutual consent’ for Friday namaz NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday directed the Madhya Pradesh government to make suitable arrangements for members of the Muslim community to offer Friday prayers at a site adjacent to the disputed Bhojshala-Kamal Maula complex in Dhar. The court also said that, if required, another nearby location could be identified with the mutual consent of both sides.The order came after the Muslim side told the court that the alternate site identified by the state government was too far from the disputed complex and did not comply with the apex court’s earlier directions.A bench headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant clarified its interim order passed earlier this month and said members of the Muslim community would be permitted to offer Friday namaz between 1 pm and 3 pm at Khasra No 596, which was stated to be Dargah land adjoining the disputed site.The bench directed the Madhya Pradesh government to make the necessary arrangements to facilitate prayers at the site.The top court also observed that if the identified land was found to be unsuitable, the state government and the Muslim community could identify another nearby place with mutual consent.According to the court, the site plan placed before it showed that Khasra No 596 had an independent access road and appeared to be suitable as it was adjacent to the disputed premises.The clarification came on an application filed by the Muslim side, which said the interim arrangement currently in place required worshippers to offer Friday prayers at a location around one kilometre away from the Bhojshala complex.Earlier this week, senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi, appearing for the Muslim side, told the court that the land identified by the state government was much farther than what the court had intended while directing that an adjacent site be provided.Representing the Madhya Pradesh government, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta had assured the court that he would personally examine the issue after the Muslim side objected to the distance of the alternate site.The dispute relates to the Bhojshala-Kamal Maula complex in Madhya Pradesh’s Dhar district. Earlier this month, the Supreme Court had said the existing arrangement at the disputed site would remain temporary and subject to the final outcome of the pending appeals challenging the Madhya Pradesh high court’s judgment declaring Bhojshala to be a temple dedicated to Goddess Saraswati.Join conversationView All Comments →Share your thoughts in the commentsInsightfulAgreeDisagreeSkepticalConcerningPromisingWorth ReadingBig DevelopmentPost CommentBe respectful · TOI community guidelinesThe apex court had also directed that if the Archaeological Survey of India undertakes any structural alterations at the disputed complex, they should not be implemented without its permission. The matter remains pending before the Supreme Court.Get the latest India News and Live updates. Download the TOI app.About the AuthorPriyanshi RastogiPriyanshi Rastogi is a journalist with The Times of India. She primarily covers national and international news, along with business affairs. Her work focuses on the latest political events, in-depth explainers, features, offbeat articles and viral social media trending stories.Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosSC Questions Blanket Ban On Pellet Guns, Orders Preservation Of RAF Ammunition LogOver 1 Lakh Schools Across India Have Only One Teacher; Andhra Pradesh Records Highest NumberStudent Allegedly Hacks IIT Kanpur- IIT Madras Websites After Admission RejectionAbhijeet Dipke Says PM Modi Should “Become An Influencer”, Warns Of Fresh Student Protest‘Vasteguna Huiya, Kuchu-Puchu, FOMO’: Viral Gen Z Vocabulary Echoes In ParliamentBihar Man Claims He Was Booked In NEET Leak Protest Viral Video Sparks Questions Over Protest FIRs’Dear Saurav…’ BJP MP Kangana Ranaut Tells CJP’s Saurav Das To ‘Learn Some Skill’ | Watch’Detaining Activists Is Normal’: JP Nadda Defends Police Crackdown On CJP ProtestersWho Is V Kamakoti? IIT Madras Director And Exam Reforms Task Force Member Draws Political FireKhawaja Asif Calls POK Protesters “Enemies Like India” Amid Deadly Crackdown; Statement Sparks Stir123Photostories5 times Kangana Ranaut made traditional sarees look unapologetically powerful8 Healthy high-protein breakfasts that take 15 minutes or less’Love Island UK’ couples who are still together in love: From Olivia Buckland-Alex Bowen to Jessie Wynter-Will Young6 Indian dishes that are over 1,000 years old and still loved todayEvery Sawan, millions of devotees visit these 6 Jyotirlingas; here’s what makes them most-visited and why every traveller should experience them at least once in a lifetimeFrom Popatlal’s emotional moment to Asit Modi’s revelation about Champak Chacha aka Amit Bhatt’s bald look: Highlights from the Taarak Mehta 18-Year celebrationMillions still get this wrong about HIV: Doctor explains exactly how the virus spreads, and how it doesn’tBreakfasts from 12 countries that look nothing alikeYour balcony railing is wasted space: 5 DIY ways to turn it into a vertical garden7 fashion mistakes that are secretly making you look older than you are123Hot PicksAugust School HolidaysNEET UG CounsellingKerala Engineering rank listSamsung Q2 resultsByelection todayBengaluru restaurantsFed meetingKanwar Yatra securityNew anti-paper leak billTop TrendingIPS Trainee Rape CasePM ModiNanakdin Bhurji DeathSonam RaghuvanshiNagpur MurderGujarat MurderHardoi Double SuicideMohammad Ali Jauhar University demolitionWeather TomorrowStock Market Up


Bhojshala complex row: SC asks government to provide nearby site for Friday namaz
Bhojshala complex row: SC asks govt to provide nearby site with ‘mutual consent’ for Friday namaz

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday directed the Madhya Pradesh government to make suitable arrangements for members of the Muslim community to offer Friday prayers at a site adjacent to the disputed Bhojshala-Kamal Maula complex in Dhar. The court also said that, if required, another nearby location could be identified with the mutual consent of both sides.The order came after the Muslim side told the court that the alternate site identified by the state government was too far from the disputed complex and did not comply with the apex court’s earlier directions.A bench headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant clarified its interim order passed earlier this month and said members of the Muslim community would be permitted to offer Friday namaz between 1 pm and 3 pm at Khasra No 596, which was stated to be Dargah land adjoining the disputed site.The bench directed the Madhya Pradesh government to make the necessary arrangements to facilitate prayers at the site.The top court also observed that if the identified land was found to be unsuitable, the state government and the Muslim community could identify another nearby place with mutual consent.According to the court, the site plan placed before it showed that Khasra No 596 had an independent access road and appeared to be suitable as it was adjacent to the disputed premises.The clarification came on an application filed by the Muslim side, which said the interim arrangement currently in place required worshippers to offer Friday prayers at a location around one kilometre away from the Bhojshala complex.Earlier this week, senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi, appearing for the Muslim side, told the court that the land identified by the state government was much farther than what the court had intended while directing that an adjacent site be provided.Representing the Madhya Pradesh government, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta had assured the court that he would personally examine the issue after the Muslim side objected to the distance of the alternate site.The dispute relates to the Bhojshala-Kamal Maula complex in Madhya Pradesh’s Dhar district. Earlier this month, the Supreme Court had said the existing arrangement at the disputed site would remain temporary and subject to the final outcome of the pending appeals challenging the Madhya Pradesh high court’s judgment declaring Bhojshala to be a temple dedicated to Goddess Saraswati.

Share your thoughts in the comments