‘Stressful for students’: SC tells Centre not to introduce 3rd language in Class 9 NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court Thursday observed that introducing a third language in Class 9 under the National Education Policy would put undue pressure on students as they begin preparing for their board examinations.The court said Central Board of Secondary Education’s (CBSE) introduction of third language from Class 9 increases stress level of students.(CBSE) has made the study of three languages compulsory for students from Class IX. The board has also clarified that there will be no Board examination for the third language (R3) in Class X.”No that is very bad. 9th standard is stressful. Why do you introduce a new language in 9th? You introduce it in 6th. When we were there in our school we had both ICSE and SSLC. We were taught both syllabus. Only at the end of 9th standard we had to select,” Justice BV Nagarathna, who was hearing plea challenging Madras high court direction to establish Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas in each district, said according to Live Law.”… Union of India please don’t have 3rd language in 9th standard. CBSE ICSE State board 10th standard is a board exam. From the end of 8th standard onwards, the pressure starts. The chapter on Light which was in SSLC 10th standard was taught to us in 8th standard ICSE. Prepairing for us for 10th,” Justice Nagarathna further reiterated.The case arises from the Tamil Nadu government’s appeal against a Madras high court order that directed the setting up of a Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya (JNV) in every district of the state. The high court had ruled that refusing permission for JNVs deprived students of their freedom to choose where they wanted to study and was not in line with the objectives of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act. It also instructed the state to arrange temporary facilities for 240 students in each district until permanent schools were established.However, in December 2017, the Supreme Court stayed the high court’s directions after the Tamil Nadu government challenged the verdict. During a hearing on December 15, 2025, the apex court asked the Centre and the Tamil Nadu government to hold discussions on the possibility of establishing JNVs in the state. It directed both sides to identify suitable land for schools in every district and submit the outcome of their consultations before the court, describing the exercise as an effort to encourage cooperative discussions between the Union and the state rather than impose an immediate decision.In 2025, ;the Supreme Court also asked both the Centre and the Tamil Nadu government “not to make it into a language issue” while hearing the state’s plea challenging a Madras high court order.The observation was made by a bench of Justices BV Nagarathna and R Mahadevan after senior counsel P Wilson, appearing for the DMK-led Tamil Nadu government, argued that the Centre should adopt a two-language formula in line with the state’s policy instead of the three-language formula under the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020.As the Centre’s counsel began to respond, the bench urged both parties to refrain from turning the matter into a language issue. Get the latest India news and live updates. Download the TOI App.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosModi Hails India-UK Trade Deal As Duty-Free Access Opens New Opportunities For ExportersNDA Eyes Fresh Push For Women’s Quota Bill As Supriya Sule Opens Door To SupportBageshwar Baba Dhirendra Shastri’s Brother Arrested For Firing At Farmer In Madhya Pradesh’Abhishek Has Done No Wrong’: Mamata Banerjee Defends Nephew Amid TMC Rebellion“Party Is Sinking”: Mamata’s Loyalist Crosses Over To Ritabrata Camp; TMC Crack Deepens’Serious Risk’ To India’s Largest Nuclear Plant Kudankulam After Files Leaked On Dark Web: ReportRahul Gandhi Steps In As Punjab Congress Infighting Threatens 2027 Election PreparationsExplained: Why PM Modi’s July 17 Punjab Visit Is Politically Crucial Ahead Of Assembly ElectionsHigh Profile Political Meeting Rekindle Talk Of NCP Unity In Maharashtra; Patil Denies BuzzKGMU Bars Cooking Of Non-Veg Food In Hostels After Governor Flags Issue At Convocation123PhotostoriesWhy Italian women never seem tired or stressed after 40? 8 simple daily habits every Indian woman needs to steal right nowMonsoon health alert: Why fungal skin infections spike during the rainy season, and the simple daily habits doctors say can help prevent them10 Cleaning mistakes guests notice the moment they walk into your homeWorld Snakes Day 2026: Celebrating India’s iconic snake species10 types of traditional Pooris and calories per servingWhy children suddenly stop telling their parents everything around age 12Why airplane food tastes bland even when it’s perfectly seasonedYour liver may be silently failing: Doctor reveals 8 warning signs most people mistake for everyday health problems10 comforting and traditional sooji dishes for breakfast5 long-haired dog breeds that win hearts with their looks and personality123Hot PicksDU Round 1 Seat AllocationDiesel export priceStock market todayBank holiday todayAlex SunnyManipur JusticeRaghuram RajanAP POLYCET Phase 2 counsellingSonam WangchukTop TrendingMessiThomas Tuchels Net WorthFIFA World Cup 2026Mumbai Goa Highway AccidentBengaluru Law Student MurderBihar Railway Employee MurderSiya GoyalTaslima NasrinGujarat RapeIran war
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court Thursday observed that introducing a third language in Class 9 under the National Education Policy would put undue pressure on students as they begin preparing for their board examinations.The court said Central Board of Secondary Education’s (CBSE) introduction of third language from Class 9 increases stress level of students.(CBSE) has made the study of three languages compulsory for students from Class IX. The board has also clarified that there will be no Board examination for the third language (R3) in Class X.“No that is very bad. 9th standard is stressful. Why do you introduce a new language in 9th? You introduce it in 6th. When we were there in our school we had both ICSE and SSLC. We were taught both syllabus. Only at the end of 9th standard we had to select,” Justice BV Nagarathna, who was hearing plea challenging Madras high court direction to establish Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas in each district, said according to Live Law.“… Union of India please don’t have 3rd language in 9th standard. CBSE ICSE State board 10th standard is a board exam. From the end of 8th standard onwards, the pressure starts. The chapter on Light which was in SSLC 10th standard was taught to us in 8th standard ICSE. Prepairing for us for 10th,” Justice Nagarathna further reiterated.The case arises from the Tamil Nadu government’s appeal against a Madras high court order that directed the setting up of a Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya (JNV) in every district of the state. The high court had ruled that refusing permission for JNVs deprived students of their freedom to choose where they wanted to study and was not in line with the objectives of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act. It also instructed the state to arrange temporary facilities for 240 students in each district until permanent schools were established.However, in December 2017, the Supreme Court stayed the high court’s directions after the Tamil Nadu government challenged the verdict. During a hearing on December 15, 2025, the apex court asked the Centre and the Tamil Nadu government to hold discussions on the possibility of establishing JNVs in the state. It directed both sides to identify suitable land for schools in every district and submit the outcome of their consultations before the court, describing the exercise as an effort to encourage cooperative discussions between the Union and the state rather than impose an immediate decision.In 2025, ;the Supreme Court also asked both the Centre and the Tamil Nadu government “not to make it into a language issue” while hearing the state’s plea challenging a Madras high court order.The observation was made by a bench of Justices BV Nagarathna and R Mahadevan after senior counsel P Wilson, appearing for the DMK-led Tamil Nadu government, argued that the Centre should adopt a two-language formula in line with the state’s policy instead of the three-language formula under the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020.As the Centre’s counsel began to respond, the bench urged both parties to refrain from turning the matter into a language issue.
