The Supreme Court, meanwhile, directed the parties to maintain status quo NEW DELHI: The government on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that India’s 20 per cent ethanol blending programme in petrol is still an ongoing experiment and that the impact of the policy is expected to become clearer by next year.The submission came during a hearing on a plea filed by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL), which challenged a Karnataka high court order relating to ethanol allocation for the 2025-26 Ethanol Supply Year.Appearing for the Centre, Attorney General R Venkataramani argued that any judicial intervention in the allocation process at this stage could unsettle the government’s national ethanol blending policy. He submitted that the 20 per cent ethanol blending programme remained an ongoing experiment and that its impact would become clearer by next year, reported news agency PTI.The Supreme Court, meanwhile, directed the parties to maintain status quo on the Karnataka high court’s order while issuing notice on BPCL’s appeal.A bench of Justices M M Sundresh and Sheel Nagu was hearing BPCL’s challenge to the high court’s direction asking Oil Marketing Companies to consider a representation filed by VINP Distilleries and Sugars seeking enhanced ethanol allocation for the 2025-26 supply year.The Karnataka high court had held that dedicated ethanol plants established under the government’s policy and bound by Long-Term Offtake Agreements (LTOAs) to supply ethanol exclusively to Oil Marketing Companies (OMCs) could not be denied the benefit of preferential allocation envisaged under those agreements.It had directed Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Indian Oil Corporation Limited and Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited to consider and decide the company’s request for enhanced allocation.Opposing the order, Venkataramani submitted that the ethanol allocation process had already concluded in October 2025, when supply contracts were finalised.He informed the court that ethanol allocations had been communicated to 378 suppliers for a total of 1,050 crore litres, of which around 680 crore litres had already been supplied by June 18.The attorney general further argued that increasing the allocation of one supplier would encourage similarly placed companies to seek the same relief, potentially opening the floodgates to litigation and affecting implementation of the national policy.In its petition before the apex court, BPCL contended that VINP Distilleries could not claim an absolute right to supply ethanol merely on the basis of its production capacity, particularly after allocations had already been made to suppliers under the existing framework.The company maintained that altering the allocation process after its conclusion could disrupt the government’s ethanol blending programme.Get the latest India news and live updates. Download the TOI App.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosAbhijit Dipke Opens Up About CJP’s Next Move, Funding Model & Post-Protest Strategy | WatchCabinet Reshuffle Soon? Big Changes Likely Before Monsoon Session; Who May Enter, Who Could Exit?India’s Oil Import Price Fell Below $70— Why Petrol & Diesel Prices Won’t Drop Yet |West Asia CrisisDelhi’s Biggest EV Policy Yet! No New Petrol Bikes From 2028 | ₹15,000 Crore Plan ExplainedIndia, US Close to Major Boeing Defence Deal, Says Sergio Gor; Cites $20.5 Billion Investment BoostRajya Sabha Numbers Tilt Towards NDA, Bringing Two-Thirds Majority Within Striking DistanceIndia Condemns Pakistan’s Airstrikes In Afghanistan, Calls Them Assault On Sovereignty & Peace’No Official Role, No Official Support’: India Distances Itself From India-Pakistan Track-2 DialogueUS Ambassador Says Trump’s India Visit Could Happen Soon, Confirms Quad Meeting in PhilippinesAre We Learning Nothing From Deadly Fire Accidents Across India? Experts Sound Alarm123PhotostoriesIs your skin barrier crying for help? 5 warning signs you should never ignore10 beautiful baby girl names that mean peace and calmness in different languagesFrom love at first sight to divorce: Gaurav Khanna and Akanksha Chamola’s relationship timeline explainedLove quote of the day by Plato: ‘The madness of love is the greatest of heaven’s blessings’Kareena Kapoor Khan vrooms in a MINI dressed to kill in pinstriped suit with corsetAre you always complaining? Neurosurgeon explains how it affects the brain, and why its not worth it8 hacks every Indian woman needs this season to beat ‘monsoon frizz’7 Natural ways to clean your home floors without harsh chemicals3 signs you are the ‘fringe friend’ in your groupNaomi Osaka rewrites Wimbledon fashion rules in a striking kimono-inspired ensemble123Hot PicksKarnataka SIRJohn CenaSergio GorWWE Summerslam PredictionsiPhone 18 Pro data leakNoida schools timingSachin AhirDK ShivakumarAP EAPCET Result 2026Top TrendingDelhi EV Vehicle Policy 2026Bengal Refinery FireSonam RaghuvanshiFIFA World Cup 2026Monaco BlastBengaluru TechieAnukalp MishraSergei IvanovMK StalinJosh Hokit
NEW DELHI: The government on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that India’s 20 per cent ethanol blending programme in petrol is still an ongoing experiment and that the impact of the policy is expected to become clearer by next year.The submission came during a hearing on a plea filed by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL), which challenged a Karnataka high court order relating to ethanol allocation for the 2025-26 Ethanol Supply Year.Appearing for the Centre, Attorney General R Venkataramani argued that any judicial intervention in the allocation process at this stage could unsettle the government’s national ethanol blending policy. He submitted that the 20 per cent ethanol blending programme remained an ongoing experiment and that its impact would become clearer by next year, reported news agency PTI.The Supreme Court, meanwhile, directed the parties to maintain status quo on the Karnataka high court’s order while issuing notice on BPCL’s appeal.A bench of Justices M M Sundresh and Sheel Nagu was hearing BPCL’s challenge to the high court’s direction asking Oil Marketing Companies to consider a representation filed by VINP Distilleries and Sugars seeking enhanced ethanol allocation for the 2025-26 supply year.The Karnataka high court had held that dedicated ethanol plants established under the government’s policy and bound by Long-Term Offtake Agreements (LTOAs) to supply ethanol exclusively to Oil Marketing Companies (OMCs) could not be denied the benefit of preferential allocation envisaged under those agreements.It had directed Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Indian Oil Corporation Limited and Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited to consider and decide the company’s request for enhanced allocation.Opposing the order, Venkataramani submitted that the ethanol allocation process had already concluded in October 2025, when supply contracts were finalised.He informed the court that ethanol allocations had been communicated to 378 suppliers for a total of 1,050 crore litres, of which around 680 crore litres had already been supplied by June 18.The attorney general further argued that increasing the allocation of one supplier would encourage similarly placed companies to seek the same relief, potentially opening the floodgates to litigation and affecting implementation of the national policy.In its petition before the apex court, BPCL contended that VINP Distilleries could not claim an absolute right to supply ethanol merely on the basis of its production capacity, particularly after allocations had already been made to suppliers under the existing framework.The company maintained that altering the allocation process after its conclusion could disrupt the government’s ethanol blending programme.
