May 15, 2026

NEW DELHI: In a fresh twist in the ongoing CBI appeal hearings against the discharge of all accused in the excise policy case, Delhi HC’s Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma initiated criminal contempt proceedings against former chief minister Arvind Kejriwal, AAP functionaries Manish Sisodia, Durgesh Pathak, Sanjay Singh, Saurabh Bharadwaj and others, and then opted out of hearing the main matter.“Can’t surrender before a powerful litigant,” Justice Sharma observed as she drew contempt proceedings against Kejriwal, adding that he “orchestrated a calculated campaign of vilification” against her on social media instead of challenging adverse orders against him before the higher court.She said she will now hear only the contempt case and transferred the appeal, so that the “respondents” don’t later claim she is biased against them. The judge said while the hearings in the excise policy case are in progress inside, “a parallel narrative was being constructed outside… and insinuations directed at this court… by contemnors armed with political powers.”Justice Sharma took exception to social media posts by Kejriwal and shared by other AAP functionaries that attributed “political allegiance” to her and targeted her by posting a misleading “edited” video of a speech given by her at an educational institution in Varanasi.“Arvind Kejriwal sought to destroy my reputation instead of availing legal remedies after I refused to recuse and a deliberate attempt to lower the court’s authority can’t be permitted in the guise of free speech,” Justice Sharma said.She noted that Kejriwal wanted to sow “seeds of distrust”, but warned that “judicial silence can’t tolerate judges being threatened into silence”.Gandhiji’s Satyagraha has won: KejriwalShe said she will now hear only the contempt case and transferred the appeal, so that the “respondents” don’t later claim she is biased. The judge said while the hearings in the excise policy case are in progress inside, “a parallel narrative was being constructed outside… and insinuations directed at this court… by contemnors armed with political powers”.Justice Sharma took exception to social media posts by Kejriwal and shared by other AAP functionaries that attributed “political allegiance” to her and targeted her by posting a misleading “edited” video of a speech given by her at an educational institution in Varanasi.“Arvind Kejriwal sought to destroy my reputation instead of availing legal remedies after I refused to recuse and a deliberate attempt to lower the court’s authority can’t be permitted in the guise of free speech,” Justice Sharma said.She noted that Kejriwal wanted to sow “seeds of distrust”, but warned that “judicial silence can’t tolerate judges being threatened into silence”.Citing Kejriwal’s “conduct”, the judge said it was expected that once his plea seeking recusal stood decided, the “issue will attain quietus”.“The litigant could have gone to Supreme Court in challenge, but he didn’t, instead he issued a video and repeated the same allegations and grounds that were rejected by this court,” Justice Sharma said. She also referred to Kejriwal’s letter on X where he announced his decision to boycott hearings in her court.“The tone, tenor and manner were not of fair criticism. They have run a campaign, and the social media campaigns questioned the integrity, impartiality of this court,” HC observed. A detailed copy of the order is awaited. The judge read out portions from her order in a special sitting around 6.30pm and went on for around 1.5 hours.Justice Sharma clarified that she was not recusing herself but was only transferring the case to another bench as she has initiated contempt proceedings. “By selectively editing letters and videos, the respondents tried to intimidate the court and tried to cast aspersions by dragging in my family members,” the judge said, adding that the aim was “calculated humiliation”.The AAP chief, unfazed as Justice Sharma ordered contempt proceedings against him, applauded her decision to step away from the excise case. “The truth has won, Gandhiji’s Satyagraha has won,” Kejriwal said in his first response on social media platform X.About the AuthorAbhinav GargAs legal editor for Delhi, Abhinav Garg handles coverage of courts and connected legal challenges shaping the capital. From breaking down complex law related jargon to simplifying how a particular verdict or development in courts may impact the readers, Abhinav brings with him over two decades of experience in the field.Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosDelhi HC Judge Initiates Contempt Proceedings Against Kejriwal; Refers Case To New Bench2 Days WFH To ‘No Vehicle Day’: Delhi CM Rekha Gupta Unveils Fuel-Saving Steps After PM Modi’s CallCong Picks VD Satheesan As Kerala CM; Iran FM Lands In India For Brics Meet With ‘Minab168’ MsgSupreme Court Questions CEC Appointment Process, Raises ‘Independence’ ConcernsMan Trying To Hold Tin Shed Gets Swept Into Air During Violent Storm In Bareilly, Survives Fall’Unacceptable’: India Slams Attack On Indian-Flagged Ship Near OmanEC Announces Phase 3 Of SIR Across 16 States, 3 UTs; J&K, Ladakh, Himachal Left OutEx-Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee In Lawyer’s Gown Argues Post-poll Violence Case In High CourtKC Venugopal Backs VD Satheesan as Kerala CM, Says Congress Fully United Behind HimCongress Picks VD Satheesan as Kerala CM After 10 Days of Talks and Leadership Battle123PhotostoriesTara Sutaria looks straight out of a 1950s Hollywood dream at Cannes in this vintage Vivienne Westwood coutureHappy Birthday Vicky Kaushal: With Katrina Kaif, Sunny Kaushal and family, inside the actor’s most heartwarming momentsMilk Price Hike: Popular packaged milk prices rise across India; healthy milk alternatives to add to daily dietTop 10 fascinating facts about rhinos that make them unlike any other wild animal5 animals with giant tusks and horns that make them look prehistoricHow these 5 Indian ice creams became among the 100 Most Iconic Ice Creams of the WorldRice water vs coconut water for hair growth: Which works better in summer?5 reasons why someone dislikes you – And why is it not your problemAditi Rao Hydari just landed in Cannes and her denim airport look already screams red carpet royalty10 affirmations to attract calm and genuine love123Hot PicksCBSE class 12 resultUS Iran warPrateek YadavHaryana election resultForeign outflowNEET exam cancelledTamil Nadu assemblyTop TrendingWB Class 12 Result 2026WB Board 12th ResultIPL Points TablePM Internship SchemeCalcutta High CourtMI vs PBKS IPL MatchIPL Orange Cap 2026Haryana Board ResultAir India FlightsPrateek Yadav

Vamsikrishna04 mins mins
NEW DELHI: In a fresh twist in the ongoing CBI appeal hearings against the discharge of all accused in the excise policy case, Delhi HC’s Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma initiated criminal contempt proceedings against former chief minister Arvind Kejriwal, AAP functionaries Manish Sisodia, Durgesh Pathak, Sanjay Singh, Saurabh Bharadwaj and others, and then opted out of hearing the main matter.“Can’t surrender before a powerful litigant,” Justice Sharma observed as she drew contempt proceedings against Kejriwal, adding that he “orchestrated a calculated campaign of vilification” against her on social media instead of challenging adverse orders against him before the higher court.She said she will now hear only the contempt case and transferred the appeal, so that the “respondents” don’t later claim she is biased against them. The judge said while the hearings in the excise policy case are in progress inside, “a parallel narrative was being constructed outside… and insinuations directed at this court… by contemnors armed with political powers.”Justice Sharma took exception to social media posts by Kejriwal and shared by other AAP functionaries that attributed “political allegiance” to her and targeted her by posting a misleading “edited” video of a speech given by her at an educational institution in Varanasi.“Arvind Kejriwal sought to destroy my reputation instead of availing legal remedies after I refused to recuse and a deliberate attempt to lower the court’s authority can’t be permitted in the guise of free speech,” Justice Sharma said.She noted that Kejriwal wanted to sow “seeds of distrust”, but warned that “judicial silence can’t tolerate judges being threatened into silence”.Gandhiji’s Satyagraha has won: KejriwalShe said she will now hear only the contempt case and transferred the appeal, so that the “respondents” don’t later claim she is biased. The judge said while the hearings in the excise policy case are in progress inside, “a parallel narrative was being constructed outside… and insinuations directed at this court… by contemnors armed with political powers”.Justice Sharma took exception to social media posts by Kejriwal and shared by other AAP functionaries that attributed “political allegiance” to her and targeted her by posting a misleading “edited” video of a speech given by her at an educational institution in Varanasi.“Arvind Kejriwal sought to destroy my reputation instead of availing legal remedies after I refused to recuse and a deliberate attempt to lower the court’s authority can’t be permitted in the guise of free speech,” Justice Sharma said.She noted that Kejriwal wanted to sow “seeds of distrust”, but warned that “judicial silence can’t tolerate judges being threatened into silence”.Citing Kejriwal’s “conduct”, the judge said it was expected that once his plea seeking recusal stood decided, the “issue will attain quietus”.“The litigant could have gone to Supreme Court in challenge, but he didn’t, instead he issued a video and repeated the same allegations and grounds that were rejected by this court,” Justice Sharma said. She also referred to Kejriwal’s letter on X where he announced his decision to boycott hearings in her court.“The tone, tenor and manner were not of fair criticism. They have run a campaign, and the social media campaigns questioned the integrity, impartiality of this court,” HC observed. A detailed copy of the order is awaited. The judge read out portions from her order in a special sitting around 6.30pm and went on for around 1.5 hours.Justice Sharma clarified that she was not recusing herself but was only transferring the case to another bench as she has initiated contempt proceedings. “By selectively editing letters and videos, the respondents tried to intimidate the court and tried to cast aspersions by dragging in my family members,” the judge said, adding that the aim was “calculated humiliation”.The AAP chief, unfazed as Justice Sharma ordered contempt proceedings against him, applauded her decision to step away from the excise case. “The truth has won, Gandhiji’s Satyagraha has won,” Kejriwal said in his first response on social media platform X.About the AuthorAbhinav GargAs legal editor for Delhi, Abhinav Garg handles coverage of courts and connected legal challenges shaping the capital. From breaking down complex law related jargon to simplifying how a particular verdict or development in courts may impact the readers, Abhinav brings with him over two decades of experience in the field.Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosDelhi HC Judge Initiates Contempt Proceedings Against Kejriwal; Refers Case To New Bench2 Days WFH To ‘No Vehicle Day’: Delhi CM Rekha Gupta Unveils Fuel-Saving Steps After PM Modi’s CallCong Picks VD Satheesan As Kerala CM; Iran FM Lands In India For Brics Meet With ‘Minab168’ MsgSupreme Court Questions CEC Appointment Process, Raises ‘Independence’ ConcernsMan Trying To Hold Tin Shed Gets Swept Into Air During Violent Storm In Bareilly, Survives Fall’Unacceptable’: India Slams Attack On Indian-Flagged Ship Near OmanEC Announces Phase 3 Of SIR Across 16 States, 3 UTs; J&K, Ladakh, Himachal Left OutEx-Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee In Lawyer’s Gown Argues Post-poll Violence Case In High CourtKC Venugopal Backs VD Satheesan as Kerala CM, Says Congress Fully United Behind HimCongress Picks VD Satheesan as Kerala CM After 10 Days of Talks and Leadership Battle123PhotostoriesTara Sutaria looks straight out of a 1950s Hollywood dream at Cannes in this vintage Vivienne Westwood coutureHappy Birthday Vicky Kaushal: With Katrina Kaif, Sunny Kaushal and family, inside the actor’s most heartwarming momentsMilk Price Hike: Popular packaged milk prices rise across India; healthy milk alternatives to add to daily dietTop 10 fascinating facts about rhinos that make them unlike any other wild animal5 animals with giant tusks and horns that make them look prehistoricHow these 5 Indian ice creams became among the 100 Most Iconic Ice Creams of the WorldRice water vs coconut water for hair growth: Which works better in summer?5 reasons why someone dislikes you – And why is it not your problemAditi Rao Hydari just landed in Cannes and her denim airport look already screams red carpet royalty10 affirmations to attract calm and genuine love123Hot PicksCBSE class 12 resultUS Iran warPrateek YadavHaryana election resultForeign outflowNEET exam cancelledTamil Nadu assemblyTop TrendingWB Class 12 Result 2026WB Board 12th ResultIPL Points TablePM Internship SchemeCalcutta High CourtMI vs PBKS IPL MatchIPL Orange Cap 2026Haryana Board ResultAir India FlightsPrateek Yadav


Delhi HC judge opts out of Kejriwal excise case after initiating contempt

NEW DELHI: In a fresh twist in the ongoing CBI appeal hearings against the discharge of all accused in the excise policy case, Delhi HC’s Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma initiated criminal contempt proceedings against former chief minister Arvind Kejriwal, AAP functionaries Manish Sisodia, Durgesh Pathak, Sanjay Singh, Saurabh Bharadwaj and others, and then opted out of hearing the main matter.“Can’t surrender before a powerful litigant,” Justice Sharma observed as she drew contempt proceedings against Kejriwal, adding that he “orchestrated a calculated campaign of vilification” against her on social media instead of challenging adverse orders against him before the higher court.She said she will now hear only the contempt case and transferred the appeal, so that the “respondents” don’t later claim she is biased against them. The judge said while the hearings in the excise policy case are in progress inside, “a parallel narrative was being constructed outside… and insinuations directed at this court… by contemnors armed with political powers.”

-

Justice Sharma took exception to social media posts by Kejriwal and shared by other AAP functionaries that attributed “political allegiance” to her and targeted her by posting a misleading “edited” video of a speech given by her at an educational institution in Varanasi.“Arvind Kejriwal sought to destroy my reputation instead of availing legal remedies after I refused to recuse and a deliberate attempt to lower the court’s authority can’t be permitted in the guise of free speech,” Justice Sharma said.She noted that Kejriwal wanted to sow “seeds of distrust”, but warned that “judicial silence can’t tolerate judges being threatened into silence”.

Gandhiji’s Satyagraha has won: Kejriwal

She said she will now hear only the contempt case and transferred the appeal, so that the “respondents” don’t later claim she is biased. The judge said while the hearings in the excise policy case are in progress inside, “a parallel narrative was being constructed outside… and insinuations directed at this court… by contemnors armed with political powers”.Justice Sharma took exception to social media posts by Kejriwal and shared by other AAP functionaries that attributed “political allegiance” to her and targeted her by posting a misleading “edited” video of a speech given by her at an educational institution in Varanasi.“Arvind Kejriwal sought to destroy my reputation instead of availing legal remedies after I refused to recuse and a deliberate attempt to lower the court’s authority can’t be permitted in the guise of free speech,” Justice Sharma said.She noted that Kejriwal wanted to sow “seeds of distrust”, but warned that “judicial silence can’t tolerate judges being threatened into silence”.Citing Kejriwal’s “conduct”, the judge said it was expected that once his plea seeking recusal stood decided, the “issue will attain quietus”.“The litigant could have gone to Supreme Court in challenge, but he didn’t, instead he issued a video and repeated the same allegations and grounds that were rejected by this court,” Justice Sharma said. She also referred to Kejriwal’s letter on X where he announced his decision to boycott hearings in her court.“The tone, tenor and manner were not of fair criticism. They have run a campaign, and the social media campaigns questioned the integrity, impartiality of this court,” HC observed. A detailed copy of the order is awaited. The judge read out portions from her order in a special sitting around 6.30pm and went on for around 1.5 hours.Justice Sharma clarified that she was not recusing herself but was only transferring the case to another bench as she has initiated contempt proceedings. “By selectively editing letters and videos, the respondents tried to intimidate the court and tried to cast aspersions by dragging in my family members,” the judge said, adding that the aim was “calculated humiliation”.The AAP chief, unfazed as Justice Sharma ordered contempt proceedings against him, applauded her decision to step away from the excise case. “The truth has won, Gandhiji’s Satyagraha has won,” Kejriwal said in his first response on social media platform X.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related News

Talks for a BRICS foreign ministers’ joint statement seemed balanced on a knife-edge on the first day of the meeting, with a consensus on the West Asia situation remaining uncertain. Diplomatic sources said efforts to find common ground between the UAE and Iran were still on, even as the 2 countries held on to their positions and even clashed at the meeting. While the UAE is seeking condemnation of Iran’s actions, the Iranian foreign minister, Seyed Abbas Araghchi, urged member-states to “explicitly condemn violations of international law by the US and Israel, including their illegal aggression against Iran”. Araghchi accused the Arab country of being directly involved in aggression against Iran. This accusation came not while delivering Iran’s national statement but in response to “unfounded” claims by UAE’s junior foreign minister Khalifa Shaheen Al Marar, according to reports from Iran. “In fact, I must say that the UAE was directly involved in the act of aggression against Iran. When the war of aggression began against Iran, they (UAE) refused to even condemn it,” said Araghchi, accusing the UAE of providing military bases, airspace, land and facilities to the US and Israel. “If you want Israel to provide your security, this is the result. If you want America to provide your security, this is the result you are complaining about now. Therefore, I strongly advise my brothers in the Emirates to reconsider their policy towards Iran,” he further said addressing the UAE minister, according to the Iranian state media. The foreign ministers’ meeting ends with the final session on Friday morning. If there is no consensus for a joint statement, the meeting would likely end with a Chair’s statement like what happened with a meeting of the special envoys last month. Significantly, external affairs minister S Jaishankar stressed in his welcome remarks at the meeting that it is essential for the smooth advancement of BRICS that “later members” fully appreciate and subscribe to the grouping consensus on various important issues. He was talking about institutional development, including the integration of new members through a stocktake and updation of existing mechanisms. Iran and UAE had both joined the grouping of major emerging economies along with Egypt and Ethiopia in 2024. Araghchi also raised the issue of Israel PM Benjamin Netanyahu’s “secret” trip to UAE during the war, something which Abu Dhabi has denied. “Just yesterday, it was revealed that Netanyahu had traveled to the UAE during the war. It was also revealed that they participated in these attacks and may have even acted directly against us. So, the UAE is an active partner in this aggression, and there is no doubt about it,” said Araghchi. While delivering Iran’s national statement, the minister also urged BRICS to prevent the politicization of international institutions and to take concrete action to halt “warmongering and to bring an end to the impunity of those who violate the UN Charter”. “We believe that BRICS can, and must, become one of the principal pillars in shaping a more just, balanced, and humane global order; an order in which might can never make right,” said Araghchi.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosDelhi HC Judge Initiates Contempt Proceedings Against Kejriwal; Refers Case To New Bench2 Days WFH To ‘No Vehicle Day’: Delhi CM Rekha Gupta Unveils Fuel-Saving Steps After PM Modi’s CallCong Picks VD Satheesan As Kerala CM; Iran FM Lands In India For Brics Meet With ‘Minab168’ MsgSupreme Court Questions CEC Appointment Process, Raises ‘Independence’ ConcernsMan Trying To Hold Tin Shed Gets Swept Into Air During Violent Storm In Bareilly, Survives Fall’Unacceptable’: India Slams Attack On Indian-Flagged Ship Near OmanEC Announces Phase 3 Of SIR Across 16 States, 3 UTs; J&K, Ladakh, Himachal Left OutEx-Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee In Lawyer’s Gown Argues Post-poll Violence Case In High CourtKC Venugopal Backs VD Satheesan as Kerala CM, Says Congress Fully United Behind HimCongress Picks VD Satheesan as Kerala CM After 10 Days of Talks and Leadership Battle123PhotostoriesHappy Birthday Vicky Kaushal: With Katrina Kaif, Sunny Kaushal and family, inside the actor’s most heartwarming momentsMilk Price Hike: Popular packaged milk prices rise across India; healthy milk alternatives to add to daily dietTop 10 fascinating facts about rhinos that make them unlike any other wild animal5 animals with giant tusks and horns that make them look prehistoricHow these 5 Indian ice creams became among the 100 Most Iconic Ice Creams of the WorldRice water vs coconut water for hair growth: Which works better in summer?5 reasons why someone dislikes you – And why is it not your problemAditi Rao Hydari just landed in Cannes and her denim airport look already screams red carpet royalty10 affirmations to attract calm and genuine loveFeeling constantly exhausted at work? The 6-4-2 formula may be the balance your life is missing123Hot PicksCBSE class 12 resultUS Iran warPrateek YadavHaryana election resultForeign outflowNEET exam cancelledTamil Nadu assemblyTop TrendingWB Class 12 Result 2026WB Board 12th ResultIPL Points TablePM Internship SchemeCalcutta High CourtMI vs PBKS IPL MatchIPL Orange Cap 2026Haryana Board ResultAir India FlightsPrateek Yadav

Talks for a BRICS foreign ministers’ joint statement seemed balanced on a knife-edge on the first day of the meeting, with a consensus on the West Asia situation remaining uncertain. Diplomatic sources said efforts to find common ground between the UAE and Iran were still on, even as the 2 countries held on to their positions and even clashed at the meeting. While the UAE is seeking condemnation of Iran’s actions, the Iranian foreign minister, Seyed Abbas Araghchi, urged member-states to “explicitly condemn violations of international law by the US and Israel, including their illegal aggression against Iran”. Araghchi accused the Arab country of being directly involved in aggression against Iran. This accusation came not while delivering Iran’s national statement but in response to “unfounded” claims by UAE’s junior foreign minister Khalifa Shaheen Al Marar, according to reports from Iran. “In fact, I must say that the UAE was directly involved in the act of aggression against Iran. When the war of aggression began against Iran, they (UAE) refused to even condemn it,” said Araghchi, accusing the UAE of providing military bases, airspace, land and facilities to the US and Israel. “If you want Israel to provide your security, this is the result. If you want America to provide your security, this is the result you are complaining about now. Therefore, I strongly advise my brothers in the Emirates to reconsider their policy towards Iran,” he further said addressing the UAE minister, according to the Iranian state media. The foreign ministers’ meeting ends with the final session on Friday morning. If there is no consensus for a joint statement, the meeting would likely end with a Chair’s statement like what happened with a meeting of the special envoys last month. Significantly, external affairs minister S Jaishankar stressed in his welcome remarks at the meeting that it is essential for the smooth advancement of BRICS that “later members” fully appreciate and subscribe to the grouping consensus on various important issues. He was talking about institutional development, including the integration of new members through a stocktake and updation of existing mechanisms. Iran and UAE had both joined the grouping of major emerging economies along with Egypt and Ethiopia in 2024. Araghchi also raised the issue of Israel PM Benjamin Netanyahu’s “secret” trip to UAE during the war, something which Abu Dhabi has denied. “Just yesterday, it was revealed that Netanyahu had traveled to the UAE during the war. It was also revealed that they participated in these attacks and may have even acted directly against us. So, the UAE is an active partner in this aggression, and there is no doubt about it,” said Araghchi. While delivering Iran’s national statement, the minister also urged BRICS to prevent the politicization of international institutions and to take concrete action to halt “warmongering and to bring an end to the impunity of those who violate the UN Charter”. “We believe that BRICS can, and must, become one of the principal pillars in shaping a more just, balanced, and humane global order; an order in which might can never make right,” said Araghchi.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosDelhi HC Judge Initiates Contempt Proceedings Against Kejriwal; Refers Case To New Bench2 Days WFH To ‘No Vehicle Day’: Delhi CM Rekha Gupta Unveils Fuel-Saving Steps After PM Modi’s CallCong Picks VD Satheesan As Kerala CM; Iran FM Lands In India For Brics Meet With ‘Minab168’ MsgSupreme Court Questions CEC Appointment Process, Raises ‘Independence’ ConcernsMan Trying To Hold Tin Shed Gets Swept Into Air During Violent Storm In Bareilly, Survives Fall’Unacceptable’: India Slams Attack On Indian-Flagged Ship Near OmanEC Announces Phase 3 Of SIR Across 16 States, 3 UTs; J&K, Ladakh, Himachal Left OutEx-Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee In Lawyer’s Gown Argues Post-poll Violence Case In High CourtKC Venugopal Backs VD Satheesan as Kerala CM, Says Congress Fully United Behind HimCongress Picks VD Satheesan as Kerala CM After 10 Days of Talks and Leadership Battle123PhotostoriesHappy Birthday Vicky Kaushal: With Katrina Kaif, Sunny Kaushal and family, inside the actor’s most heartwarming momentsMilk Price Hike: Popular packaged milk prices rise across India; healthy milk alternatives to add to daily dietTop 10 fascinating facts about rhinos that make them unlike any other wild animal5 animals with giant tusks and horns that make them look prehistoricHow these 5 Indian ice creams became among the 100 Most Iconic Ice Creams of the WorldRice water vs coconut water for hair growth: Which works better in summer?5 reasons why someone dislikes you – And why is it not your problemAditi Rao Hydari just landed in Cannes and her denim airport look already screams red carpet royalty10 affirmations to attract calm and genuine loveFeeling constantly exhausted at work? The 6-4-2 formula may be the balance your life is missing123Hot PicksCBSE class 12 resultUS Iran warPrateek YadavHaryana election resultForeign outflowNEET exam cancelledTamil Nadu assemblyTop TrendingWB Class 12 Result 2026WB Board 12th ResultIPL Points TablePM Internship SchemeCalcutta High CourtMI vs PBKS IPL MatchIPL Orange Cap 2026Haryana Board ResultAir India FlightsPrateek Yadav

Vamsikrishna 0
NEW DELHI: After 10 days of intense consultations, lobbying and internal churning, Congress on Thursday finally ended suspense over Kerala’s chief ministerial face by picking VD Satheesan for the top post.Satheesan emerged victorious in a closely watched leadership battle against senior leaders KC Venugopal and Ramesh Chennithala after the Congress high command weighed alliance equations, grassroots sentiment, public perception and electoral calculations before arriving at a final decision.Though Venugopal was seen as a strong contender with backing from a large section of MLAs and the party leadership in Delhi, multiple political factors eventually tilted the balance in Satheesan’s favour.Satheesan being a vocal and visible critic of the LDF government led by Pinarayi Vijayan also worked heavily in his favour. Although the Congress never formally projected a chief ministerial face before the elections, Satheesan had gradually emerged over the last five years as the public face of the opposition against the Left Democratic Front government.Satheesan also enjoyed visible support from grassroots Congress workers. In the days following the election results, party workers openly campaigned for him to be made chief minister, arguing that the leader who led the election battle should also lead the government.One of the most crucial reasons was the stand taken by key allies in the Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF), especially the Indian Union Muslim League. The IUML, which has 22 MLAs in the 102-member UDF alliance, strongly backed Satheesan and viewed the alliance’s massive victory as an endorsement of his leadership over the last five years as Leader of Opposition.The Kerala Congress (Joseph) and the Revolutionary Socialist Party also supported Satheesan, strengthening his position within the alliance.The Congress leadership was aware that ignoring the IUML’s stand could create complications for the new government. The IUML has long acted as one of the Congress’ strongest grassroots partners in Kerala and played a major role in Rahul Gandhi’s victories from Wayanad in 2019 and 2024, and later in Priyanka Gandhi Vadra’s by-election win from the constituency.Within sections of the party, there was unease over Venugopal, considered close to Rahul Gandhi, entering the race for the top post despite having earlier indicated during the campaign that he was not seeking any position. Many workers believed that bypassing Satheesan after the UDF’s sweeping mandate would amount to denying him political credit for the victory.The Congress’s recent struggles in assembly elections in several Hindi heartland states during Venugopal’s tenure as AICC organisation secretary also became a point of discussion among Kerala leaders and workers.The internal pressure was visible at the constituency level as well. Several newly elected Congress MLAs who were identified as supporters of Venugopal reportedly faced protests from local party workers. Some legislators had to cut short their post-election tours amid criticism from cadres and social media campaigns questioning their opposition to Satheesan.Young Congress leaders such as Shafi Parambil and Mathew Kuzhalnadan were also criticised online by party workers who projected them as leaders going against the people’s mandate.Another important factor behind the Congress decision was the possibility of multiple by-elections if Venugopal had been selected as chief minister.As the sitting Lok Sabha MP from Alappuzha, Venugopal would have had to resign from Parliament and contest an assembly by-election within six months to continue as chief minister. His resignation from the Lok Sabha would have also triggered another parliamentary bypoll.Within the UDF, there was concern over forcing voters into fresh elections immediately after the assembly polls, particularly at a time when the alliance was trying to consolidate its political gains.Congress leaders were also conscious of the political risk involved in a by-election contest for a sitting chief minister. Even though Venugopal would likely have contested from a safe Congress seat, party leaders did not want to introduce avoidable uncertainty into the new government.Public perception also worked heavily in Satheesan’s favour.He was one of Vijayan’s sharpest critics and frequently targeted the LDF government on issues related to governance and corruption. Satheesan also built an image as a strong advocate of secular politics in Kerala.At a time when several Congress leaders avoided directly confronting controversial remarks made by influential Hindu community leaders, Satheesan repeatedly warned against attempts to polarise Kerala politics. By openly challenging leaders such as Vellappally Natesan and G. Sukumaran Nair, he gained support among sections that viewed him as a leader willing to take political risks.During the campaign, Satheesan had also made a high-stakes political declaration, saying he would end his political career if the UDF failed to cross 100 seats. The alliance eventually crossed that mark comfortably, strengthening his image as a confident campaign leader.Even though Venugopal reportedly had the backing of a majority of Congress MLAs and enjoyed close ties with the central leadership, the delay in announcing the chief ministerial face reflected the party’s attempt to strike a balance between organisational control and political realities on the ground.Satheesan, a six-time MLA from Paravur in Ernakulam district, was eventually seen as the candidate with broader public acceptability, stronger alliance backing and deeper grassroots support.Soon after being chosen, Satheesan attempted to send a message of unity within the party and praised both Venugopal and Chennithala.“I do not see this position as a personal achievement… it was Venugopal who coordinated all the activities (and) his support was immense. Chennithala is also my leader,” Satheesan said after the announcement.“I will take all of them into my confidence,” he added. “I seek the support of every section of people… only a collective effort can build a new Kerala. No one can do it alone…”Venugopal also accepted the decision publicly and backed the party line.“Satheesan has been appointed as chief minister. I was saying the decision of the High Command will prevail, and it is my responsibility to see that the decision is respected and implemented,” he told reporters.Satheesan’s rise to the top post has also been shaped by years of internal political battles within the Kerala Congress. After missing out on a ministerial berth in the 2011 cabinet headed by Oommen Chandy and later losing out in the race for the Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee chief’s post in 2016, Satheesan once again found himself in a tough contest this time against senior leaders such as K. C. Venugopal and Ramesh Chennithala.Despite leading the Congress-led UDF to a sweeping Assembly victory, Satheesan was reportedly not the automatic choice of the party high command for the chief minister’s post. Party insiders pointed to familiar concerns that had surfaced during earlier leadership contests, including his strained relationship with influential community lobbies, limited support within sections of the national leadership and his assertive political style that has often unsettled even leaders within his own party.In 2011, when Satheesan was denied a ministerial berth in the Oommen Chandy government, his “attitude” was widely cited within party circles as one of the reasons. Unlike several leaders who actively cultivated support from influential community organisations such as the Nair Service Society, Satheesan was seen as reluctant to engage in lobbying for positions, a trait that contributed to his image as an independent-minded but uncompromising leader.The real test for the Congress in Kerala, however, begins after the celebrations. The last 10 days have exposed the depth of factional friction within the party, even in the middle of one of its biggest victories in the state in a decade. For now, Satheesan has moved quickly to project unity and Venugopal has publicly accepted the high command’s decision. Senior leader Chennithala, however, has been missing in action since the CM announcement.In the coming days, as Satheesan forms the government, it will be worth watching whether all the frontrunners fall in line to ensure a stable five-year UDF government, or whether the Kerala Congress faces a Karnataka-style tussle similar to the rivalry between Siddaramaiah and DK Shivakumar.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideos2 Days WFH To ‘No Vehicle Day’: Delhi CM Rekha Gupta Unveils Fuel-Saving Steps After PM Modi’s CallCong Picks VD Satheesan As Kerala CM; Iran FM Lands In India For Brics Meet With ‘Minab168’ MsgSupreme Court Questions CEC Appointment Process, Raises ‘Independence’ ConcernsMan Trying To Hold Tin Shed Gets Swept Into Air During Violent Storm In Bareilly, Survives Fall’Unacceptable’: India Slams Attack On Indian-Flagged Ship Near OmanEC Announces Phase 3 Of SIR Across 16 States, 3 UTs; J&K, Ladakh, Himachal Left OutEx-Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee In Lawyer’s Gown Argues Post-poll Violence Case In High CourtKC Venugopal Backs VD Satheesan as Kerala CM, Says Congress Fully United Behind HimCongress Picks VD Satheesan as Kerala CM After 10 Days of Talks and Leadership BattleRBI Governor Warns Fuel Price Hike Possible If Middle East Crisis Continues Longer123PhotostoriesMilk Price Hike: Popular packaged milk prices rise across India; healthy milk alternatives to add to daily dietTop 10 fascinating facts about rhinos that make them unlike any other wild animal5 animals with giant tusks and horns that make them look prehistoricHow these 5 Indian ice creams became among the 100 Most Iconic Ice Creams of the WorldRice water vs coconut water for hair growth: Which works better in summer?5 reasons why someone dislikes you – And why is it not your problemAditi Rao Hydari just landed in Cannes and her denim airport look already screams red carpet royalty10 affirmations to attract calm and genuine loveFeeling constantly exhausted at work? The 6-4-2 formula may be the balance your life is missing6 foods a Harvard doc eats daily to prevent colon cancer and fatty liver123Hot PicksCBSE class 12 resultUS Iran warPrateek YadavHaryana election resultForeign outflowNEET exam cancelledTamil Nadu assemblyTop TrendingWB Class 12 Result 2026WB Board 12th ResultIPL Points TablePM Internship SchemeCalcutta High CourtMI vs PBKS IPL MatchIPL Orange Cap 2026Haryana Board ResultAir India FlightsPrateek Yadav

NEW DELHI: After 10 days of intense consultations, lobbying and internal churning, Congress on Thursday finally ended suspense over Kerala’s chief ministerial face by picking VD Satheesan for the top post.Satheesan emerged victorious in a closely watched leadership battle against senior leaders KC Venugopal and Ramesh Chennithala after the Congress high command weighed alliance equations, grassroots sentiment, public perception and electoral calculations before arriving at a final decision.Though Venugopal was seen as a strong contender with backing from a large section of MLAs and the party leadership in Delhi, multiple political factors eventually tilted the balance in Satheesan’s favour.Satheesan being a vocal and visible critic of the LDF government led by Pinarayi Vijayan also worked heavily in his favour. Although the Congress never formally projected a chief ministerial face before the elections, Satheesan had gradually emerged over the last five years as the public face of the opposition against the Left Democratic Front government.Satheesan also enjoyed visible support from grassroots Congress workers. In the days following the election results, party workers openly campaigned for him to be made chief minister, arguing that the leader who led the election battle should also lead the government.One of the most crucial reasons was the stand taken by key allies in the Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF), especially the Indian Union Muslim League. The IUML, which has 22 MLAs in the 102-member UDF alliance, strongly backed Satheesan and viewed the alliance’s massive victory as an endorsement of his leadership over the last five years as Leader of Opposition.The Kerala Congress (Joseph) and the Revolutionary Socialist Party also supported Satheesan, strengthening his position within the alliance.The Congress leadership was aware that ignoring the IUML’s stand could create complications for the new government. The IUML has long acted as one of the Congress’ strongest grassroots partners in Kerala and played a major role in Rahul Gandhi’s victories from Wayanad in 2019 and 2024, and later in Priyanka Gandhi Vadra’s by-election win from the constituency.Within sections of the party, there was unease over Venugopal, considered close to Rahul Gandhi, entering the race for the top post despite having earlier indicated during the campaign that he was not seeking any position. Many workers believed that bypassing Satheesan after the UDF’s sweeping mandate would amount to denying him political credit for the victory.The Congress’s recent struggles in assembly elections in several Hindi heartland states during Venugopal’s tenure as AICC organisation secretary also became a point of discussion among Kerala leaders and workers.The internal pressure was visible at the constituency level as well. Several newly elected Congress MLAs who were identified as supporters of Venugopal reportedly faced protests from local party workers. Some legislators had to cut short their post-election tours amid criticism from cadres and social media campaigns questioning their opposition to Satheesan.Young Congress leaders such as Shafi Parambil and Mathew Kuzhalnadan were also criticised online by party workers who projected them as leaders going against the people’s mandate.Another important factor behind the Congress decision was the possibility of multiple by-elections if Venugopal had been selected as chief minister.As the sitting Lok Sabha MP from Alappuzha, Venugopal would have had to resign from Parliament and contest an assembly by-election within six months to continue as chief minister. His resignation from the Lok Sabha would have also triggered another parliamentary bypoll.Within the UDF, there was concern over forcing voters into fresh elections immediately after the assembly polls, particularly at a time when the alliance was trying to consolidate its political gains.Congress leaders were also conscious of the political risk involved in a by-election contest for a sitting chief minister. Even though Venugopal would likely have contested from a safe Congress seat, party leaders did not want to introduce avoidable uncertainty into the new government.Public perception also worked heavily in Satheesan’s favour.He was one of Vijayan’s sharpest critics and frequently targeted the LDF government on issues related to governance and corruption. Satheesan also built an image as a strong advocate of secular politics in Kerala.At a time when several Congress leaders avoided directly confronting controversial remarks made by influential Hindu community leaders, Satheesan repeatedly warned against attempts to polarise Kerala politics. By openly challenging leaders such as Vellappally Natesan and G. Sukumaran Nair, he gained support among sections that viewed him as a leader willing to take political risks.During the campaign, Satheesan had also made a high-stakes political declaration, saying he would end his political career if the UDF failed to cross 100 seats. The alliance eventually crossed that mark comfortably, strengthening his image as a confident campaign leader.Even though Venugopal reportedly had the backing of a majority of Congress MLAs and enjoyed close ties with the central leadership, the delay in announcing the chief ministerial face reflected the party’s attempt to strike a balance between organisational control and political realities on the ground.Satheesan, a six-time MLA from Paravur in Ernakulam district, was eventually seen as the candidate with broader public acceptability, stronger alliance backing and deeper grassroots support.Soon after being chosen, Satheesan attempted to send a message of unity within the party and praised both Venugopal and Chennithala.“I do not see this position as a personal achievement… it was Venugopal who coordinated all the activities (and) his support was immense. Chennithala is also my leader,” Satheesan said after the announcement.“I will take all of them into my confidence,” he added. “I seek the support of every section of people… only a collective effort can build a new Kerala. No one can do it alone…”Venugopal also accepted the decision publicly and backed the party line.“Satheesan has been appointed as chief minister. I was saying the decision of the High Command will prevail, and it is my responsibility to see that the decision is respected and implemented,” he told reporters.Satheesan’s rise to the top post has also been shaped by years of internal political battles within the Kerala Congress. After missing out on a ministerial berth in the 2011 cabinet headed by Oommen Chandy and later losing out in the race for the Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee chief’s post in 2016, Satheesan once again found himself in a tough contest this time against senior leaders such as K. C. Venugopal and Ramesh Chennithala.Despite leading the Congress-led UDF to a sweeping Assembly victory, Satheesan was reportedly not the automatic choice of the party high command for the chief minister’s post. Party insiders pointed to familiar concerns that had surfaced during earlier leadership contests, including his strained relationship with influential community lobbies, limited support within sections of the national leadership and his assertive political style that has often unsettled even leaders within his own party.In 2011, when Satheesan was denied a ministerial berth in the Oommen Chandy government, his “attitude” was widely cited within party circles as one of the reasons. Unlike several leaders who actively cultivated support from influential community organisations such as the Nair Service Society, Satheesan was seen as reluctant to engage in lobbying for positions, a trait that contributed to his image as an independent-minded but uncompromising leader.The real test for the Congress in Kerala, however, begins after the celebrations. The last 10 days have exposed the depth of factional friction within the party, even in the middle of one of its biggest victories in the state in a decade. For now, Satheesan has moved quickly to project unity and Venugopal has publicly accepted the high command’s decision. Senior leader Chennithala, however, has been missing in action since the CM announcement.In the coming days, as Satheesan forms the government, it will be worth watching whether all the frontrunners fall in line to ensure a stable five-year UDF government, or whether the Kerala Congress faces a Karnataka-style tussle similar to the rivalry between Siddaramaiah and DK Shivakumar.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideos2 Days WFH To ‘No Vehicle Day’: Delhi CM Rekha Gupta Unveils Fuel-Saving Steps After PM Modi’s CallCong Picks VD Satheesan As Kerala CM; Iran FM Lands In India For Brics Meet With ‘Minab168’ MsgSupreme Court Questions CEC Appointment Process, Raises ‘Independence’ ConcernsMan Trying To Hold Tin Shed Gets Swept Into Air During Violent Storm In Bareilly, Survives Fall’Unacceptable’: India Slams Attack On Indian-Flagged Ship Near OmanEC Announces Phase 3 Of SIR Across 16 States, 3 UTs; J&K, Ladakh, Himachal Left OutEx-Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee In Lawyer’s Gown Argues Post-poll Violence Case In High CourtKC Venugopal Backs VD Satheesan as Kerala CM, Says Congress Fully United Behind HimCongress Picks VD Satheesan as Kerala CM After 10 Days of Talks and Leadership BattleRBI Governor Warns Fuel Price Hike Possible If Middle East Crisis Continues Longer123PhotostoriesMilk Price Hike: Popular packaged milk prices rise across India; healthy milk alternatives to add to daily dietTop 10 fascinating facts about rhinos that make them unlike any other wild animal5 animals with giant tusks and horns that make them look prehistoricHow these 5 Indian ice creams became among the 100 Most Iconic Ice Creams of the WorldRice water vs coconut water for hair growth: Which works better in summer?5 reasons why someone dislikes you – And why is it not your problemAditi Rao Hydari just landed in Cannes and her denim airport look already screams red carpet royalty10 affirmations to attract calm and genuine loveFeeling constantly exhausted at work? The 6-4-2 formula may be the balance your life is missing6 foods a Harvard doc eats daily to prevent colon cancer and fatty liver123Hot PicksCBSE class 12 resultUS Iran warPrateek YadavHaryana election resultForeign outflowNEET exam cancelledTamil Nadu assemblyTop TrendingWB Class 12 Result 2026WB Board 12th ResultIPL Points TablePM Internship SchemeCalcutta High CourtMI vs PBKS IPL MatchIPL Orange Cap 2026Haryana Board ResultAir India FlightsPrateek Yadav

Vamsikrishna 0
NEW DELHI: Questioning the appointment process for chief election commissioner/election commissioners where a panel of PM, a Cabinet minister and the leader of opposition, pick the candidate, Supreme Court on Thursday said that the present system allows the govt to appoint a person of its choice as two out of three member would favour it and asked govt why this “show-off about independence” in appointment process. It said that an independent person should be made part of panel in place of minister.Referring to SC’s earlier direction that the panel should comprise of PM, CJI and LoP, a bench of Justices Dipankar Gupta and Satish Chandra Sharma said that it was not necessary that the CJI participate in the process but some independent person has to be part of it or the presence of the LoP would become just ornamental. It said that when a CBI director is appointed by an independent panel of PM, CJI & LoP, then why should the same not be the practice for CEC/ECs which is more important as the institution is involved in upholding democracy and ensuring free and fair elections in the country. Watch Supreme Court Questions CEC Appointment Process, Raises ‘Independence’ ConcernsThough attorney general K Venkataramani submitted that the neutrality and independence of CEC/ECs arises from their functioning after their appointment, the bench, however, said that it started from the appointment process itself. The court said that the poll panel should not only act as neutral but it should also appear neutral.”Why should a minister from the Cabinet be part of it? Let us assume the ruling party has 300 MPs. The PM picks 25 of his best. Now you again micromanage it and bring one from the 25. Why? Why do you then include the leader of the opposition? He is ornamental. A minister will never go against the PM. It will always be decided by 2:1. Why this show-off of independence in the body?,” the bench observed.The court is examining the validity of law — CEC and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act– which was framed after the apex court had passed the order that appointments be done by a panel of PM, CJI and LoP to infuse independence in the process. A bunch of petitions were filed including by Congress functionary from MP Jaya Thakur alleging that the new law amounts to undoing of SC’s order and paved the way for govt to appoint its “yes men” to the crucial post.As deliberations leading to search, selection and appointment of Gyanesh Kumar (now CEC) and S S Sandhu as election commissioners in 2024 came under the scanner, with the petitioner alleging that it was done in a tearing hurry in a day just before the apex court’s crucial hearing, the bench asked the Centre to bring original records before it. Kumar was appointed election commissioner to the Election Commission of India on March 15, 2024 after his superannuation on Jan 31.The court further pointed out that it is the executive govt which is at the controlling position in deciding appointments in the poll panel. It said CJI is part of the panel for appointing the director of the CBI which acts for maintenance of law and order and upholding rule of law also. The court said that in comparison to CBI, the role of EC was more crucial as it is involved in maintaining democracy. “We don’t say CJI should be there. But why shouldn’t there be an independent member? Why should it be from the ministry? Let us be very clear. Today the Prime Minister picks one name. And LoP picks another one. There is disagreement. Then the third member will go towards whom?,” the bench said.Contending that the court should resist from going into the legislative arena while deciding the validity of the law, the AG said that there had never been any allegation of CEC/ECs being compromised and being hand-in-glove with govt. He said the country never witnessed any kind of a devastating or sad experience when an election commissioner failed to advance rule of law and there was no reason to doubt the present system in place.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideos2 Days WFH To ‘No Vehicle Day’: Delhi CM Rekha Gupta Unveils Fuel-Saving Steps After PM Modi’s CallCong Picks VD Satheesan As Kerala CM; Iran FM Lands In India For Brics Meet With ‘Minab168’ MsgSupreme Court Questions CEC Appointment Process, Raises ‘Independence’ ConcernsMan Trying To Hold Tin Shed Gets Swept Into Air During Violent Storm In Bareilly, Survives Fall’Unacceptable’: India Slams Attack On Indian-Flagged Ship Near OmanEC Announces Phase 3 Of SIR Across 16 States, 3 UTs; J&K, Ladakh, Himachal Left OutEx-Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee In Lawyer’s Gown Argues Post-poll Violence Case In High CourtKC Venugopal Backs VD Satheesan as Kerala CM, Says Congress Fully United Behind HimCongress Picks VD Satheesan as Kerala CM After 10 Days of Talks and Leadership BattleRBI Governor Warns Fuel Price Hike Possible If Middle East Crisis Continues Longer123PhotostoriesMilk Price Hike: Popular packaged milk prices rise across India; healthy milk alternatives to add to daily dietTop 10 fascinating facts about rhinos that make them unlike any other wild animal5 animals with giant tusks and horns that make them look prehistoricHow these 5 Indian ice creams became among the 100 Most Iconic Ice Creams of the WorldRice water vs coconut water for hair growth: Which works better in summer?5 reasons why someone dislikes you – And why is it not your problemAditi Rao Hydari just landed in Cannes and her denim airport look already screams red carpet royalty10 affirmations to attract calm and genuine loveFeeling constantly exhausted at work? The 6-4-2 formula may be the balance your life is missing6 foods a Harvard doc eats daily to prevent colon cancer and fatty liver123Hot PicksCBSE class 12 resultUS Iran warPrateek YadavHaryana election resultForeign outflowNEET exam cancelledTamil Nadu assemblyTop TrendingWB Class 12 Result 2026WB Board 12th ResultIPL Points TablePM Internship SchemeCalcutta High CourtMI vs PBKS IPL MatchIPL Orange Cap 2026Haryana Board ResultAir India FlightsPrateek Yadav

NEW DELHI: Questioning the appointment process for chief election commissioner/election commissioners where a panel of PM, a Cabinet minister and the leader of opposition, pick the candidate, Supreme Court on Thursday said that the present system allows the govt to appoint a person of its choice as two out of three member would favour it and asked govt why this “show-off about independence” in appointment process. It said that an independent person should be made part of panel in place of minister.Referring to SC’s earlier direction that the panel should comprise of PM, CJI and LoP, a bench of Justices Dipankar Gupta and Satish Chandra Sharma said that it was not necessary that the CJI participate in the process but some independent person has to be part of it or the presence of the LoP would become just ornamental. It said that when a CBI director is appointed by an independent panel of PM, CJI & LoP, then why should the same not be the practice for CEC/ECs which is more important as the institution is involved in upholding democracy and ensuring free and fair elections in the country. Watch Supreme Court Questions CEC Appointment Process, Raises ‘Independence’ ConcernsThough attorney general K Venkataramani submitted that the neutrality and independence of CEC/ECs arises from their functioning after their appointment, the bench, however, said that it started from the appointment process itself. The court said that the poll panel should not only act as neutral but it should also appear neutral.”Why should a minister from the Cabinet be part of it? Let us assume the ruling party has 300 MPs. The PM picks 25 of his best. Now you again micromanage it and bring one from the 25. Why? Why do you then include the leader of the opposition? He is ornamental. A minister will never go against the PM. It will always be decided by 2:1. Why this show-off of independence in the body?,” the bench observed.The court is examining the validity of law — CEC and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act– which was framed after the apex court had passed the order that appointments be done by a panel of PM, CJI and LoP to infuse independence in the process. A bunch of petitions were filed including by Congress functionary from MP Jaya Thakur alleging that the new law amounts to undoing of SC’s order and paved the way for govt to appoint its “yes men” to the crucial post.As deliberations leading to search, selection and appointment of Gyanesh Kumar (now CEC) and S S Sandhu as election commissioners in 2024 came under the scanner, with the petitioner alleging that it was done in a tearing hurry in a day just before the apex court’s crucial hearing, the bench asked the Centre to bring original records before it. Kumar was appointed election commissioner to the Election Commission of India on March 15, 2024 after his superannuation on Jan 31.The court further pointed out that it is the executive govt which is at the controlling position in deciding appointments in the poll panel. It said CJI is part of the panel for appointing the director of the CBI which acts for maintenance of law and order and upholding rule of law also. The court said that in comparison to CBI, the role of EC was more crucial as it is involved in maintaining democracy. “We don’t say CJI should be there. But why shouldn’t there be an independent member? Why should it be from the ministry? Let us be very clear. Today the Prime Minister picks one name. And LoP picks another one. There is disagreement. Then the third member will go towards whom?,” the bench said.Contending that the court should resist from going into the legislative arena while deciding the validity of the law, the AG said that there had never been any allegation of CEC/ECs being compromised and being hand-in-glove with govt. He said the country never witnessed any kind of a devastating or sad experience when an election commissioner failed to advance rule of law and there was no reason to doubt the present system in place.End of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideos2 Days WFH To ‘No Vehicle Day’: Delhi CM Rekha Gupta Unveils Fuel-Saving Steps After PM Modi’s CallCong Picks VD Satheesan As Kerala CM; Iran FM Lands In India For Brics Meet With ‘Minab168’ MsgSupreme Court Questions CEC Appointment Process, Raises ‘Independence’ ConcernsMan Trying To Hold Tin Shed Gets Swept Into Air During Violent Storm In Bareilly, Survives Fall’Unacceptable’: India Slams Attack On Indian-Flagged Ship Near OmanEC Announces Phase 3 Of SIR Across 16 States, 3 UTs; J&K, Ladakh, Himachal Left OutEx-Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee In Lawyer’s Gown Argues Post-poll Violence Case In High CourtKC Venugopal Backs VD Satheesan as Kerala CM, Says Congress Fully United Behind HimCongress Picks VD Satheesan as Kerala CM After 10 Days of Talks and Leadership BattleRBI Governor Warns Fuel Price Hike Possible If Middle East Crisis Continues Longer123PhotostoriesMilk Price Hike: Popular packaged milk prices rise across India; healthy milk alternatives to add to daily dietTop 10 fascinating facts about rhinos that make them unlike any other wild animal5 animals with giant tusks and horns that make them look prehistoricHow these 5 Indian ice creams became among the 100 Most Iconic Ice Creams of the WorldRice water vs coconut water for hair growth: Which works better in summer?5 reasons why someone dislikes you – And why is it not your problemAditi Rao Hydari just landed in Cannes and her denim airport look already screams red carpet royalty10 affirmations to attract calm and genuine loveFeeling constantly exhausted at work? The 6-4-2 formula may be the balance your life is missing6 foods a Harvard doc eats daily to prevent colon cancer and fatty liver123Hot PicksCBSE class 12 resultUS Iran warPrateek YadavHaryana election resultForeign outflowNEET exam cancelledTamil Nadu assemblyTop TrendingWB Class 12 Result 2026WB Board 12th ResultIPL Points TablePM Internship SchemeCalcutta High CourtMI vs PBKS IPL MatchIPL Orange Cap 2026Haryana Board ResultAir India FlightsPrateek Yadav

Vamsikrishna 0