The Central Information Commission (CIC) has pulled up the Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation (IRCTC) for denying information on an RTI plea seeking disclosure of whether bidders in railway tenders had declared links to the Rail Neer scam and related cases probed by central agencies, PTI reported.The applicant had sought details on whether companies bidding for tenders disclosed any cases registered by the CBI or the Enforcement Directorate (ED) against them, including their alleged involvement in the 2015 Rail Neer scam.RTI sought disclosure of CBI, ED casesThe RTI application specifically asked if bidders had declared that they were “accused in the famous Rail Neer scam” and that the CBI had “registered an FIR (RC-DAI-2015-A-0032) against them”.It also sought details on whether bidders disclosed that the ED had “registered a case under sections 120B read with Section 420 of the IPC and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act”.Further, the applicant asked if companies informed authorities about developments such as raids, cash seizures, and whether a “chargesheet” or “complaint” had been filed by the agencies.CIC flags ‘mechanical’ denial by IRCTCIRCTC denied the information citing exemption under Section 8(1)(d) of the RTI Act, which covers commercial confidence and trade secrets. The respondent officials maintained that they had “categorically informed the appellant” and that the first appellate authority upheld the reply.However, the CIC found the response inadequate, noting it “merely states the exemption clause without providing any reasons or justification whatsoever”.“A bare or mechanical reference to an exemption clause, without explaining its applicability to the information sought, does not constitute a valid or speaking reply under the RTI Act,” the commission said.Emphasising that denial must be supported by “cogent reasons”, the CIC added that “the burden of proving the applicability of an exemption squarely lies on the public authority”.Holding the reply deficient, the commission said it was “not in consonance with the provisions of the RTI Act” and directed IRCTC to revisit the application and issue a “fresh, reasoned reply”.About the AuthorTOI Business DeskThe TOI Business Desk is a vigilant and dedicated team of journalists committed to delivering the latest and most relevant business news from around the world to readers of The Times of India. The primary focus of the TOI Business Desk is to keep a watchful eye on the global business landscape, covering a wide spectrum of industries, markets, economic trends, in-depth analysis, exclusive reports and breaking stories that impact businesses and economies. With a mission to provide valuable insights and updates, the desk ensures that TOI readers are well-informed about the ever-changing and dynamic world of commerce and can navigate the complexities of the business world.Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosOil India Posts Record Crude Output From Rajasthan’s Thar Desert Amid West Asia Crisis‘True Friendship’: Iran Envoy Lauds India Ties, Clarifies Deleted Thank You PostsPM Modi Assures No Seat Cut For Southern States, Pushes Women’s Quota Bill‘Will Take It To Kolkata’: Pak Minister Khawaja Asif’s Fresh Threat After Rajnath’s Stern WarningBig Reveal: ISI Behind Chandigarh Attack, Global Terror Links Surface”Living In Fear”: Indian Family In Bahrain Amid Escalating Iran War‘Genius Move’: Ex-US Pilot Hails India’s Ploy To Use Rafale Decoys In Op Sindoor To Fool PakistanIndia Buys Iranian Oil After 7 Years, No Payment Hurdles Reported“Violation Of Article 21”: Owaisi Slams UCC, Says It Interferes With Religious FreedomAmid Strait Of Hormuz Tensions, Iran Calls India A ‘Cherished Partner’ As Ships Transit Safely123PhotostoriesBest Angelina Jolie movies of all time: ‘Girl, Interrupted’, ‘Maleficent’ and moreShiney Ahuja, Rimi Sen to Uday Chopra : The 2000s Bollywood faces who faded away from the big screenBefore age 10, these 12 simple things parents say can shape a child’s confidence and emotional strength for lifeWhy you feel lonely even around people (And 5 ways to feel truly loved)Divyanka Tripathi and Vivek Dahiya host a heartwarming baby shower ceremony; co-star Ruhaanika Dhawan, actor Dheeraj Dhoopar, and others joinMumbai-Ahmedabad Bullet train corridor: 5 km tunnel excavation complete — why it’s a key step toward operationsBig relief for commuters: Noida plans 10-lane Pushta Road, new link to ease Delhi–Jewar airport traffic; what we knowTilak Varma’s multi-storey home in Hyderabad is rooted in humble beginnings, now a stylish residence shaped by cricket fame and family valuesRashmika Mandanna birthday special: Best performances to watch on OTT, from ‘Animal’ to ‘Chhaava’Stephen Colbert, Steve Carell and more: 6 Hollywood icons who shared apartments before hitting it big123Hot PicksIPL ScoreUpdated IPL Points TableApp Leader Raghav ChadhaLPG ShortageStephen CurryPublic holidays April 2026Bank Holidays AprilTop TrendingYesterday IPL match resultVaibhav SooryavanshiStrait of HormuzIPL 2026Saudi Arabia travel ban rulesToll PaymentIran Drone StrikeHailee SteinfeldSchool Holidays in AprilIran war news

The Central Information Commission (CIC) has pulled up the Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation (IRCTC) for denying information on an RTI plea seeking disclosure of whether bidders in railway tenders had declared links to the Rail Neer scam and related cases probed by central agencies, PTI reported.The applicant had sought details on whether companies bidding for tenders disclosed any cases registered by the CBI or the Enforcement Directorate (ED) against them, including their alleged involvement in the 2015 Rail Neer scam.RTI sought disclosure of CBI, ED casesThe RTI application specifically asked if bidders had declared that they were “accused in the famous Rail Neer scam” and that the CBI had “registered an FIR (RC-DAI-2015-A-0032) against them”.It also sought details on whether bidders disclosed that the ED had “registered a case under sections 120B read with Section 420 of the IPC and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act”.Further, the applicant asked if companies informed authorities about developments such as raids, cash seizures, and whether a “chargesheet” or “complaint” had been filed by the agencies.CIC flags ‘mechanical’ denial by IRCTCIRCTC denied the information citing exemption under Section 8(1)(d) of the RTI Act, which covers commercial confidence and trade secrets. The respondent officials maintained that they had “categorically informed the appellant” and that the first appellate authority upheld the reply.However, the CIC found the response inadequate, noting it “merely states the exemption clause without providing any reasons or justification whatsoever”.“A bare or mechanical reference to an exemption clause, without explaining its applicability to the information sought, does not constitute a valid or speaking reply under the RTI Act,” the commission said.Emphasising that denial must be supported by “cogent reasons”, the CIC added that “the burden of proving the applicability of an exemption squarely lies on the public authority”.Holding the reply deficient, the commission said it was “not in consonance with the provisions of the RTI Act” and directed IRCTC to revisit the application and issue a “fresh, reasoned reply”.About the AuthorTOI Business DeskThe TOI Business Desk is a vigilant and dedicated team of journalists committed to delivering the latest and most relevant business news from around the world to readers of The Times of India. The primary focus of the TOI Business Desk is to keep a watchful eye on the global business landscape, covering a wide spectrum of industries, markets, economic trends, in-depth analysis, exclusive reports and breaking stories that impact businesses and economies. With a mission to provide valuable insights and updates, the desk ensures that TOI readers are well-informed about the ever-changing and dynamic world of commerce and can navigate the complexities of the business world.Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosOil India Posts Record Crude Output From Rajasthan’s Thar Desert Amid West Asia Crisis‘True Friendship’: Iran Envoy Lauds India Ties, Clarifies Deleted Thank You PostsPM Modi Assures No Seat Cut For Southern States, Pushes Women’s Quota Bill‘Will Take It To Kolkata’: Pak Minister Khawaja Asif’s Fresh Threat After Rajnath’s Stern WarningBig Reveal: ISI Behind Chandigarh Attack, Global Terror Links Surface”Living In Fear”: Indian Family In Bahrain Amid Escalating Iran War‘Genius Move’: Ex-US Pilot Hails India’s Ploy To Use Rafale Decoys In Op Sindoor To Fool PakistanIndia Buys Iranian Oil After 7 Years, No Payment Hurdles Reported“Violation Of Article 21”: Owaisi Slams UCC, Says It Interferes With Religious FreedomAmid Strait Of Hormuz Tensions, Iran Calls India A ‘Cherished Partner’ As Ships Transit Safely123PhotostoriesBest Angelina Jolie movies of all time: ‘Girl, Interrupted’, ‘Maleficent’ and moreShiney Ahuja, Rimi Sen to Uday Chopra : The 2000s Bollywood faces who faded away from the big screenBefore age 10, these 12 simple things parents say can shape a child’s confidence and emotional strength for lifeWhy you feel lonely even around people (And 5 ways to feel truly loved)Divyanka Tripathi and Vivek Dahiya host a heartwarming baby shower ceremony; co-star Ruhaanika Dhawan, actor Dheeraj Dhoopar, and others joinMumbai-Ahmedabad Bullet train corridor: 5 km tunnel excavation complete — why it’s a key step toward operationsBig relief for commuters: Noida plans 10-lane Pushta Road, new link to ease Delhi–Jewar airport traffic; what we knowTilak Varma’s multi-storey home in Hyderabad is rooted in humble beginnings, now a stylish residence shaped by cricket fame and family valuesRashmika Mandanna birthday special: Best performances to watch on OTT, from ‘Animal’ to ‘Chhaava’Stephen Colbert, Steve Carell and more: 6 Hollywood icons who shared apartments before hitting it big123Hot PicksIPL ScoreUpdated IPL Points TableApp Leader Raghav ChadhaLPG ShortageStephen CurryPublic holidays April 2026Bank Holidays AprilTop TrendingYesterday IPL match resultVaibhav SooryavanshiStrait of HormuzIPL 2026Saudi Arabia travel ban rulesToll PaymentIran Drone StrikeHailee SteinfeldSchool Holidays in AprilIran war news


Rail Neer scam: CIC pulls up IRCTC for refusing information on RTI plea

The Central Information Commission (CIC) has pulled up the Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation (IRCTC) for denying information on an RTI plea seeking disclosure of whether bidders in railway tenders had declared links to the Rail Neer scam and related cases probed by central agencies, PTI reported.The applicant had sought details on whether companies bidding for tenders disclosed any cases registered by the CBI or the Enforcement Directorate (ED) against them, including their alleged involvement in the 2015 Rail Neer scam.

RTI sought disclosure of CBI, ED cases

The RTI application specifically asked if bidders had declared that they were “accused in the famous Rail Neer scam” and that the CBI had “registered an FIR (RC-DAI-2015-A-0032) against them”.It also sought details on whether bidders disclosed that the ED had “registered a case under sections 120B read with Section 420 of the IPC and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act”.Further, the applicant asked if companies informed authorities about developments such as raids, cash seizures, and whether a “chargesheet” or “complaint” had been filed by the agencies.

CIC flags ‘mechanical’ denial by IRCTC

IRCTC denied the information citing exemption under Section 8(1)(d) of the RTI Act, which covers commercial confidence and trade secrets. The respondent officials maintained that they had “categorically informed the appellant” and that the first appellate authority upheld the reply.However, the CIC found the response inadequate, noting it “merely states the exemption clause without providing any reasons or justification whatsoever”.“A bare or mechanical reference to an exemption clause, without explaining its applicability to the information sought, does not constitute a valid or speaking reply under the RTI Act,” the commission said.Emphasising that denial must be supported by “cogent reasons”, the CIC added that “the burden of proving the applicability of an exemption squarely lies on the public authority”.Holding the reply deficient, the commission said it was “not in consonance with the provisions of the RTI Act” and directed IRCTC to revisit the application and issue a “fresh, reasoned reply”.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *