NEW DELHI: A Delhi court has granted 10-day interim bail to Sharjeel Imam in a case linked to the 2020 Delhi riots. The interim bail comes months after the Supreme Court of India rejected Imam’s regular bail plea in January this year. At the time, the top court had refused bail to Imam and fellow student activist Umar Khalid in the Delhi riots conspiracy case.In its January 6 order, the Supreme Court said that delay in trial and long incarceration cannot be a “trump card” to secure bail in cases registered under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. The court observed that while personal liberty is important, it cannot be the sole factor when allegations involve serious offences affecting public order and national security.The bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and N V Anjaria rejected the bail pleas of Khalid and Imam but granted relief to five co-accused in the case. Israel Iran WarUS-Israel-Iran War News Live Updates: Iran fires first wave of missiles at Israel under new Supreme Leader Mojtaba KhameneiWatch: Video challenges Trump claim, appears to show US Tomahawk missile hitting IRGC facility near Iran school where over 160 diedVideo shows thick black smoke rising after Iran hits Bahrain’s largest BAPCO oil refinery — watchThose granted bail included Gulfisha Fatima, Meeran Haider, Shifa-ur-Rehman, Mohd Saleem Khan and Shadab Ahmad.The court said Khalid and Imam stood on a different footing compared with the other accused due to the “hierarchy of culpability”. Both activists have spent more than five years in jail in connection with the case.The riots erupted in February 2020 during protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019, leading to communal clashes in parts of northeast Delhi during the visit of then US President Donald Trump to India.The Supreme Court had said the two accused could apply for bail again after one year or after all protected witnesses in the trial had been examined, whichever occurs earlier.The top court also said that the mere passage of time cannot automatically justify bail in cases involving offences under special statutes such as UAPA. It stressed that courts must balance constitutional protections under Article 21 with Parliament’s intent behind stricter bail conditions in laws dealing with national security related offences.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideosJaishankar Statement On Iran War Sparks Walkout As Opposition Demands Full Debate, BJP Hits BackLok Sabha Arithmetic Takes Center Stage As Opposition Moves No-Confidence Motion On Speaker Om Birla”Never Seen Such Irresponsible Oppn…” Rijiju Hits Out At Oppn Over Uproar In ParliamentCEC Visit Sparks Protests and Voter Roll Controversy in West Bengal Ahead of 2026 PollsOpposition Storms Parliament Over US Iran War Impact Kharge Flags Threat To India Energy SupplyJaishankar Sounds Alarm On Oil Supply As Parliament Erupts Over West Asia War And India’s StakesPresident Murmu Protocol Row Turns Into Political Flashpoint, Centre Seeks Answers From Mamata Govt‘Matter Of Relief’: India Embassy In Riyadh Denies Reports Of Indian Death In Projectile Attack‘Champions!’ Narendra Modi Celebrates Team India’s Stunning ICC Men’s T20 World Cup Title Win‘Good Relations With Govt Of India’: Iran’s Envoy To Delhi On Bilateral Ties Amid West Asia War123Photostories7 simple daily habits for a healthier life8 posh localities in Bengaluru known for luxury living and premium homesWhy your uric acid can suddenly spike even if your diet hasn’t changed: Doctor explains hidden causes and simple ways to control itWho’s Anurag Dobhal aka UK07 Rider? YouTuber and Bigg Boss 17 fame with a net worth of approximately Rs 30 croresStill buzzing after India’s T20 World Cup 2026 win? These Bollywood cricket films will keep the celebration going9 best places to visit in India in March and April, and whyInside T20 World Cup-winning captain Suryakumar Yadav’s multi-crore watch collectionBigg Boss Tamil fame Priyanka Deshpande’s lavish lifestyle: From luxurious home to enviable car collection and net worth9 royal dishes that are now available as street foodPowerful healing mantras to chant to overcome depression123Hot PicksIran war newsStock Market todayMojtaba KhameneiPakistan Oil Price TodayIncome Tax CalculatorPublic holidays March 2026Bank Holidays MarchTop TrendingVallabh MaheshwariStock Market todayUS Strike on Iran OilS JaishankarUS EmbassyBahrain BapcoIran School Attack VideoGulf TensionGold Price TodayWhere to watch ind vs nz t20
NEW DELHI: A Delhi court has granted 10-day interim bail to Sharjeel Imam in a case linked to the 2020 Delhi riots. The interim bail comes months after the Supreme Court of India rejected Imam’s regular bail plea in January this year. At the time, the top court had refused bail to Imam and fellow student activist Umar Khalid in the Delhi riots conspiracy case.In its January 6 order, the Supreme Court said that delay in trial and long incarceration cannot be a “trump card” to secure bail in cases registered under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. The court observed that while personal liberty is important, it cannot be the sole factor when allegations involve serious offences affecting public order and national security.The bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and N V Anjaria rejected the bail pleas of Khalid and Imam but granted relief to five co-accused in the case. Those granted bail included Gulfisha Fatima, Meeran Haider, Shifa-ur-Rehman, Mohd Saleem Khan and Shadab Ahmad.The court said Khalid and Imam stood on a different footing compared with the other accused due to the “hierarchy of culpability”. Both activists have spent more than five years in jail in connection with the case.The riots erupted in February 2020 during protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019, leading to communal clashes in parts of northeast Delhi during the visit of then US President Donald Trump to India.The Supreme Court had said the two accused could apply for bail again after one year or after all protected witnesses in the trial had been examined, whichever occurs earlier.The top court also said that the mere passage of time cannot automatically justify bail in cases involving offences under special statutes such as UAPA. It stressed that courts must balance constitutional protections under Article 21 with Parliament’s intent behind stricter bail conditions in laws dealing with national security related offences.
