Kejriwal, Sisodia after being cleared of all charges NEW DELHI: A Delhi court on Friday sharply criticised the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for repeatedly using the term “South Group” in its chargesheet, while it discharged former chief minister Arvind Kejriwal, former education minister Manish Sisodia and 21 others in the liquor policy case.The court said the nomenclature had no basis in law and cautioned the agency to exercise restraint in its choice of language in investigative narratives. “No Overarching Conspiracy” Court Clears Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia In Excise Case Special Judge Jitendra Singh said, “The court considers it necessary to place on record its concern with the repeated and deliberate use of the expression, ‘South Group’, by the investigating agency to describe a set of accused persons, ostensibly based on their regional origin or place of residence.”“It is equally significant that no comparable regional descriptor has been employed for the remaining accused persons. The prosecution narrative does not speak of any ‘North Group’ or similar categorisation. The selective adoption of a geographically-defined label is, therefore, plainly arbitrary and unwarranted,” he added, as quoted by news agency PTI.The court also said that region-based labelling could create a prejudicial impression and was inconsistent with constitutional principles.“The continued use of this label, despite the absence of any legally-sustainable basis, carries a real risk of colouring perception, causing unintended prejudice and diverting focus from the evidentiary material, which alone must guide adjudication,” it said.Observing that the issue was not merely semantic, adding that, “Identity-based labelling, whether by ethnicity, nationality or regional origin, cannot be employed as a prosecutorial shorthand where such identity is irrelevant to the offence. Such labelling is not a mere irregularity of expression, it constitutes a constitutional infirmity capable of undermining the fairness of the proceedings themselves.”The Judge Jitendra Singh asked the central agency to exercise “greater care, circumspection and restraint” while drafting chargesheets and investigative narratives. “Descriptions of accused persons must remain strictly neutral, evidence-based and free from expressions that carry a stigmatic, divisive or pejorative overtone,” he said, adding that the use of such terminology violates constitutional provisions.“Persistence with such nomenclature risks undermining the due process of law and is best avoided in the interest of an impartial and constitutionally-compliant administration of criminal justice,” he added.About the AuthorTOI News DeskThe TOI News Desk comprises a dedicated and tireless team of journalists who operate around the clock to deliver the most current and comprehensive news and updates to the readers of The Times of India worldwide. With an unwavering commitment to excellence in journalism, our team is at the forefront of gathering, verifying, and presenting breaking news, in-depth analysis, and insightful reports on a wide range of topics. The TOI News Desk is your trusted source for staying informed and connected to the ever-evolving global landscape, ensuring that our readers are equipped with the latest developments that matter most.”Read MoreEnd of ArticleFollow Us On Social MediaVideos”If BJP Wins Over 10 Seats…”: Kejriwal Throws Open Challenge After Court ReliefWhy Netanyahu’s Reference to Indian Soldiers In Battle Of Haifa Sparks Criticism in TurkeyExplained: As Pakistan Opens Afghan Front, Where Does India Stand And How Will Delhi Respond Now”No Overarching Conspiracy” Court Clears Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia In Excise CaseIndia Commissions INS Anjadip: The Shallow-Water Warship Built to Hunt Pakistani SubmarinesEx-Afghan MP Mariam Solaimankhil Blasts Pakistan Over Civilian Killings, Echoes India’s Stance’Zero Tolerance And Full Transparency’: CEC Gyanesh Kumar Says Tamil Nadu Polls A Matter Of Pride’Prachand’ Moment: President Murmu Flies in Indigenous Combat Helicopter Near India-Pak BorderFrom First Date To Diplomatic Stage, Netanyahu Links Love Story To India’I Am Not Corrupt’: Arvind Kejriwal Breaks Down As Court Frees Him, Sisodia In Excise Policy Case123PhotostoriesDeepika Padukone to Aishwarya Rai: Bollywood stars who turned down Hollywood projectsFrom Bengal’s Mukut to Marathi Mundavalya:5 stunning bridal headgears from different states8 healthy daily habits to keep your heart strong and prevent heart disease, says cardiologistTop 7 muscle car names that defined an eraRegional Holi foods from different parts of India that no one talks aboutWhat happens when you wake up at the same time every night and the spiritual meaning behind it5 famous tourist destinations with really dark nicknames‘Kennedy’, ‘Sector 36’, ‘Daldal’: Mind-bending Indian psychological thrillers streaming on OTT right nowDelhi launches Rs 160-crore underground cabling project in Chandni ChowkMumbai’s Bellasis flyover rebuilt in 15 months, opens four months early123Hot PicksPakistan-Afghanistan warIndia GDP growthGold rate todayAir ticket refund rulesIncome Tax CalculatorPublic holidays February 2026Bank Holidays februaryTop TrendingJEE Mains Correction WindowBengaluru Namma Metro FareIlia TopuriaKylian MbappeJoel EmbiidVanessa BryantTony DungyUttarakhand Gang RapeNFL CombineGold Price Prediction
Kejriwal, Sisodia after being cleared of all charges
NEW DELHI: A Delhi court on Friday sharply criticised the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for repeatedly using the term “South Group” in its chargesheet, while it discharged former chief minister Arvind Kejriwal, former education minister Manish Sisodia and 21 others in the liquor policy case.The court said the nomenclature had no basis in law and cautioned the agency to exercise restraint in its choice of language in investigative narratives.
Special Judge Jitendra Singh said, “The court considers it necessary to place on record its concern with the repeated and deliberate use of the expression, ‘South Group’, by the investigating agency to describe a set of accused persons, ostensibly based on their regional origin or place of residence.”“It is equally significant that no comparable regional descriptor has been employed for the remaining accused persons. The prosecution narrative does not speak of any ‘North Group’ or similar categorisation. The selective adoption of a geographically-defined label is, therefore, plainly arbitrary and unwarranted,” he added, as quoted by news agency PTI.The court also said that region-based labelling could create a prejudicial impression and was inconsistent with constitutional principles.“The continued use of this label, despite the absence of any legally-sustainable basis, carries a real risk of colouring perception, causing unintended prejudice and diverting focus from the evidentiary material, which alone must guide adjudication,” it said.Observing that the issue was not merely semantic, adding that, “Identity-based labelling, whether by ethnicity, nationality or regional origin, cannot be employed as a prosecutorial shorthand where such identity is irrelevant to the offence. Such labelling is not a mere irregularity of expression, it constitutes a constitutional infirmity capable of undermining the fairness of the proceedings themselves.“The Judge Jitendra Singh asked the central agency to exercise “greater care, circumspection and restraint” while drafting chargesheets and investigative narratives. “Descriptions of accused persons must remain strictly neutral, evidence-based and free from expressions that carry a stigmatic, divisive or pejorative overtone,” he said, adding that the use of such terminology violates constitutional provisions.“Persistence with such nomenclature risks undermining the due process of law and is best avoided in the interest of an impartial and constitutionally-compliant administration of criminal justice,” he added.
